Theorem axc11n11r 36725

Description: Proof of axc11n 2426 from { ax-1 6-- ax-7 2009, axc9 2382, axc11r 2368 } (note that axc16 2264 is provable from { ax-1 6-- ax-7 2009, axc11r 2368 }).

Note that axc11n 2426 proves (over minimal calculus) that axc11 2430 and axc11r 2368 are equivalent. Therefore, axc11n11 36724 and axc11n11r 36725 prove that one can use one or the other as an axiom, provided one assumes the axioms listed above (axc11 2430 appears slightly stronger since axc11n11r 36725 requires axc9 2382 while axc11n11 36724 does not).

(Contributed by BJ, 6-Jul-2021.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
axc11n11r	⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑥)

Proof of Theorem axc11n11r

Dummy variable 𝑧 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		equcomi 2018	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝑦 = 𝑥)
2		axc16 2264	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑧 → (𝑦 = 𝑥 → ∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑥))
3	1, 2	syl5 34	. . . 4 ⊢ (∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑧 → (𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑥))
4	3	spsd 2190	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑧 → (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑥))
5	4	exlimiv 1931	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑧∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑧 → (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑥))
6		alnex 1782	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑧 ¬ ∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑧 ↔ ¬ ∃𝑧∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑧)
7		ax6evr 2016	. . . . 5 ⊢ ∃𝑧 𝑥 = 𝑧
8		19.29 1874	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((∀𝑧 ¬ ∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑧 ∧ ∃𝑧 𝑥 = 𝑧) → ∃𝑧(¬ ∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑧 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑧))
9	7, 8	mpan2 691	. . . 4 ⊢ (∀𝑧 ¬ ∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑧 → ∃𝑧(¬ ∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑧 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑧))
10		axc9 2382	. . . . . . . . . . . 12 ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑥 → (¬ ∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑧 → (𝑥 = 𝑧 → ∀𝑦 𝑥 = 𝑧)))
11	10	impcom 407	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ ((¬ ∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑧 ∧ ¬ ∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑥) → (𝑥 = 𝑧 → ∀𝑦 𝑥 = 𝑧))
12		axc11r 2368	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (∀𝑦 𝑥 = 𝑧 → ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑧))
13	11, 12	syl9 77	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ ((¬ ∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑧 ∧ ¬ ∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑥) → (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑥 = 𝑧 → ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑧)))
14		aev 2060	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑧 → ∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑥)
15	13, 14	syl8 76	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((¬ ∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑧 ∧ ¬ ∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑥) → (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑥 = 𝑧 → ∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑥)))
16	15	ex 412	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑧 → (¬ ∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑥 → (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑥 = 𝑧 → ∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑥))))
17	16	com24 95	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑧 → (𝑥 = 𝑧 → (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (¬ ∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑥 → ∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑥))))
18	17	imp 406	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((¬ ∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑧 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑧) → (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (¬ ∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑥 → ∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑥)))
19		pm2.18 128	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((¬ ∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑥 → ∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑥) → ∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑥)
20	18, 19	syl6 35	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((¬ ∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑧 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑧) → (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑥))
21	20	exlimiv 1931	. . . 4 ⊢ (∃𝑧(¬ ∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑧 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑧) → (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑥))
22	9, 21	syl 17	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑧 ¬ ∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑧 → (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑥))
23	6, 22	sylbir 235	. 2 ⊢ (¬ ∃𝑧∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑧 → (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑥))
24	5, 23	pm2.61i 182	1 ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑥)

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ∧ wa 395  ∀wal 1539  ∃wex 1780

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1796  ax-4 1810  ax-5 1911  ax-6 1968  ax-7 2009  ax-10 2144  ax-12 2180  ax-13 2372

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 848  df-tru 1544  df-ex 1781  df-nf 1785

This theorem is referenced by: (None)