MPE Home Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  MPE Home  >  Th. List  >  abexd Structured version   Visualization version   GIF version

Theorem abexd 5287
Description: Conditions for a class abstraction to be a set, deduction form. (Contributed by AV, 19-Apr-2025.)
Hypotheses
Ref Expression
abexd.1 ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)
abexd.2 (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)
Assertion
Ref Expression
abexd (𝜑 → {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓} ∈ V)
Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴   𝜑,𝑥
Allowed substitution hints:   𝜓(𝑥)   𝑉(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem abexd
StepHypRef Expression
1 abexd.2 . 2 (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)
2 abexd.1 . . . 4 ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)
32ex 418 . . 3 (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴))
43abssdv 3991 . 2 (𝜑 → {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓} ⊆ 𝐴)
51, 4ssexd 5286 1 (𝜑 → {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓} ∈ V)
Colors of variables:    wff setvar class
This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 401   ∈ wcel 2144  {cab 2738  Vcvv 3450
This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1827  ax-4 1841  ax-5 1942  ax-6 1999  ax-7 2040  ax-8 2146  ax-9 2154  ax-ext 2732  ax-sep 5248
This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1572  df-ex 1812  df-sb 2099  df-clab 2739  df-cleq 2752  df-clel 2835  df-rab 3413  df-v 3452  df-ss 3897  df-in 4090
This theorem is used by:  upfval2  50429
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator