Theorem supminfrnmpt 46728

Description: The indexed supremum of a bounded-above set of reals is the negation of the indexed infimum of that set's image under negation. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 2-Jan-2022.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
supminfrnmpt.x	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑
supminfrnmpt.a	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ ∅)
supminfrnmpt.b	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)
supminfrnmpt.y	⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑦 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ≤ 𝑦)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
supminfrnmpt	⊢ (𝜑 → sup(ran (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵), ℝ, < ) = -inf(ran (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ -𝐵), ℝ, < ))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴,𝑦   𝑦,𝐵

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥, 𝑦)   𝐵(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem supminfrnmpt

Dummy variables 𝑤 𝑧 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		supminfrnmpt.x	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑
2		eqid 2763	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵)
3		supminfrnmpt.b	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)
4	1, 2, 3	rnmptssd 7156	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ran (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ⊆ ℝ)
5		supminfrnmpt.a	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ ∅)
6	1, 3, 2, 5	rnmptn0 6264	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ran (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ≠ ∅)
7		supminfrnmpt.y	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑦 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ≤ 𝑦)
8	1, 7	rnmptbdd 46530	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑦 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑧 ∈ ran (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵)𝑧 ≤ 𝑦)
9		supminf 13102	. . 3 ⊢ ((ran (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ⊆ ℝ ∧ ran (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑧 ∈ ran (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵)𝑧 ≤ 𝑦) → sup(ran (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵), ℝ, < ) = -inf({𝑤 ∈ ℝ ∣ -𝑤 ∈ ran (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵)}, ℝ, < ))
10	4, 6, 8, 9	syl3anc 1399	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → sup(ran (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵), ℝ, < ) = -inf({𝑤 ∈ ℝ ∣ -𝑤 ∈ ran (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵)}, ℝ, < ))
11		eqid 2763	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ -𝐵) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ -𝐵)
12		simpr 490	. . . . . . . . . . . 12 ⊢ ((𝑤 ∈ ℝ ∧ -𝑤 ∈ ran (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵)) → -𝑤 ∈ ran (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵))
13		renegcl 11660	. . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 ⊢ (𝑤 ∈ ℝ → -𝑤 ∈ ℝ)
14	2	elrnmpt 5952	. . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 ⊢ ( -𝑤 ∈ ℝ → ( -𝑤 ∈ ran (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 -𝑤 = 𝐵))
15	13, 14	syl 18	. . . . . . . . . . . . 13 ⊢ (𝑤 ∈ ℝ → ( -𝑤 ∈ ran (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 -𝑤 = 𝐵))
16	15	adantr 486	. . . . . . . . . . . 12 ⊢ ((𝑤 ∈ ℝ ∧ -𝑤 ∈ ran (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵)) → ( -𝑤 ∈ ran (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 -𝑤 = 𝐵))
17	12, 16	mpbid 235	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ ((𝑤 ∈ ℝ ∧ -𝑤 ∈ ran (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵)) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 -𝑤 = 𝐵)
18	17	adantll 727	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ ℝ) ∧ -𝑤 ∈ ran (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵)) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 -𝑤 = 𝐵)
19		nfv 1949	. . . . . . . . . . . . 13 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝑤 ∈ ℝ
20	1, 19	nfan 1934	. . . . . . . . . . . 12 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ ℝ)
21		negeq 11588	. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 ⊢ ( -𝑤 = 𝐵 → - -𝑤 = -𝐵)
22	21	eqcomd 2769	. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 ⊢ ( -𝑤 = 𝐵 → -𝐵 = - -𝑤)
23	22	adantl 487	. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 ⊢ ((𝑤 ∈ ℝ ∧ -𝑤 = 𝐵) → -𝐵 = - -𝑤)
24		recn 11329	. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 ⊢ (𝑤 ∈ ℝ → 𝑤 ∈ ℂ)
25	24	negnegd 11699	. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 ⊢ (𝑤 ∈ ℝ → - -𝑤 = 𝑤)
26	25	adantr 486	. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 ⊢ ((𝑤 ∈ ℝ ∧ -𝑤 = 𝐵) → - -𝑤 = 𝑤)
27	23, 26	eqtr2d 2799	. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 ⊢ ((𝑤 ∈ ℝ ∧ -𝑤 = 𝐵) → 𝑤 = -𝐵)
28	27	ex 418	. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 ⊢ (𝑤 ∈ ℝ → ( -𝑤 = 𝐵 → 𝑤 = -𝐵))
29	28	adantl 487	. . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ ℝ) → ( -𝑤 = 𝐵 → 𝑤 = -𝐵))
30	29	adantr 486	. . . . . . . . . . . . 13 ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ ℝ) ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → ( -𝑤 = 𝐵 → 𝑤 = -𝐵))
31		negeq 11588	. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 ⊢ (𝑤 = -𝐵 → -𝑤 = - -𝐵)
32	31	adantl 487	. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝑤 = -𝐵) → -𝑤 = - -𝐵)
33	3	recnd 11376	. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)
34	33	negnegd 11699	. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → - -𝐵 = 𝐵)
35	34	adantr 486	. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝑤 = -𝐵) → - -𝐵 = 𝐵)
