Theorem rspcimedv 2845

Description: Restricted existential specialization, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
rspcimdv.1	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)
rspcimedv.2	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → (𝜒 → 𝜓))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
rspcimedv	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴   𝑥,𝐵   𝜑,𝑥   𝜒,𝑥

Allowed substitution hint:   𝜓(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem rspcimedv

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		rspcimdv.1	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)
2		simpr 110	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → 𝑥 = 𝐴)
3	2	eleq1d 2246	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵))
4	3	biimprd 158	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))
5		rspcimedv.2	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → (𝜒 → 𝜓))
6	4, 5	anim12d 335	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜒) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜓)))
7	1, 6	spcimedv 2825	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜒) → ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜓)))
8	1, 7	mpand 429	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 → ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜓)))
9		df-rex 2461	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜓))
10	8, 9	imbitrrdi 162	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 104   = wceq 1353  ∃wex 1492   ∈ wcel 2148  ∃wrex 2456

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-io 709  ax-5 1447  ax-7 1448  ax-gen 1449  ax-ie1 1493  ax-ie2 1494  ax-8 1504  ax-10 1505  ax-11 1506  ax-i12 1507  ax-bndl 1509  ax-4 1510  ax-17 1526  ax-i9 1530  ax-ial 1534  ax-i5r 1535  ax-ext 2159

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-tru 1356  df-nf 1461  df-sb 1763  df-clab 2164  df-cleq 2170  df-clel 2173  df-nfc 2308  df-rex 2461  df-v 2741

This theorem is referenced by:  rspcedv  2847