Theorem cleqf 2953

Description: Establish equality between classes, using bound-variable hypotheses instead of distinct variable conditions as in dfcleq 2756. See also cleqh 2892. (Contributed by NM, 26-May-1993.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 7-Oct-2016.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 17-Nov-2019.) Avoid ax-13 2404. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 10-May-2023.) Avoid ax-10 2176. (Revised by GG, 20-Aug-2023.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
cleqf.1	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
cleqf.2	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵

Assertion

Ref	Expression
cleqf	⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))

Proof of Theorem cleqf

Dummy variable 𝑦 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		dfcleq 2756	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵))
2		nfv 1944	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)
3		cleqf.1	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
4	3	nfcri 2917	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴
5		cleqf.2	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵
6	5	nfcri 2917	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵
7	4, 6	nfbi 1933	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)
8		eleq1w 2846	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴))
9		eleq1w 2846	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↔ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵))
10	8, 9	bibi12d 348	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)))
11	2, 7, 10	cbvalv1 2373	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ↔ ∀𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵))
12	1, 11	bitr4i 281	1 ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))

Syntax hints:   ↔ wb 209  ∀wal 1568   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2143  Ⅎwnfc 2910

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1825  ax-4 1839  ax-5 1940  ax-6 1997  ax-7 2038  ax-8 2145  ax-9 2153  ax-11 2192  ax-12 2213  ax-ext 2735

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 401  df-or 861  df-tru 1573  df-ex 1810  df-nf 1814  df-cleq 2755  df-clel 2838  df-nfc 2912

This theorem is referenced by:  eqabf  2954  abid2fOLD  2956  eqvf  3466  eqrd  3956  eq0f  4301  rspsn0  21372  mbfposr  25811  mbfinf  25824  itg1climres  25873  bnj1366  35217  bj-rabtrALT  37587  bj-rcleqf  37681  compab  45171  ssmapsn  45952  infnsuprnmpt  45985  pimrecltpos  47442  pimrecltneg  47458  smfaddlem1  47497  smflimsuplem7  47560  absnsb  47784