Theorem sb56 1900

Description: Two equivalent ways of expressing the proper substitution of 𝑦 for 𝑥 in 𝜑, when 𝑥 and 𝑦 are distinct. Theorem 6.2 of [Quine] p. 40. The proof does not involve df-sb 1777. (Contributed by NM, 14-Apr-2008.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
sb56	⊢ (∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑))

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝑦

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑦)

Proof of Theorem sb56

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		hba1 1554	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑) → ∀𝑥∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑))
2		ax11v 1841	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑)))
3		ax-4 1524	. . . 4 ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑) → (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑))
4	3	com12 30	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑) → 𝜑))
5	2, 4	impbid 129	. 2 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑)))
6	1, 5	equsex 1742	1 ⊢ (∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 104   ↔ wb 105  ∀wal 1362  ∃wex 1506

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-5 1461  ax-gen 1463  ax-ie1 1507  ax-ie2 1508  ax-8 1518  ax-11 1520  ax-4 1524  ax-17 1540  ax-i9 1544  ax-ial 1548

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117

This theorem is referenced by:  sb6  1901  sb5  1902  alexeq  2890  dfdif3  3273