Theorem qseq 39931

Description: The quotient set equal to a class.

This theorem is used when a class 𝐴 is identified with a quotient (dom 𝑅 / 𝑅). In such a situation, every element 𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 is an 𝑅-coset [𝑣]𝑅 for some 𝑣 ∈ dom 𝑅, but there is no requirement that the "witness" 𝑣 be equal to its own block [𝑣]𝑅. 𝐴 is a set of blocks (equivalence classes), not a set of raw witnesses. In particular, when (dom 𝑅 / 𝑅) = 𝐴 is read together with a partition hypothesis 𝑅 Part 𝐴 (defined as dfpart2 40070), 𝐴 is being treated as the set of blocks [𝑣]𝑅; it does not assert any fixed-point condition 𝑣 = [𝑣]𝑅 such as would arise from the mistaken reading 𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑢 = [𝑢]𝑅. Cf. dmqsblocks 40165. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 19-Oct-2018.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
qseq	⊢ ((𝐵 / 𝑅) = 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑢(𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ ∃𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 𝑢 = [𝑣]𝑅))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑢,𝐴   𝑢,𝐵,𝑣   𝑢,𝑅,𝑣

Allowed substitution hint:   𝐴(𝑣)

Proof of Theorem qseq

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-qs 8761	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐵 / 𝑅) = {𝑢 ∣ ∃𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 𝑢 = [𝑣]𝑅}
2	1	eqeq2i 2776	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 = (𝐵 / 𝑅) ↔ 𝐴 = {𝑢 ∣ ∃𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 𝑢 = [𝑣]𝑅})
3		eqcom 2770	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 = (𝐵 / 𝑅) ↔ (𝐵 / 𝑅) = 𝐴)
4		eqabb 2903	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 = {𝑢 ∣ ∃𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 𝑢 = [𝑣]𝑅} ↔ ∀𝑢(𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ ∃𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 𝑢 = [𝑣]𝑅))
5	2, 3, 4	3bitr3i 304	1 ⊢ ((𝐵 / 𝑅) = 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑢(𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ ∃𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 𝑢 = [𝑣]𝑅))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   ↔ wb 209  ∀wal 1568   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2147  {cab 2741  ∃wrex 3090  [cec 8753   / cqs 8754

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1945  ax-6 2002  ax-7 2043  ax-8 2149  ax-9 2157  ax-10 2180  ax-11 2197  ax-12 2216  ax-ext 2735

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-tru 1573  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2102  df-clab 2742  df-cleq 2755  df-clel 2839  df-qs 8761

This theorem is used by:  dmqsblocks  40165