Theorem rzalf 45664

Description: A version of rzal 4458 using bound-variable hypotheses instead of distinct variable conditions. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 20-Apr-2017.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
rzalf.1	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝐴 = ∅

Assertion

Ref	Expression
rzalf	⊢ (𝐴 = ∅ → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)

Proof of Theorem rzalf

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		rzalf.1	. 2 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝐴 = ∅
2		ne0i 4300	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝐴 ≠ ∅)
3	2	necon2bi 2994	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 = ∅ → ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)
4	3	pm2.21d 122	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 = ∅ → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝜑))
5	1, 4	ralrimi 3269	1 ⊢ (𝐴 = ∅ → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   = wceq 1567  Ⅎwnf 1810   ∈ wcel 2149  ∀wral 3085  ∅c0 4292

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1822  ax-4 1836  ax-5 1937  ax-6 1994  ax-7 2035  ax-8 2151  ax-9 2159  ax-12 2219  ax-ext 2741

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 401  df-tru 1570  df-fal 1580  df-ex 1807  df-nf 1811  df-sb 2098  df-clab 2748  df-cleq 2761  df-clel 2844  df-ne 2965  df-ral 3086  df-dif 3914  df-nul 4293

This theorem is referenced by:  stoweidlem18  46659  stoweidlem28  46669  stoweidlem55  46696