MPE Home Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  MPE Home  >  Th. List  >  abexd Structured version   Visualization version   GIF version

Theorem abexd 5296
Description: Conditions for a class abstraction to be a set, deduction form. (Contributed by AV, 19-Apr-2025.)
Hypotheses
Ref Expression
abexd.1 ((𝜑𝜓) → 𝑥𝐴)
abexd.2 (𝜑𝐴𝑉)
Assertion
Ref Expression
abexd (𝜑 → {𝑥𝜓} ∈ V)
Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴   𝜑,𝑥
Allowed substitution hints:   𝜓(𝑥)   𝑉(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem abexd
StepHypRef Expression
1 abexd.2 . 2 (𝜑𝐴𝑉)
2 abexd.1 . . . 4 ((𝜑𝜓) → 𝑥𝐴)
32ex 417 . . 3 (𝜑 → (𝜓𝑥𝐴))
43abssdv 4021 . 2 (𝜑 → {𝑥𝜓} ⊆ 𝐴)
51, 4ssexd 5295 1 (𝜑 → {𝑥𝜓} ∈ V)
Colors of variables: wff setvar class
Syntax hints:  wi 4  wa 400  wcel 2143  {cab 2741  Vcvv 3455
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1825  ax-4 1839  ax-5 1940  ax-6 1997  ax-7 2038  ax-8 2145  ax-9 2153  ax-ext 2735  ax-sep 5257
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 401  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-ex 1810  df-sb 2097  df-clab 2742  df-cleq 2755  df-clel 2838  df-rab 3417  df-v 3457  df-in 3912  df-ss 3922
This theorem is referenced by:  upfval2  49955
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator