Theorem cleqf 2929

Description: Establish equality between classes, using bound-variable hypotheses instead of distinct variable conditions as in dfcleq 2732. See also cleqh 2868. (Contributed by NM, 26-May-1993.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 7-Oct-2016.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 17-Nov-2019.) Avoid ax-13 2380. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 10-May-2023.) Avoid ax-10 2152. (Revised by GG, 20-Aug-2023.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
cleqf.1	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
cleqf.2	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵

Assertion

Ref	Expression
cleqf	⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))

Proof of Theorem cleqf

Dummy variable 𝑦 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		dfcleq 2732	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵))
2		nfv 1921	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)
3		cleqf.1	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
4	3	nfcri 2893	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴
5		cleqf.2	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵
6	5	nfcri 2893	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵
7	4, 6	nfbi 1910	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)
8		eleq1w 2822	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴))
9		eleq1w 2822	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↔ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵))
10	8, 9	bibi12d 346	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)))
11	2, 7, 10	cbvalv1 2349	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ↔ ∀𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵))
12	1, 11	bitr4i 279	1 ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))

Syntax hints:   ↔ wb 207  ∀wal 1545   = wceq 1547   ∈ wcel 2119  Ⅎwnfc 2886

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1802  ax-4 1816  ax-5 1917  ax-6 1974  ax-7 2015  ax-8 2121  ax-9 2129  ax-11 2168  ax-12 2189  ax-ext 2711

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 208  df-an 397  df-or 854  df-tru 1550  df-ex 1787  df-nf 1791  df-cleq 2731  df-clel 2814  df-nfc 2888

This theorem is referenced by:  eqabf  2930  abid2fOLD  2932  eqvf  3442  eqrd  3934  eq0f  4275  mbfposr  25637  mbfinf  25650  itg1climres  25699  bnj1366  35011  bj-rabtrALT  37284  bj-rcleqf  37378  compab  44885  ssmapsn  45661  infnsuprnmpt  45694  pimrecltpos  47151  pimrecltneg  47167  smfaddlem1  47206  smflimsuplem7  47269  absnsb  47490