Theorem cleqf 2927

Description: Establish equality between classes, using bound-variable hypotheses instead of distinct variable conditions as in dfcleq 2729. See also cleqh 2865. (Contributed by NM, 26-May-1993.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 7-Oct-2016.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 17-Nov-2019.) Avoid ax-13 2376. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 10-May-2023.) Avoid ax-10 2147. (Revised by GG, 20-Aug-2023.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
cleqf.1	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
cleqf.2	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵

Assertion

Ref	Expression
cleqf	⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))

Proof of Theorem cleqf

Dummy variable 𝑦 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		dfcleq 2729	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵))
2		nfv 1916	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)
3		cleqf.1	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
4	3	nfcri 2890	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴
5		cleqf.2	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵
6	5	nfcri 2890	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵
7	4, 6	nfbi 1905	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)
8		eleq1w 2819	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴))
9		eleq1w 2819	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↔ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵))
10	8, 9	bibi12d 345	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)))
11	2, 7, 10	cbvalv1 2345	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ↔ ∀𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵))
12	1, 11	bitr4i 278	1 ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))

Syntax hints:   ↔ wb 206  ∀wal 1540   = wceq 1542   ∈ wcel 2114  Ⅎwnfc 2883

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1797  ax-4 1811  ax-5 1912  ax-6 1969  ax-7 2010  ax-8 2116  ax-9 2124  ax-11 2163  ax-12 2185  ax-ext 2708

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 849  df-tru 1545  df-ex 1782  df-nf 1786  df-cleq 2728  df-clel 2811  df-nfc 2885

This theorem is referenced by:  eqabf  2928  abid2fOLD  2930  eqvf  3440  eqrd  3941  eq0f  4287  mbfposr  25619  mbfinf  25632  itg1climres  25681  bnj1366  34971  bj-rabtrALT  37238  bj-rcleqf  37332  compab  44868  ssmapsn  45645  infnsuprnmpt  45679  pimrecltpos  47136  pimrecltneg  47152  smfaddlem1  47191  smflimsuplem7  47254  absnsb  47475