| Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
| Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > cleqh | Structured version Visualization version GIF version | ||
| Description: Establish equality between classes, using bound-variable hypotheses instead of distinct variable conditions as in dfcleq 2759. See also cleqf 2956. (Contributed by NM, 26-May-1993.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 14-Nov-2019.) Remove dependency on ax-13 2407. (Revised by BJ, 30-Nov-2020.) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| cleqh.1 | ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 → ∀𝑥 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴) |
| cleqh.2 | ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 → ∀𝑥 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| cleqh | ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | dfcleq 2759 | . 2 ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)) | |
| 2 | nfv 1947 | . . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) | |
| 3 | cleqh.1 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 → ∀𝑥 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴) | |
| 4 | 3 | nf5i 2184 | . . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 |
| 5 | cleqh.2 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 → ∀𝑥 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) | |
| 6 | 5 | nf5i 2184 | . . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 |
| 7 | 4, 6 | nfbi 1936 | . . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) |
| 8 | eleq1w 2849 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)) | |
| 9 | eleq1w 2849 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↔ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)) | |
| 10 | 8, 9 | bibi12d 348 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵))) |
| 11 | 2, 7, 10 | cbvalv1 2376 | . 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ↔ ∀𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)) |
| 12 | 1, 11 | bitr4i 281 | 1 ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)) |
| Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
| This proof depends on syntax axioms: → wi 4 ↔ wb 209 ∀wal 1568 = wceq 1570 ∈ wcel 2146 |
| This proof depends on axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1828 ax-4 1842 ax-5 1943 ax-6 2000 ax-7 2041 ax-8 2148 ax-9 2156 ax-10 2179 ax-11 2195 ax-12 2216 ax-ext 2738 |
| This proof depends on definitions: df-bi 210 df-an 402 df-or 862 df-tru 1573 df-ex 1813 df-nf 1817 df-cleq 2758 df-clel 2841 |
| This theorem is used by: (None) |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |