Theorem rspcimedv 2738

Description: Restricted existential specialization, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
rspcimdv.1	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)
rspcimedv.2	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → (𝜒 → 𝜓))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
rspcimedv	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴   𝑥,𝐵   𝜑,𝑥   𝜒,𝑥

Allowed substitution hint:   𝜓(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem rspcimedv

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		rspcimdv.1	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)
2		simpr 109	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → 𝑥 = 𝐴)
3	2	eleq1d 2163	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵))
4	3	biimprd 157	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))
5		rspcimedv.2	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → (𝜒 → 𝜓))
6	4, 5	anim12d 329	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜒) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜓)))
7	1, 6	spcimedv 2719	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜒) → ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜓)))
8	1, 7	mpand 421	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 → ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜓)))
9		df-rex 2376	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜓))
10	8, 9	syl6ibr 161	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 103   = wceq 1296  ∃wex 1433   ∈ wcel 1445  ∃wrex 2371

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107  ax-io 668  ax-5 1388  ax-7 1389  ax-gen 1390  ax-ie1 1434  ax-ie2 1435  ax-8 1447  ax-10 1448  ax-11 1449  ax-i12 1450  ax-bndl 1451  ax-4 1452  ax-17 1471  ax-i9 1475  ax-ial 1479  ax-i5r 1480  ax-ext 2077

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-tru 1299  df-nf 1402  df-sb 1700  df-clab 2082  df-cleq 2088  df-clel 2091  df-nfc 2224  df-rex 2376  df-v 2635

This theorem is referenced by:  rspcedv  2740