P. 29 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 2801-2900   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	sylan9eqr 2801	An equality transitivity deduction. (Contributed by NM, 8-May-1994.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜓 → 𝐵 = 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝐴 = 𝐶)
Theorem	3eqtr3g 2802	A chained equality inference, useful for converting from definitions. (Contributed by NM, 15-Nov-1994.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐶    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = 𝐷    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = 𝐷)
Theorem	3eqtr3a 2803	A chained equality inference, useful for converting from definitions. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Nov-2015.)
⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = 𝐷)
Theorem	3eqtr4g 2804	A chained equality inference, useful for converting to definitions. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-1993.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = 𝐴    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = 𝐷)
Theorem	3eqtr4a 2805	A chained equality inference, useful for converting to definitions. (Contributed by NM, 2-Feb-2007.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 25-May-2011.)
⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = 𝐷)
Theorem	eq2tri 2806	A compound transitive inference for class equality. (Contributed by NM, 22-Jan-2004.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐶 → 𝐷 = 𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝐵 = 𝐷 → 𝐶 = 𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 = 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 = 𝐹) ↔ (𝐵 = 𝐷 ∧ 𝐴 = 𝐺))
Theorem	abbi1 2807	Equivalent formulas yield equal class abstractions (closed form). This is the forward implication of abbi 2811, proved from fewer axioms. (Contributed by BJ and WL and SN, 20-Aug-2023.)
⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓})
Theorem	abbidv 2808*	Equivalent wff's yield equal class abstractions (deduction form). (Contributed by NM, 10-Aug-1993.) Avoid ax-12 2173, based on an idea of Steven Nguyen. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 6-May-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓} = {𝑥 ∣ 𝜒})
Theorem	abbii 2809	Equivalent wff's yield equal class abstractions (inference form). (Contributed by NM, 26-May-1993.) Remove dependency on ax-10 2139, ax-11 2156, and ax-12 2173. (Revised by Steven Nguyen, 3-May-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓}
Theorem	abbid 2810	Equivalent wff's yield equal class abstractions (deduction form, with nonfreeness hypothesis). (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-1993.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 7-Oct-2016.) Avoid ax-10 2139 and ax-11 2156. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 6-May-2023.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓} = {𝑥 ∣ 𝜒})
Theorem	abbi 2811	Equivalent formulas define equal class abstractions, and conversely. (Contributed by NM, 25-Nov-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.) Remove dependency on ax-8 2110 and df-clel 2817 (by avoiding use of cleqh 2862). (Revised by BJ, 23-Jun-2019.)
⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ↔ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓})
Theorem	cbvabv 2812*	Rule used to change bound variables, using implicit substitution. Version of cbvab 2815 with disjoint variable conditions requiring fewer axioms. (Contributed by NM, 26-May-1999.) Require 𝑥, 𝑦 be disjoint to avoid ax-11 2156 and ax-13 2372. (Revised by Steven Nguyen, 4-Dec-2022.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑦 ∣ 𝜓}
Theorem	cbvabw 2813*	Rule used to change bound variables, using implicit substitution. Version of cbvab 2815 with a disjoint variable condition, which does not require ax-10 2139, ax-13 2372. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 11-Jul-2011.) (Revised by Gino Giotto, 23-May-2024.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑦 ∣ 𝜓}
Theorem	cbvabwOLD 2814*	Obsolete version of cbvabw 2813 as of 23-May-2024. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 11-Jul-2011.) (Revised by Gino Giotto, 10-Jan-2024.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑦 ∣ 𝜓}
Theorem	cbvab 2815	Rule used to change bound variables, using implicit substitution. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2372. Usage of the weaker cbvabw 2813 and cbvabv 2812 are preferred. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 11-Jul-2011.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 16-Nov-2019.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑦 ∣ 𝜓}
Theorem	abeq2w 2816*	Version of abeq2 2871 using implicit substitution, which requires fewer axioms. (Contributed by GG and AV, 18-Sep-2024.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 = {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ ∀𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝜓))
2.1.2.3  Class membership
Definition	df-clel 2817*	Define the membership connective between classes. Theorem 6.3 of [Quine] p. 41, or Proposition 4.6 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 13, which we adopt as a definition. See these references for its metalogical justification. The hypotheses express that all instances of the conclusion where class variables are replaced with setvar variables hold. Therefore, this definition merely extends to class variables something that is true for setvar variables, hence is conservative. This is only a proof sketch of conservativity; for details see Appendix of [Levy] p. 357. This is the reason why we call this axiomatic statement a "definition", even though it does not have the usual form of a definition. If we required a definition to have the usual form, we would call df-clel 2817 an axiom. See also comments under df-clab 2716, df-cleq 2730, and abeq2 2871. Alternate characterizations of 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 when either 𝐴 or 𝐵 is a set are given by clel2g 3581, clel3g 3584, and clel4g 3586. This is called the "axiom of membership" by [Levy] p. 338, who treats the theory of classes as an extralogical extension to our logic and set theory axioms. While the three class definitions df-clab 2716, df-cleq 2730, and df-clel 2817 are eliminable and conservative and thus meet the requirements for sound definitions, they are technically axioms in that they do not satisfy the requirements for the current definition checker. The proofs of conservativity require external justification that is beyond the scope of the definition checker. For a general discussion of the theory of classes, see mmset.html#class 2817. (Contributed by NM, 26-May-1993.) (Revised by BJ, 27-Jun-2019.)
⊢ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑧 ↔ ∃𝑢(𝑢 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝑢 ∈ 𝑧))    &   ⊢ (𝑡 ∈ 𝑡 ↔ ∃𝑣(𝑣 = 𝑡 ∧ 𝑣 ∈ 𝑡))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))
Theorem	dfclel 2818*	Characterization of the elements of a class. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Jun-2019.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))
Theorem	elissetv 2819*	An element of a class exists. Version of elisset 2820 with a disjoint variable condition on 𝑉, 𝑥, avoiding df-clab 2716. Prefer its use over elisset 2820 when sufficient (for instance in usages where 𝑥 is a dummy variable). (Contributed by BJ, 14-Sep-2019.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ∃𝑥 𝑥 = 𝐴)
Theorem	elisset 2820*	An element of a class exists. Use elissetv 2819 instead when sufficient (for instance in usages where 𝑥 is a dummy variable). (Contributed by NM, 1-May-1995.) Reduce dependencies on axioms. (Revised by BJ, 29-Apr-2019.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ∃𝑥 𝑥 = 𝐴)
Theorem	eleq1w 2821	Weaker version of eleq1 2826 (but more general than elequ1 2115) not depending on ax-ext 2709 nor df-cleq 2730. Note that this provides a proof of ax-8 2110 from Tarski's FOL and dfclel 2818 (simply consider an instance where 𝐴 is replaced by a setvar and deduce the forward implication by biimpd 228), which shows that dfclel 2818 is too powerful to be used as a definition instead of df-clel 2817. (Contributed by BJ, 24-Jun-2019.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴))
Theorem	eleq2w 2822	Weaker version of eleq2 2827 (but more general than elequ2 2123) not depending on ax-ext 2709 nor df-cleq 2730. (Contributed by BJ, 29-Sep-2019.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝐴 ∈ 𝑥 ↔ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑦))
Theorem	eleq1d 2823	Deduction from equality to equivalence of membership. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-1993.) Allow shortening of eleq1 2826. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 20-Nov-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ↔ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶))
Theorem	eleq2d 2824	Deduction from equality to equivalence of membership. (Contributed by NM, 27-Dec-1993.) Reduce dependencies on axioms. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 5-Dec-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐵))
Theorem	eleq2dALT 2825	Alternate proof of eleq2d 2824, shorter at the expense of requiring ax-12 2173. (Contributed by NM, 27-Dec-1993.) (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 20-Nov-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐵))
Theorem	eleq1 2826	Equality implies equivalence of membership. (Contributed by NM, 26-May-1993.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 20-Nov-2019.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ↔ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶))
Theorem	eleq2 2827	Equality implies equivalence of membership. (Contributed by NM, 26-May-1993.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 20-Nov-2019.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐵))
Theorem	eleq12 2828	Equality implies equivalence of membership. (Contributed by NM, 31-May-1999.)