36	32, 35	eqtrd 2798	. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝑤 = -𝐵) → -𝑤 = 𝐵)
37	36	ex 418	. . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑤 = -𝐵 → -𝑤 = 𝐵))
38	37	adantlr 728	. . . . . . . . . . . . 13 ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ ℝ) ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑤 = -𝐵 → -𝑤 = 𝐵))
39	30, 38	impbid 215	. . . . . . . . . . . 12 ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ ℝ) ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → ( -𝑤 = 𝐵 ↔ 𝑤 = -𝐵))
40	20, 39	rexbida 3278	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ ℝ) → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 -𝑤 = 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑤 = -𝐵))
41	40	adantr 486	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ ℝ) ∧ -𝑤 ∈ ran (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵)) → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 -𝑤 = 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑤 = -𝐵))
42	18, 41	mpbid 235	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ ℝ) ∧ -𝑤 ∈ ran (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵)) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑤 = -𝐵)
43		simplr 781	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ ℝ) ∧ -𝑤 ∈ ran (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵)) → 𝑤 ∈ ℝ)
44	11, 42, 43	elrnmptd 5957	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ ℝ) ∧ -𝑤 ∈ ran (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵)) → 𝑤 ∈ ran (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ -𝐵))
45	44	ex 418	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ ℝ) → ( -𝑤 ∈ ran (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) → 𝑤 ∈ ran (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ -𝐵)))
46	45	ralrimiva 3158	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑤 ∈ ℝ ( -𝑤 ∈ ran (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) → 𝑤 ∈ ran (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ -𝐵)))
47		rabss 3998	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ({𝑤 ∈ ℝ ∣ -𝑤 ∈ ran (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵)} ⊆ ran (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ -𝐵) ↔ ∀𝑤 ∈ ℝ ( -𝑤 ∈ ran (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) → 𝑤 ∈ ran (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ -𝐵)))
48	46, 47	sylibr 237	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑤 ∈ ℝ ∣ -𝑤 ∈ ran (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵)} ⊆ ran (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ -𝐵))
49		nfcv 2926	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 -𝑤
50		nfmpt1 5210	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵)
51	50	nfrn 5946	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥ran (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵)
52	49, 51	nfel 2940	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 -𝑤 ∈ ran (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵)
53		nfcv 2926	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥ℝ
54	52, 53	nfrabw 3451	. . . . . 6 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥{𝑤 ∈ ℝ ∣ -𝑤 ∈ ran (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵)}
55	31	eleq1d 2849	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑤 = -𝐵 → ( -𝑤 ∈ ran (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ↔ - -𝐵 ∈ ran (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵)))
56	3	renegcld 11782	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → -𝐵 ∈ ℝ)
57		simpr 490	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)
58	2	elrnmpt1 5954	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → 𝐵 ∈ ran (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵))
59	57, 3, 58	syl2anc 596	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ ran (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵))
60	34, 59	eqeltrd 2864	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → - -𝐵 ∈ ran (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵))
61	55, 56, 60	elrabd 3650	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → -𝐵 ∈ {𝑤 ∈ ℝ ∣ -𝑤 ∈ ran (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵)})
62	1, 54, 11, 61	rnmptssdf 46539	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → ran (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ -𝐵) ⊆ {𝑤 ∈ ℝ ∣ -𝑤 ∈ ran (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵)})
63	48, 62	eqssd 3930	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑤 ∈ ℝ ∣ -𝑤 ∈ ran (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵)} = ran (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ -𝐵))
64	63	infeq1d 9507	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → inf({𝑤 ∈ ℝ ∣ -𝑤 ∈ ran (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵)}, ℝ, < ) = inf(ran (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ -𝐵), ℝ, < ))
65	64	negeqd 11590	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → -inf({𝑤 ∈ ℝ ∣ -𝑤 ∈ ran (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵)}, ℝ, < ) = -inf(ran (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ -𝐵), ℝ, < ))
66	10, 65	eqtrd 2798	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → sup(ran (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵), ℝ, < ) = -inf(ran (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ -𝐵), ℝ, < ))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401   = wceq 1570  Ⅎwnf 1816   ∈ wcel 2147   ≠ wne 2959  ∀wral 3080  ∃wrex 3090  {crab 3416   ⊆ wss 3900  ∅c0 4281   class class class wbr 5108   ↦ cmpt 5192  ran crn 5659  supcsup 9469  infcinf 9470  ℝcr 11238   < clt 11382   ≤ cle 11383   -cneg 11581

