P. 29 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 2801-2900   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	3eqtr3a 2801	A chained equality inference, useful for converting from definitions. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Nov-2015.)
⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = 𝐷)
Theorem	3eqtr4g 2802	A chained equality inference, useful for converting to definitions. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-1993.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = 𝐴    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = 𝐷)
Theorem	3eqtr4a 2803	A chained equality inference, useful for converting to definitions. (Contributed by NM, 2-Feb-2007.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 25-May-2011.)
⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = 𝐷)
Theorem	eq2tri 2804	A compound transitive inference for class equality. (Contributed by NM, 22-Jan-2004.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐶 → 𝐷 = 𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝐵 = 𝐷 → 𝐶 = 𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 = 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 = 𝐹) ↔ (𝐵 = 𝐷 ∧ 𝐴 = 𝐺))
Theorem	iseqsetvlem 2805*	Lemma for iseqsetv-cleq 2806. (Contributed by Wolf Lammen, 17-Aug-2025.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (∃𝑥 𝑥 = 𝐴 ↔ ∃𝑧 𝑧 = 𝐴)
Theorem	iseqsetv-cleq 2806*	Alternate proof of iseqsetv-clel 2820. The expression ∃𝑥𝑥 = 𝐴 does not depend on a particular choice of the set variable. The proof here avoids df-clab 2715, df-clel 2816 and ax-8 2110, but instead is based on ax-9 2118, ax-ext 2708 and df-cleq 2729. In particular it still accepts 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 being a primitive syntax term, not assuming any specific semantics (like elementhood in some form). Use it in contexts where you want to avoid df-clab 2715, or you need df-cleq 2729 anyway. See the alternative version , not using df-cleq 2729 or ax-ext 2708 or ax-9 2118. (Contributed by Wolf Lammen, 6-Aug-2025.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (∃𝑥 𝑥 = 𝐴 ↔ ∃𝑦 𝑦 = 𝐴)
Theorem	abbi 2807	Equivalent formulas yield equal class abstractions (closed form). This is the backward implication of abbib 2811, proved from fewer axioms, and hence is independently named. (Contributed by BJ and WL and SN, 20-Aug-2023.)
⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓})
Theorem	abbidv 2808*	Equivalent wff's yield equal class abstractions (deduction form). (Contributed by NM, 10-Aug-1993.) Avoid ax-12 2177, based on an idea of Steven Nguyen. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 6-May-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓} = {𝑥 ∣ 𝜒})
Theorem	abbii 2809	Equivalent wff's yield equal class abstractions (inference form). (Contributed by NM, 26-May-1993.) Remove dependency on ax-10 2141, ax-11 2157, and ax-12 2177. (Revised by Steven Nguyen, 3-May-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓}
Theorem	abbid 2810	Equivalent wff's yield equal class abstractions (deduction form, with nonfreeness hypothesis). (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-1993.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 7-Oct-2016.) Avoid ax-10 2141 and ax-11 2157. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 6-May-2023.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓} = {𝑥 ∣ 𝜒})
Theorem	abbib 2811	Equal class abstractions require equivalent formulas, and conversely. (Contributed by NM, 25-Nov-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.) Remove dependency on ax-8 2110 and df-clel 2816 (by avoiding use of cleqh 2871). (Revised by BJ, 23-Jun-2019.) Definitial form. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 23-Feb-2025.)
⊢ ({𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓} ↔ ∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
Theorem	cbvabv 2812*	Rule used to change bound variables, using implicit substitution. Version of cbvab 2814 with disjoint variable conditions requiring fewer axioms. (Contributed by NM, 26-May-1999.) Require 𝑥, 𝑦 be disjoint to avoid ax-11 2157 and ax-13 2377. (Revised by Steven Nguyen, 4-Dec-2022.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑦 ∣ 𝜓}
Theorem	cbvabw 2813*	Rule used to change bound variables, using implicit substitution. Version of cbvab 2814 with a disjoint variable condition, which does not require ax-10 2141, ax-13 2377. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 11-Jul-2011.) (Revised by GG, 23-May-2024.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑦 ∣ 𝜓}
Theorem	cbvab 2814	Rule used to change bound variables, using implicit substitution. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2377. Usage of the weaker cbvabw 2813 and cbvabv 2812 are preferred. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 11-Jul-2011.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 16-Nov-2019.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑦 ∣ 𝜓}
Theorem	eqabbw 2815*	Version of eqabb 2881 using implicit substitution, which requires fewer axioms. (Contributed by GG and AV, 18-Sep-2024.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 = {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ ∀𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝜓))
2.1.2.3  Class membership
Definition	df-clel 2816*	Define the membership connective between classes. Theorem 6.3 of [Quine] p. 41, or Proposition 4.6 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 13, which we adopt as a definition. See these references for its metalogical justification. The hypotheses express that all instances of the conclusion where class variables are replaced with setvar variables hold. Therefore, this definition merely extends to class variables something that is true for setvar variables, hence is conservative. This is only a proof sketch of conservativity; for details see Appendix of [Levy] p. 357. This is the reason why we call this axiomatic statement a "definition", even though it does not have the usual form of a definition. If we required a definition to have the usual form, we would call df-clel 2816 an axiom. See also comments under df-clab 2715, df-cleq 2729, and eqabb 2881. Alternate characterizations of 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 when either 𝐴 or 𝐵 is a set are given by clel2g 3659, clel3g 3661, and clel4g 3663. This is called the "axiom of membership" by [Levy] p. 338, who treats the theory of classes as an extralogical extension to our logic and set theory axioms. While the three class definitions df-clab 2715, df-cleq 2729, and df-clel 2816 are eliminable and conservative and thus meet the requirements for sound definitions, they are technically axioms in that they do not satisfy the requirements for the current definition checker. The proofs of conservativity require external justification that is beyond the scope of the definition checker. For a general discussion of the theory of classes, see mmset.html#class 2816. (Contributed by NM, 26-May-1993.) (Revised by BJ, 27-Jun-2019.)
⊢ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑧 ↔ ∃𝑢(𝑢 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝑢 ∈ 𝑧))    &   ⊢ (𝑡 ∈ 𝑡 ↔ ∃𝑣(𝑣 = 𝑡 ∧ 𝑣 ∈ 𝑡))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))
Theorem	dfclel 2817*	Characterization of the elements of a class. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Jun-2019.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))
Theorem	elex2 2818*	If a class contains another class, then it contains some set. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 25-Sep-2011.) Avoid ax-9 2118, ax-ext 2708, df-clab 2715. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 30-Nov-2024.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)
Theorem	issettru 2819*	Weak version of isset 3494. (Contributed by BJ, 24-Apr-2024.)
⊢ (∃𝑥 𝑥 = 𝐴 ↔ 𝐴 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ ⊤})
Theorem	iseqsetv-clel 2820*	Alternate proof of iseqsetv-cleq 2806. The expression ∃𝑥𝑥 = 𝐴 does not depend on a particular choice of the set variable. Use this theorem in contexts where df-cleq 2729 or ax-ext 2708 is not referenced elsewhere in your proof. It is proven from a specific implementation (class builder, axiom df-clab 2715) of the primitive term 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴. (Contributed by BJ, 29-Apr-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (∃𝑥 𝑥 = 𝐴 ↔ ∃𝑦 𝑦 = 𝐴)
Theorem	issetlem 2821*	Lemma for elisset 2823 and isset 3494. (Contributed by NM, 26-May-1993.) Extract from the proof of isset 3494. (Revised by WL, 2-Feb-2025.)
⊢ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑉    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ↔ ∃𝑥 𝑥 = 𝐴)
Theorem	elissetv 2822*	An element of a class exists. Version of elisset 2823 with a disjoint variable condition on 𝑉, 𝑥, avoiding df-clab 2715. Prefer its use over elisset 2823 when sufficient (for instance in usages where 𝑥 is a dummy variable). (Contributed by BJ, 14-Sep-2019.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ∃𝑥 𝑥 = 𝐴)
Theorem	elisset 2823*	An element of a class exists. Use elissetv 2822 instead when sufficient (for instance in usages where 𝑥 is a dummy variable). (Contributed by NM, 1-May-1995.) Reduce dependencies on axioms. (Revised by BJ, 29-Apr-2019.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ∃𝑥 𝑥 = 𝐴)
Theorem	eleq1w 2824	Weaker version of eleq1 2829 (but more general than elequ1 2115) not depending on ax-ext 2708 nor df-cleq 2729. Note that this provides a proof of ax-8 2110 from Tarski's FOL and dfclel 2817 (simply consider an instance where 𝐴 is replaced by a setvar and deduce the forward implication by biimpd 229), which shows that dfclel 2817 is too powerful to be used as a definition instead of df-clel 2816. (Contributed by BJ, 24-Jun-2019.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴))
Theorem	eleq2w 2825	Weaker version of eleq2 2830 (but more general than elequ2 2123) not depending on ax-ext 2708 nor df-cleq 2729. (Contributed by BJ, 29-Sep-2019.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝐴 ∈ 𝑥 ↔ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑦))
Theorem	eleq1d 2826	Deduction from equality to equivalence of membership. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-1993.) Allow shortening of eleq1 2829. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 20-Nov-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ↔ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶))
Theorem	eleq2d 2827	Deduction from equality to equivalence of membership. (Contributed by NM, 27-Dec-1993.) Reduce dependencies on axioms. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 5-Dec-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐵))
Theorem	eleq2dALT 2828	Alternate proof of eleq2d 2827, shorter at the expense of requiring ax-12 2177. (Contributed by NM, 27-Dec-1993.) (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 20-Nov-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐵))
Theorem	eleq1 2829	Equality implies equivalence of membership. (Contributed by NM, 26-May-1993.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 20-Nov-2019.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ↔ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶))
Theorem	eleq2 2830	Equality implies equivalence of membership. (Contributed by NM, 26-May-1993.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 20-Nov-2019.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐵))
Theorem	eleq12 2831	Equality implies equivalence of membership. (Contributed by NM, 31-May-1999.)
⊢ ((𝐴 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 = 𝐷) → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ↔ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷))
Theorem	eleq1i 2832	Inference from equality to equivalence of membership. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-1993.)
⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ↔ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶)
Theorem	eleq2i 2833	Inference from equality to equivalence of membership. (Contributed by NM, 26-May-1993.)
⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐵)
Theorem	eleq12i 2834	Inference from equality to equivalence of membership. (Contributed by NM, 31-May-1994.)
⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = 𝐷    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ↔ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷)
Theorem	eleq12d 2835	Deduction from equality to equivalence of membership. (Contributed by NM, 31-May-1994.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ↔ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷))
Theorem	eleq1a 2836	A transitive-type law relating membership and equality. (Contributed by NM, 9-Apr-1994.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → (𝐶 = 𝐴 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐵))
Theorem	eqeltri 2837	Substitution of equal classes into membership relation. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-1993.)
⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶
Theorem	eqeltrri 2838	Substitution of equal classes into membership relation. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-1993.)
⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵    &   ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶
Theorem	eleqtri 2839	Substitution of equal classes into membership relation. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jul-1993.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = 𝐶    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶
Theorem	eleqtrri 2840	Substitution of equal classes into membership relation. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jul-1993.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶
Theorem	eqeltrd 2841	Substitution of equal classes into membership relation, deduction form. (Contributed by Raph Levien, 10-Dec-2002.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶)
Theorem	eqeltrrd 2842	Deduction that substitutes equal classes into membership. (Contributed by NM, 14-Dec-2004.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶)
Theorem	eleqtrd 2843	Deduction that substitutes equal classes into membership. (Contributed by NM, 14-Dec-2004.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶)
Theorem	eleqtrrd 2844	Deduction that substitutes equal classes into membership. (Contributed by NM, 14-Dec-2004.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶)
Theorem	eqeltrid 2845	A membership and equality inference. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jan-2006.)
⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶)
Theorem	eqeltrrid 2846	A membership and equality inference. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jan-2006.)
⊢ 𝐵 = 𝐴    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶)
Theorem	eleqtrid 2847	A membership and equality inference. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jan-2006.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶)
Theorem	eleqtrrid 2848	A membership and equality inference. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jan-2006.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶)
Theorem	eqeltrdi 2849	A membership and equality inference. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jan-2006.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶)
Theorem	eqeltrrdi 2850	A membership and equality inference. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jan-2006.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = 𝐴)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶)
Theorem	eleqtrdi 2851	A membership and equality inference. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jan-2006.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = 𝐶    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶)
Theorem	eleqtrrdi 2852	A membership and equality inference. (Contributed by NM, 24-Apr-2005.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶)
Theorem	3eltr3i 2853	Substitution of equal classes into membership relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐶    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = 𝐷    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐷
Theorem	3eltr4i 2854	Substitution of equal classes into membership relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = 𝐴    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐷
Theorem	3eltr3d 2855	Substitution of equal classes into membership relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Jan-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐷)
Theorem	3eltr4d 2856	Substitution of equal classes into membership relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Jan-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐷)
Theorem	3eltr3g 2857	Substitution of equal classes into membership relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Jan-2017.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 23-Nov-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐶    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = 𝐷    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐷)
Theorem	3eltr4g 2858	Substitution of equal classes into membership relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Jan-2017.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 23-Nov-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = 𝐴    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐷)
Theorem	eleq2s 2859	Substitution of equal classes into a membership antecedent. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → 𝜑)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 → 𝜑)
Theorem	eqneltri 2860	If a class is not an element of another class, an equal class is also not an element. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 3-Jan-2021.)
⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵    &   ⊢ ¬ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶    ⇒   ⊢ ¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶
Theorem	eqneltrd 2861	If a class is not an element of another class, an equal class is also not an element. Deduction form. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶)
Theorem	eqneltrrd 2862	If a class is not an element of another class, an equal class is also not an element. Deduction form. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 13-Nov-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶)
Theorem	neleqtrd 2863	If a class is not an element of another class, it is also not an element of an equal class. Deduction form. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐵)
Theorem	neleqtrrd 2864	If a class is not an element of another class, it is also not an element of an equal class. Deduction form. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 13-Nov-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	nelneq 2865	A way of showing two classes are not equal. (Contributed by NM, 1-Apr-1997.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ ¬ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶) → ¬ 𝐴 = 𝐵)
Theorem	nelneq2 2866	A way of showing two classes are not equal. (Contributed by NM, 12-Jan-2002.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶) → ¬ 𝐵 = 𝐶)
Theorem	eqsb1 2867*	Substitution for the left-hand side in an equality. Class version of equsb3 2103. (Contributed by Rodolfo Medina, 28-Apr-2010.)
⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝑥 = 𝐴 ↔ 𝑦 = 𝐴)
Theorem	clelsb1 2868*	Substitution for the first argument of the membership predicate in an atomic formula (class version of elsb1 2116). (Contributed by Rodolfo Medina, 28-Apr-2010.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 14-Jun-2011.)
⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	clelsb2 2869*	Substitution for the second argument of the membership predicate in an atomic formula (class version of elsb2 2125). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 22-Nov-2018.) Reduce dependencies on axioms. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 24-Nov-2024.)
⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝐴 ∈ 𝑥 ↔ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑦)
Theorem	clelsb2OLD 2870*	Obsolete version of clelsb2 2869 as of 24-Nov-2024.) (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 22-Nov-2018.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝐴 ∈ 𝑥 ↔ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑦)
Theorem	cleqh 2871*	Establish equality between classes, using bound-variable hypotheses instead of distinct variable conditions as in dfcleq 2730. See also cleqf 2934. (Contributed by NM, 26-May-1993.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 14-Nov-2019.) Remove dependency on ax-13 2377. (Revised by BJ, 30-Nov-2020.)
⊢ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 → ∀𝑥 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 → ∀𝑥 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))
Theorem	hbxfreq 2872	A utility lemma to transfer a bound-variable hypothesis builder into a definition. See hbxfrbi 1825 for equivalence version. (Contributed by NM, 21-Aug-2007.)
⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵    &   ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 → ∀𝑥 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 → ∀𝑥 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	hblem 2873*	Change the free variable of a hypothesis builder. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-1993.) (Revised by Andrew Salmon, 11-Jul-2011.) Add disjoint variable condition to avoid ax-13 2377. See hblemg 2874 for a less restrictive version requiring more axioms. (Revised by GG, 20-Jan-2024.)
⊢ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 → ∀𝑥 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 → ∀𝑥 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	hblemg 2874*	Change the free variable of a hypothesis builder. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2377. See hblem 2873 for a version with more disjoint variable conditions, but not requiring ax-13 2377. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-1993.) (Revised by Andrew Salmon, 11-Jul-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 → ∀𝑥 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 → ∀𝑥 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴)
2.1.2.4  Elementary properties of class abstractions
Theorem	eqabdv 2875*	Deduction from a wff to a class abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 9-Jul-1994.) Avoid ax-11 2157. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 6-May-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓})
Theorem	eqabcdv 2876*	Deduction from a wff to a class abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 9-Jul-1994.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 16-Nov-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓} = 𝐴)
Theorem	eqabi 2877*	Equality of a class variable and a class abstraction (inference form). (Contributed by NM, 26-May-1993.) Avoid ax-11 2157. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 6-May-2023.)
⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝜑)    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑}
Theorem	abid1 2878*	Every class is equal to a class abstraction (the class of sets belonging to it). Theorem 5.2 of [Quine] p. 35. This is a generalization to classes of cvjust 2731. The proof does not rely on cvjust 2731, so cvjust 2731 could be proved as a special instance of it. Note however that abid1 2878 necessarily relies on df-clel 2816, whereas cvjust 2731 does not. This theorem requires ax-ext 2708, df-clab 2715, df-cleq 2729, df-clel 2816, but to prove that any specific class term not containing class variables is a setvar or is equal to a class abstraction does not require these $a-statements. This last fact is a metatheorem, consequence of the fact that the only $a-statements with typecode class are cv 1539, cab 2714, and statements corresponding to defined class constructors. Note on the simultaneous presence in set.mm of this abid1 2878 and its commuted form abid2 2879: It is rare that two forms so closely related both appear in set.mm. Indeed, such equalities are generally used in later proofs as parts of transitive inferences, and with the many variants of eqtri 2765 (search for *eqtr*), it would be rare that either one would shorten a proof compared to the other. There is typically a choice between what we call a "definitional form", where the shorter expression is on the LHS (left-hand side), and a "computational form", where the shorter expression is on the RHS (right-hand side). An example is df-2 12329 versus 1p1e2 12391. We do not need 1p1e2 12391, but because it occurs "naturally" in computations, it can be useful to have it directly, together with a uniform set of 1-digit operations like 1p2e3 12409, etc. In most cases, we do not need both a definitional and a computational forms. A definitional form would favor consistency with genuine definitions, while a computational form is often more natural. The situation is similar with biconditionals in propositional calculus: see for instance pm4.24 563 and anidm 564, while other biconditionals generally appear in a single form (either definitional, but more often computational). In the present case, the equality is important enough that both abid1 2878 and abid2 2879 are in set.mm. (Contributed by NM, 26-Dec-1993.) (Revised by BJ, 10-Nov-2020.)
⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑥 ∣ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴}
Theorem	abid2 2879*	A simplification of class abstraction. Commuted form of abid1 2878. See comments there. (Contributed by NM, 26-Dec-1993.)
⊢ {𝑥 ∣ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴} = 𝐴
Theorem	eqab 2880*	One direction of eqabb 2881 is provable from fewer axioms. (Contributed by Wolf Lammen, 13-Feb-2025.)
⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝜑) → 𝐴 = {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑})
Theorem	eqabb 2881*	Equality of a class variable and a class abstraction (also called a class builder). Theorem 5.1 of [Quine] p. 34. This theorem shows the relationship between expressions with class abstractions and expressions with class variables. Note that abbib 2811 and its relatives are among those useful for converting theorems with class variables to equivalent theorems with wff variables, by first substituting a class abstraction for each class variable. Class variables can always be eliminated from a theorem to result in an equivalent theorem with wff variables, and vice-versa. The idea is roughly as follows. To convert a theorem with a wff variable 𝜑 (that has a free variable 𝑥) to a theorem with a class variable 𝐴, we substitute 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 for 𝜑 throughout and simplify, where 𝐴 is a new class variable not already in the wff. An example is the conversion of zfauscl 5298 to inex1 5317 (look at the instance of zfauscl 5298 that occurs in the proof of inex1 5317). Conversely, to convert a theorem with a class variable 𝐴 to one with 𝜑, we substitute {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} for 𝐴 throughout and simplify, where 𝑥 and 𝜑 are new setvar and wff variables not already in the wff. Examples include dfsymdif2 4261 and cp 9931; the latter derives a formula containing wff variables from substitution instances of the class variables in its equivalent formulation cplem2 9930. For more information on class variables, see Quine pp. 15-21 and/or Takeuti and Zaring pp. 10-13. Usage of eqabbw 2815 is preferred since it requires fewer axioms. (Contributed by NM, 26-May-1993.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 12-Feb-2025.)
⊢ (𝐴 = {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝜑))
Theorem	eqabbOLD 2882*	Obsolete version of eqabb 2881 as of 12-Feb-2025. (Contributed by NM, 26-May-1993.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 = {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝜑))
Theorem	eqabcb 2883*	Equality of a class variable and a class abstraction. Commuted form of eqabb 2881. (Contributed by NM, 20-Aug-1993.)
⊢ ({𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴))
Theorem	eqabrd 2884	Equality of a class variable and a class abstraction (deduction form of eqabb 2881). (Contributed by NM, 16-Nov-1995.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓})    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝜓))
Theorem	eqabri 2885	Equality of a class variable and a class abstraction (inference form). (Contributed by NM, 3-Apr-1996.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 15-Nov-2019.)
⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝜑)
Theorem	eqabcri 2886	Equality of a class variable and a class abstraction (inference form). (Contributed by NM, 31-Jul-1994.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 15-Nov-2019.)
⊢ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = 𝐴    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	clelab 2887*	Membership of a class variable in a class abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 23-Dec-1993.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 16-Nov-2019.) Avoid ax-11 2157, see sbc5ALT 3817 for more details. (Revised by SN, 2-Sep-2024.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑))
Theorem	clabel 2888*	Membership of a class abstraction in another class. (Contributed by NM, 17-Jan-2006.)
⊢ ({𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ∈ 𝐴 ↔ ∃𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ 𝜑)))
Theorem	sbab 2889*	The right-hand side of the second equality is a way of representing proper substitution of 𝑦 for 𝑥 into a class variable. (Contributed by NM, 14-Sep-2003.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝐴 = {𝑧 ∣ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝑧 ∈ 𝐴})
2.1.3  Class form not-free predicate
Syntax	wnfc 2890	Extend wff definition to include the not-free predicate for classes.
wff Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
Theorem	nfcjust 2891*	Justification theorem for df-nfc 2892. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 13-Oct-2016.)
⊢ (∀𝑦Ⅎ𝑥 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑧Ⅎ𝑥 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴)
Definition	df-nfc 2892*	Define the not-free predicate for classes. This is read "𝑥 is not free in 𝐴". Not-free means that the value of 𝑥 cannot affect the value of 𝐴, e.g., any occurrence of 𝑥 in 𝐴 is effectively bound by a "for all" or something that expands to one (such as "there exists"). It is defined in terms of the not-free predicate df-nf 1784 for wffs; see that definition for more information. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.)
⊢ (Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑦Ⅎ𝑥 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	nfci 2893*	Deduce that a class 𝐴 does not have 𝑥 free in it. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
Theorem	nfcii 2894*	Deduce that a class 𝐴 does not have 𝑥 free in it. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.)
⊢ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 → ∀𝑥 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
Theorem	nfcr 2895*	Consequence of the not-free predicate. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.) Drop ax-12 2177 but use ax-8 2110, df-clel 2816, and avoid a DV condition on 𝑦, 𝐴. (Revised by SN, 3-Jun-2024.)
⊢ (Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 → Ⅎ𝑥 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	nfcrALT 2896*	Alternate version of nfcr 2895. Avoids ax-8 2110 but uses ax-12 2177. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 → Ⅎ𝑥 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	nfcri 2897*	Consequence of the not-free predicate. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.) Avoid ax-10 2141, ax-11 2157. (Revised by GG, 23-May-2024.) Avoid ax-12 2177 (adopting Wolf Lammen's 13-May-2023 proof). (Revised by SN, 3-Jun-2024.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴
Theorem	nfcd 2898*	Deduce that a class 𝐴 does not have 𝑥 free in it. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐴)
Theorem	nfcrd 2899*	Consequence of the not-free predicate. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	nfcrii 2900*	Consequence of the not-free predicate. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.) Avoid ax-10 2141, ax-11 2157. (Revised by GG, 23-May-2024.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 → ∀𝑥 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)