Theorem riotarab 33203

Description: Restricted iota of a restricted abstraction. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 8-Aug-2024.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
riotarab.1	⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
riotarab	⊢ (℩𝑥 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓}𝜒) = (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 ∧ 𝜒))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑦,𝐴   𝜑,𝑦   𝑥,𝑦

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥)   𝜓(𝑥,𝑦)   𝜒(𝑥,𝑦)   𝐴(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem riotarab

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		riotarab.1	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
2	1	bicomd 226	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜑))
3	2	equcoms 2027	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑥 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜑))
4	3	elrab 3604	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓} ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑))
5	4	anbi1i 626	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓} ∧ 𝜒) ↔ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ∧ 𝜒))
6		anass 472	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ∧ 𝜒) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜒)))
7	5, 6	bitri 278	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓} ∧ 𝜒) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜒)))
8	7	iotabii 6325	. 2 ⊢ (℩𝑥(𝑥 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓} ∧ 𝜒)) = (℩𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜒)))
9		df-riota 7114	. 2 ⊢ (℩𝑥 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓}𝜒) = (℩𝑥(𝑥 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓} ∧ 𝜒))
10		df-riota 7114	. 2 ⊢ (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 ∧ 𝜒)) = (℩𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜒)))
11	8, 9, 10	3eqtr4i 2791	1 ⊢ (℩𝑥 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓}𝜒) = (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 ∧ 𝜒))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 399   = wceq 1538   ∈ wcel 2111  {crab 3074  ℩cio 6297  ℩crio 7113

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1797  ax-4 1811  ax-5 1911  ax-6 1970  ax-7 2015  ax-8 2113  ax-9 2121  ax-10 2142  ax-11 2158  ax-12 2175  ax-ext 2729

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 400  df-or 845  df-tru 1541  df-ex 1782  df-nf 1786  df-sb 2070  df-clab 2736  df-cleq 2750  df-clel 2830  df-nfc 2901  df-rab 3079  df-v 3411  df-in 3867  df-ss 3877  df-uni 4802  df-iota 6299  df-riota 7114

This theorem is referenced by:  eqscut  33594