Theorem rexbida 3275

Description: Formula-building rule for restricted existential quantifier (deduction form). (Contributed by NM, 6-Oct-2003.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
rexbida.1	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑
rexbida.2	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
rexbida	⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒))

Proof of Theorem rexbida

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		rexbida.1	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑
2		rexbida.2	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))
3	2	pm5.32da 590	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜒)))
4	1, 3	exbid 2260	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜒)))
5		df-rex 3088	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓))
6		df-rex 3088	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜒))
7	4, 5, 6	3bitr4g 317	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401  ∃wex 1812  Ⅎwnf 1816   ∈ wcel 2145  ∃wrex 3087

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-12 2213

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-rex 3088

This theorem is used by:  rexbid  3277  rexbidvaALT  3279  iuneq12daf  33151  bnj1366  35459  glbconxN  40435  supminfrnmpt  46454  limsupre2mpt  46739  limsupre3mpt  46743  limsupreuzmpt  46748