⊢ ((𝐴 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 = 𝐷) → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ↔ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷))
Theorem	eleq1i 2829	Inference from equality to equivalence of membership. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-1993.)
⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ↔ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶)
Theorem	eleq2i 2830	Inference from equality to equivalence of membership. (Contributed by NM, 26-May-1993.)
⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐵)
Theorem	eleq12i 2831	Inference from equality to equivalence of membership. (Contributed by NM, 31-May-1994.)
⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = 𝐷    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ↔ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷)
Theorem	eqneltri 2832	If a class is not an element of another class, an equal class is also not an element. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 3-Jan-2021.)
⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵    &   ⊢ ¬ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶    ⇒   ⊢ ¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶
Theorem	eleq12d 2833	Deduction from equality to equivalence of membership. (Contributed by NM, 31-May-1994.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ↔ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷))
Theorem	eleq1a 2834	A transitive-type law relating membership and equality. (Contributed by NM, 9-Apr-1994.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → (𝐶 = 𝐴 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐵))
Theorem	eqeltri 2835	Substitution of equal classes into membership relation. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-1993.)
⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶
Theorem	eqeltrri 2836	Substitution of equal classes into membership relation. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-1993.)
⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵    &   ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶
Theorem	eleqtri 2837	Substitution of equal classes into membership relation. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jul-1993.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = 𝐶    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶
Theorem	eleqtrri 2838	Substitution of equal classes into membership relation. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jul-1993.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶
Theorem	eqeltrd 2839	Substitution of equal classes into membership relation, deduction form. (Contributed by Raph Levien, 10-Dec-2002.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶)
Theorem	eqeltrrd 2840	Deduction that substitutes equal classes into membership. (Contributed by NM, 14-Dec-2004.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶)
Theorem	eleqtrd 2841	Deduction that substitutes equal classes into membership. (Contributed by NM, 14-Dec-2004.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶)
Theorem	eleqtrrd 2842	Deduction that substitutes equal classes into membership. (Contributed by NM, 14-Dec-2004.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶)
Theorem	eqeltrid 2843	A membership and equality inference. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jan-2006.)
⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶)
Theorem	eqeltrrid 2844	A membership and equality inference. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jan-2006.)
⊢ 𝐵 = 𝐴    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶)
Theorem	eleqtrid 2845	A membership and equality inference. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jan-2006.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶)
Theorem	eleqtrrid 2846	A membership and equality inference. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jan-2006.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶)
Theorem	eqeltrdi 2847	A membership and equality inference. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jan-2006.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶)
Theorem	eqeltrrdi 2848	A membership and equality inference. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jan-2006.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = 𝐴)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶)
Theorem	eleqtrdi 2849	A membership and equality inference. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jan-2006.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = 𝐶    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶)
Theorem	eleqtrrdi 2850	A membership and equality inference. (Contributed by NM, 24-Apr-2005.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶)
Theorem	3eltr3i 2851	Substitution of equal classes into membership relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐶    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = 𝐷    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐷
Theorem	3eltr4i 2852	Substitution of equal classes into membership relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = 𝐴    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐷
Theorem	3eltr3d 2853	Substitution of equal classes into membership relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Jan-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐷)
Theorem	3eltr4d 2854	Substitution of equal classes into membership relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Jan-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐷)
Theorem	3eltr3g 2855	Substitution of equal classes into membership relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Jan-2017.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 23-Nov-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐶    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = 𝐷    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐷)
Theorem	3eltr4g 2856	Substitution of equal classes into membership relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Jan-2017.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 23-Nov-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = 𝐴    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐷)
Theorem	eleq2s 2857	Substitution of equal classes into a membership antecedent. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → 𝜑)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 → 𝜑)
Theorem	eqneltrd 2858	If a class is not an element of another class, an equal class is also not an element. Deduction form. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶)
Theorem	eqneltrrd 2859	If a class is not an element of another class, an equal class is also not an element. Deduction form. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 13-Nov-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶)
Theorem	neleqtrd 2860	If a class is not an element of another class, it is also not an element of an equal class. Deduction form. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐵)
Theorem	neleqtrrd 2861	If a class is not an element of another class, it is also not an element of an equal class. Deduction form. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 13-Nov-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	cleqh 2862*	Establish equality between classes, using bound-variable hypotheses instead of distinct variable conditions as in dfcleq 2731. See also cleqf 2937. (Contributed by NM, 26-May-1993.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 14-Nov-2019.) Remove dependency on ax-13 2372. (Revised by BJ, 30-Nov-2020.)
⊢ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 → ∀𝑥 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 → ∀𝑥 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))
Theorem	nelneq 2863	A way of showing two classes are not equal. (Contributed by NM, 1-Apr-1997.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ ¬ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶) → ¬ 𝐴 = 𝐵)
Theorem	nelneq2 2864	A way of showing two classes are not equal. (Contributed by NM, 12-Jan-2002.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶) → ¬ 𝐵 = 𝐶)
Theorem	eqsb1 2865*	Substitution for the left-hand side in an equality. Class version of equsb3 2103. (Contributed by Rodolfo Medina, 28-Apr-2010.)
⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝑥 = 𝐴 ↔ 𝑦 = 𝐴)
Theorem	clelsb1 2866*	Substitution for the first argument of the membership predicate in an atomic formula (class version of elsb1 2116). (Contributed by Rodolfo Medina, 28-Apr-2010.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 14-Jun-2011.)
⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	clelsb2 2867*	Substitution for the second argument of the membership predicate in an atomic formula (class version of elsb2 2125). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 22-Nov-2018.)
⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝐴 ∈ 𝑥 ↔ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑦)
Theorem	hbxfreq 2868	A utility lemma to transfer a bound-variable hypothesis builder into a definition. See hbxfrbi 1828 for equivalence version. (Contributed by NM, 21-Aug-2007.)
⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵    &   ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 → ∀𝑥 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 → ∀𝑥 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	hblem 2869*	Change the free variable of a hypothesis builder. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-1993.) (Revised by Andrew Salmon, 11-Jul-2011.) Add disjoint variable condition to avoid ax-13 2372. See hblemg 2870 for a less restrictive version requiring more axioms. (Revised by Gino Giotto, 20-Jan-2024.)
⊢ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 → ∀𝑥 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 → ∀𝑥 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	hblemg 2870*	Change the free variable of a hypothesis builder. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2372. See hblem 2869 for a version with more disjoint variable conditions, but not requiring ax-13 2372. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-1993.) (Revised by Andrew Salmon, 11-Jul-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 → ∀𝑥 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 → ∀𝑥 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴)
2.1.2.4  Elementary properties of class abstractions
Theorem	abeq2 2871*	Equality of a class variable and a class abstraction (also called a class builder). Theorem 5.1 of [Quine] p. 34. This theorem shows the relationship between expressions with class abstractions and expressions with class variables. Note that abbi 2811 and its relatives are among those useful for converting theorems with class variables to equivalent theorems with wff variables, by first substituting a class abstraction for each class variable. Class variables can always be eliminated from a theorem to result in an equivalent theorem with wff variables, and vice-versa. The idea is roughly as follows. To convert a theorem with a wff variable 𝜑 (that has a free variable 𝑥) to a theorem with a class variable 𝐴, we substitute 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 for 𝜑 throughout and simplify, where 𝐴 is a new class variable not already in the wff. An example is the conversion of zfauscl 5220 to inex1 5236 (look at the instance of zfauscl 5220 that occurs in the proof of inex1 5236). Conversely, to convert a theorem with a class variable 𝐴 to one with 𝜑, we substitute {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} for 𝐴 throughout and simplify, where 𝑥 and 𝜑 are new setvar and wff variables not already in the wff. Examples include dfsymdif2 4181 and cp 9580; the latter derives a formula containing wff variables from substitution instances of the class variables in its equivalent formulation cplem2 9579. For more information on class variables, see Quine pp. 15-21 and/or Takeuti and Zaring pp. 10-13. Usage of abeq2w 2816 is preferred since it requires fewer axioms. (Contributed by NM, 26-May-1993.)
