Theorem rspcimedv 2836

Description: Restricted existential specialization, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
rspcimdv.1	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)
rspcimedv.2	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → (𝜒 → 𝜓))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
rspcimedv	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴   𝑥,𝐵   𝜑,𝑥   𝜒,𝑥

Allowed substitution hint:   𝜓(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem rspcimedv

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		rspcimdv.1	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)
2		simpr 109	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → 𝑥 = 𝐴)
3	2	eleq1d 2239	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵))
4	3	biimprd 157	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))
5		rspcimedv.2	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → (𝜒 → 𝜓))
6	4, 5	anim12d 333	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜒) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜓)))
7	1, 6	spcimedv 2816	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜒) → ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜓)))
8	1, 7	mpand 427	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 → ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜓)))
9		df-rex 2454	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜓))
10	8, 9	syl6ibr 161	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 103   = wceq 1348  ∃wex 1485   ∈ wcel 2141  ∃wrex 2449

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107  ax-io 704  ax-5 1440  ax-7 1441  ax-gen 1442  ax-ie1 1486  ax-ie2 1487  ax-8 1497  ax-10 1498  ax-11 1499  ax-i12 1500  ax-bndl 1502  ax-4 1503  ax-17 1519  ax-i9 1523  ax-ial 1527  ax-i5r 1528  ax-ext 2152

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-tru 1351  df-nf 1454  df-sb 1756  df-clab 2157  df-cleq 2163  df-clel 2166  df-nfc 2301  df-rex 2454  df-v 2732

This theorem is referenced by:  rspcedv  2838