Theorem cleqf 2923

Description: Establish equality between classes, using bound-variable hypotheses instead of distinct variable conditions as in dfcleq 2724. See also cleqh 2860. (Contributed by NM, 26-May-1993.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 7-Oct-2016.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 17-Nov-2019.) Avoid ax-13 2372. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 10-May-2023.) Avoid ax-10 2144. (Revised by GG, 20-Aug-2023.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
cleqf.1	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
cleqf.2	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵

Assertion

Ref	Expression
cleqf	⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))

Proof of Theorem cleqf

Dummy variable 𝑦 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		dfcleq 2724	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵))
2		nfv 1915	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)
3		cleqf.1	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
4	3	nfcri 2886	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴
5		cleqf.2	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵
6	5	nfcri 2886	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵
7	4, 6	nfbi 1904	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)
8		eleq1w 2814	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴))
9		eleq1w 2814	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↔ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵))
10	8, 9	bibi12d 345	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)))
11	2, 7, 10	cbvalv1 2341	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ↔ ∀𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵))
12	1, 11	bitr4i 278	1 ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))

Syntax hints:   ↔ wb 206  ∀wal 1539   = wceq 1541   ∈ wcel 2111  Ⅎwnfc 2879

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1796  ax-4 1810  ax-5 1911  ax-6 1968  ax-7 2009  ax-8 2113  ax-9 2121  ax-11 2160  ax-12 2180  ax-ext 2703

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 848  df-tru 1544  df-ex 1781  df-nf 1785  df-cleq 2723  df-clel 2806  df-nfc 2881

This theorem is referenced by:  eqabf  2924  abid2fOLD  2926  eqvf  3447  eqrd  3949  eq0f  4294  iunab  4998  iinab  5014  mbfposr  25580  mbfinf  25593  itg1climres  25642  bnj1366  34841  bj-rabtrALT  36975  bj-rcleqf  37069  compab  44544  ssmapsn  45323  infnsuprnmpt  45357  pimrecltpos  46816  pimrecltneg  46832  smfaddlem1  46871  smflimsuplem7  46934  absnsb  47137