MPE Home Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  MPE Home  >  Th. List  >  abexd Structured version   Visualization version   GIF version

Theorem abexd 5296
Description: Conditions for a class abstraction to be a set, deduction form. (Contributed by AV, 19-Apr-2025.)
Hypotheses
Ref Expression
abexd.1 ((𝜑𝜓) → 𝑥𝐴)
abexd.2 (𝜑𝐴𝑉)
Assertion
Ref Expression
abexd (𝜑 → {𝑥𝜓} ∈ V)
Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴   𝜑,𝑥
Allowed substitution hints:   𝜓(𝑥)   𝑉(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem abexd
StepHypRef Expression
1 abexd.2 . 2 (𝜑𝐴𝑉)
2 abexd.1 . . . 4 ((𝜑𝜓) → 𝑥𝐴)
32ex 417 . . 3 (𝜑 → (𝜓𝑥𝐴))
43abssdv 4029 . 2 (𝜑 → {𝑥𝜓} ⊆ 𝐴)
51, 4ssexd 5295 1 (𝜑 → {𝑥𝜓} ∈ V)
Colors of variables: wff setvar class
Syntax hints:  wi 4  wa 400  wcel 2149  {cab 2747  Vcvv 3463
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1822  ax-4 1836  ax-5 1937  ax-6 1994  ax-7 2035  ax-8 2151  ax-9 2159  ax-ext 2741  ax-sep 5261
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 401  df-3an 1103  df-tru 1570  df-ex 1807  df-sb 2098  df-clab 2748  df-cleq 2761  df-clel 2844  df-rab 3424  df-v 3465  df-in 3920  df-ss 3930
This theorem is referenced by:  upfval2  49839
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator