Theorem rzalf 42449

Description: A version of rzal 4436 using bound-variable hypotheses instead of distinct variable conditions. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 20-Apr-2017.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
rzalf.1	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝐴 = ∅

Assertion

Ref	Expression
rzalf	⊢ (𝐴 = ∅ → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)

Proof of Theorem rzalf

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		rzalf.1	. 2 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝐴 = ∅
2		ne0i 4265	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝐴 ≠ ∅)
3	2	necon2bi 2973	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 = ∅ → ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)
4	3	pm2.21d 121	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 = ∅ → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝜑))
5	1, 4	ralrimi 3139	1 ⊢ (𝐴 = ∅ → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   = wceq 1539  Ⅎwnf 1787   ∈ wcel 2108  ∀wral 3063  ∅c0 4253

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1799  ax-4 1813  ax-5 1914  ax-6 1972  ax-7 2012  ax-8 2110  ax-9 2118  ax-12 2173  ax-ext 2709

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 396  df-tru 1542  df-fal 1552  df-ex 1784  df-nf 1788  df-sb 2069  df-clab 2716  df-cleq 2730  df-clel 2817  df-ne 2943  df-ral 3068  df-dif 3886  df-nul 4254

This theorem is referenced by:  stoweidlem18  43449  stoweidlem28  43459  stoweidlem55  43486