P. 390 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 38901-39000   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	sstotbnd 38901*	Condition for a subset of a metric space to be totally bounded. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 12-Sep-2015.)
⊢ 𝑁 = (𝑀 ↾ (𝑌 × 𝑌))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ (Met‘𝑋) ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝑋) → (𝑁 ∈ (TotBnd‘𝑌) ↔ ∀𝑑 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑣 ∈ Fin (𝑌 ⊆ ∪ 𝑣 ∧ ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝑣 ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 𝑏 = (𝑥(ball‘𝑀)𝑑))))
Theorem	sstotbnd3 38902*	Use a net that is not necessarily finite, but for which only finitely many balls meet the subset. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Sep-2015.)
⊢ 𝑁 = (𝑀 ↾ (𝑌 × 𝑌))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ (Met‘𝑋) ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝑋) → (𝑁 ∈ (TotBnd‘𝑌) ↔ ∀𝑑 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑣 ∈ 𝒫 𝑋(𝑌 ⊆ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑣 (𝑥(ball‘𝑀)𝑑) ∧ {𝑥 ∈ 𝑣 ∣ ((𝑥(ball‘𝑀)𝑑) ∩ 𝑌) ≠ ∅} ∈ Fin)))
Theorem	totbndss 38903	A subset of a totally bounded metric space is totally bounded. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 12-Sep-2015.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ (TotBnd‘𝑋) ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑋) → (𝑀 ↾ (𝑆 × 𝑆)) ∈ (TotBnd‘𝑆))
Theorem	equivtotbnd 38904*	If the metric 𝑀 is "strongly finer" than 𝑁 (meaning that there is a positive real constant 𝑅 such that 𝑁(𝑥, 𝑦) ≤ 𝑅 · 𝑀(𝑥, 𝑦)), then total boundedness of 𝑀 implies total boundedness of 𝑁. (Using this theorem twice in each direction states that if two metrics are strongly equivalent, then one is totally bounded iff the other is.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Sep-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ (TotBnd‘𝑋))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (Met‘𝑋))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ ℝ+)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑋)) → (𝑥𝑁𝑦) ≤ (𝑅 · (𝑥𝑀𝑦)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (TotBnd‘𝑋))
Definition	df-bnd 38905*	Define the class of bounded metrics. A metric space is bounded iff it can be covered by a single ball. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.)
⊢ Bnd = (𝑥 ∈ V ↦ {𝑚 ∈ (Met‘𝑥) ∣ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∃𝑟 ∈ ℝ+ 𝑥 = (𝑦(ball‘𝑚)𝑟)})
Theorem	isbnd 38906*	The predicate "is a bounded metric space". (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 12-Sep-2015.)
⊢ (𝑀 ∈ (Bnd‘𝑋) ↔ (𝑀 ∈ (Met‘𝑋) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∃𝑟 ∈ ℝ+ 𝑋 = (𝑥(ball‘𝑀)𝑟)))
Theorem	bndmet 38907	A bounded metric space is a metric space. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Sep-2015.)
⊢ (𝑀 ∈ (Bnd‘𝑋) → 𝑀 ∈ (Met‘𝑋))
Theorem	isbndx 38908*	A "bounded extended metric" (meaning that it satisfies the same condition as a bounded metric, but with "metric" replaced with "extended metric") is a metric and thus is bounded in the conventional sense. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Sep-2015.)
⊢ (𝑀 ∈ (Bnd‘𝑋) ↔ (𝑀 ∈ (∞Met‘𝑋) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∃𝑟 ∈ ℝ+ 𝑋 = (𝑥(ball‘𝑀)𝑟)))
Theorem	isbnd2 38909*	The predicate "is a bounded metric space". Uses a single point instead of an arbitrary point in the space. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ (Bnd‘𝑋) ∧ 𝑋 ≠ ∅) ↔ (𝑀 ∈ (∞Met‘𝑋) ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∃𝑟 ∈ ℝ+ 𝑋 = (𝑥(ball‘𝑀)𝑟)))
Theorem	isbnd3 38910*	A metric space is bounded iff the metric function maps to some bounded real interval. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 13-Sep-2015.)
⊢ (𝑀 ∈ (Bnd‘𝑋) ↔ (𝑀 ∈ (Met‘𝑋) ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ 𝑀:(𝑋 × 𝑋)⟶(0[,]𝑥)))
Theorem	isbnd3b 38911*	A metric space is bounded iff the metric function maps to some bounded real interval. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Sep-2015.)
⊢ (𝑀 ∈ (Bnd‘𝑋) ↔ (𝑀 ∈ (Met‘𝑋) ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑋 (𝑦𝑀𝑧) ≤ 𝑥))
Theorem	bndss 38912	A subset of a bounded metric space is bounded. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ (Bnd‘𝑋) ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑋) → (𝑀 ↾ (𝑆 × 𝑆)) ∈ (Bnd‘𝑆))
Theorem	blbnd 38913	A ball is bounded. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 15-Jan-2014.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ (∞Met‘𝑋) ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ ℝ) → (𝑀 ↾ ((𝑌(ball‘𝑀)𝑅) × (𝑌(ball‘𝑀)𝑅))) ∈ (Bnd‘(𝑌(ball‘𝑀)𝑅)))
Theorem	ssbnd 38914*	A subset of a metric space is bounded iff it is contained in a ball around 𝑃, for any 𝑃 in the larger space. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Sep-2015.)
⊢ 𝑁 = (𝑀 ↾ (𝑌 × 𝑌))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ (Met‘𝑋) ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝑋) → (𝑁 ∈ (Bnd‘𝑌) ↔ ∃𝑑 ∈ ℝ 𝑌 ⊆ (𝑃(ball‘𝑀)𝑑)))
Theorem	totbndbnd 38915	A totally bounded metric space is bounded. This theorem fails for extended metrics - a bounded extended metric is a metric, but there are totally bounded extended metrics that are not metrics (if we were to weaken istotbnd 38895 to only require that 𝑀 be an extended metric). A counterexample is the discrete extended metric (assigning distinct points distance +∞) on a finite set. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 12-Sep-2015.)
⊢ (𝑀 ∈ (TotBnd‘𝑋) → 𝑀 ∈ (Bnd‘𝑋))
Theorem	equivbnd 38916*	If the metric 𝑀 is "strongly finer" than 𝑁 (meaning that there is a positive real constant 𝑅 such that 𝑁(𝑥, 𝑦) ≤ 𝑅 · 𝑀(𝑥, 𝑦)), then boundedness of 𝑀 implies boundedness of 𝑁. (Using this theorem twice in each direction states that if two metrics are strongly equivalent, then one is bounded iff the other is.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Sep-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ (Bnd‘𝑋))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (Met‘𝑋))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ ℝ+)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑋)) → (𝑥𝑁𝑦) ≤ (𝑅 · (𝑥𝑀𝑦)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (Bnd‘𝑋))
Theorem	bnd2lem 38917	Lemma for equivbnd2 38918 and similar theorems. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 16-Sep-2015.)
⊢ 𝐷 = (𝑀 ↾ (𝑌 × 𝑌))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ (Met‘𝑋) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (Bnd‘𝑌)) → 𝑌 ⊆ 𝑋)
Theorem	equivbnd2 38918*	If balls are totally bounded in the metric 𝑀, then balls are totally bounded in the equivalent metric 𝑁. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Sep-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ (Met‘𝑋))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (Met‘𝑋))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ ℝ+)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ ℝ+)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑋)) → (𝑥𝑁𝑦) ≤ (𝑅 · (𝑥𝑀𝑦)))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑋)) → (𝑥𝑀𝑦) ≤ (𝑆 · (𝑥𝑁𝑦)))    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (𝑀 ↾ (𝑌 × 𝑌))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (𝑁 ↾ (𝑌 × 𝑌))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 ∈ (TotBnd‘𝑌) ↔ 𝐶 ∈ (Bnd‘𝑌)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐷 ∈ (TotBnd‘𝑌) ↔ 𝐷 ∈ (Bnd‘𝑌)))
Theorem	prdsbnd 38919*	The product metric over finite index set is bounded if all the factors are bounded. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 13-Sep-2015.)
⊢ 𝑌 = (𝑆Xs𝑅)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑌)    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘(𝑅‘𝑥))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((dist‘(𝑅‘𝑥)) ↾ (𝑉 × 𝑉))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (dist‘𝑌)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Fn 𝐼)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐼) → 𝐸 ∈ (Bnd‘𝑉))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ (Bnd‘𝐵))
Theorem	prdstotbnd 38920*	The product metric over finite index set is totally bounded if all the factors are totally bounded. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Sep-2015.)
⊢ 𝑌 = (𝑆Xs𝑅)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑌)    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘(𝑅‘𝑥))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((dist‘(𝑅‘𝑥)) ↾ (𝑉 × 𝑉))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (dist‘𝑌)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Fn 𝐼)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐼) → 𝐸 ∈ (TotBnd‘𝑉))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ (TotBnd‘𝐵))
Theorem	prdsbnd2 38921*	If balls are totally bounded in each factor, then balls are bounded in a metric product. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Sep-2015.)
⊢ 𝑌 = (𝑆Xs𝑅)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑌)    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘(𝑅‘𝑥))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((dist‘(𝑅‘𝑥)) ↾ (𝑉 × 𝑉))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (dist‘𝑌)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Fn 𝐼)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (𝐷 ↾ (𝐴 × 𝐴))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐼) → 𝐸 ∈ (Met‘𝑉))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐼) → ((𝐸 ↾ (𝑦 × 𝑦)) ∈ (TotBnd‘𝑦) ↔ (𝐸 ↾ (𝑦 × 𝑦)) ∈ (Bnd‘𝑦)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 ∈ (TotBnd‘𝐴) ↔ 𝐶 ∈ (Bnd‘𝐴)))
Theorem	cntotbnd 38922	A subset of the complex numbers is totally bounded iff it is bounded. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Sep-2015.)
⊢ 𝐷 = ((abs ∘ − ) ↾ (𝑋 × 𝑋))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐷 ∈ (TotBnd‘𝑋) ↔ 𝐷 ∈ (Bnd‘𝑋))
Theorem	cnpwstotbnd 38923	A subset of 𝐴↑𝐼, where 𝐴 ⊆ ℂ, is totally bounded iff it is bounded. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Sep-2015.)
⊢ 𝑌 = ((ℂfld ↾s 𝐴) ↑s 𝐼)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((dist‘𝑌) ↾ (𝑋 × 𝑋))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ℂ ∧ 𝐼 ∈ Fin) → (𝐷 ∈ (TotBnd‘𝑋) ↔ 𝐷 ∈ (Bnd‘𝑋)))
21.26.8  Isometries
Syntax	cismty 38924	Extend class notation with the class of metric space isometries.
class Ismty
Definition	df-ismty 38925*	Define a function which takes two metric spaces and returns the set of isometries between the spaces. An isometry is a bijection which preserves distance. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.)
⊢ Ismty = (𝑚 ∈ ∪ ran ∞Met, 𝑛 ∈ ∪ ran ∞Met ↦ {𝑓 ∣ (𝑓:dom dom 𝑚⟶1-1ontodom dom 𝑛 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ dom dom 𝑚∀𝑦 ∈ dom dom 𝑚(𝑥𝑚𝑦) = ((𝑓‘𝑥)𝑛(𝑓‘𝑦)))})
Theorem	ismtyval 38926*	The set of isometries between two metric spaces. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ (∞Met‘𝑋) ∧ 𝑁 ∈ (∞Met‘𝑌)) → (𝑀 Ismty 𝑁) = {𝑓 ∣ (𝑓:𝑋⟶1-1onto𝑌 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 (𝑥𝑀𝑦) = ((𝑓‘𝑥)𝑁(𝑓‘𝑦)))})
Theorem	isismty 38927*	The condition "is an isometry". (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ (∞Met‘𝑋) ∧ 𝑁 ∈ (∞Met‘𝑌)) → (𝐹 ∈ (𝑀 Ismty 𝑁) ↔ (𝐹:𝑋⟶1-1onto𝑌 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 (𝑥𝑀𝑦) = ((𝐹‘𝑥)𝑁(𝐹‘𝑦)))))
Theorem	ismtycnv 38928	The inverse of an isometry is an isometry. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ (∞Met‘𝑋) ∧ 𝑁 ∈ (∞Met‘𝑌)) → (𝐹 ∈ (𝑀 Ismty 𝑁) → ◡𝐹 ∈ (𝑁 Ismty 𝑀)))
Theorem	ismtyima 38929	The image of a ball under an isometry is another ball. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 31-Jan-2014.)
⊢ (((𝑀 ∈ (∞Met‘𝑋) ∧ 𝑁 ∈ (∞Met‘𝑌) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ (𝑀 Ismty 𝑁)) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ ℝ*)) → (𝐹 “ (𝑃(ball‘𝑀)𝑅)) = ((𝐹‘𝑃)(ball‘𝑁)𝑅))
Theorem	ismtyhmeolem 38930	Lemma for ismtyhmeo 38931. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 12-Sep-2015.)
⊢ 𝐽 = (MetOpen‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (MetOpen‘𝑁)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ (∞Met‘𝑋))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (∞Met‘𝑌))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝑀 Ismty 𝑁))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐽 Cn 𝐾))
Theorem	ismtyhmeo 38931	An isometry is a homeomorphism on the induced topology. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 12-Sep-2015.)
⊢ 𝐽 = (MetOpen‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (MetOpen‘𝑁)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ (∞Met‘𝑋) ∧ 𝑁 ∈ (∞Met‘𝑌)) → (𝑀 Ismty 𝑁) ⊆ (𝐽Homeo𝐾))
Theorem	ismtybndlem 38932	Lemma for ismtybnd 38933. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jan-2014.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ (∞Met‘𝑌) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ (𝑀 Ismty 𝑁)) → (𝑀 ∈ (Bnd‘𝑋) → 𝑁 ∈ (Bnd‘𝑌)))
Theorem	ismtybnd 38933	Isometries preserve boundedness. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jan-2014.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ (∞Met‘𝑋) ∧ 𝑁 ∈ (∞Met‘𝑌) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ (𝑀 Ismty 𝑁)) → (𝑀 ∈ (Bnd‘𝑋) ↔ 𝑁 ∈ (Bnd‘𝑌)))
Theorem	ismtyres 38934	A restriction of an isometry is an isometry. The condition 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑋 is not necessary but makes the proof easier. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 12-Sep-2015.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (𝐹 “ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑀 ↾ (𝐴 × 𝐴))    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = (𝑁 ↾ (𝐵 × 𝐵))    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝑀 ∈ (∞Met‘𝑋) ∧ 𝑁 ∈ (∞Met‘𝑌)) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ (𝑀 Ismty 𝑁) ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑋)) → (𝐹 ↾ 𝐴) ∈ (𝑆 Ismty 𝑇))
21.26.9  Heine-Borel Theorem
Theorem	heibor1lem 38935	Lemma for heibor1 38936. A compact metric space is complete. This proof works by considering the collection cls(𝐹 “ (ℤ≥‘𝑛)) for each 𝑛 ∈ ℕ, which has the finite intersection property because any finite intersection of upper integer sets is another upper integer set, so any finite intersection of the image closures will contain (𝐹 “ (ℤ≥‘𝑚)) for some 𝑚. Thus, by compactness, the intersection contains a point 𝑦, which must then be the convergent point of 𝐹. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 17-Jan-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 5-Jun-2014.)
⊢ 𝐽 = (MetOpen‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ (Met‘𝑋))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ Comp)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (Cau‘𝐷))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:ℕ⟶𝑋)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ dom (⇝𝑡‘𝐽))
Theorem	heibor1 38936	One half of heibor 38947, that does not require any Choice. A compact metric space is complete and totally bounded. We prove completeness in cmpcmet 25670 and total boundedness here, which follows trivially from the fact that the set of all 𝑟-balls is an open cover of 𝑋, so finitely many cover 𝑋. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 16-Jan-2014.)
⊢ 𝐽 = (MetOpen‘𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐷 ∈ (Met‘𝑋) ∧ 𝐽 ∈ Comp) → (𝐷 ∈ (CMet‘𝑋) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (TotBnd‘𝑋)))
Theorem	heiborlem1 38937*	Lemma for heibor 38947. We work with a fixed open cover 𝑈 throughout. The set 𝐾 is the set of all subsets of 𝑋 that admit no finite subcover of 𝑈. (We wish to prove that 𝐾 is empty.) If a set 𝐶 has no finite subcover, then any finite cover of 𝐶 must contain a set that also has no finite subcover. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 23-Jan-2014.)
⊢ 𝐽 = (MetOpen‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = {𝑢 ∣ ¬ ∃𝑣 ∈ (𝒫 𝑈 ∩ Fin)𝑢 ⊆ ∪ 𝑣}    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐾) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ 𝐾)
Theorem	heiborlem2 38938*	Lemma for heibor 38947. Substitutions for the set 𝐺. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 23-Jan-2014.)
⊢ 𝐽 = (MetOpen‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = {𝑢 ∣ ¬ ∃𝑣 ∈ (𝒫 𝑈 ∩ Fin)𝑢 ⊆ ∪ 𝑣}    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = {⟨𝑦, 𝑛⟩ ∣ (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑛) ∧ (𝑦𝐵𝑛) ∈ 𝐾)}    &   ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴𝐺𝐶 ↔ (𝐶 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝐹‘𝐶) ∧ (𝐴𝐵𝐶) ∈ 𝐾))
Theorem	heiborlem3 38939*	Lemma for heibor 38947. Using countable choice ax-cc 10540, we have fixed in advance a collection of finite 2↑ -𝑛 nets (𝐹‘𝑛) for 𝑋 (note that an 𝑟-net is a set of points in 𝑋 whose 𝑟 -balls cover 𝑋). The set 𝐺 is the subset of these points whose corresponding balls have no finite subcover (i.e. in the set 𝐾). If the theorem was false, then 𝑋 would be in 𝐾, and so some ball at each level would also be in 𝐾. But we can say more than this; given a ball (𝑦𝐵𝑛) on level 𝑛, since level 𝑛 + 1 covers the space and thus also (𝑦𝐵𝑛), using heiborlem1 38937 there is a ball on the next level whose intersection with (𝑦𝐵𝑛) also has no finite subcover. Now since the set 𝐺 is a countable union of finite sets, it is countable (which needs ax-cc 10540 via iunctb 10686), and so we can apply ax-cc 10540 to 𝐺 directly to get a function from 𝐺 to itself, which points from each ball in 𝐾 to a ball on the next level in 𝐾, and such that the intersection between these balls is also in 𝐾. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 18-Jan-2014.)
⊢ 𝐽 = (MetOpen‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = {𝑢 ∣ ¬ ∃𝑣 ∈ (𝒫 𝑈 ∩ Fin)𝑢 ⊆ ∪ 𝑣}    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = {⟨𝑦, 𝑛⟩ ∣ (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑛) ∧ (𝑦𝐵𝑛) ∈ 𝐾)}    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (𝑧 ∈ 𝑋, 𝑚 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (𝑧(ball‘𝐷)(1 / (2↑𝑚))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ (CMet‘𝑋))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:ℕ0⟶(𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 𝑋 = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑛)(𝑦𝐵𝑛))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑔∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐺 ((𝑔‘𝑥)𝐺((2nd ‘𝑥) + 1) ∧ ((𝐵‘𝑥) ∩ ((𝑔‘𝑥)𝐵((2nd ‘𝑥) + 1))) ∈ 𝐾))
Theorem	heiborlem4 38940*	Lemma for heibor 38947. Using the function 𝑇 constructed in heiborlem3 38939, construct an infinite path in 𝐺. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 23-Jan-2014.)
⊢ 𝐽 = (MetOpen‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = {𝑢 ∣ ¬ ∃𝑣 ∈ (𝒫 𝑈 ∩ Fin)𝑢 ⊆ ∪ 𝑣}    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = {⟨𝑦, 𝑛⟩ ∣ (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑛) ∧ (𝑦𝐵𝑛) ∈ 𝐾)}    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (𝑧 ∈ 𝑋, 𝑚 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (𝑧(ball‘𝐷)(1 / (2↑𝑚))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ (CMet‘𝑋))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:ℕ0⟶(𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 𝑋 = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑛)(𝑦𝐵𝑛))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐺 ((𝑇‘𝑥)𝐺((2nd ‘𝑥) + 1) ∧ ((𝐵‘𝑥) ∩ ((𝑇‘𝑥)𝐵((2nd ‘𝑥) + 1))) ∈ 𝐾))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶𝐺0)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = seq0(𝑇, (𝑚 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ if(𝑚 = 0, 𝐶, (𝑚 − 1))))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ0) → (𝑆‘𝐴)𝐺𝐴)
Theorem	heiborlem5 38941*	Lemma for heibor 38947. The function 𝑀 is a set of point-and-radius pairs suitable for application to caubl 25659. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 23-Jan-2014.)
⊢ 𝐽 = (MetOpen‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = {𝑢 ∣ ¬ ∃𝑣 ∈ (𝒫 𝑈 ∩ Fin)𝑢 ⊆ ∪ 𝑣}    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = {⟨𝑦, 𝑛⟩ ∣ (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑛) ∧ (𝑦𝐵𝑛) ∈ 𝐾)}    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (𝑧 ∈ 𝑋, 𝑚 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (𝑧(ball‘𝐷)(1 / (2↑𝑚))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ (CMet‘𝑋))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:ℕ0⟶(𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 𝑋 = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑛)(𝑦𝐵𝑛))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐺 ((𝑇‘𝑥)𝐺((2nd ‘𝑥) + 1) ∧ ((𝐵‘𝑥) ∩ ((𝑇‘𝑥)𝐵((2nd ‘𝑥) + 1))) ∈ 𝐾))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶𝐺0)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = seq0(𝑇, (𝑚 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ if(𝑚 = 0, 𝐶, (𝑚 − 1))))    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ ⟨(𝑆‘𝑛), (3 / (2↑𝑛))⟩)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀:ℕ⟶(𝑋 × ℝ+))
Theorem	heiborlem6 38942*	Lemma for heibor 38947. Since the sequence of balls connected by the function 𝑇 ensures that each ball nontrivially intersects with the next (since the empty set has a finite subcover, the intersection of any two successive balls in the sequence is nonempty), and each ball is half the size of the previous one, the distance between the centers is at most 3 / 2 times the size of the larger, and so if we expand each ball by a factor of 3 we get a nested sequence of balls. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 23-Jan-2014.)
⊢ 𝐽 = (MetOpen‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = {𝑢 ∣ ¬ ∃𝑣 ∈ (𝒫 𝑈 ∩ Fin)𝑢 ⊆ ∪ 𝑣}    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = {⟨𝑦, 𝑛⟩ ∣ (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑛) ∧ (𝑦𝐵𝑛) ∈ 𝐾)}    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (𝑧 ∈ 𝑋, 𝑚 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (𝑧(ball‘𝐷)(1 / (2↑𝑚))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ (CMet‘𝑋))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:ℕ0⟶(𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 𝑋 = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑛)(𝑦𝐵𝑛))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐺 ((𝑇‘𝑥)𝐺((2nd ‘𝑥) + 1) ∧ ((𝐵‘𝑥) ∩ ((𝑇‘𝑥)𝐵((2nd ‘𝑥) + 1))) ∈ 𝐾))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶𝐺0)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = seq0(𝑇, (𝑚 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ if(𝑚 = 0, 𝐶, (𝑚 − 1))))    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ ⟨(𝑆‘𝑛), (3 / (2↑𝑛))⟩)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑘 ∈ ℕ ((ball‘𝐷)‘(𝑀‘(𝑘 + 1))) ⊆ ((ball‘𝐷)‘(𝑀‘𝑘)))
Theorem	heiborlem7 38943*	Lemma for heibor 38947. Since the sizes of the balls decrease exponentially, the sequence converges to zero. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 23-Jan-2014.)
⊢ 𝐽 = (MetOpen‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = {𝑢 ∣ ¬ ∃𝑣 ∈ (𝒫 𝑈 ∩ Fin)𝑢 ⊆ ∪ 𝑣}    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = {⟨𝑦, 𝑛⟩ ∣ (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑛) ∧ (𝑦𝐵𝑛) ∈ 𝐾)}    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (𝑧 ∈ 𝑋, 𝑚 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (𝑧(ball‘𝐷)(1 / (2↑𝑚))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ (CMet‘𝑋))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:ℕ0⟶(𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 𝑋 = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑛)(𝑦𝐵𝑛))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐺 ((𝑇‘𝑥)𝐺((2nd ‘𝑥) + 1) ∧ ((𝐵‘𝑥) ∩ ((𝑇‘𝑥)𝐵((2nd ‘𝑥) + 1))) ∈ 𝐾))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶𝐺0)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = seq0(𝑇, (𝑚 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ if(𝑚 = 0, 𝐶, (𝑚 − 1))))    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ ⟨(𝑆‘𝑛), (3 / (2↑𝑛))⟩)    ⇒   ⊢ ∀𝑟 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑘 ∈ ℕ (2nd ‘(𝑀‘𝑘)) < 𝑟
Theorem	heiborlem8 38944*	Lemma for heibor 38947. The previous lemmas establish that the sequence 𝑀 is Cauchy, so using completeness we now consider the convergent point 𝑌. By assumption, 𝑈 is an open cover, so 𝑌 is an element of some 𝑍 ∈ 𝑈, and some ball centered at 𝑌 is contained in 𝑍. But the sequence contains arbitrarily small balls close to 𝑌, so some element ball(𝑀‘𝑛) of the sequence is contained in 𝑍. And finally we arrive at a contradiction, because {𝑍} is a finite subcover of 𝑈 that covers ball(𝑀‘𝑛), yet ball(𝑀‘𝑛) ∈ 𝐾. For convenience, we write this contradiction as 𝜑 → 𝜓 where 𝜑 is all the accumulated hypotheses and 𝜓 is anything at all. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 22-Jan-2014.)
⊢ 𝐽 = (MetOpen‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = {𝑢 ∣ ¬ ∃𝑣 ∈ (𝒫 𝑈 ∩ Fin)𝑢 ⊆ ∪ 𝑣}    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = {⟨𝑦, 𝑛⟩ ∣ (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑛) ∧ (𝑦𝐵𝑛) ∈ 𝐾)}    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (𝑧 ∈ 𝑋, 𝑚 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (𝑧(ball‘𝐷)(1 / (2↑𝑚))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ (CMet‘𝑋))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:ℕ0⟶(𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 𝑋 = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑛)(𝑦𝐵𝑛))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐺 ((𝑇‘𝑥)𝐺((2nd ‘𝑥) + 1) ∧ ((𝐵‘𝑥) ∩ ((𝑇‘𝑥)𝐵((2nd ‘𝑥) + 1))) ∈ 𝐾))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶𝐺0)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = seq0(𝑇, (𝑚 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ if(𝑚 = 0, 𝐶, (𝑚 − 1))))    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ ⟨(𝑆‘𝑛), (3 / (2↑𝑛))⟩)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ⊆ 𝐽)    &   ⊢ 𝑌 ∈ V    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑍)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (1st ∘ 𝑀)(⇝𝑡‘𝐽)𝑌)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)
Theorem	heiborlem9 38945*	Lemma for heibor 38947. Discharge the hypotheses of heiborlem8 38944 by applying caubl 25659 to get a convergent point and adding the open cover assumption. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 20-Jan-2014.)
⊢ 𝐽 = (MetOpen‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = {𝑢 ∣ ¬ ∃𝑣 ∈ (𝒫 𝑈 ∩ Fin)𝑢 ⊆ ∪ 𝑣}    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = {⟨𝑦, 𝑛⟩ ∣ (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑛) ∧ (𝑦𝐵𝑛) ∈ 𝐾)}    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (𝑧 ∈ 𝑋, 𝑚 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (𝑧(ball‘𝐷)(1 / (2↑𝑚))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ (CMet‘𝑋))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:ℕ0⟶(𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 𝑋 = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑛)(𝑦𝐵𝑛))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐺 ((𝑇‘𝑥)𝐺((2nd ‘𝑥) + 1) ∧ ((𝐵‘𝑥) ∩ ((𝑇‘𝑥)𝐵((2nd ‘𝑥) + 1))) ∈ 𝐾))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶𝐺0)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = seq0(𝑇, (𝑚 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ if(𝑚 = 0, 𝐶, (𝑚 − 1))))    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ ⟨(𝑆‘𝑛), (3 / (2↑𝑛))⟩)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ⊆ 𝐽)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∪ 𝑈 = 𝑋)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)
Theorem	heiborlem10 38946*	Lemma for heibor 38947. The last remaining piece of the proof is to find an element 𝐶 such that 𝐶𝐺0, i.e. 𝐶 is an element of (𝐹‘0) that has no finite subcover, which is true by heiborlem1 38937, since (𝐹‘0) is a finite cover of 𝑋, which has no finite subcover. Thus, the rest of the proof follows to a contradiction, and thus there must be a finite subcover of 𝑈 that covers 𝑋, i.e. 𝑋 is compact. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 22-Jan-2014.)
⊢ 𝐽 = (MetOpen‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = {𝑢 ∣ ¬ ∃𝑣 ∈ (𝒫 𝑈 ∩ Fin)𝑢 ⊆ ∪ 𝑣}    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = {⟨𝑦, 𝑛⟩ ∣ (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑛) ∧ (𝑦𝐵𝑛) ∈ 𝐾)}    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (𝑧 ∈ 𝑋, 𝑚 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (𝑧(ball‘𝐷)(1 / (2↑𝑚))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ (CMet‘𝑋))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:ℕ0⟶(𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 𝑋 = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑛)(𝑦𝐵𝑛))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑈 ⊆ 𝐽 ∧ ∪ 𝐽 = ∪ 𝑈)) → ∃𝑣 ∈ (𝒫 𝑈 ∩ Fin)∪ 𝐽 = ∪ 𝑣)
Theorem	heibor 38947	Generalized Heine-Borel Theorem. A metric space is compact iff it is complete and totally bounded. See heibor1 38936 and heiborlem1 38937 for a description of the proof. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 28-Jan-2014.)
⊢ 𝐽 = (MetOpen‘𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐷 ∈ (Met‘𝑋) ∧ 𝐽 ∈ Comp) ↔ (𝐷 ∈ (CMet‘𝑋) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (TotBnd‘𝑋)))
21.26.10  Banach Fixed Point Theorem
Theorem	bfplem1 38948*	Lemma for bfp 38950. The sequence 𝐺, which simply starts from any point in the space and iterates 𝐹, satisfies the property that the distance from 𝐺(𝑛) to 𝐺(𝑛 + 1) decreases by at least 𝐾 after each step. Thus, the total distance from any 𝐺(𝑖) to 𝐺(𝑗) is bounded by a geometric series, and the sequence is Cauchy. Therefore, it converges to a point ((⇝𝑡‘𝐽)‘𝐺) since the space is complete. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 17-Jun-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ (CMet‘𝑋))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≠ ∅)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ ℝ+)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 < 1)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑋⟶𝑋)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑋)) → ((𝐹‘𝑥)𝐷(𝐹‘𝑦)) ≤ (𝐾 · (𝑥𝐷𝑦)))    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (MetOpen‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑋)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = seq1((𝐹 ∘ 1st ), (ℕ × {𝐴}))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺(⇝𝑡‘𝐽)((⇝𝑡‘𝐽)‘𝐺))
Theorem	bfplem2 38949*	Lemma for bfp 38950. Using the point found in bfplem1 38948, we show that this convergent point is a fixed point of 𝐹. Since for any positive 𝑥, the sequence 𝐺 is in 𝐵(𝑥 / 2, 𝑃) for all 𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑗) (where 𝑃 = ((⇝𝑡‘𝐽)‘𝐺)), we have 𝐷(𝐺(𝑗 + 1), 𝐹(𝑃)) ≤ 𝐷(𝐺(𝑗), 𝑃) < 𝑥 / 2 and 𝐷(𝐺(𝑗 + 1), 𝑃) < 𝑥 / 2, so 𝐹(𝑃) is in every neighborhood of 𝑃 and 𝑃 is a fixed point of 𝐹. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 5-Jun-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ (CMet‘𝑋))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≠ ∅)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ ℝ+)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 < 1)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑋⟶𝑋)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑋)) → ((𝐹‘𝑥)𝐷(𝐹‘𝑦)) ≤ (𝐾 · (𝑥𝐷𝑦)))    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (MetOpen‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑋)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = seq1((𝐹 ∘ 1st ), (ℕ × {𝐴}))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑋 (𝐹‘𝑧) = 𝑧)
Theorem	bfp 38950*	Banach fixed point theorem, also known as contraction mapping theorem. A contraction on a complete metric space has a unique fixed point. We show existence in the lemmas, and uniqueness here - if 𝐹 has two fixed points, then the distance between them is less than 𝐾 times itself, a contradiction. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 5-Jun-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ (CMet‘𝑋))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≠ ∅)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ ℝ+)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 < 1)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑋⟶𝑋)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑋)) → ((𝐹‘𝑥)𝐷(𝐹‘𝑦)) ≤ (𝐾 · (𝑥𝐷𝑦)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃!𝑧 ∈ 𝑋 (𝐹‘𝑧) = 𝑧)
21.26.11  Euclidean space
Syntax	crrn 38951	Extend class notation with the n-dimensional Euclidean space.
class ℝn
Definition	df-rrn 38952*	Define n-dimensional Euclidean space as a metric space with the standard Euclidean norm given by the quadratic mean. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.)
⊢ ℝn = (𝑖 ∈ Fin ↦ (𝑥 ∈ (ℝ ↑m 𝑖), 𝑦 ∈ (ℝ ↑m 𝑖) ↦ (√‘Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝑖 (((𝑥‘𝑘) − (𝑦‘𝑘))↑2))))
Theorem	rrnval 38953*	The n-dimensional Euclidean space. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 13-Sep-2015.)
⊢ 𝑋 = (ℝ ↑m 𝐼)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐼 ∈ Fin → (ℝn‘𝐼) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋, 𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (√‘Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝐼 (((𝑥‘𝑘) − (𝑦‘𝑘))↑2))))
Theorem	rrnmval 38954*	The value of the Euclidean metric. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 13-Sep-2015.)
⊢ 𝑋 = (ℝ ↑m 𝐼)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐼 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑋) → (𝐹(ℝn‘𝐼)𝐺) = (√‘Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝐼 (((𝐹‘𝑘) − (𝐺‘𝑘))↑2)))
Theorem	rrnmet 38955	Euclidean space is a metric space. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 5-Jun-2014.)
⊢ 𝑋 = (ℝ ↑m 𝐼)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐼 ∈ Fin → (ℝn‘𝐼) ∈ (Met‘𝑋))
Theorem	rrndstprj1 38956	The distance between two points in Euclidean space is greater than the distance between the projections onto one coordinate. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 13-Sep-2015.)
⊢ 𝑋 = (ℝ ↑m 𝐼)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = ((abs ∘ − ) ↾ (ℝ × ℝ))    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐼 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐼) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑋)) → ((𝐹‘𝐴)𝑀(𝐺‘𝐴)) ≤ (𝐹(ℝn‘𝐼)𝐺))
Theorem	rrndstprj2 38957*	Bound on the distance between two points in Euclidean space given bounds on the distances in each coordinate. This theorem and rrndstprj1 38956 can be used to show that the supremum norm and Euclidean norm are equivalent. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 13-Sep-2015.)
⊢ 𝑋 = (ℝ ↑m 𝐼)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = ((abs ∘ − ) ↾ (ℝ × ℝ))    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐼 ∈ (Fin ∖ {∅}) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑋) ∧ (𝑅 ∈ ℝ+ ∧ ∀𝑛 ∈ 𝐼 ((𝐹‘𝑛)𝑀(𝐺‘𝑛)) < 𝑅)) → (𝐹(ℝn‘𝐼)𝐺) < (𝑅 · (√‘(♯‘𝐼))))
Theorem	rrncmslem 38958*	Lemma for rrncms 38959. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 6-Jun-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 13-Sep-2015.)
⊢ 𝑋 = (ℝ ↑m 𝐼)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = ((abs ∘ − ) ↾ (ℝ × ℝ))    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (MetOpen‘(ℝn‘𝐼))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (Cau‘(ℝn‘𝐼)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:ℕ⟶𝑋)    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (𝑚 ∈ 𝐼 ↦ ( ⇝ ‘(𝑡 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((𝐹‘𝑡)‘𝑚))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ dom (⇝𝑡‘𝐽))
Theorem	rrncms 38959	Euclidean space is complete. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 13-Sep-2015.)
⊢ 𝑋 = (ℝ ↑m 𝐼)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐼 ∈ Fin → (ℝn‘𝐼) ∈ (CMet‘𝑋))
Theorem	repwsmet 38960	The supremum metric on ℝ↑𝐼 is a metric. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 15-Sep-2015.)
⊢ 𝑌 = ((ℂfld ↾s ℝ) ↑s 𝐼)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (dist‘𝑌)    &   ⊢ 𝑋 = (ℝ ↑m 𝐼)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐼 ∈ Fin → 𝐷 ∈ (Met‘𝑋))
Theorem	rrnequiv 38961	The supremum metric on ℝ↑𝐼 is equivalent to the ℝn metric. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 15-Sep-2015.)
⊢ 𝑌 = ((ℂfld ↾s ℝ) ↑s 𝐼)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (dist‘𝑌)    &   ⊢ 𝑋 = (ℝ ↑m 𝐼)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ Fin)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑋)) → ((𝐹𝐷𝐺) ≤ (𝐹(ℝn‘𝐼)𝐺) ∧ (𝐹(ℝn‘𝐼)𝐺) ≤ ((√‘(♯‘𝐼)) · (𝐹𝐷𝐺))))
Theorem	rrntotbnd 38962	A set in Euclidean space is totally bounded iff its is bounded. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 16-Sep-2015.)
⊢ 𝑋 = (ℝ ↑m 𝐼)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = ((ℝn‘𝐼) ↾ (𝑌 × 𝑌))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐼 ∈ Fin → (𝑀 ∈ (TotBnd‘𝑌) ↔ 𝑀 ∈ (Bnd‘𝑌)))
Theorem	rrnheibor 38963	Heine-Borel theorem for Euclidean space. A subset of Euclidean space is compact iff it is closed and bounded. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 22-Sep-2015.)
⊢ 𝑋 = (ℝ ↑m 𝐼)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = ((ℝn‘𝐼) ↾ (𝑌 × 𝑌))    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = (MetOpen‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = (MetOpen‘(ℝn‘𝐼))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐼 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝑋) → (𝑇 ∈ Comp ↔ (𝑌 ∈ (Clsd‘𝑈) ∧ 𝑀 ∈ (Bnd‘𝑌))))
21.26.12  Intervals (continued)
Theorem	ismrer1 38964*	An isometry between ℝ and ℝ↑1. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 22-Sep-2015.)
⊢ 𝑅 = ((abs ∘ − ) ↾ (ℝ × ℝ))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ ℝ ↦ ({𝐴} × {𝑥}))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝑅 Ismty (ℝn‘{𝐴})))
Theorem	reheibor 38965	Heine-Borel theorem for real numbers. A subset of ℝ is compact iff it is closed and bounded. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 22-Sep-2015.)
⊢ 𝑀 = ((abs ∘ − ) ↾ (𝑌 × 𝑌))    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = (MetOpen‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = (topGen‘ran (,))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑌 ⊆ ℝ → (𝑇 ∈ Comp ↔ (𝑌 ∈ (Clsd‘𝑈) ∧ 𝑀 ∈ (Bnd‘𝑌))))
Theorem	iccbnd 38966	A closed interval in ℝ is bounded. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 22-Sep-2015.)
⊢ 𝐽 = (𝐴[,]𝐵)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = ((abs ∘ − ) ↾ (𝐽 × 𝐽))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → 𝑀 ∈ (Bnd‘𝐽))
Theorem	icccmpALT 38967	A closed interval in ℝ is compact. Alternate proof of icccmp 25175 using the Heine-Borel theorem heibor 38947. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 14-Aug-2014.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐽 = (𝐴[,]𝐵)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = ((abs ∘ − ) ↾ (𝐽 × 𝐽))    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = (MetOpen‘𝑀)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → 𝑇 ∈ Comp)
21.26.13  Operation properties Obsolete part of JM's mathbox as of 13-Aug-2026. This and the following sections contain outdated material. All relevant definitions and theorems are available based on extensible structures, which is the preferred way in set.mm to deal with groups, rings and related structures. All definitions and theorems in the following are marked as deprecated (containing the tag "(New usage is discouraged.)" in their comments). In most cases, the corresponding definitions and theorems based on extensible structures are indicated within the comments. This and the following sections in JM's mathox will be removed from set.mm on 13-Aug-2027, unless there are any objections.
Syntax	cass 38968	Extend class notation with a device to add associativity to internal operations.
class Ass
Definition	df-ass 38969*	A device to add associativity to various sorts of internal operations. The definition is meaningful when 𝑔 is a magma at least. (Contributed by FL, 1-Nov-2009.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Ass = {𝑔 ∣ ∀𝑥 ∈ dom dom 𝑔∀𝑦 ∈ dom dom 𝑔∀𝑧 ∈ dom dom 𝑔((𝑥𝑔𝑦)𝑔𝑧) = (𝑥𝑔(𝑦𝑔𝑧))}
Syntax	cexid 38970	Extend class notation with the class of all the internal operations with an identity element.
class ExId
Definition	df-exid 38971*	A device to add an identity element to various sorts of internal operations. (Contributed by FL, 2-Nov-2009.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ExId = {𝑔 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ dom dom 𝑔∀𝑦 ∈ dom dom 𝑔((𝑥𝑔𝑦) = 𝑦 ∧ (𝑦𝑔𝑥) = 𝑦)}
Theorem	isass 38972*	The predicate "is an associative operation". (Contributed by FL, 1-Nov-2009.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑋 = dom dom 𝐺    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝐺 ∈ Ass ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑋 ((𝑥𝐺𝑦)𝐺𝑧) = (𝑥𝐺(𝑦𝐺𝑧))))
Theorem	isexid 38973*	The predicate 𝐺 has a left and right identity element. (Contributed by FL, 2-Nov-2009.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 22-Dec-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑋 = dom dom 𝐺    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝐺 ∈ ExId ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 ((𝑥𝐺𝑦) = 𝑦 ∧ (𝑦𝐺𝑥) = 𝑦)))
21.26.14  Groups and related structures
Syntax	cmagm 38974	Extend class notation with the class of all magmas.
class Magma
Definition	df-mgmOLD 38975*	Obsolete version of df-mgm 18845 as of 3-Feb-2020. A magma is a binary internal operation. (Contributed by FL, 2-Nov-2009.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Magma = {𝑔 ∣ ∃𝑡 𝑔:(𝑡 × 𝑡)⟶𝑡}
Theorem	ismgmOLD 38976	Obsolete version of ismgm 18846 as of 3-Feb-2020. The predicate "is a magma". (Contributed by FL, 2-Nov-2009.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑋 = dom dom 𝐺    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝐺 ∈ Magma ↔ 𝐺:(𝑋 × 𝑋)⟶𝑋))
Theorem	clmgmOLD 38977	Obsolete version of mgmcl 18848 as of 3-Feb-2020. Closure of a magma. (Contributed by FL, 14-Sep-2010.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑋 = dom dom 𝐺    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ Magma ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋) → (𝐴𝐺𝐵) ∈ 𝑋)
Theorem	opidonOLD 38978	Obsolete version of mgmidpfod 18886 as of 23-Jan-2020. An operation with a left and right identity element is onto. (Contributed by FL, 2-Nov-2009.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 22-Dec-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑋 = dom dom 𝐺    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ (Magma ∩ ExId ) → 𝐺:(𝑋 × 𝑋)⟶onto𝑋)
Theorem	rngopidOLD 38979	Obsolete version of mgmidprnd 18887 as of 23-Jan-2020. Range of an operation with a left and right identity element. (Contributed by FL, 2-Nov-2009.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐺 ∈ (Magma ∩ ExId ) → ran 𝐺 = dom dom 𝐺)
Theorem	opidon2OLD 38980	Obsolete version of mgmfod 18888 as of 23-Jan-2020. An operation with a left and right identity element is onto. (Contributed by FL, 2-Nov-2009.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑋 = ran 𝐺    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ (Magma ∩ ExId ) → 𝐺:(𝑋 × 𝑋)⟶onto𝑋)
Theorem	isexid2 38981*	Obsolete theorem. If 𝐺 ∈ (Magma ∩ ExId ), then it has a left and right identity element that belongs to the range of the operation. (Contributed by FL, 12-Dec-2009.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 22-Dec-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑋 = ran 𝐺    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ (Magma ∩ ExId ) → ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝑋 ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ((𝑢𝐺𝑥) = 𝑥 ∧ (𝑥𝐺𝑢) = 𝑥))
Theorem	exidu1 38982*	Obsolete theorem, use mgmidmo 18867 or mndideu 18963 instead. Uniqueness of the left and right identity element of a magma when it exists. (Contributed by FL, 12-Dec-2009.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 22-Dec-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑋 = ran 𝐺    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ (Magma ∩ ExId ) → ∃!𝑢 ∈ 𝑋 ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ((𝑢𝐺𝑥) = 𝑥 ∧ (𝑥𝐺𝑢) = 𝑥))
Theorem	idrval 38983*	Obsolete theorem, use idvalriota 18870 instead. The value of the identity element. (Contributed by FL, 12-Dec-2009.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 22-Dec-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑋 = ran 𝐺    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = (GId‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑈 = (℩𝑢 ∈ 𝑋 ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ((𝑢𝐺𝑥) = 𝑥 ∧ (𝑥𝐺𝑢) = 𝑥)))
Theorem	iorlid 38984	Obsolete theorem, use mgmidcl 18875 instead. A magma right and left identity belongs to the underlying set of the operation. (Contributed by FL, 12-Dec-2009.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 22-Dec-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑋 = ran 𝐺    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = (GId‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ (Magma ∩ ExId ) → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑋)
Theorem	cmpidelt 38985	Obsolete theorem, use mgmlrid 18876 instead. A magma right and left identity element keeps the other elements unchanged. (Contributed by FL, 12-Dec-2009.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 22-Dec-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑋 = ran 𝐺    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = (GId‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ (Magma ∩ ExId ) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑋) → ((𝑈𝐺𝐴) = 𝐴 ∧ (𝐴𝐺𝑈) = 𝐴))
Syntax	csem 38986	Extend class notation with the class of all semigroups.
class SemiGrp
Definition	df-sgrOLD 38987	Obsolete version of df-sgrp 18937 as of 3-Feb-2020. A semigroup is an associative magma. (Contributed by FL, 2-Nov-2009.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ SemiGrp = (Magma ∩ Ass)
Theorem	smgrpismgmOLD 38988	Obsolete version of sgrpmgm 18942 as of 3-Feb-2020. A semigroup is a magma. (Contributed by FL, 2-Nov-2009.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐺 ∈ SemiGrp → 𝐺 ∈ Magma)
Theorem	issmgrpOLD 38989*	Obsolete version of issgrp 18938 as of 3-Feb-2020. The predicate "is a semigroup". (Contributed by FL, 2-Nov-2009.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑋 = dom dom 𝐺    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝐺 ∈ SemiGrp ↔ (𝐺:(𝑋 × 𝑋)⟶𝑋 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑋 ((𝑥𝐺𝑦)𝐺𝑧) = (𝑥𝐺(𝑦𝐺𝑧)))))
Theorem	smgrpmgm 38990	Obsolete theorem, use sgrpmgm 18942 instead. A semigroup is a magma. (Contributed by FL, 2-Nov-2009.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑋 = dom dom 𝐺    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ SemiGrp → 𝐺:(𝑋 × 𝑋)⟶𝑋)
Theorem	smgrpassOLD 38991*	Obsolete version of sgrpass 18943 as of 3-Feb-2020. A semigroup is associative. (Contributed by FL, 2-Nov-2009.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑋 = dom dom 𝐺    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ SemiGrp → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑋 ((𝑥𝐺𝑦)𝐺𝑧) = (𝑥𝐺(𝑦𝐺𝑧)))
Syntax	cmndo 38992	Extend class notation with the class of all monoids.
class MndOp
Definition	df-mndo 38993	Obsolete definition, use df-mnd 18953 instead. A monoid is a semigroup with an identity element. (Contributed by FL, 2-Nov-2009.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ MndOp = (SemiGrp ∩ ExId )
Theorem	mndoissmgrpOLD 38994	Obsolete version of mndsgrp 18958 as of 3-Feb-2020. A monoid is a semigroup. (Contributed by FL, 2-Nov-2009.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐺 ∈ MndOp → 𝐺 ∈ SemiGrp)
Theorem	mndoisexid 38995	Obsolete theorem, use mndid 18962 instead. A monoid has an identity element. (Contributed by FL, 2-Nov-2009.) (New usage is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐺 ∈ MndOp → 𝐺 ∈ ExId )
Theorem	mndoismgmOLD 38996	Obsolete version of mndmgm 18959 as of 3-Feb-2020. A monoid is a magma. (Contributed by FL, 2-Nov-2009.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐺 ∈ MndOp → 𝐺 ∈ Magma)
Theorem	mndomgmid 38997	Obsolete theorem, use mndmgm 18959 and/or mndid 18962 instead. A monoid is a magma with an identity element. (Contributed by FL, 18-Feb-2010.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐺 ∈ MndOp → 𝐺 ∈ (Magma ∩ ExId ))
Theorem	ismndo 38998*	Obsolete theorem, use ismnddef 18954 instead. The predicate "is a monoid". (Contributed by FL, 2-Nov-2009.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 22-Dec-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑋 = dom dom 𝐺    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝐺 ∈ MndOp ↔ (𝐺 ∈ SemiGrp ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 ((𝑥𝐺𝑦) = 𝑦 ∧ (𝑦𝐺𝑥) = 𝑦))))
Theorem	ismndo1 38999*	Obsolete theorem, use ismnd 18955 instead. The predicate "is a monoid". (Contributed by FL, 2-Nov-2009.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 22-Dec-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑋 = dom dom 𝐺    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝐺 ∈ MndOp ↔ (𝐺:(𝑋 × 𝑋)⟶𝑋 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑋 ((𝑥𝐺𝑦)𝐺𝑧) = (𝑥𝐺(𝑦𝐺𝑧)) ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 ((𝑥𝐺𝑦) = 𝑦 ∧ (𝑦𝐺𝑥) = 𝑦))))
Theorem	ismndo2 39000*	Obsolete theorem, use ismnd 18955 instead. The predicate "is a monoid". (Contributed by FL, 2-Nov-2009.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 22-Dec-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑋 = ran 𝐺    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝐺 ∈ MndOp ↔ (𝐺:(𝑋 × 𝑋)⟶𝑋 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑋 ((𝑥𝐺𝑦)𝐺𝑧) = (𝑥𝐺(𝑦𝐺𝑧)) ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 ((𝑥𝐺𝑦) = 𝑦 ∧ (𝑦𝐺𝑥) = 𝑦))))