Theorem rexbida 3235

Description: Formula-building rule for restricted existential quantifier (deduction form). (Contributed by NM, 6-Oct-2003.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
rexbida.1	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑
rexbida.2	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
rexbida	⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒))

Proof of Theorem rexbida

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		rexbida.1	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑
2		rexbida.2	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))
3	2	pm5.32da 570	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜒)))
4	1, 3	exbid 2259	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜒)))
5		df-rex 3102	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓))
6		df-rex 3102	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜒))
7	4, 5, 6	3bitr4g 305	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 197   ∧ wa 384  ∃wex 1859  Ⅎwnf 1863   ∈ wcel 2156  ∃wrex 3097

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1877  ax-4 1894  ax-5 2001  ax-6 2068  ax-7 2104  ax-12 2214

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 198  df-an 385  df-ex 1860  df-nf 1864  df-rex 3102

This theorem is referenced by:  rexbidvaALT  3238  rexbid  3239  dfiun2g  4744  fun11iun  7356  iuneq12daf  29698  bnj1366  31223  glbconxN  35158  supminfrnmpt  40151  limsupre2mpt  40442  limsupre3mpt  40446  limsupreuzmpt  40451