MPE Home Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  MPE Home  >  Th. List  >  abexd Structured version   Visualization version   GIF version

Theorem abexd 5287
Description: Conditions for a class abstraction to be a set, deduction form. (Contributed by AV, 19-Apr-2025.)
Hypotheses
Ref Expression
abexd.1 ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)
abexd.2 (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)
Assertion
Ref Expression
abexd (𝜑 → {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓} ∈ V)
Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴   𝜑,𝑥
Allowed substitution hints:   𝜓(𝑥)   𝑉(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem abexd
StepHypRef Expression
1 abexd.2 . 2 (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)
2 abexd.1 . . . 4 ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)
32ex 418 . . 3 (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴))
43abssdv 4015 . 2 (𝜑 → {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓} ⊆ 𝐴)
51, 4ssexd 5286 1 (𝜑 → {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓} ∈ V)
Colors of variables:    wff setvar class
This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 401   ∈ wcel 2145  {cab 2739  Vcvv 3451
This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2147  ax-9 2155  ax-ext 2733  ax-sep 5249
This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-ex 1813  df-sb 2100  df-clab 2740  df-cleq 2753  df-clel 2836  df-rab 3414  df-v 3453  df-in 3906  df-ss 3916
This theorem is used by:  upfval2  50284
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator