P. 390 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 38901-39000   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	ax5el 38901*	Theorem to add distinct quantifier to atomic formula. This theorem demonstrates the induction basis for ax-5 1910 considered as a metatheorem.) (Contributed by NM, 22-Jun-1993.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 → ∀𝑧 𝑥 ∈ 𝑦)
Theorem	axc11n-16 38902*	This theorem shows that, given ax-c16 38856, we can derive a version of ax-c11n 38852. However, it is weaker than ax-c11n 38852 because it has a distinct variable requirement. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 27-Jul-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑧 → ∀𝑧 𝑧 = 𝑥)
Theorem	dveel2ALT 38903*	Alternate proof of dveel2 2466 using ax-c16 38856 instead of ax-5 1910. (Contributed by NM, 10-May-2008.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 → ∀𝑥 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦))
Theorem	ax12f 38904	Basis step for constructing a substitution instance of ax-c15 38853 without using ax-c15 38853. We can start with any formula 𝜑 in which 𝑥 is not free. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jan-2007.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑)    ⇒   ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑))))
Theorem	ax12eq 38905	Basis step for constructing a substitution instance of ax-c15 38853 without using ax-c15 38853. Atomic formula for equality predicate. (Contributed by NM, 22-Jan-2007.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑧 = 𝑤 → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝑧 = 𝑤))))
Theorem	ax12el 38906	Basis step for constructing a substitution instance of ax-c15 38853 without using ax-c15 38853. Atomic formula for membership predicate. (Contributed by NM, 22-Jan-2007.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑧 ∈ 𝑤 → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑤))))
Theorem	ax12indn 38907	Induction step for constructing a substitution instance of ax-c15 38853 without using ax-c15 38853. Negation case. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jan-2007.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑))))    ⇒   ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (¬ 𝜑 → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → ¬ 𝜑))))
Theorem	ax12indi 38908	Induction step for constructing a substitution instance of ax-c15 38853 without using ax-c15 38853. Implication case. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jan-2007.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑))))    &   ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜓 → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜓))))    ⇒   ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑥 = 𝑦 → ((𝜑 → 𝜓) → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 → 𝜓)))))
Theorem	ax12indalem 38909	Lemma for ax12inda2 38911 and ax12inda 38912. (Contributed by NM, 24-Jan-2007.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑))))    ⇒   ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑧 → (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (∀𝑧𝜑 → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑧𝜑)))))
Theorem	ax12inda2ALT 38910*	Alternate proof of ax12inda2 38911, slightly more direct and not requiring ax-c16 38856. (Contributed by NM, 4-May-2007.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑))))    ⇒   ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (∀𝑧𝜑 → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑧𝜑))))
Theorem	ax12inda2 38911*	Induction step for constructing a substitution instance of ax-c15 38853 without using ax-c15 38853. Quantification case. When 𝑧 and 𝑦 are distinct, this theorem avoids the dummy variables needed by the more general ax12inda 38912. (Contributed by NM, 24-Jan-2007.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑))))    ⇒   ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (∀𝑧𝜑 → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑧𝜑))))
Theorem	ax12inda 38912*	Induction step for constructing a substitution instance of ax-c15 38853 without using ax-c15 38853. Quantification case. (When 𝑧 and 𝑦 are distinct, ax12inda2 38911 may be used instead to avoid the dummy variable 𝑤 in the proof.) (Contributed by NM, 24-Jan-2007.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑤 → (𝑥 = 𝑤 → (𝜑 → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑤 → 𝜑))))    ⇒   ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (∀𝑧𝜑 → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑧𝜑))))
Theorem	ax12v2-o 38913*	Rederivation of ax-c15 38853 from ax12v 2178 (without using ax-c15 38853 or the full ax-12 2177). Thus, the hypothesis (ax12v 2178) provides an alternate axiom that can be used in place of ax-c15 38853. See also axc15 2426. (Contributed by NM, 2-Feb-2007.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑧 → (𝜑 → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑧 → 𝜑)))    ⇒   ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑))))
Theorem	ax12a2-o 38914*	Derive ax-c15 38853 from a hypothesis in the form of ax-12 2177, without using ax-12 2177 or ax-c15 38853. The hypothesis is weaker than ax-12 2177, with 𝑧 both distinct from 𝑥 and not occurring in 𝜑. Thus, the hypothesis provides an alternate axiom that can be used in place of ax-12 2177, if we also have ax-c11 38851, which this proof uses. As Theorem ax12 2427 shows, the distinct variable conditions are optional. An open problem is whether we can derive this with ax-c11n 38852 instead of ax-c11 38851. (Contributed by NM, 2-Feb-2007.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑧 → (∀𝑧𝜑 → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑧 → 𝜑)))    ⇒   ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑))))
Theorem	axc11-o 38915	Show that ax-c11 38851 can be derived from ax-c11n 38852 and ax-12 2177. An open problem is whether this theorem can be derived from ax-c11n 38852 and the others when ax-12 2177 is replaced with ax-c15 38853 or ax12v 2178. See Theorems axc11nfromc11 38890 for the rederivation of ax-c11n 38852 from axc11 2434. Normally, axc11 2434 should be used rather than ax-c11 38851 or axc11-o 38915, except by theorems specifically studying the latter's properties. (Contributed by NM, 16-May-2008.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (∀𝑥𝜑 → ∀𝑦𝜑))
Theorem	fsumshftd 38916*	Index shift of a finite sum with a weaker "implicit substitution" hypothesis than fsumshft 15794. The proof demonstrates how this can be derived starting from from fsumshft 15794. (Contributed by NM, 1-Nov-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑗 ∈ (𝑀...𝑁)) → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑗 = (𝑘 − 𝐾)) → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Σ𝑗 ∈ (𝑀...𝑁)𝐴 = Σ𝑘 ∈ ((𝑀 + 𝐾)...(𝑁 + 𝐾))𝐵)
Axiom	ax-riotaBAD 38917	Define restricted description binder. In case it doesn't exist, we return a set which is not a member of the domain of discourse 𝐴. See also comments for df-iota 6483. (Contributed by NM, 15-Sep-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Oct-2016.) WARNING: THIS "AXIOM", WHICH IS THE OLD df-riota 7360, CONFLICTS WITH (THE NEW) df-riota 7360 AND MAKES THE SYSTEM IN set.mm INCONSISTENT. IT IS TEMPORARY AND WILL BE DELETED AFTER ALL USES ARE ELIMINATED.
⊢ (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑) = if(∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑, (℩𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)), (Undef‘{𝑥 ∣ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴}))
Theorem	riotaclbgBAD 38918*	Closure of restricted iota. (Contributed by NM, 28-Feb-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Dec-2016.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑) ∈ 𝐴))
Theorem	riotaclbBAD 38919*	Closure of restricted iota. (Contributed by NM, 15-Sep-2011.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑) ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	riotasvd 38920*	Deduction version of riotasv 38923. (Contributed by NM, 4-Mar-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Oct-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 = (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝜓 → 𝑥 = 𝐶)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) → ((𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝐷 = 𝐶))
Theorem	riotasv2d 38921*	Value of description binder 𝐷 for a single-valued class expression 𝐶(𝑦) (as in e.g. reusv2 5373). Special case of riota2f 7384. (Contributed by NM, 2-Mar-2013.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑦𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑦𝜒)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 = (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝜓 → 𝑥 = 𝐶)))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐸) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐸) → 𝐶 = 𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜒)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) → 𝐷 = 𝐹)
Theorem	riotasv2s 38922*	The value of description binder 𝐷 for a single-valued class expression 𝐶(𝑦) (as in e.g. reusv2 5373) in the form of a substitution instance. Special case of riota2f 7384. (Contributed by NM, 3-Mar-2013.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 6-Dec-2016.)
⊢ 𝐷 = (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝜑 → 𝑥 = 𝐶))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝐸 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ [𝐸 / 𝑦]𝜑)) → 𝐷 = ⦋𝐸 / 𝑦⦌𝐶)
Theorem	riotasv 38923*	Value of description binder 𝐷 for a single-valued class expression 𝐶(𝑦) (as in e.g. reusv2 5373). Special case of riota2f 7384. (Contributed by NM, 26-Jan-2013.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 6-Dec-2016.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝜑 → 𝑥 = 𝐶))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐷 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝐷 = 𝐶)
Theorem	riotasv3d 38924*	A property 𝜒 holding for a representative of a single-valued class expression 𝐶(𝑦) (see e.g. reusv2 5373) also holds for its description binder 𝐷 (in the form of property 𝜃). (Contributed by NM, 5-Mar-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Oct-2016.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑦𝜃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 = (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝜓 → 𝑥 = 𝐶)))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐶 = 𝐷) → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) → 𝜃)
21.28.4  Experiments with weak deduction theorem
Theorem	elimhyps 38925	A version of elimhyp 4566 using explicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jun-2019.)
⊢ [𝐵 / 𝑥]𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ [if(𝜑, 𝑥, 𝐵) / 𝑥]𝜑
Theorem	dedths 38926	A version of weak deduction theorem dedth 4559 using explicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jun-2019.)
⊢ [if(𝜑, 𝑥, 𝐵) / 𝑥]𝜓    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)
Theorem	renegclALT 38927	Closure law for negative of reals. Demonstrates use of weak deduction theorem with explicit substitution. The proof is much longer than that of renegcl 11544. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jun-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → -𝐴 ∈ ℝ)
Theorem	elimhyps2 38928	Generalization of elimhyps 38925 that is not useful unless we can separately prove ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V. (Contributed by NM, 13-Jun-2019.)
⊢ [𝐵 / 𝑥]𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ [if([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑, 𝐴, 𝐵) / 𝑥]𝜑
Theorem	dedths2 38929	Generalization of dedths 38926 that is not useful unless we can separately prove ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V. (Contributed by NM, 13-Jun-2019.)
⊢ [if([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑, 𝐴, 𝐵) / 𝑥]𝜓    ⇒   ⊢ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 → [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓)
Theorem	nfcxfrdf 38930	A utility lemma to transfer a bound-variable hypothesis builder into a definition. (Contributed by NM, 19-Nov-2020.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐴)
Theorem	nfded 38931	A deduction theorem that converts a not-free inference directly to deduction form. The first hypothesis is the hypothesis of the deduction form. The second is an equality deduction (e.g., (Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 → ∪ {𝑦 ∣ ∀𝑥𝑦 ∈ 𝐴} = ∪ 𝐴)) that starts from abidnf 3685. The last is assigned to the inference form (e.g., Ⅎ𝑥∪ {𝑦 ∣ ∀𝑥𝑦 ∈ 𝐴}) whose hypothesis is satisfied using nfaba1 2906. (Contributed by NM, 19-Nov-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐴)    &   ⊢ (Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 → 𝐵 = 𝐶)    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐶)
Theorem	nfded2 38932	A deduction theorem that converts a not-free inference directly to deduction form. The first 2 hypotheses are the hypotheses of the deduction form. The third is an equality deduction (e.g., ((Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 ∧ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵) → ⟨{𝑦 ∣ ∀𝑥𝑦 ∈ 𝐴}, {𝑦 ∣ ∀𝑥𝑦 ∈ 𝐵}⟩ = ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩) for nfopd 4866) that starts from abidnf 3685. The last is assigned to the inference form (e.g., Ⅎ𝑥⟨{𝑦 ∣ ∀𝑥𝑦 ∈ 𝐴}, {𝑦 ∣ ∀𝑥𝑦 ∈ 𝐵}⟩ for nfop 4865) whose hypotheses are satisfied using nfaba1 2906. (Contributed by NM, 19-Nov-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐵)    &   ⊢ ((Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 ∧ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵) → 𝐶 = 𝐷)    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐶    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐷)
Theorem	nfunidALT2 38933	Deduction version of nfuni 4890. (Contributed by NM, 19-Nov-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥∪ 𝐴)
Theorem	nfunidALT 38934	Deduction version of nfuni 4890. (Contributed by NM, 19-Nov-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥∪ 𝐴)
Theorem	nfopdALT 38935	Deduction version of bound-variable hypothesis builder nfop 4865. This shows how the deduction version of a not-free theorem such as nfop 4865 can be created from the corresponding not-free inference theorem. (Contributed by NM, 19-Nov-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩)
21.28.5  Miscellanea
Theorem	cnaddcom 38936	Recover the commutative law of addition for complex numbers from the Abelian group structure. (Contributed by NM, 17-Mar-2013.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴 + 𝐵) = (𝐵 + 𝐴))
Theorem	toycom 38937*	Show the commutative law for an operation 𝑂 on a toy structure class 𝐶 of commutative operations on ℂ. This illustrates how a structure class can be partially specialized. In practice, we would ordinarily define a new constant such as "CAbel" in place of 𝐶. (Contributed by NM, 17-Mar-2013.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑔 ∈ Abel ∣ (Base‘𝑔) = ℂ}    &   ⊢ + = (+g‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴 + 𝐵) = (𝐵 + 𝐴))
21.28.6  Atoms, hyperplanes, and covering in a left vector space (or module)
Syntax	clsa 38938	Extend class notation with all 1-dim subspaces (atoms) of a left module or left vector space.
class LSAtoms
Syntax	clsh 38939	Extend class notation with all subspaces of a left module or left vector space that are hyperplanes.
class LSHyp
Definition	df-lsatoms 38940*	Define the set of all 1-dim subspaces (atoms) of a left module or left vector space. (Contributed by NM, 9-Apr-2014.)
⊢ LSAtoms = (𝑤 ∈ V ↦ ran (𝑣 ∈ ((Base‘𝑤) ∖ {(0g‘𝑤)}) ↦ ((LSpan‘𝑤)‘{𝑣})))
Definition	df-lshyp 38941*	Define the set of all hyperplanes of a left module or left vector space. Also called co-atoms, these are subspaces that are one dimension less than the full space. (Contributed by NM, 29-Jun-2014.)
⊢ LSHyp = (𝑤 ∈ V ↦ {𝑠 ∈ (LSubSp‘𝑤) ∣ (𝑠 ≠ (Base‘𝑤) ∧ ∃𝑣 ∈ (Base‘𝑤)((LSpan‘𝑤)‘(𝑠 ∪ {𝑣})) = (Base‘𝑤))})
Theorem	lshpset 38942*	The set of all hyperplanes of a left module or left vector space. The vector 𝑣 is called a generating vector for the hyperplane. (Contributed by NM, 29-Jun-2014.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (LSpan‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (LSubSp‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LSHyp‘𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ 𝑋 → 𝐻 = {𝑠 ∈ 𝑆 ∣ (𝑠 ≠ 𝑉 ∧ ∃𝑣 ∈ 𝑉 (𝑁‘(𝑠 ∪ {𝑣})) = 𝑉)})
Theorem	islshp 38943*	The predicate "is a hyperplane" (of a left module or left vector space). (Contributed by NM, 29-Jun-2014.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (LSpan‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (LSubSp‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LSHyp‘𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ 𝑋 → (𝑈 ∈ 𝐻 ↔ (𝑈 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑈 ≠ 𝑉 ∧ ∃𝑣 ∈ 𝑉 (𝑁‘(𝑈 ∪ {𝑣})) = 𝑉)))
Theorem	islshpsm 38944*	Hyperplane properties expressed with subspace sum. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jul-2014.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (LSpan‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (LSubSp‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LSHyp‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LMod)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑈 ∈ 𝐻 ↔ (𝑈 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑈 ≠ 𝑉 ∧ ∃𝑣 ∈ 𝑉 (𝑈 ⊕ (𝑁‘{𝑣})) = 𝑉)))
Theorem	lshplss 38945	A hyperplane is a subspace. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jul-2014.)
⊢ 𝑆 = (LSubSp‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LSHyp‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LMod)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝐻)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑆)
Theorem	lshpne 38946	A hyperplane is not equal to the vector space. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jul-2014.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LSHyp‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LMod)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝐻)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ≠ 𝑉)
Theorem	lshpnel 38947	A hyperplane's generating vector does not belong to the hyperplane. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jul-2014.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (LSpan‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LSHyp‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LMod)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝐻)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑈 ⊕ (𝑁‘{𝑋})) = 𝑉)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑈)
Theorem	lshpnelb 38948	The subspace sum of a hyperplane and the span of an element equals the vector space iff the element is not in the hyperplane. (Contributed by NM, 2-Oct-2014.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (LSpan‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LSHyp‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LVec)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝐻)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (¬ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑈 ↔ (𝑈 ⊕ (𝑁‘{𝑋})) = 𝑉))
Theorem	lshpnel2N 38949	Condition that determines a hyperplane. (Contributed by NM, 3-Oct-2014.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (LSubSp‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (LSpan‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LSHyp‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LVec)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ≠ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑈)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑈 ∈ 𝐻 ↔ (𝑈 ⊕ (𝑁‘{𝑋})) = 𝑉))
Theorem	lshpne0 38950	The member of the span in the hyperplane definition does not belong to the hyperplane. (Contributed by NM, 14-Jul-2014.) (Proof shortened by AV, 19-Jul-2022.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (LSpan‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LSHyp‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LMod)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝐻)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑈 ⊕ (𝑁‘{𝑋})) = 𝑉)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≠ 0 )
Theorem	lshpdisj 38951	A hyperplane and the span in the hyperplane definition are disjoint. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jul-2014.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (LSpan‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LSHyp‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LVec)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝐻)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑈 ⊕ (𝑁‘{𝑋})) = 𝑉)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑈 ∩ (𝑁‘{𝑋})) = { 0 })
Theorem	lshpcmp 38952	If two hyperplanes are comparable, they are equal. (Contributed by NM, 9-Oct-2014.)
⊢ 𝐻 = (LSHyp‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LVec)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ 𝐻)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝐻)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑇 ⊆ 𝑈 ↔ 𝑇 = 𝑈))
Theorem	lshpinN 38953	The intersection of two different hyperplanes is not a hyperplane. (Contributed by NM, 29-Oct-2014.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐻 = (LSHyp‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LVec)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ 𝐻)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝐻)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑇 ∩ 𝑈) ∈ 𝐻 ↔ 𝑇 = 𝑈))
Theorem	lsatset 38954*	The set of all 1-dim subspaces (atoms) of a left module or left vector space. (Contributed by NM, 9-Apr-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 22-Sep-2015.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (LSpan‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (LSAtoms‘𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ 𝑋 → 𝐴 = ran (𝑣 ∈ (𝑉 ∖ { 0 }) ↦ (𝑁‘{𝑣})))
Theorem	islsat 38955*	The predicate "is a 1-dim subspace (atom)" (of a left module or left vector space). (Contributed by NM, 9-Apr-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jun-2014.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (LSpan‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (LSAtoms‘𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ 𝑋 → (𝑈 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ (𝑉 ∖ { 0 })𝑈 = (𝑁‘{𝑥})))
Theorem	lsatlspsn2 38956	The span of a nonzero singleton is an atom. TODO: make this obsolete and use lsatlspsn 38957 instead? (Contributed by NM, 9-Apr-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jun-2014.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (LSpan‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (LSAtoms‘𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑋 ≠ 0 ) → (𝑁‘{𝑋}) ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	lsatlspsn 38957	The span of a nonzero singleton is an atom. (Contributed by NM, 16-Jan-2015.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (LSpan‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (LSAtoms‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LMod)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (𝑉 ∖ { 0 }))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑁‘{𝑋}) ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	islsati 38958*	A 1-dim subspace (atom) (of a left module or left vector space) equals the span of some vector. (Contributed by NM, 1-Oct-2014.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (LSpan‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (LSAtoms‘𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝐴) → ∃𝑣 ∈ 𝑉 𝑈 = (𝑁‘{𝑣}))
Theorem	lsateln0 38959*	A 1-dim subspace (atom) (of a left module or left vector space) contains a nonzero vector. (Contributed by NM, 2-Jan-2015.)
⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (LSAtoms‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LMod)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑣 ∈ 𝑈 𝑣 ≠ 0 )
Theorem	lsatlss 38960	The set of 1-dim subspaces is a set of subspaces. (Contributed by NM, 9-Apr-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jun-2014.)
⊢ 𝑆 = (LSubSp‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (LSAtoms‘𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ LMod → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑆)
Theorem	lsatlssel 38961	An atom is a subspace. (Contributed by NM, 25-Aug-2014.)
⊢ 𝑆 = (LSubSp‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (LSAtoms‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LMod)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑆)
Theorem	lsatssv 38962	An atom is a set of vectors. (Contributed by NM, 27-Feb-2015.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (LSAtoms‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LMod)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ⊆ 𝑉)
Theorem	lsatn0 38963	A 1-dim subspace (atom) of a left module or left vector space is nonzero. (atne0 32272 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 25-Aug-2014.)
⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (LSAtoms‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LMod)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ≠ { 0 })
Theorem	lsatspn0 38964	The span of a vector is an atom iff the vector is nonzero. (Contributed by NM, 4-Feb-2015.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (LSpan‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (LSAtoms‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LMod)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑁‘{𝑋}) ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑋 ≠ 0 ))
Theorem	lsator0sp 38965	The span of a vector is either an atom or the zero subspace. (Contributed by NM, 15-Mar-2015.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (LSpan‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (LSAtoms‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LMod)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑁‘{𝑋}) ∈ 𝐴 ∨ (𝑁‘{𝑋}) = { 0 }))
Theorem	lsatssn0 38966	A subspace (or any class) including an atom is nonzero. (Contributed by NM, 3-Feb-2015.)
⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (LSAtoms‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LMod)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ⊆ 𝑈)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ≠ { 0 })
Theorem	lsatcmp 38967	If two atoms are comparable, they are equal. (atsseq 32274 analog.) TODO: can lspsncmp 21075 shorten this? (Contributed by NM, 25-Aug-2014.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (LSAtoms‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LVec)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑇 ⊆ 𝑈 ↔ 𝑇 = 𝑈))
Theorem	lsatcmp2 38968	If an atom is included in at-most an atom, they are equal. More general version of lsatcmp 38967. TODO: can lspsncmp 21075 shorten this? (Contributed by NM, 3-Feb-2015.)
⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (LSAtoms‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LVec)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑈 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑈 = { 0 }))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑇 ⊆ 𝑈 ↔ 𝑇 = 𝑈))
Theorem	lsatel 38969	A nonzero vector in an atom determines the atom. (Contributed by NM, 25-Aug-2014.)
⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (LSpan‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (LSAtoms‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LVec)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≠ 0 )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 = (𝑁‘{𝑋}))
Theorem	lsatelbN 38970	A nonzero vector in an atom determines the atom. (Contributed by NM, 3-Feb-2015.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (LSpan‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (LSAtoms‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LVec)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (𝑉 ∖ { 0 }))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 ∈ 𝑈 ↔ 𝑈 = (𝑁‘{𝑋})))
Theorem	lsat2el 38971	Two atoms sharing a nonzero vector are equal. (Contributed by NM, 8-Mar-2015.)
⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (LSAtoms‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LVec)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≠ 0 )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑄)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 = 𝑄)
Theorem	lsmsat 38972*	Convert comparison of atom with sum of subspaces to a comparison to sum with atom. (elpaddatiN 39770 analog.) TODO: any way to shorten this? (Contributed by NM, 15-Jan-2015.)
⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (LSubSp‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (LSAtoms‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LMod)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ≠ { 0 })    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ⊆ (𝑇 ⊕ 𝑈))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑝 ⊆ 𝑇 ∧ 𝑄 ⊆ (𝑝 ⊕ 𝑈)))
Theorem	lsatfixedN 38973*	Show equality with the span of the sum of two vectors, one of which (𝑋) is fixed in advance. Compare lspfixed 21087. (Contributed by NM, 29-May-2015.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ + = (+g‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (LSpan‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (LSAtoms‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LVec)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ≠ (𝑁‘{𝑋}))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ≠ (𝑁‘{𝑌}))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ⊆ (𝑁‘{𝑋, 𝑌}))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑧 ∈ ((𝑁‘{𝑌}) ∖ { 0 })𝑄 = (𝑁‘{(𝑋 + 𝑧)}))
Theorem	lsmsatcv 38974	Subspace sum has the covering property (using spans of singletons to represent atoms). Similar to Exercise 5 of [Kalmbach] p. 153. (spansncvi 31579 analog.) Explicit atom version of lsmcv 21100. (Contributed by NM, 29-Oct-2014.)
⊢ 𝑆 = (LSubSp‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (LSAtoms‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LVec)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑇 ⊊ 𝑈 ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ (𝑇 ⊕ 𝑄)) → 𝑈 = (𝑇 ⊕ 𝑄))
Theorem	lssatomic 38975*	The lattice of subspaces is atomic, i.e. any nonzero element is greater than or equal to some atom. (shatomici 32285 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 10-Jan-2015.)
⊢ 𝑆 = (LSubSp‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (LSAtoms‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LMod)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ≠ { 0 })    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑞 ∈ 𝐴 𝑞 ⊆ 𝑈)
Theorem	lssats 38976*	The lattice of subspaces is atomistic, i.e. any element is the supremum of its atoms. Part of proof of Theorem 16.9 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 70. Hypothesis (shatomistici 32288 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 9-Apr-2014.)
⊢ 𝑆 = (LSubSp‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (LSpan‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (LSAtoms‘𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝑆) → 𝑈 = (𝑁‘∪ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝑈}))
Theorem	lpssat 38977*	Two subspaces in a proper subset relationship imply the existence of an atom less than or equal to one but not the other. (chpssati 32290 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 11-Jan-2015.)
⊢ 𝑆 = (LSubSp‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (LSAtoms‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LMod)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ⊊ 𝑈)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑞 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑞 ⊆ 𝑈 ∧ ¬ 𝑞 ⊆ 𝑇))
Theorem	lrelat 38978*	Subspaces are relatively atomic. Remark 2 of [Kalmbach] p. 149. (chrelati 32291 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 11-Jan-2015.)
⊢ 𝑆 = (LSubSp‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (LSAtoms‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LMod)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ⊊ 𝑈)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑞 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑇 ⊊ (𝑇 ⊕ 𝑞) ∧ (𝑇 ⊕ 𝑞) ⊆ 𝑈))
Theorem	lssatle 38979*	The ordering of two subspaces is determined by the atoms under them. (chrelat3 32298 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 29-Oct-2014.)
⊢ 𝑆 = (LSubSp‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (LSAtoms‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LMod)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑇 ⊆ 𝑈 ↔ ∀𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑝 ⊆ 𝑇 → 𝑝 ⊆ 𝑈)))
Theorem	lssat 38980*	Two subspaces in a proper subset relationship imply the existence of a 1-dim subspace less than or equal to one but not the other. (chpssati 32290 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 9-Apr-2014.)
⊢ 𝑆 = (LSubSp‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (LSAtoms‘𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑉 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑈 ⊊ 𝑉) → ∃𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑝 ⊆ 𝑉 ∧ ¬ 𝑝 ⊆ 𝑈))
Theorem	islshpat 38981*	Hyperplane properties expressed with subspace sum and an atom. TODO: can proof be shortened? Seems long for a simple variation of islshpsm 38944. (Contributed by NM, 11-Jan-2015.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (LSubSp‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LSHyp‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (LSAtoms‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LMod)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑈 ∈ 𝐻 ↔ (𝑈 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑈 ≠ 𝑉 ∧ ∃𝑞 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑈 ⊕ 𝑞) = 𝑉)))
Syntax	clcv 38982	Extend class notation with the covering relation for a left module or left vector space.
class ⋖L
Definition	df-lcv 38983*	Define the covering relation for subspaces of a left vector space. Similar to Definition 3.2.18 of [PtakPulmannova] p. 68. Ptak/Pulmannova's notation 𝐴( ⋖L ‘𝑊)𝐵 is read "𝐵 covers 𝐴 " or "𝐴 is covered by 𝐵 " , and it means that 𝐵 is larger than 𝐴 and there is nothing in between. See lcvbr 38985 for binary relation. (df-cv 32206 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 7-Jan-2015.)
⊢ ⋖L = (𝑤 ∈ V ↦ {⟨𝑡, 𝑢⟩ ∣ ((𝑡 ∈ (LSubSp‘𝑤) ∧ 𝑢 ∈ (LSubSp‘𝑤)) ∧ (𝑡 ⊊ 𝑢 ∧ ¬ ∃𝑠 ∈ (LSubSp‘𝑤)(𝑡 ⊊ 𝑠 ∧ 𝑠 ⊊ 𝑢)))})
Theorem	lcvfbr 38984*	The covers relation for a left vector space (or a left module). (Contributed by NM, 7-Jan-2015.)
⊢ 𝑆 = (LSubSp‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖L ‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ 𝑋)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = {⟨𝑡, 𝑢⟩ ∣ ((𝑡 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑢 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑡 ⊊ 𝑢 ∧ ¬ ∃𝑠 ∈ 𝑆 (𝑡 ⊊ 𝑠 ∧ 𝑠 ⊊ 𝑢)))})
Theorem	lcvbr 38985*	The covers relation for a left vector space (or a left module). (cvbr 32209 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 9-Jan-2015.)
⊢ 𝑆 = (LSubSp‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖L ‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ 𝑋)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑇𝐶𝑈 ↔ (𝑇 ⊊ 𝑈 ∧ ¬ ∃𝑠 ∈ 𝑆 (𝑇 ⊊ 𝑠 ∧ 𝑠 ⊊ 𝑈))))
Theorem	lcvbr2 38986*	The covers relation for a left vector space (or a left module). (cvbr2 32210 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 9-Jan-2015.)
⊢ 𝑆 = (LSubSp‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖L ‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ 𝑋)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑇𝐶𝑈 ↔ (𝑇 ⊊ 𝑈 ∧ ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝑆 ((𝑇 ⊊ 𝑠 ∧ 𝑠 ⊆ 𝑈) → 𝑠 = 𝑈))))
Theorem	lcvbr3 38987*	The covers relation for a left vector space (or a left module). (Contributed by NM, 9-Jan-2015.)
⊢ 𝑆 = (LSubSp‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖L ‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ 𝑋)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑇𝐶𝑈 ↔ (𝑇 ⊊ 𝑈 ∧ ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝑆 ((𝑇 ⊆ 𝑠 ∧ 𝑠 ⊆ 𝑈) → (𝑠 = 𝑇 ∨ 𝑠 = 𝑈)))))
Theorem	lcvpss 38988	The covers relation implies proper subset. (cvpss 32212 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 7-Jan-2015.)
⊢ 𝑆 = (LSubSp‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖L ‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ 𝑋)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇𝐶𝑈)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ⊊ 𝑈)
Theorem	lcvnbtwn 38989	The covers relation implies no in-betweenness. (cvnbtwn 32213 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 7-Jan-2015.)
⊢ 𝑆 = (LSubSp‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖L ‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ 𝑋)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅𝐶𝑇)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝑅 ⊊ 𝑈 ∧ 𝑈 ⊊ 𝑇))
Theorem	lcvntr 38990	The covers relation is not transitive. (cvntr 32219 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 10-Jan-2015.)
⊢ 𝑆 = (LSubSp‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖L ‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ 𝑋)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅𝐶𝑇)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇𝐶𝑈)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝑅𝐶𝑈)
Theorem	lcvnbtwn2 38991	The covers relation implies no in-betweenness. (cvnbtwn2 32214 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 7-Jan-2015.)
⊢ 𝑆 = (LSubSp‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖L ‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ 𝑋)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅𝐶𝑇)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ⊊ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ⊆ 𝑇)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 = 𝑇)
Theorem	lcvnbtwn3 38992	The covers relation implies no in-betweenness. (cvnbtwn3 32215 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 7-Jan-2015.)
⊢ 𝑆 = (LSubSp‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖L ‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ 𝑋)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅𝐶𝑇)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ⊆ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ⊊ 𝑇)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 = 𝑅)
Theorem	lsmcv2 38993	Subspace sum has the covering property (using spans of singletons to represent atoms). Proposition 1(ii) of [Kalmbach] p. 153. (spansncv2 32220 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 10-Jan-2015.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (LSubSp‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (LSpan‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖L ‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LVec)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝑁‘{𝑋}) ⊆ 𝑈)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈𝐶(𝑈 ⊕ (𝑁‘{𝑋})))
Theorem	lcvat 38994*	If a subspace covers another, it equals the other joined with some atom. This is a consequence of relative atomicity. (cvati 32293 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 11-Jan-2015.)
⊢ 𝑆 = (LSubSp‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (LSAtoms‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖L ‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LMod)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇𝐶𝑈)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑞 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑇 ⊕ 𝑞) = 𝑈)
Theorem	lsatcv0 38995	An atom covers the zero subspace. (atcv0 32269 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 7-Jan-2015.)
⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (LSAtoms‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖L ‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LVec)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → { 0 }𝐶𝑄)
Theorem	lsatcveq0 38996	A subspace covered by an atom must be the zero subspace. (atcveq0 32275 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 7-Jan-2015.)
⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (LSubSp‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (LSAtoms‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖L ‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LVec)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑈𝐶𝑄 ↔ 𝑈 = { 0 }))
Theorem	lsat0cv 38997	A subspace is an atom iff it covers the zero subspace. This could serve as an alternate definition of an atom. TODO: this is a quick-and-dirty proof that could probably be more efficient. (Contributed by NM, 14-Mar-2015.)
⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (LSubSp‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (LSAtoms‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖L ‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LVec)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑈 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ { 0 }𝐶𝑈))
Theorem	lcvexchlem1 38998	Lemma for lcvexch 39003. (Contributed by NM, 10-Jan-2015.)
⊢ 𝑆 = (LSubSp‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖L ‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LMod)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑇 ⊊ (𝑇 ⊕ 𝑈) ↔ (𝑇 ∩ 𝑈) ⊊ 𝑈))
Theorem	lcvexchlem2 38999	Lemma for lcvexch 39003. (Contributed by NM, 10-Jan-2015.)
⊢ 𝑆 = (LSubSp‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖L ‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LMod)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑇 ∩ 𝑈) ⊆ 𝑅)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ⊆ 𝑈)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑅 ⊕ 𝑇) ∩ 𝑈) = 𝑅)
Theorem	lcvexchlem3 39000	Lemma for lcvexch 39003. (Contributed by NM, 10-Jan-2015.)
⊢ 𝑆 = (LSubSp‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖L ‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LMod)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ⊆ 𝑅)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ⊆ (𝑇 ⊕ 𝑈))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑅 ∩ 𝑈) ⊕ 𝑇) = 𝑅)