Theorem drnfc1 2949

Description: Formula-building lemma for use with the Distinctor Reduction Theorem. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Oct-2016.) Avoid ax-11 2093. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 10-May-2023.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
drnfc1.1	⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
drnfc1	⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 ↔ Ⅎ𝑦𝐵))

Proof of Theorem drnfc1

Dummy variable 𝑤 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		drnfc1.1	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)
2	1	eleq2d 2851	. . . 4 ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑤 ∈ 𝐵))
3	2	drnf1 2379	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (Ⅎ𝑥 𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ Ⅎ𝑦 𝑤 ∈ 𝐵))
4	3	albidv 1879	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (∀𝑤Ⅎ𝑥 𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑤Ⅎ𝑦 𝑤 ∈ 𝐵))
5		df-nfc 2918	. 2 ⊢ (Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑤Ⅎ𝑥 𝑤 ∈ 𝐴)
6		df-nfc 2918	. 2 ⊢ (Ⅎ𝑦𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑤Ⅎ𝑦 𝑤 ∈ 𝐵)
7	4, 5, 6	3bitr4g 306	1 ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 ↔ Ⅎ𝑦𝐵))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 198  ∀wal 1505   = wceq 1507  Ⅎwnf 1746   ∈ wcel 2050  Ⅎwnfc 2916

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1758  ax-4 1772  ax-5 1869  ax-6 1928  ax-7 1965  ax-8 2052  ax-9 2059  ax-10 2079  ax-12 2106  ax-13 2301  ax-ext 2750

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 199  df-an 388  df-or 834  df-ex 1743  df-nf 1747  df-cleq 2771  df-clel 2846  df-nfc 2918

This theorem is referenced by:  nfabd2  2953  nfabd2OLD  2954  nfcvb  5131  nfriotad  6947  bj-nfcsym  33707