Theorem cleqf 2959

Description: Establish equality between classes, using bound-variable hypotheses instead of distinct variable conditions as in dfcleq 2762. See also cleqh 2898. (Contributed by NM, 26-May-1993.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 7-Oct-2016.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 17-Nov-2019.) Avoid ax-13 2410. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 10-May-2023.) Avoid ax-10 2182. (Revised by GG, 20-Aug-2023.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
cleqf.1	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
cleqf.2	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵

Assertion

Ref	Expression
cleqf	⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))

Proof of Theorem cleqf

Dummy variable 𝑦 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		dfcleq 2762	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵))
2		nfv 1941	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)
3		cleqf.1	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
4	3	nfcri 2923	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴
5		cleqf.2	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵
6	5	nfcri 2923	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵
7	4, 6	nfbi 1930	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)
8		eleq1w 2852	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴))
9		eleq1w 2852	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↔ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵))
10	8, 9	bibi12d 348	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)))
11	2, 7, 10	cbvalv1 2379	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ↔ ∀𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵))
12	1, 11	bitr4i 281	1 ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))

Syntax hints:   ↔ wb 209  ∀wal 1565   = wceq 1567   ∈ wcel 2149  Ⅎwnfc 2916

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1822  ax-4 1836  ax-5 1937  ax-6 1994  ax-7 2035  ax-8 2151  ax-9 2159  ax-11 2198  ax-12 2219  ax-ext 2741

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 401  df-or 861  df-tru 1570  df-ex 1807  df-nf 1811  df-cleq 2761  df-clel 2844  df-nfc 2918

This theorem is referenced by:  eqabf  2960  abid2fOLD  2962  eqvf  3474  eqrd  3964  eq0f  4309  mbfposr  25780  mbfinf  25793  itg1climres  25842  bnj1366  35162  bj-rabtrALT  37455  bj-rcleqf  37549  compab  45043  ssmapsn  45824  infnsuprnmpt  45857  pimrecltpos  47314  pimrecltneg  47330  smfaddlem1  47369  smflimsuplem7  47432  absnsb  47653