Theorem riotarab 33575

Description: Restricted iota of a restricted abstraction. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 8-Aug-2024.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
riotarab.1	⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
riotarab	⊢ (℩𝑥 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓}𝜒) = (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 ∧ 𝜒))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑦,𝐴   𝜑,𝑦   𝑥,𝑦

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥)   𝜓(𝑥,𝑦)   𝜒(𝑥,𝑦)   𝐴(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem riotarab

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		riotarab.1	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
2	1	bicomd 222	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜑))
3	2	equcoms 2024	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑥 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜑))
4	3	elrab 3617	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓} ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑))
5	4	anbi1i 623	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓} ∧ 𝜒) ↔ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ∧ 𝜒))
6		anass 468	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ∧ 𝜒) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜒)))
7	5, 6	bitri 274	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓} ∧ 𝜒) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜒)))
8	7	iotabii 6403	. 2 ⊢ (℩𝑥(𝑥 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓} ∧ 𝜒)) = (℩𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜒)))
9		df-riota 7212	. 2 ⊢ (℩𝑥 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓}𝜒) = (℩𝑥(𝑥 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓} ∧ 𝜒))
10		df-riota 7212	. 2 ⊢ (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 ∧ 𝜒)) = (℩𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜒)))
11	8, 9, 10	3eqtr4i 2776	1 ⊢ (℩𝑥 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓}𝜒) = (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 ∧ 𝜒))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 205   ∧ wa 395   = wceq 1539   ∈ wcel 2108  {crab 3067  ℩cio 6374  ℩crio 7211

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1799  ax-4 1813  ax-5 1914  ax-6 1972  ax-7 2012  ax-8 2110  ax-9 2118  ax-ext 2709

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 396  df-tru 1542  df-ex 1784  df-sb 2069  df-clab 2716  df-cleq 2730  df-clel 2817  df-rab 3072  df-v 3424  df-in 3890  df-ss 3900  df-uni 4837  df-iota 6376  df-riota 7212

This theorem is referenced by:  eqscut  33926