Theorem axc11n 2434

Description: Derive set.mm's original ax-c11n 38844 from others. Commutation law for identical variable specifiers. The antecedent and consequent are true when 𝑥 and 𝑦 are substituted with the same variable. Lemma L12 in [Megill] p. 445 (p. 12 of the preprint). If a disjoint variable condition is added on 𝑥 and 𝑦, then this becomes an instance of aevlem 2055. Use aecom 2435 instead when this does not lengthen the proof. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2380. (Contributed by NM, 10-May-1993.) (Revised by NM, 7-Nov-2015.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 6-Mar-2018.) (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 30-Nov-2019.) (Proof shortened by BJ, 29-Mar-2021.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 2-Jul-2021.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
axc11n	⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑥)

Proof of Theorem axc11n

Dummy variable 𝑧 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		dveeq1 2388	. . . . 5 ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑥 → (𝑥 = 𝑧 → ∀𝑦 𝑥 = 𝑧))
2	1	com12 32	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑧 → (¬ ∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑥 → ∀𝑦 𝑥 = 𝑧))
3		axc11r 2374	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (∀𝑦 𝑥 = 𝑧 → ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑧))
4		aev 2057	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑧 → ∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑥)
5	3, 4	syl6 35	. . . 4 ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (∀𝑦 𝑥 = 𝑧 → ∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑥))
6	2, 5	syl9 77	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑧 → (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (¬ ∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑥 → ∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑥)))
7		ax6evr 2014	. . 3 ⊢ ∃𝑧 𝑥 = 𝑧
8	6, 7	exlimiiv 1930	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (¬ ∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑥 → ∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑥))
9	8	pm2.18d 127	1 ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑥)

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4  ∀wal 1535

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1793  ax-4 1807  ax-5 1909  ax-6 1967  ax-7 2007  ax-10 2141  ax-12 2178  ax-13 2380

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-ex 1778  df-nf 1782

This theorem is referenced by:  aecom  2435  axi10  2708  wl-hbae1  37473  wl-ax11-lem3  37541  wl-ax11-lem8  37546  2sb5ndVD  44881  e2ebindVD  44883  e2ebindALT  44900  2sb5ndALT  44903