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1945  ax-6 2002  ax-7 2043  ax-8 2149  ax-9 2157  ax-10 2180  ax-11 2197  ax-12 2216  ax-ext 2735  ax-sep 5255  ax-nul 5266  ax-pow 5334  ax-pr 5398  ax-un 7783  ax-resscn 11296  ax-1cn 11297  ax-icn 11298  ax-addcl 11299  ax-addrcl 11300  ax-mulcl 11301  ax-mulrcl 11302  ax-mulcom 11303  ax-addass 11304  ax-mulass 11305  ax-distr 11306  ax-i2m1 11307  ax-1ne0 11308  ax-1rid 11309  ax-rnegex 11310  ax-rrecex 11311  ax-cnre 11312  ax-pre-lttri 11313  ax-pre-lttrn 11314  ax-pre-ltadd 11315  ax-pre-mulgt0 11316  ax-pre-sup 11317

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3or 1104  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2102  df-mo 2567  df-eu 2597  df-clab 2742  df-cleq 2755  df-clel 2839  df-nfc 2913  df-ne 2960  df-nel 3066  df-ral 3081  df-rex 3091  df-rmo 3369  df-reu 3370  df-rab 3417  df-v 3456  df-sbc 3743  df-csb 3852  df-ss 3901  df-dif 4050  df-in 4094  df-un 4154  df-nul 4282  df-if 4486  df-pw 4562  df-sn 4589  df-pr 4591  df-op 4841  df-uni 4873  df-br 5109  df-opab 5174  df-mpt 5193  df-id 5553  df-po 5566  df-so 5567  df-xp 5664  df-rel 5665  df-cnv 5666  df-co 5667  df-dm 5668  df-rn 5669  df-res 5670  df-ima 5671  df-iota 6520  df-fun 6568  df-fn 6569  df-f 6570  df-f1 6571  df-fo 6572  df-f1o 6573  df-fv 6574  df-isom 6575  df-riota 7408  df-ov 7454  df-oprab 7455  df-mpo 7456  df-er 8755  df-en 9012  df-dom 9013  df-sdom 9014  df-sup 9471  df-inf 9472  df-pnf 11384  df-mnf 11385  df-xr 11386  df-ltxr 11387  df-le 11388  df-sub 11582  df-neg 11583

This theorem is used by: (None)