⊢ (𝐴 = {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝜑))
Theorem	abeq1 2872*	Equality of a class variable and a class abstraction. Commuted form of abeq2 2871. (Contributed by NM, 20-Aug-1993.)
⊢ ({𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴))
Theorem	abeq2d 2873	Equality of a class variable and a class abstraction (deduction form of abeq2 2871). (Contributed by NM, 16-Nov-1995.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓})    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝜓))
Theorem	abeq2i 2874	Equality of a class variable and a class abstraction (inference form). (Contributed by NM, 3-Apr-1996.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 15-Nov-2019.)
⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝜑)
Theorem	abeq1i 2875	Equality of a class variable and a class abstraction (inference form). (Contributed by NM, 31-Jul-1994.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 15-Nov-2019.)
⊢ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = 𝐴    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	abbi2dv 2876*	Deduction from a wff to a class abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 9-Jul-1994.) Avoid ax-11 2156. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 6-May-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓})
Theorem	abbi1dv 2877*	Deduction from a wff to a class abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 9-Jul-1994.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 16-Nov-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓} = 𝐴)
Theorem	abbi2i 2878*	Equality of a class variable and a class abstraction (inference form). (Contributed by NM, 26-May-1993.) Avoid ax-11 2156. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 6-May-2023.)
⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝜑)    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑}
Theorem	abbiOLD 2879	Obsolete proof of abbi 2811 as of 7-Jan-2024. (Contributed by NM, 25-Nov-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 16-Nov-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ↔ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓})
Theorem	abid1 2880*	Every class is equal to a class abstraction (the class of sets belonging to it). Theorem 5.2 of [Quine] p. 35. This is a generalization to classes of cvjust 2732. The proof does not rely on cvjust 2732, so cvjust 2732 could be proved as a special instance of it. Note however that abid1 2880 necessarily relies on df-clel 2817, whereas cvjust 2732 does not. This theorem requires ax-ext 2709, df-clab 2716, df-cleq 2730, df-clel 2817, but to prove that any specific class term not containing class variables is a setvar or is equal to a class abstraction does not require these $a-statements. This last fact is a metatheorem, consequence of the fact that the only $a-statements with typecode class are cv 1538, cab 2715, and statements corresponding to defined class constructors. Note on the simultaneous presence in set.mm of this abid1 2880 and its commuted form abid2 2881: It is rare that two forms so closely related both appear in set.mm. Indeed, such equalities are generally used in later proofs as parts of transitive inferences, and with the many variants of eqtri 2766 (search for *eqtr*), it would be rare that either one would shorten a proof compared to the other. There is typically a choice between what we call a "definitional form", where the shorter expression is on the LHS (left-hand side), and a "computational form", where the shorter expression is on the RHS (right-hand side). An example is df-2 11966 versus 1p1e2 12028. We do not need 1p1e2 12028, but because it occurs "naturally" in computations, it can be useful to have it directly, together with a uniform set of 1-digit operations like 1p2e3 12046, etc. In most cases, we do not need both a definitional and a computational forms. A definitional form would favor consistency with genuine definitions, while a computational form is often more natural. The situation is similar with biconditionals in propositional calculus: see for instance pm4.24 563 and anidm 564, while other biconditionals generally appear in a single form (either definitional, but more often computational). In the present case, the equality is important enough that both abid1 2880 and abid2 2881 are in set.mm. (Contributed by NM, 26-Dec-1993.) (Revised by BJ, 10-Nov-2020.)
⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑥 ∣ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴}
Theorem	abid2 2881*	A simplification of class abstraction. Commuted form of abid1 2880. See comments there. (Contributed by NM, 26-Dec-1993.)
