HomeTheorem List (p. 390 of 510)
GIF version.
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > MPE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List
| Home |
Metamath
Proof Explorer Theorem List (p. 390 of 510) | < Previous Next > |
| Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
|
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > MPE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
||
| Color key: | Metamath Proof Explorer
(1-31454) |
Hilbert Space Explorer
(31455-32977) |
Users' Mathboxes
(32978-50912) |
| Type | Label | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Statement | ||
| Syntax | cdmn 38901 | Extend class notation with the class of domains. |
| class Dmn | ||
| Definition | df-prrngo 38902 | Obsolete definition, use df-prmring 49354 instead. Define the class of prime rings. A ring is prime if the zero ideal is a prime ideal. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 10-Jun-2010.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ PrRing = {𝑟 ∈ RingOps ∣ {(GId‘(1st ‘𝑟))} ∈ (PrIdl‘𝑟)} | ||
| Definition | df-dmn 38903 | Obsolete definition, use df-idom 20910 resp. dfidom2 49362 instead. Define the class of (integral) domains. A domain is a commutative prime ring. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 10-Jun-2010.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ Dmn = (PrRing ∩ Com2) | ||
| Theorem | isprrngo 38904 | Obsolete theorem, use isprmrng 49355 instead. The predicate "is a prime ring". (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 10-Jun-2010.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐺 = (1st ‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (GId‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ PrRing ↔ (𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ {𝑍} ∈ (PrIdl‘𝑅))) | ||
| Theorem | prrngorngo 38905 | Obsolete theorem, use prmrngring 49357 instead. A prime ring is a ring. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 10-Jun-2010.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ PrRing → 𝑅 ∈ RingOps) | ||
| Theorem | smprngopr 38906 | Obsolete theorem, use smprngprmrng 49358 instead. A simple ring (one whose only ideals are 0 and 𝑅) is a prime ring. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 6-Jan-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐺 = (1st ‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (2nd ‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝑋 = ran 𝐺 & ⊢ 𝑍 = (GId‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝑈 = (GId‘𝐻) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ 𝑈 ≠ 𝑍 ∧ (Idl‘𝑅) = {{𝑍}, 𝑋}) → 𝑅 ∈ PrRing) | ||
| Theorem | divrngpr 38907 | Obsolete theorem, use drngprmrng 49359 instead. A division ring is a prime ring. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 6-Jan-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ DivRingOps → 𝑅 ∈ PrRing) | ||
| Theorem | isdmn 38908 | Obsolete theorem, use isidom2 49363 instead. The predicate "is a domain". (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 10-Jun-2010.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ Dmn ↔ (𝑅 ∈ PrRing ∧ 𝑅 ∈ Com2)) | ||
| Theorem | isdmn2 38909 | Obsolete theorem, use isidom2 49363 instead. The predicate "is a domain". (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 10-Jun-2010.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ Dmn ↔ (𝑅 ∈ PrRing ∧ 𝑅 ∈ CRingOps)) | ||
| Theorem | dmncrng 38910 | Obsolete theorem, use idomcringd 20940 instead. A domain is a commutative ring. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 6-Jan-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ Dmn → 𝑅 ∈ CRingOps) | ||
| Theorem | dmnrngo 38911 | Obsolete theorem, use idomringd 20941 instead. A domain is a ring. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 6-Jan-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ Dmn → 𝑅 ∈ RingOps) | ||
| Theorem | flddmn 38912 | Obsolete theorem, use fldidom 20991 instead. A field is a domain. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 10-Jun-2010.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ Fld → 𝐾 ∈ Dmn) | ||
| Syntax | cigen 38913 | Extend class notation with the ideal generation function. |
| class IdlGen | ||
| Definition | df-igen 38914* | Obsolete definition, use df-rsp 21449 instead. Define the ideal generated by a subset of a ring. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 10-Jun-2010.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ IdlGen = (𝑟 ∈ RingOps, 𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 ran (1st ‘𝑟) ↦ ∩ {𝑗 ∈ (Idl‘𝑟) ∣ 𝑠 ⊆ 𝑗}) | ||
| Theorem | igenval 38915* | Obsolete theorem, use rspvalint 21485 instead. The ideal generated by a subset of a ring. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 10-Jun-2010.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 20-Dec-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐺 = (1st ‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝑋 = ran 𝐺 ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑋) → (𝑅 IdlGen 𝑆) = ∩ {𝑗 ∈ (Idl‘𝑅) ∣ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑗}) | ||
| Theorem | igenss 38916 | Obsolete theorem, use rspssid 21481 instead. A set is a subset of the ideal it generates. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 10-Jun-2010.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐺 = (1st ‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝑋 = ran 𝐺 ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑋) → 𝑆 ⊆ (𝑅 IdlGen 𝑆)) | ||
| Theorem | igenidl 38917 | Obsolete theorem, use rspcl 21480 instead. The ideal generated by a set is an ideal. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 10-Jun-2010.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐺 = (1st ‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝑋 = ran 𝐺 ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑋) → (𝑅 IdlGen 𝑆) ∈ (Idl‘𝑅)) | ||
| Theorem | igenmin 38918 | Obsolete theorem, use rspssp 21484 instead. The ideal generated by a set is the minimal ideal containing that set. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 10-Jun-2010.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ 𝐼 ∈ (Idl‘𝑅) ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝐼) → (𝑅 IdlGen 𝑆) ⊆ 𝐼) | ||
| Theorem | igenidl2 38919 | Obsolete theorem, use rsp2idlid 33865 instead. The ideal generated by an ideal is that ideal. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 10-Jun-2010.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ 𝐼 ∈ (Idl‘𝑅)) → (𝑅 IdlGen 𝐼) = 𝐼) | ||
| Theorem | igenval2 38920* | Obsolete theorem, use rspprop 21486 instead. The ideal generated by a subset of a ring. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 10-Jun-2010.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐺 = (1st ‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝑋 = ran 𝐺 ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑋) → ((𝑅 IdlGen 𝑆) = 𝐼 ↔ (𝐼 ∈ (Idl‘𝑅) ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝐼 ∧ ∀𝑗 ∈ (Idl‘𝑅)(𝑆 ⊆ 𝑗 → 𝐼 ⊆ 𝑗)))) | ||
| Theorem | prnc 38921* | Obsolete theorem, use rspsn0 21488 instead (holds for arbitrary rings). A principal ideal (an ideal generated by one element) in a commutative ring. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 10-Jun-2010.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐺 = (1st ‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (2nd ‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝑋 = ran 𝐺 ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ CRingOps ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑋) → (𝑅 IdlGen {𝐴}) = {𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∣ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 𝑥 = (𝑦𝐻𝐴)}) | ||
| Theorem | isfldidl 38922 | Obsolete theorem, use isfieldidl 21502 instead. Determine if a ring is a field based on its ideals. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 10-Jun-2010.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐺 = (1st ‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (2nd ‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑋 = ran 𝐺 & ⊢ 𝑍 = (GId‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝑈 = (GId‘𝐻) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ Fld ↔ (𝐾 ∈ CRingOps ∧ 𝑈 ≠ 𝑍 ∧ (Idl‘𝐾) = {{𝑍}, 𝑋})) | ||
| Theorem | isfldidl2 38923 | Obsolete theorem, use isfieldidl2 21503 instead. Determine if a ring is a field based on its ideals. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 6-Jan-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐺 = (1st ‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (2nd ‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑋 = ran 𝐺 & ⊢ 𝑍 = (GId‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ Fld ↔ (𝐾 ∈ CRingOps ∧ 𝑋 ≠ {𝑍} ∧ (Idl‘𝐾) = {{𝑍}, 𝑋})) | ||
| Theorem | ispridlc 38924* | Obsolete theorem, use isprmidlc 21590 instead. The predicate "is a prime ideal". Alternate definition for commutative rings. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 19-Jun-2010.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐺 = (1st ‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (2nd ‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝑋 = ran 𝐺 ⇒ ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ CRingOps → (𝑃 ∈ (PrIdl‘𝑅) ↔ (𝑃 ∈ (Idl‘𝑅) ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑋 ∧ ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝑋 ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝑋 ((𝑎𝐻𝑏) ∈ 𝑃 → (𝑎 ∈ 𝑃 ∨ 𝑏 ∈ 𝑃))))) | ||
| Theorem | pridlc 38925 | Obsolete theorem, use prmidlc 21591 instead. Property of a prime ideal in a commutative ring. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 17-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐺 = (1st ‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (2nd ‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝑋 = ran 𝐺 ⇒ ⊢ (((𝑅 ∈ CRingOps ∧ 𝑃 ∈ (PrIdl‘𝑅)) ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ (𝐴𝐻𝐵) ∈ 𝑃)) → (𝐴 ∈ 𝑃 ∨ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)) | ||
| Theorem | pridlc2 38926 | Obsolete theorem, use prmidlc2 21592 instead. Property of a prime ideal in a commutative ring. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 17-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐺 = (1st ‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (2nd ‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝑋 = ran 𝐺 ⇒ ⊢ (((𝑅 ∈ CRingOps ∧ 𝑃 ∈ (PrIdl‘𝑅)) ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝑋 ∖ 𝑃) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ (𝐴𝐻𝐵) ∈ 𝑃)) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) | ||
| Theorem | pridlc3 38927 | Obsolete theorem, use cmprmidlmcl 21593 instead. Property of a prime ideal in a commutative ring. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 17-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐺 = (1st ‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (2nd ‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝑋 = ran 𝐺 ⇒ ⊢ (((𝑅 ∈ CRingOps ∧ 𝑃 ∈ (PrIdl‘𝑅)) ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝑋 ∖ 𝑃) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝑋 ∖ 𝑃))) → (𝐴𝐻𝐵) ∈ (𝑋 ∖ 𝑃)) | ||
| Theorem | isdmn3 38928* | Obsolete theorem, use isidom3 49364 instead. The predicate "is a domain", alternate expression. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 19-Jun-2010.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐺 = (1st ‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (2nd ‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝑋 = ran 𝐺 & ⊢ 𝑍 = (GId‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝑈 = (GId‘𝐻) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ Dmn ↔ (𝑅 ∈ CRingOps ∧ 𝑈 ≠ 𝑍 ∧ ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝑋 ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝑋 ((𝑎𝐻𝑏) = 𝑍 → (𝑎 = 𝑍 ∨ 𝑏 = 𝑍)))) | ||
| Theorem | dmnnzd 38929 | Obsolete theorem, use idomnzd 49365 instead. A domain has no zero-divisors (besides zero). (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 19-Jun-2010.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐺 = (1st ‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (2nd ‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝑋 = ran 𝐺 & ⊢ 𝑍 = (GId‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ Dmn ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ (𝐴𝐻𝐵) = 𝑍)) → (𝐴 = 𝑍 ∨ 𝐵 = 𝑍)) | ||
| Theorem | dmncan1 38930 | Obsolete theorem, use idomcanl 49366 instead. Cancellation law for domains. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 6-Jan-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐺 = (1st ‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (2nd ‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝑋 = ran 𝐺 & ⊢ 𝑍 = (GId‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝑅 ∈ Dmn ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋)) ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝑍) → ((𝐴𝐻𝐵) = (𝐴𝐻𝐶) → 𝐵 = 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | dmncan2 38931 | Obsolete theorem, use idomcanr 49367 instead. Cancellation law for domains. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 6-Jan-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐺 = (1st ‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (2nd ‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝑋 = ran 𝐺 & ⊢ 𝑍 = (GId‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝑅 ∈ Dmn ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋)) ∧ 𝐶 ≠ 𝑍) → ((𝐴𝐻𝐶) = (𝐵𝐻𝐶) → 𝐴 = 𝐵)) | ||
The results in this section are mostly meant for being used by automatic proof building programs. As a result, they might appear less useful or meaningful than others to human beings. | ||
| Theorem | efald2 38932 | A proof by contradiction. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 15-Sep-2017.) |
| ⊢ (¬ 𝜑 → ⊥) ⇒ ⊢ 𝜑 | ||
| Theorem | notbinot1 38933 | Simplification rule of negation across a biconditional. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 15-Sep-2017.) |
| ⊢ (¬ (¬ 𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ↔ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) | ||
| Theorem | bicontr 38934 | Biconditional of its own negation is a contradiction. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 15-Sep-2017.) |
| ⊢ ((¬ 𝜑 ↔ 𝜑) ↔ ⊥) | ||
| Theorem | impor 38935 | An equivalent formula for implying a disjunction. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 15-Sep-2017.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 ∨ 𝜒)) ↔ ((¬ 𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ∨ 𝜒)) | ||
| Theorem | orfa 38936 | The falsum ⊥ can be removed from a disjunction. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 15-Sep-2017.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∨ ⊥) ↔ 𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | notbinot2 38937 | Commutation rule between negation and biconditional. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 15-Sep-2017.) |
| ⊢ (¬ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ↔ (¬ 𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) | ||
| Theorem | biimpor 38938 | A rewriting rule for biconditional. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 15-Sep-2017.) |
| ⊢ (((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → 𝜒) ↔ ((¬ 𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ∨ 𝜒)) | ||
| Theorem | orfa1 38939 | Add a contradicting disjunct to an antecedent. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 15-Sep-2017.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∨ ⊥) → 𝜓) | ||
| Theorem | orfa2 38940 | Remove a contradicting disjunct from an antecedent. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 15-Sep-2017.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → ⊥) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) → 𝜓) | ||
| Theorem | bifald 38941 | Infer the equivalence to a contradiction from a negation, in deduction form. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 15-Sep-2017.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝜓) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ ⊥)) | ||
| Theorem | cnf1dd 38942 | A lemma for Conjunctive Normal Form unit propagation, in double deduction form. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 19-Mar-2018.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → ¬ 𝜒)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 ∨ 𝜃))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜃)) | ||
| Theorem | cnf2dd 38943 | A lemma for Conjunctive Normal Form unit propagation, in double deduction form. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 19-Mar-2018.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → ¬ 𝜃)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 ∨ 𝜃))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) | ||
| Theorem | cnfn1dd 38944 | A lemma for Conjunctive Normal Form unit propagation, in double deduction form. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 19-Mar-2018.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (¬ 𝜒 ∨ 𝜃))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜃)) | ||
| Theorem | cnfn2dd 38945 | A lemma for Conjunctive Normal Form unit propagation, in double deduction form. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 19-Mar-2018.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜃)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 ∨ ¬ 𝜃))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) | ||
| Theorem | or32dd 38946 | A rearrangement of disjuncts, in double deduction form. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 19-Mar-2018.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → ((𝜒 ∨ 𝜃) ∨ 𝜏))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → ((𝜒 ∨ 𝜏) ∨ 𝜃))) | ||
| Theorem | notornotel1 38947 | A lemma for not-or-not elimination, in deduction form. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 19-Mar-2018.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (¬ 𝜓 ∨ 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓) | ||
| Theorem | notornotel2 38948 | A lemma for not-or-not elimination, in deduction form. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 19-Mar-2018.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝜓 ∨ ¬ 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜒) | ||
| Theorem | contrd 38949 | A proof by contradiction, in deduction form. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 19-Mar-2018.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → (¬ 𝜓 → 𝜒)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (¬ 𝜓 → ¬ 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓) | ||
| Theorem | an12i 38950 | An inference from commuting operands in a chain of conjunctions. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 22-May-2019.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 ∧ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜓 ∧ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜒)) | ||
| Theorem | exmid2 38951 | An excluded middle law. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 23-May-2019.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜒) & ⊢ ((¬ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜂) → 𝜒) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜂) → 𝜒) | ||
| Theorem | selconj 38952 | An inference for selecting one of a list of conjuncts. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 23-May-2019.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜂 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (𝜓 ∧ (𝜂 ∧ 𝜒))) | ||
| Theorem | truconj 38953 | Add true as a conjunct. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 23-May-2019.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (⊤ ∧ 𝜑)) | ||
| Theorem | orel 38954 | An inference for disjunction elimination. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 24-May-2019.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜂) → 𝜃) & ⊢ ((𝜒 ∧ 𝜌) → 𝜃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ∨ 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝜂 ∧ 𝜌)) → 𝜃) | ||
| Theorem | negel 38955 | An inference for negation elimination. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 24-May-2019.) |
| ⊢ (𝜓 → 𝜒) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝜒) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → ⊥) | ||
| Theorem | botel 38956 | An inference for bottom elimination. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 24-May-2019.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → ⊥) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓) | ||
| Theorem | tradd 38957 | Add top ad a conjunct. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 24-May-2019.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (⊤ ∧ 𝜓)) | ||
| Theorem | gm-sbtru 38958 | Substitution does not change truth. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 24-May-2019.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]⊤ ↔ ⊤) | ||
| Theorem | sbfal 38959 | Substitution does not change falsity. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 24-May-2019.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]⊥ ↔ ⊥) | ||
| Theorem | sbcani 38960 | Distribution of class substitution over conjunction, in inference form. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 27-May-2019.) |
| ⊢ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ 𝜒) & ⊢ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓 ↔ 𝜂) ⇒ ⊢ ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (𝜒 ∧ 𝜂)) | ||
| Theorem | sbcori 38961 | Distribution of class substitution over disjunction, in inference form. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 27-May-2019.) |
| ⊢ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ 𝜒) & ⊢ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓 ↔ 𝜂) ⇒ ⊢ ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ↔ (𝜒 ∨ 𝜂)) | ||
| Theorem | sbcimi 38962 | Distribution of class substitution over implication, in inference form. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 27-May-2019.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ 𝜒) & ⊢ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓 ↔ 𝜂) ⇒ ⊢ ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝜑 → 𝜓) ↔ (𝜒 → 𝜂)) | ||
| Theorem | sbcni 38963 | Move class substitution inside a negation, in inference form. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 27-May-2019.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ⇒ ⊢ ([𝐴 / 𝑥] ¬ 𝜑 ↔ ¬ 𝜓) | ||
| Theorem | sbali 38964 | Discard class substitution in a universal quantification when substituting the quantified variable, in inference form. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 27-May-2019.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]∀𝑥𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | sbexi 38965 | Discard class substitution in an existential quantification when substituting the quantified variable, in inference form. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 27-May-2019.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]∃𝑥𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | sbcalf 38966* | Move universal quantifier in and out of class substitution, with an explicit nonfree variable condition. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 29-May-2019.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴 ⇒ ⊢ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]∀𝑦𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑦[𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | sbcexf 38967* | Move existential quantifier in and out of class substitution, with an explicit nonfree variable condition. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 29-May-2019.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴 ⇒ ⊢ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]∃𝑦𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦[𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | sbcalfi 38968* | Move universal quantifier in and out of class substitution, with an explicit nonfree variable condition and in inference form. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 30-May-2019.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴 & ⊢ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ⇒ ⊢ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]∀𝑦𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑦𝜓) | ||
| Theorem | sbcexfi 38969* | Move existential quantifier in and out of class substitution, with an explicit nonfree variable condition and in inference form. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 30-May-2019.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴 & ⊢ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ⇒ ⊢ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]∃𝑦𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦𝜓) | ||
| Theorem | spsbcdi 38970 | A lemma for eliminating a universal quantifier, in inference form. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 30-May-2019.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜒) & ⊢ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜒 ↔ 𝜓) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓) | ||
| Theorem | alrimii 38971* | A lemma for introducing a universal quantifier, in inference form. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 30-May-2019.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑 & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓) & ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜒 ↔ 𝜓) & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜒 ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜒) | ||
| Theorem | spesbcdi 38972 | A lemma for introducing an existential quantifier, in inference form. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 30-May-2019.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓) & ⊢ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜒 ↔ 𝜓) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥𝜒) | ||
| Theorem | exlimddvf 38973 | A lemma for eliminating an existential quantifier. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 30-May-2019.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥𝜃) & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓 & ⊢ ((𝜃 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒) & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜒 ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒) | ||
| Theorem | exlimddvfi 38974 | A lemma for eliminating an existential quantifier, in inference form. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 31-May-2019.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥𝜃) & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜃 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜓 & ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜃 ↔ 𝜂) & ⊢ ((𝜂 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒) & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜒 ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒) | ||
| Theorem | sbceq1ddi 38975 | A lemma for eliminating inequality, in inference form. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 31-May-2019.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜓 → 𝜃) & ⊢ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜒 ↔ 𝜃) & ⊢ ([𝐵 / 𝑥]𝜒 ↔ 𝜂) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜂) | ||
| Theorem | sbccom2lem 38976* | Lemma for sbccom2 38977. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 31-May-2019.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ ([𝐴 / 𝑥][𝐵 / 𝑦]𝜑 ↔ [⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 / 𝑦][𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | sbccom2 38977* | Commutative law for double class substitution. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 31-May-2019.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ ([𝐴 / 𝑥][𝐵 / 𝑦]𝜑 ↔ [⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 / 𝑦][𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | sbccom2f 38978* | Commutative law for double class substitution, with nonfree variable condition. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 31-May-2019.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴 ⇒ ⊢ ([𝐴 / 𝑥][𝐵 / 𝑦]𝜑 ↔ [⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 / 𝑦][𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | sbccom2fi 38979* | Commutative law for double class substitution, with nonfree variable condition and in inference form. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 1-Jun-2019.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴 & ⊢ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 = 𝐶 & ⊢ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ⇒ ⊢ ([𝐴 / 𝑥][𝐵 / 𝑦]𝜑 ↔ [𝐶 / 𝑦]𝜓) | ||
| Theorem | csbcom2fi 38980* | Commutative law for double class substitution in a class, with nonfree variable condition and in inference form. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 4-Jun-2019.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴 & ⊢ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 = 𝐶 & ⊢ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷 = 𝐸 ⇒ ⊢ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌⦋𝐵 / 𝑦⦌𝐷 = ⦋𝐶 / 𝑦⦌𝐸 | ||
A collection of Tseitin axioms used to convert a wff to Conjunctive Normal Form. | ||
| Theorem | fald 38981 | Refutation of falsity, in deduction form. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 24-Mar-2018.) |
| ⊢ (𝜃 → ¬ ⊥) | ||
| Theorem | tsim1 38982 | A Tseitin axiom for logical implication, in deduction form. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 24-Mar-2018.) |
| ⊢ (𝜃 → ((¬ 𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ∨ ¬ (𝜑 → 𝜓))) | ||
| Theorem | tsim2 38983 | A Tseitin axiom for logical implication, in deduction form. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 24-Mar-2018.) |
| ⊢ (𝜃 → (𝜑 ∨ (𝜑 → 𝜓))) | ||
| Theorem | tsim3 38984 | A Tseitin axiom for logical implication, in deduction form. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 24-Mar-2018.) |
| ⊢ (𝜃 → (¬ 𝜓 ∨ (𝜑 → 𝜓))) | ||
| Theorem | tsbi1 38985 | A Tseitin axiom for logical biconditional, in deduction form. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 24-Mar-2018.) |
| ⊢ (𝜃 → ((¬ 𝜑 ∨ ¬ 𝜓) ∨ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))) | ||
| Theorem | tsbi2 38986 | A Tseitin axiom for logical biconditional, in deduction form. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 24-Mar-2018.) |
| ⊢ (𝜃 → ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ∨ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))) | ||
| Theorem | tsbi3 38987 | A Tseitin axiom for logical biconditional, in deduction form. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 24-Mar-2018.) |
| ⊢ (𝜃 → ((𝜑 ∨ ¬ 𝜓) ∨ ¬ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))) | ||
| Theorem | tsbi4 38988 | A Tseitin axiom for logical biconditional, in deduction form. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 24-Mar-2018.) |
| ⊢ (𝜃 → ((¬ 𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ∨ ¬ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))) | ||
| Theorem | tsxo1 38989 | A Tseitin axiom for logical exclusive disjunction, in deduction form. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 24-Mar-2018.) |
| ⊢ (𝜃 → ((¬ 𝜑 ∨ ¬ 𝜓) ∨ ¬ (𝜑 ⊻ 𝜓))) | ||
| Theorem | tsxo2 38990 | A Tseitin axiom for logical exclusive disjunction, in deduction form. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 24-Mar-2018.) |
| ⊢ (𝜃 → ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ∨ ¬ (𝜑 ⊻ 𝜓))) | ||
| Theorem | tsxo3 38991 | A Tseitin axiom for logical exclusive disjunction, in deduction form. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 24-Mar-2018.) |
| ⊢ (𝜃 → ((𝜑 ∨ ¬ 𝜓) ∨ (𝜑 ⊻ 𝜓))) | ||
| Theorem | tsxo4 38992 | A Tseitin axiom for logical exclusive disjunction, in deduction form. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 24-Mar-2018.) |
| ⊢ (𝜃 → ((¬ 𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ∨ (𝜑 ⊻ 𝜓))) | ||
| Theorem | tsan1 38993 | A Tseitin axiom for logical conjunction, in deduction form. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 24-Mar-2018.) |
| ⊢ (𝜃 → ((¬ 𝜑 ∨ ¬ 𝜓) ∨ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))) | ||
| Theorem | tsan2 38994 | A Tseitin axiom for logical conjunction, in deduction form. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 24-Mar-2018.) |
| ⊢ (𝜃 → (𝜑 ∨ ¬ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))) | ||
| Theorem | tsan3 38995 | A Tseitin axiom for logical conjunction, in deduction form. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 24-Mar-2018.) |
| ⊢ (𝜃 → (𝜓 ∨ ¬ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))) | ||
| Theorem | tsna1 38996 | A Tseitin axiom for logical incompatibility, in deduction form. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 24-Mar-2018.) |
| ⊢ (𝜃 → ((¬ 𝜑 ∨ ¬ 𝜓) ∨ ¬ (𝜑 ⊼ 𝜓))) | ||
| Theorem | tsna2 38997 | A Tseitin axiom for logical incompatibility, in deduction form. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 24-Mar-2018.) |
| ⊢ (𝜃 → (𝜑 ∨ (𝜑 ⊼ 𝜓))) | ||
| Theorem | tsna3 38998 | A Tseitin axiom for logical incompatibility, in deduction form. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 24-Mar-2018.) |
| ⊢ (𝜃 → (𝜓 ∨ (𝜑 ⊼ 𝜓))) | ||
| Theorem | tsor1 38999 | A Tseitin axiom for logical disjunction, in deduction form. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 25-Mar-2018.) |
| ⊢ (𝜃 → ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ∨ ¬ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓))) | ||
| Theorem | tsor2 39000 | A Tseitin axiom for logical disjunction, in deduction form. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 25-Mar-2018.) |
| ⊢ (𝜃 → (¬ 𝜑 ∨ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓))) | ||
| < Previous Next > |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |