Theorem 2mos 2675

Description: Double "there exists at most one", using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 10-Feb-2005.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 21-May-2025.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
2mos.1	⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑤) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
2mos	⊢ (∃𝑧∃𝑤∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → (𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑤)) ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦∀𝑧∀𝑤((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑤)))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑧,𝑤,𝜑   𝑥,𝑦,𝜓   𝑥,𝑧,𝑤,𝑦

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑦)   𝜓(𝑧,𝑤)

Proof of Theorem 2mos

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		2mo 2674	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑧∃𝑤∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → (𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑤)) ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦∀𝑧∀𝑤((𝜑 ∧ [𝑧 / 𝑥][𝑤 / 𝑦]𝜑) → (𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑤)))
2		2mos.1	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑤) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
3	2	2sbievw 2129	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ([𝑧 / 𝑥][𝑤 / 𝑦]𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)
4	3	anbi2i 632	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ [𝑧 / 𝑥][𝑤 / 𝑦]𝜑) ↔ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))
5	4	imbi1i 351	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ [𝑧 / 𝑥][𝑤 / 𝑦]𝜑) → (𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑤)) ↔ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑤)))
6	5	2albii 1839	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑧∀𝑤((𝜑 ∧ [𝑧 / 𝑥][𝑤 / 𝑦]𝜑) → (𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑤)) ↔ ∀𝑧∀𝑤((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑤)))
7	6	2albii 1839	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦∀𝑧∀𝑤((𝜑 ∧ [𝑧 / 𝑥][𝑤 / 𝑦]𝜑) → (𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑤)) ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦∀𝑧∀𝑤((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑤)))
8	1, 7	bitri 277	1 ⊢ (∃𝑧∃𝑤∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → (𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑤)) ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦∀𝑧∀𝑤((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑤)))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 208   ∧ wa 399  ∀wal 1557  ∃wex 1798  [wsb 2089

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1814  ax-4 1828  ax-5 1929  ax-6 1986  ax-7 2027  ax-10 2174  ax-11 2190  ax-12 2211

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 400  df-or 859  df-tru 1562  df-ex 1799  df-nf 1803  df-sb 2090  df-mo 2565

This theorem is referenced by: (None)