⊢ {𝑥 ∣ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴} = 𝐴
Theorem	clelab 2882*	Membership of a class variable in a class abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 23-Dec-1993.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 16-Nov-2019.) Avoid ax-11 2156, see sbc5ALT 3740 for more details. (Revised by SN, 2-Sep-2024.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑))
Theorem	clelabOLD 2883*	Obsolete version of clelab 2882 as of 2-Sep-2024. (Contributed by NM, 23-Dec-1993.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 16-Nov-2019.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑))
Theorem	clabel 2884*	Membership of a class abstraction in another class. (Contributed by NM, 17-Jan-2006.)
⊢ ({𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ∈ 𝐴 ↔ ∃𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ 𝜑)))
Theorem	sbab 2885*	The right-hand side of the second equality is a way of representing proper substitution of 𝑦 for 𝑥 into a class variable. (Contributed by NM, 14-Sep-2003.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝐴 = {𝑧 ∣ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝑧 ∈ 𝐴})
2.1.3  Class form not-free predicate
Syntax	wnfc 2886	Extend wff definition to include the not-free predicate for classes.
wff Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
Theorem	nfcjust 2887*	Justification theorem for df-nfc 2888. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 13-Oct-2016.)
⊢ (∀𝑦Ⅎ𝑥 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑧Ⅎ𝑥 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴)
Definition	df-nfc 2888*	Define the not-free predicate for classes. This is read "𝑥 is not free in 𝐴". Not-free means that the value of 𝑥 cannot affect the value of 𝐴, e.g., any occurrence of 𝑥 in 𝐴 is effectively bound by a "for all" or something that expands to one (such as "there exists"). It is defined in terms of the not-free predicate df-nf 1788 for wffs; see that definition for more information. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.)
⊢ (Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑦Ⅎ𝑥 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	nfci 2889*	Deduce that a class 𝐴 does not have 𝑥 free in it. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
Theorem	nfcii 2890*	Deduce that a class 𝐴 does not have 𝑥 free in it. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.)
⊢ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 → ∀𝑥 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
Theorem	nfcr 2891*	Consequence of the not-free predicate. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.) Drop ax-12 2173 but use ax-8 2110, df-clel 2817, and avoid a DV condition on 𝑦, 𝐴. (Revised by SN, 3-Jun-2024.)
⊢ (Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 → Ⅎ𝑥 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	nfcrALT 2892*	Alternate version of nfcr 2891. Avoids ax-8 2110 but uses ax-12 2173. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 → Ⅎ𝑥 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	nfcri 2893*	Consequence of the not-free predicate. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.) Avoid ax-10 2139, ax-11 2156. (Revised by Gino Giotto, 23-May-2024.) Avoid ax-12 2173 (adopting Wolf Lammen's 13-May-2023 proof). (Revised by SN, 3-Jun-2024.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴
Theorem	nfcd 2894*	Deduce that a class 𝐴 does not have 𝑥 free in it. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐴)
Theorem	nfcrd 2895*	Consequence of the not-free predicate. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	nfcriOLD 2896*	Obsolete version of nfcri 2893 as of 3-Jun-2024. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.) Avoid ax-10 2139, ax-11 2156. (Revised by Gino Giotto, 23-May-2024.) Avoid ax-12 2173. (Revised by SN, 26-May-2024.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴
Theorem	nfcriOLDOLD 2897*	Obsolete version of nfcri 2893 as of 26-May-2024. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.) Avoid ax-10 2139, ax-11 2156. (Revised by Gino Giotto, 23-May-2024.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴
Theorem	nfcrii 2898*	Consequence of the not-free predicate. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.) Avoid ax-10 2139, ax-11 2156. (Revised by Gino Giotto, 23-May-2024.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 → ∀𝑥 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	nfcriiOLD 2899*	Obsolete version of nfcrii 2898 as of 23-May-2024. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 → ∀𝑥 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	nfcriOLDOLDOLD 2900*	Obsolete version of nfcri 2893 as of 23-May-2024. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