Theorem drnfc1 2920

Description: Formula-building lemma for use with the Distinctor Reduction Theorem. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2369. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Oct-2016.) Avoid ax-8 2106, ax-11 2152. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 22-Sep-2024.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
drnfc1.1	⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
drnfc1	⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 ↔ Ⅎ𝑦𝐵))

Proof of Theorem drnfc1

Dummy variable 𝑤 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		drnfc1.1	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)
2		eleq2w2 2726	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑤 ∈ 𝐵))
3	1, 2	syl 17	. . . 4 ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑤 ∈ 𝐵))
4	3	drnf1 2440	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (Ⅎ𝑥 𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ Ⅎ𝑦 𝑤 ∈ 𝐵))
5	4	albidv 1921	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (∀𝑤Ⅎ𝑥 𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑤Ⅎ𝑦 𝑤 ∈ 𝐵))
6		df-nfc 2883	. 2 ⊢ (Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑤Ⅎ𝑥 𝑤 ∈ 𝐴)
7		df-nfc 2883	. 2 ⊢ (Ⅎ𝑦𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑤Ⅎ𝑦 𝑤 ∈ 𝐵)
8	5, 6, 7	3bitr4g 313	1 ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 ↔ Ⅎ𝑦𝐵))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 205  ∀wal 1537   = wceq 1539  Ⅎwnf 1783   ∈ wcel 2104  Ⅎwnfc 2881

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1795  ax-4 1809  ax-5 1911  ax-6 1969  ax-7 2009  ax-9 2114  ax-10 2135  ax-12 2169  ax-13 2369  ax-ext 2701

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 395  df-or 844  df-ex 1780  df-nf 1784  df-cleq 2722  df-nfc 2883

This theorem is referenced by:  nfabd2  2927  nfcvb  5375  nfriotad  7381  bj-nfcsym  36084