| Intuitionistic Logic Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
| Mirrors > Home > ILE Home > Th. List > rexrab2 | GIF version | ||
| Description: Existential quantification over a class abstraction. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Sep-2015.) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| ralab2.1 | ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| rexrab2 | ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑}𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 ∧ 𝜒)) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | df-rab 2517 | . . 3 ⊢ {𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑦 ∣ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} | |
| 2 | 1 | rexeqi 2733 | . 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑}𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)}𝜓) |
| 3 | ralab2.1 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) | |
| 4 | 3 | rexab2 2969 | . 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)}𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑦((𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ∧ 𝜒)) |
| 5 | anass 401 | . . . 4 ⊢ (((𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ∧ 𝜒) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜒))) | |
| 6 | 5 | exbii 1651 | . . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑦((𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ∧ 𝜒) ↔ ∃𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜒))) |
| 7 | df-rex 2514 | . . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) ↔ ∃𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜒))) | |
| 8 | 6, 7 | bitr4i 187 | . 2 ⊢ (∃𝑦((𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ∧ 𝜒) ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 ∧ 𝜒)) |
| 9 | 2, 4, 8 | 3bitri 206 | 1 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑}𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 ∧ 𝜒)) |
| Colors of variables: wff set class |
| Syntax hints: → wi 4 ∧ wa 104 ↔ wb 105 ∃wex 1538 ∈ wcel 2200 {cab 2215 ∃wrex 2509 {crab 2512 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-ia1 106 ax-ia2 107 ax-ia3 108 ax-io 714 ax-5 1493 ax-7 1494 ax-gen 1495 ax-ie1 1539 ax-ie2 1540 ax-8 1550 ax-10 1551 ax-11 1552 ax-i12 1553 ax-bndl 1555 ax-4 1556 ax-17 1572 ax-i9 1576 ax-ial 1580 ax-i5r 1581 ax-ext 2211 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 117 df-tru 1398 df-nf 1507 df-sb 1809 df-clab 2216 df-cleq 2222 df-clel 2225 df-nfc 2361 df-rex 2514 df-rab 2517 |
| This theorem is referenced by: (None) |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |