Theorem axc11n11r 35864

Description: Proof of axc11n 2423 from { ax-1 6-- ax-7 2009, axc9 2379, axc11r 2363 } (note that axc16 2250 is provable from { ax-1 6-- ax-7 2009, axc11r 2363 }).

Note that axc11n 2423 proves (over minimal calculus) that axc11 2427 and axc11r 2363 are equivalent. Therefore, axc11n11 35863 and axc11n11r 35864 prove that one can use one or the other as an axiom, provided one assumes the axioms listed above (axc11 2427 appears slightly stronger since axc11n11r 35864 requires axc9 2379 while axc11n11 35863 does not).

(Contributed by BJ, 6-Jul-2021.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
axc11n11r	⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑥)

Proof of Theorem axc11n11r

Dummy variable 𝑧 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		equcomi 2018	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝑦 = 𝑥)
2		axc16 2250	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑧 → (𝑦 = 𝑥 → ∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑥))
3	1, 2	syl5 34	. . . 4 ⊢ (∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑧 → (𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑥))
4	3	spsd 2178	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑧 → (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑥))
5	4	exlimiv 1931	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑧∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑧 → (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑥))
6		alnex 1781	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑧 ¬ ∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑧 ↔ ¬ ∃𝑧∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑧)
7		ax6evr 2016	. . . . 5 ⊢ ∃𝑧 𝑥 = 𝑧
8		19.29 1874	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((∀𝑧 ¬ ∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑧 ∧ ∃𝑧 𝑥 = 𝑧) → ∃𝑧(¬ ∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑧 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑧))
9	7, 8	mpan2 687	. . . 4 ⊢ (∀𝑧 ¬ ∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑧 → ∃𝑧(¬ ∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑧 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑧))
10		axc9 2379	. . . . . . . . . . . 12 ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑥 → (¬ ∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑧 → (𝑥 = 𝑧 → ∀𝑦 𝑥 = 𝑧)))
11	10	impcom 406	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ ((¬ ∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑧 ∧ ¬ ∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑥) → (𝑥 = 𝑧 → ∀𝑦 𝑥 = 𝑧))
12		axc11r 2363	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (∀𝑦 𝑥 = 𝑧 → ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑧))
13	11, 12	syl9 77	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ ((¬ ∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑧 ∧ ¬ ∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑥) → (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑥 = 𝑧 → ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑧)))
14		aev 2058	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑧 → ∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑥)
15	13, 14	syl8 76	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((¬ ∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑧 ∧ ¬ ∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑥) → (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑥 = 𝑧 → ∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑥)))
16	15	ex 411	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑧 → (¬ ∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑥 → (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑥 = 𝑧 → ∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑥))))
17	16	com24 95	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑧 → (𝑥 = 𝑧 → (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (¬ ∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑥 → ∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑥))))
18	17	imp 405	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((¬ ∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑧 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑧) → (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (¬ ∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑥 → ∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑥)))
19		pm2.18 128	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((¬ ∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑥 → ∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑥) → ∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑥)
20	18, 19	syl6 35	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((¬ ∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑧 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑧) → (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑥))
21	20	exlimiv 1931	. . . 4 ⊢ (∃𝑧(¬ ∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑧 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑧) → (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑥))
22	9, 21	syl 17	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑧 ¬ ∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑧 → (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑥))
23	6, 22	sylbir 234	. 2 ⊢ (¬ ∃𝑧∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑧 → (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑥))
24	5, 23	pm2.61i 182	1 ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑥)

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ∧ wa 394  ∀wal 1537  ∃wex 1779

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1795  ax-4 1809  ax-5 1911  ax-6 1969  ax-7 2009  ax-10 2135  ax-12 2169  ax-13 2369

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 395  df-or 844  df-tru 1542  df-ex 1780  df-nf 1784

This theorem is referenced by: (None)