MPE Home Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  MPE Home  >  Th. List  >  abexd Structured version   Visualization version   GIF version

Theorem abexd 5272
Description: Conditions for a class abstraction to be a set, deduction form. (Contributed by AV, 19-Apr-2025.)
Hypotheses
Ref Expression
abexd.1 ((𝜑𝜓) → 𝑥𝐴)
abexd.2 (𝜑𝐴𝑉)
Assertion
Ref Expression
abexd (𝜑 → {𝑥𝜓} ∈ V)
Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴   𝜑,𝑥
Allowed substitution hints:   𝜓(𝑥)   𝑉(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem abexd
StepHypRef Expression
1 abexd.2 . 2 (𝜑𝐴𝑉)
2 abexd.1 . . . 4 ((𝜑𝜓) → 𝑥𝐴)
32ex 412 . . 3 (𝜑 → (𝜓𝑥𝐴))
43abssdv 4021 . 2 (𝜑 → {𝑥𝜓} ⊆ 𝐴)
51, 4ssexd 5271 1 (𝜑 → {𝑥𝜓} ∈ V)
Colors of variables: wff setvar class
Syntax hints:  wi 4  wa 395  wcel 2114  {cab 2715  Vcvv 3442
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1797  ax-4 1811  ax-5 1912  ax-6 1969  ax-7 2010  ax-8 2116  ax-9 2124  ax-ext 2709  ax-sep 5243
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-3an 1089  df-tru 1545  df-ex 1782  df-sb 2069  df-clab 2716  df-cleq 2729  df-clel 2812  df-rab 3402  df-v 3444  df-in 3910  df-ss 3920
This theorem is referenced by:  upfval2  49536
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator