Theorem rexbida 3250

Description: Formula-building rule for restricted existential quantifier (deduction form). (Contributed by NM, 6-Oct-2003.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
rexbida.1	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑
rexbida.2	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
rexbida	⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒))

Proof of Theorem rexbida

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		rexbida.1	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑
2		rexbida.2	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))
3	2	pm5.32da 579	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜒)))
4	1, 3	exbid 2231	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜒)))
5		df-rex 3063	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓))
6		df-rex 3063	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜒))
7	4, 5, 6	3bitr4g 314	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 206   ∧ wa 395  ∃wex 1781  Ⅎwnf 1785   ∈ wcel 2114  ∃wrex 3062

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1797  ax-4 1811  ax-5 1912  ax-6 1969  ax-7 2010  ax-12 2185

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-ex 1782  df-nf 1786  df-rex 3063

This theorem is referenced by:  rexbid  3252  rexbidvaALT  3254  iuneq12daf  32643  bnj1366  35005  glbconxN  39754  supminfrnmpt  45803  limsupre2mpt  46088  limsupre3mpt  46092  limsupreuzmpt  46097