P. 438 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 43701-43800   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	relexpss1d 43701	The relational power of a subset is a subset. (Contributed by RP, 17-Jun-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴↑𝑟𝑁) ⊆ (𝐵↑𝑟𝑁))
Theorem	comptiunov2i 43702*	The composition two indexed unions is sometimes a similar indexed union. (Contributed by RP, 10-Jun-2020.)
⊢ 𝑋 = (𝑎 ∈ V ↦ ∪ 𝑖 ∈ 𝐼 (𝑎 ↑ 𝑖))    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = (𝑏 ∈ V ↦ ∪ 𝑗 ∈ 𝐽 (𝑏 ↑ 𝑗))    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (𝑐 ∈ V ↦ ∪ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐾 (𝑐 ↑ 𝑘))    &   ⊢ 𝐼 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐽 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (𝐼 ∪ 𝐽)    &   ⊢ ∪ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐼 (𝑑 ↑ 𝑘) ⊆ ∪ 𝑖 ∈ 𝐼 (∪ 𝑗 ∈ 𝐽 (𝑑 ↑ 𝑗) ↑ 𝑖)    &   ⊢ ∪ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐽 (𝑑 ↑ 𝑘) ⊆ ∪ 𝑖 ∈ 𝐼 (∪ 𝑗 ∈ 𝐽 (𝑑 ↑ 𝑗) ↑ 𝑖)    &   ⊢ ∪ 𝑖 ∈ 𝐼 (∪ 𝑗 ∈ 𝐽 (𝑑 ↑ 𝑗) ↑ 𝑖) ⊆ ∪ 𝑘 ∈ (𝐼 ∪ 𝐽)(𝑑 ↑ 𝑘)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑋 ∘ 𝑌) = 𝑍
Theorem	corclrcl 43703	The reflexive closure is idempotent. (Contributed by RP, 13-Jun-2020.)
⊢ (r* ∘ r*) = r*
Theorem	iunrelexpmin1 43704*	The indexed union of relation exponentiation over the natural numbers is the minimum transitive relation that includes the relation. (Contributed by RP, 4-Jun-2020.)
⊢ 𝐶 = (𝑟 ∈ V ↦ ∪ 𝑛 ∈ 𝑁 (𝑟↑𝑟𝑛))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑁 = ℕ) → ∀𝑠((𝑅 ⊆ 𝑠 ∧ (𝑠 ∘ 𝑠) ⊆ 𝑠) → (𝐶‘𝑅) ⊆ 𝑠))
Theorem	relexpmulnn 43705	With exponents limited to the counting numbers, the composition of powers of a relation is the relation raised to the product of exponents. (Contributed by RP, 13-Jun-2020.)
⊢ (((𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐼 = (𝐽 · 𝐾)) ∧ (𝐽 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐾 ∈ ℕ)) → ((𝑅↑𝑟𝐽)↑𝑟𝐾) = (𝑅↑𝑟𝐼))
Theorem	relexpmulg 43706	With ordered exponents, the composition of powers of a relation is the relation raised to the product of exponents. (Contributed by RP, 13-Jun-2020.)
⊢ (((𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐼 = (𝐽 · 𝐾) ∧ (𝐼 = 0 → 𝐽 ≤ 𝐾)) ∧ (𝐽 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐾 ∈ ℕ0)) → ((𝑅↑𝑟𝐽)↑𝑟𝐾) = (𝑅↑𝑟𝐼))
Theorem	trclrelexplem 43707*	The union of relational powers to positive multiples of 𝑁 is a subset to the transitive closure raised to the power of 𝑁. (Contributed by RP, 15-Jun-2020.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ → ∪ 𝑘 ∈ ℕ ((𝐷↑𝑟𝑘)↑𝑟𝑁) ⊆ (∪ 𝑗 ∈ ℕ (𝐷↑𝑟𝑗)↑𝑟𝑁))
Theorem	iunrelexpmin2 43708*	The indexed union of relation exponentiation over the natural numbers (including zero) is the minimum reflexive-transitive relation that includes the relation. (Contributed by RP, 4-Jun-2020.)
⊢ 𝐶 = (𝑟 ∈ V ↦ ∪ 𝑛 ∈ 𝑁 (𝑟↑𝑟𝑛))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑁 = ℕ0) → ∀𝑠((( I ↾ (dom 𝑅 ∪ ran 𝑅)) ⊆ 𝑠 ∧ 𝑅 ⊆ 𝑠 ∧ (𝑠 ∘ 𝑠) ⊆ 𝑠) → (𝐶‘𝑅) ⊆ 𝑠))
Theorem	relexp01min 43709	With exponents limited to 0 and 1, the composition of powers of a relation is the relation raised to the minimum of exponents. (Contributed by RP, 12-Jun-2020.)
⊢ (((𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐼 = if(𝐽 < 𝐾, 𝐽, 𝐾)) ∧ (𝐽 ∈ {0, 1} ∧ 𝐾 ∈ {0, 1})) → ((𝑅↑𝑟𝐽)↑𝑟𝐾) = (𝑅↑𝑟𝐼))
Theorem	relexp1idm 43710	Repeated raising a relation to the first power is idempotent. (Contributed by RP, 12-Jun-2020.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 → ((𝑅↑𝑟1)↑𝑟1) = (𝑅↑𝑟1))
Theorem	relexp0idm 43711	Repeated raising a relation to the zeroth power is idempotent. (Contributed by RP, 12-Jun-2020.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 → ((𝑅↑𝑟0)↑𝑟0) = (𝑅↑𝑟0))
Theorem	relexp0a 43712	Absorption law for zeroth power of a relation. (Contributed by RP, 17-Jun-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) → ((𝐴↑𝑟𝑁)↑𝑟0) ⊆ (𝐴↑𝑟0))
Theorem	relexpxpmin 43713	The composition of powers of a Cartesian product of non-disjoint sets is the Cartesian product raised to the minimum exponent. (Contributed by RP, 13-Jun-2020.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝑈 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ≠ ∅) ∧ (𝐼 = if(𝐽 < 𝐾, 𝐽, 𝐾) ∧ 𝐽 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐾 ∈ ℕ0)) → (((𝐴 × 𝐵)↑𝑟𝐽)↑𝑟𝐾) = ((𝐴 × 𝐵)↑𝑟𝐼))
Theorem	relexpaddss 43714	The composition of two powers of a relation is a subset of the relation raised to the sum of those exponents. This is equality where 𝑅 is a relation as shown by relexpaddd 15027 or when the sum of the powers isn't 1 as shown by relexpaddg 15026. (Contributed by RP, 3-Jun-2020.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝑉) → ((𝑅↑𝑟𝑁) ∘ (𝑅↑𝑟𝑀)) ⊆ (𝑅↑𝑟(𝑁 + 𝑀)))
Theorem	iunrelexpuztr 43715*	The indexed union of relation exponentiation over upper integers is a transive relation. Generalized from rtrclreclem3 15033. (Contributed by RP, 4-Jun-2020.)
⊢ 𝐶 = (𝑟 ∈ V ↦ ∪ 𝑛 ∈ 𝑁 (𝑟↑𝑟𝑛))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑁 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℕ0) → ((𝐶‘𝑅) ∘ (𝐶‘𝑅)) ⊆ (𝐶‘𝑅))
21.36.5.4  Transitive closure of a relation
Theorem	dftrcl3 43716*	Transitive closure of a relation, expressed as indexed union of powers of relations. (Contributed by RP, 5-Jun-2020.)
⊢ t+ = (𝑟 ∈ V ↦ ∪ 𝑛 ∈ ℕ (𝑟↑𝑟𝑛))
Theorem	brfvtrcld 43717*	If two elements are connected by the transitive closure of a relation, then they are connected via 𝑛 instances the relation, for some counting number 𝑛. (Contributed by RP, 22-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ V)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴(t+‘𝑅)𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑛 ∈ ℕ 𝐴(𝑅↑𝑟𝑛)𝐵))
Theorem	fvtrcllb1d 43718	A set is a subset of its image under the transitive closure. (Contributed by RP, 22-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ V)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ⊆ (t+‘𝑅))
Theorem	trclfvcom 43719	The transitive closure of a relation commutes with the relation. (Contributed by RP, 18-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 → ((t+‘𝑅) ∘ 𝑅) = (𝑅 ∘ (t+‘𝑅)))
Theorem	cnvtrclfv 43720	The converse of the transitive closure is equal to the transitive closure of the converse relation. (Contributed by RP, 19-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 → ◡(t+‘𝑅) = (t+‘◡𝑅))
Theorem	cotrcltrcl 43721	The transitive closure is idempotent. (Contributed by RP, 16-Jun-2020.)
⊢ (t+ ∘ t+) = t+
Theorem	trclimalb2 43722	Lower bound for image under a transitive closure. (Contributed by RP, 1-Jul-2020.)
⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ (𝑅 “ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)) ⊆ 𝐵) → ((t+‘𝑅) “ 𝐴) ⊆ 𝐵)
Theorem	brtrclfv2 43723*	Two ways to indicate two elements are related by the transitive closure of a relation. (Contributed by RP, 1-Jul-2020.)
⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑈 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝑋(t+‘𝑅)𝑌 ↔ 𝑌 ∈ ∩ {𝑓 ∣ (𝑅 “ ({𝑋} ∪ 𝑓)) ⊆ 𝑓}))
Theorem	trclfvdecomr 43724	The transitive closure of a relation may be decomposed into a union of the relation and the composition of the relation with its transitive closure. (Contributed by RP, 18-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 → (t+‘𝑅) = (𝑅 ∪ ((t+‘𝑅) ∘ 𝑅)))
Theorem	trclfvdecoml 43725	The transitive closure of a relation may be decomposed into a union of the relation and the composition of the relation with its transitive closure. (Contributed by RP, 18-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 → (t+‘𝑅) = (𝑅 ∪ (𝑅 ∘ (t+‘𝑅))))
Theorem	dmtrclfvRP 43726	The domain of the transitive closure is equal to the domain of the relation. (Contributed by RP, 18-Jul-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 → dom (t+‘𝑅) = dom 𝑅)
Theorem	rntrclfvRP 43727	The range of the transitive closure is equal to the range of the relation. (Contributed by RP, 19-Jul-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 → ran (t+‘𝑅) = ran 𝑅)
Theorem	rntrclfv 43728	The range of the transitive closure is equal to the range of the relation. (Contributed by RP, 18-Jul-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 → ran (t+‘𝑅) = ran 𝑅)
Theorem	dfrtrcl3 43729*	Reflexive-transitive closure of a relation, expressed as indexed union of powers of relations. Generalized from dfrtrcl2 15035. (Contributed by RP, 5-Jun-2020.)
⊢ t* = (𝑟 ∈ V ↦ ∪ 𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 (𝑟↑𝑟𝑛))
Theorem	brfvrtrcld 43730*	If two elements are connected by the reflexive-transitive closure of a relation, then they are connected via 𝑛 instances the relation, for some natural number 𝑛. Similar of dfrtrclrec2 15031. (Contributed by RP, 22-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ V)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴(t*‘𝑅)𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 𝐴(𝑅↑𝑟𝑛)𝐵))
Theorem	fvrtrcllb0d 43731	A restriction of the identity relation is a subset of the reflexive-transitive closure of a set. (Contributed by RP, 22-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ V)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ( I ↾ (dom 𝑅 ∪ ran 𝑅)) ⊆ (t*‘𝑅))
Theorem	fvrtrcllb0da 43732	A restriction of the identity relation is a subset of the reflexive-transitive closure of a relation. (Contributed by RP, 22-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → Rel 𝑅)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ V)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ( I ↾ ∪ ∪ 𝑅) ⊆ (t*‘𝑅))
Theorem	fvrtrcllb1d 43733	A set is a subset of its image under the reflexive-transitive closure. (Contributed by RP, 22-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ V)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ⊆ (t*‘𝑅))
Theorem	dfrtrcl4 43734	Reflexive-transitive closure of a relation, expressed as the union of the zeroth power and the transitive closure. (Contributed by RP, 5-Jun-2020.)
⊢ t* = (𝑟 ∈ V ↦ ((𝑟↑𝑟0) ∪ (t+‘𝑟)))
Theorem	corcltrcl 43735	The composition of the reflexive and transitive closures is the reflexive-transitive closure. (Contributed by RP, 17-Jun-2020.)
⊢ (r* ∘ t+) = t*
Theorem	cortrcltrcl 43736	Composition with the reflexive-transitive closure absorbs the transitive closure. (Contributed by RP, 13-Jun-2020.)
⊢ (t* ∘ t+) = t*
Theorem	corclrtrcl 43737	Composition with the reflexive-transitive closure absorbs the reflexive closure. (Contributed by RP, 13-Jun-2020.)
⊢ (r* ∘ t*) = t*
Theorem	cotrclrcl 43738	The composition of the reflexive and transitive closures is the reflexive-transitive closure. (Contributed by RP, 21-Jun-2020.)
⊢ (t+ ∘ r*) = t*
Theorem	cortrclrcl 43739	Composition with the reflexive-transitive closure absorbs the reflexive closure. (Contributed by RP, 13-Jun-2020.)
⊢ (t* ∘ r*) = t*
Theorem	cotrclrtrcl 43740	Composition with the reflexive-transitive closure absorbs the transitive closure. (Contributed by RP, 13-Jun-2020.)
⊢ (t+ ∘ t*) = t*
Theorem	cortrclrtrcl 43741	The reflexive-transitive closure is idempotent. (Contributed by RP, 13-Jun-2020.)
⊢ (t* ∘ t*) = t*
21.36.5.5  Adapted from Frege Theorems inspired by Begriffsschrift without restricting form and content to closely parallel those in [Frege1879].
Theorem	frege77d 43742	If the images of both {𝐴} and 𝑈 are subsets of 𝑈 and 𝐵 follows 𝐴 in the transitive closure of 𝑅, then 𝐵 is an element of 𝑈. Similar to Proposition 77 of [Frege1879] p. 62. Compare with frege77 43936. (Contributed by RP, 15-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴(t+‘𝑅)𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑅 “ 𝑈) ⊆ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑅 “ {𝐴}) ⊆ 𝑈)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑈)
Theorem	frege81d 43743	If the image of 𝑈 is a subset 𝑈, 𝐴 is an element of 𝑈 and 𝐵 follows 𝐴 in the transitive closure of 𝑅, then 𝐵 is an element of 𝑈. Similar to Proposition 81 of [Frege1879] p. 63. Compare with frege81 43940. (Contributed by RP, 15-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴(t+‘𝑅)𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑅 “ 𝑈) ⊆ 𝑈)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑈)
Theorem	frege83d 43744	If the image of the union of 𝑈 and 𝑉 is a subset of the union of 𝑈 and 𝑉, 𝐴 is an element of 𝑈 and 𝐵 follows 𝐴 in the transitive closure of 𝑅, then 𝐵 is an element of the union of 𝑈 and 𝑉. Similar to Proposition 83 of [Frege1879] p. 65. Compare with frege83 43942. (Contributed by RP, 15-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴(t+‘𝑅)𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑅 “ (𝑈 ∪ 𝑉)) ⊆ (𝑈 ∪ 𝑉))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (𝑈 ∪ 𝑉))
Theorem	frege96d 43745	If 𝐶 follows 𝐴 in the transitive closure of 𝑅 and 𝐵 follows 𝐶 in 𝑅, then 𝐵 follows 𝐴 in the transitive closure of 𝑅. Similar to Proposition 96 of [Frege1879] p. 71. Compare with frege96 43955. (Contributed by RP, 15-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴(t+‘𝑅)𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶𝑅𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴(t+‘𝑅)𝐵)
Theorem	frege87d 43746	If the images of both {𝐴} and 𝑈 are subsets of 𝑈 and 𝐶 follows 𝐴 in the transitive closure of 𝑅 and 𝐵 follows 𝐶 in 𝑅, then 𝐵 is an element of 𝑈. Similar to Proposition 87 of [Frege1879] p. 66. Compare with frege87 43946. (Contributed by RP, 15-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴(t+‘𝑅)𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶𝑅𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑅 “ {𝐴}) ⊆ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑅 “ 𝑈) ⊆ 𝑈)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑈)
Theorem	frege91d 43747	If 𝐵 follows 𝐴 in 𝑅 then 𝐵 follows 𝐴 in the transitive closure of 𝑅. Similar to Proposition 91 of [Frege1879] p. 68. Comparw with frege91 43950. (Contributed by RP, 15-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴𝑅𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴(t+‘𝑅)𝐵)
Theorem	frege97d 43748	If 𝐴 contains all elements after those in 𝑈 in the transitive closure of 𝑅, then the image under 𝑅 of 𝐴 is a subclass of 𝐴. Similar to Proposition 97 of [Frege1879] p. 71. Compare with frege97 43956. (Contributed by RP, 15-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = ((t+‘𝑅) “ 𝑈))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑅 “ 𝐴) ⊆ 𝐴)
Theorem	frege98d 43749	If 𝐶 follows 𝐴 and 𝐵 follows 𝐶 in the transitive closure of 𝑅, then 𝐵 follows 𝐴 in the transitive closure of 𝑅. Similar to Proposition 98 of [Frege1879] p. 71. Compare with frege98 43957. (Contributed by RP, 15-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴(t+‘𝑅)𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶(t+‘𝑅)𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴(t+‘𝑅)𝐵)
Theorem	frege102d 43750	If either 𝐴 and 𝐶 are the same or 𝐶 follows 𝐴 in the transitive closure of 𝑅 and 𝐵 is the successor to 𝐶, then 𝐵 follows 𝐴 in the transitive closure of 𝑅. Similar to Proposition 102 of [Frege1879] p. 72. Compare with frege102 43961. (Contributed by RP, 15-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴(t+‘𝑅)𝐶 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶𝑅𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴(t+‘𝑅)𝐵)
Theorem	frege106d 43751	If 𝐵 follows 𝐴 in 𝑅, then either 𝐴 and 𝐵 are the same or 𝐵 follows 𝐴 in 𝑅. Similar to Proposition 106 of [Frege1879] p. 73. Compare with frege106 43965. (Contributed by RP, 15-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴𝑅𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴𝑅𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	frege108d 43752	If either 𝐴 and 𝐶 are the same or 𝐶 follows 𝐴 in the transitive closure of 𝑅 and 𝐵 is the successor to 𝐶, then either 𝐴 and 𝐵 are the same or 𝐵 follows 𝐴 in the transitive closure of 𝑅. Similar to Proposition 108 of [Frege1879] p. 74. Compare with frege108 43967. (Contributed by RP, 15-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴(t+‘𝑅)𝐶 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶𝑅𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴(t+‘𝑅)𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	frege109d 43753	If 𝐴 contains all elements of 𝑈 and all elements after those in 𝑈 in the transitive closure of 𝑅, then the image under 𝑅 of 𝐴 is a subclass of 𝐴. Similar to Proposition 109 of [Frege1879] p. 74. Compare with frege109 43968. (Contributed by RP, 15-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = (𝑈 ∪ ((t+‘𝑅) “ 𝑈)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑅 “ 𝐴) ⊆ 𝐴)
Theorem	frege114d 43754	If either 𝑅 relates 𝐴 and 𝐵 or 𝐴 and 𝐵 are the same, then either 𝐴 and 𝐵 are the same, 𝑅 relates 𝐴 and 𝐵, 𝑅 relates 𝐵 and 𝐴. Similar to Proposition 114 of [Frege1879] p. 76. Compare with frege114 43973. (Contributed by RP, 15-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴𝑅𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴𝑅𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵 ∨ 𝐵𝑅𝐴))
Theorem	frege111d 43755	If either 𝐴 and 𝐶 are the same or 𝐶 follows 𝐴 in the transitive closure of 𝑅 and 𝐵 is the successor to 𝐶, then either 𝐴 and 𝐵 are the same or 𝐴 follows 𝐵 or 𝐵 and 𝐴 in the transitive closure of 𝑅. Similar to Proposition 111 of [Frege1879] p. 75. Compare with frege111 43970. (Contributed by RP, 15-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴(t+‘𝑅)𝐶 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶𝑅𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴(t+‘𝑅)𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵 ∨ 𝐵(t+‘𝑅)𝐴))
Theorem	frege122d 43756	If 𝐹 is a function, 𝐴 is the successor of 𝑋, and 𝐵 is the successor of 𝑋, then 𝐴 and 𝐵 are the same (or 𝐵 follows 𝐴 in the transitive closure of 𝐹). Similar to Proposition 122 of [Frege1879] p. 79. Compare with frege122 43981. (Contributed by RP, 15-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = (𝐹‘𝑋))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (𝐹‘𝑋))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴(t+‘𝐹)𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	frege124d 43757	If 𝐹 is a function, 𝐴 is the successor of 𝑋, and 𝐵 follows 𝑋 in the transitive closure of 𝐹, then 𝐴 and 𝐵 are the same or 𝐵 follows 𝐴 in the transitive closure of 𝐹. Similar to Proposition 124 of [Frege1879] p. 80. Compare with frege124 43983. (Contributed by RP, 16-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ dom 𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = (𝐹‘𝑋))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋(t+‘𝐹)𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun 𝐹)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴(t+‘𝐹)𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	frege126d 43758	If 𝐹 is a function, 𝐴 is the successor of 𝑋, and 𝐵 follows 𝑋 in the transitive closure of 𝐹, then (for distinct 𝐴 and 𝐵) either 𝐴 follows 𝐵 or 𝐵 follows 𝐴 in the transitive closure of 𝐹. Similar to Proposition 126 of [Frege1879] p. 81. Compare with frege126 43985. (Contributed by RP, 16-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ dom 𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = (𝐹‘𝑋))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋(t+‘𝐹)𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun 𝐹)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴(t+‘𝐹)𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵 ∨ 𝐵(t+‘𝐹)𝐴))
Theorem	frege129d 43759	If 𝐹 is a function and (for distinct 𝐴 and 𝐵) either 𝐴 follows 𝐵 or 𝐵 follows 𝐴 in the transitive closure of 𝐹, the successor of 𝐴 is either 𝐵 or it follows 𝐵 or it comes before 𝐵 in the transitive closure of 𝐹. Similar to Proposition 129 of [Frege1879] p. 83. Comparw with frege129 43988. (Contributed by RP, 16-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ dom 𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = (𝐹‘𝐴))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴(t+‘𝐹)𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵 ∨ 𝐵(t+‘𝐹)𝐴))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun 𝐹)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵(t+‘𝐹)𝐶 ∨ 𝐵 = 𝐶 ∨ 𝐶(t+‘𝐹)𝐵))
Theorem	frege131d 43760	If 𝐹 is a function and 𝐴 contains all elements of 𝑈 and all elements before or after those elements of 𝑈 in the transitive closure of 𝐹, then the image under 𝐹 of 𝐴 is a subclass of 𝐴. Similar to Proposition 131 of [Frege1879] p. 85. Compare with frege131 43990. (Contributed by RP, 17-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = (𝑈 ∪ ((◡(t+‘𝐹) “ 𝑈) ∪ ((t+‘𝐹) “ 𝑈))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun 𝐹)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 “ 𝐴) ⊆ 𝐴)
Theorem	frege133d 43761	If 𝐹 is a function and 𝐴 and 𝐵 both follow 𝑋 in the transitive closure of 𝐹, then (for distinct 𝐴 and 𝐵) either 𝐴 follows 𝐵 or 𝐵 follows 𝐴 in the transitive closure of 𝐹 (or both if it loops). Similar to Proposition 133 of [Frege1879] p. 86. Compare with frege133 43992. (Contributed by RP, 18-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋(t+‘𝐹)𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋(t+‘𝐹)𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun 𝐹)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴(t+‘𝐹)𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵 ∨ 𝐵(t+‘𝐹)𝐴))
21.36.6  Propositions from _Begriffsschrift_ In 1879, Frege introduced notation for documenting formal reasoning about propositions (and classes) which covered elements of propositional logic, predicate calculus and reasoning about relations. However, due to the pitfalls of naive set theory, adapting this work for inclusion in set.mm required dividing statements about propositions from those about classes and identifying when a restriction to sets is required. For an overview comparing the details of Frege's two-dimensional notation and that used in set.mm, see mmfrege.html. See ru 3754 for discussion of an example of a class that is not a set. Numbered propositions from [Frege1879]. ax-frege1 43786, ax-frege2 43787, ax-frege8 43805, ax-frege28 43826, ax-frege31 43830, ax-frege41 43841, frege52 (see ax-frege52a 43853, frege52b 43885, and ax-frege52c 43884 for translations), frege54 (see ax-frege54a 43858, frege54b 43889 and ax-frege54c 43888 for translations) and frege58 (see ax-frege58a 43871, ax-frege58b 43897 and frege58c 43917 for translations) are considered "core" or axioms. However, at least ax-frege8 43805 can be derived from ax-frege1 43786 and ax-frege2 43787, see axfrege8 43803. Frege introduced implication, negation and the universal quantifier as primitives and did not in the numbered propositions use other logical connectives other than equivalence introduced in ax-frege52a 43853, frege52b 43885, and ax-frege52c 43884. In dffrege69 43928, Frege introduced 𝑅 hereditary 𝐴 to say that relation 𝑅, when restricted to operate on elements of class 𝐴, will only have elements of class 𝐴 in its domain; see df-he 43769 for a definition in terms of image and subset. In dffrege76 43935, Frege introduced notation for the concept of two sets related by the transitive closure of a relation, for which we write 𝑋(t+‘𝑅)𝑌, which requires 𝑅 to also be a set. In dffrege99 43958, Frege introduced notation for the concept of two sets either identical or related by the transitive closure of a relation, for which we write 𝑋((t+‘𝑅) ∪ I )𝑌, which is a superclass of sets related by the reflexive-transitive relation 𝑋(t*‘𝑅)𝑌. Finally, in dffrege115 43974, Frege introduced notation for the concept of a relation having the property elements in its domain pair up with only one element each in its range, for which we write Fun ◡◡𝑅 (to ignore any non-relational content of the class 𝑅). Frege did this without the expressing concept of a relation (or its transitive closure) as a class, and needed to invent conventions for discussing indeterminate propositions with two slots free and how to recognize which of the slots was domain and which was range. See mmfrege.html 43974 for details. English translations for specific propositions lifted in part from a translation by Stefan Bauer-Mengelberg as reprinted in From Frege to Goedel: A Source Book in Mathematical Logic, 1879-1931. An attempt to align these propositions in the larger set.mm database has also been made. See frege77d 43742 for an example.
21.36.6.1  _Begriffsschrift_ Chapter I Section 2 introduces the turnstile ⊢ which turns an idea which may be true 𝜑 into an assertion that it does hold true ⊢ 𝜑. Section 5 introduces implication, (𝜑 → 𝜓). Section 6 introduces the single rule of interference relied upon, modus ponens ax-mp 5. Section 7 introduces negation and with in synonyms for or (¬ 𝜑 → 𝜓) , and ¬ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝜓), and two for exclusive-or corresponding to df-or 848, df-an 396, dfxor4 43762, dfxor5 43763. Section 8 introduces the problematic notation for identity of conceptual content which must be separated into cases for biconditional (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) or class equality 𝐴 = 𝐵 in this adaptation. Section 10 introduces "truth functions" for one or two variables in equally troubling notation, as the arguments may be understood to be logical predicates or collections. Here f(𝜑) is interpreted to mean if-(𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜒) where the content of the "function" is specified by the latter two arguments or logical equivalent, while g(𝐴) is read as 𝐴 ∈ 𝐺 and h(𝐴, 𝐵) as 𝐴𝐻𝐵. This necessarily introduces a need for set theory as both 𝐴 ∈ 𝐺 and 𝐴𝐻𝐵 cannot hold unless 𝐴 is a set. (Also 𝐵.) Section 11 introduces notation for generality, but there is no standard notation for generality when the variable is a proposition because it was realized after Frege that the universe of all possible propositions includes paradoxical constructions leading to the failure of naive set theory. So adopting f(𝜑) as if-(𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜒) would result in the translation of ∀𝜑 f (𝜑) as (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒). For collections, we must generalize over set variables or run into the same problems; this leads to ∀𝐴 g(𝐴) being translated as ∀𝑎𝑎 ∈ 𝐺 and so forth. Under this interpreation the text of section 11 gives us sp 2184 (or simpl 482 and simpr 484 and anifp 1071 in the propositional case) and statements similar to cbvalivw 2007, ax-gen 1795, alrimiv 1927, and alrimdv 1929. These last four introduce a generality and have no useful definition in terms of propositional variables. Section 12 introduces some combinations of primitive symbols and their human language counterparts. Using class notation, these can also be expressed without dummy variables. All are A, ∀𝑥𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, ¬ ∃𝑥¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 alex 1826, 𝐴 = V eqv 3460; Some are not B, ¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 ∈ 𝐵, ∃𝑥¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 exnal 1827, 𝐵 ⊊ V pssv 4415, 𝐵 ≠ V nev 43766; There are no C, ∀𝑥¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶, ¬ ∃𝑥𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 alnex 1781, 𝐶 = ∅ eq0 4316; There exist D, ¬ ∀𝑥¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐷, ∃𝑥𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 df-ex 1780, ∅ ⊊ 𝐷 0pss 4413, 𝐷 ≠ ∅ n0 4319. Notation for relations between expressions also can be written in various ways. All E are P, ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐸 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝑃), ¬ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐸 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑃) dfss6 3939, 𝐸 = (𝐸 ∩ 𝑃) dfss2 3935, 𝐸 ⊆ 𝑃 df-ss 3934; No F are P, ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐹 → ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑃), ¬ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐹 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑃) alinexa 1843, (𝐹 ∩ 𝑃) = ∅ disj1 4418; Some G are not P, ¬ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐺 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝑃), ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐺 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑃) exanali 1859, (𝐺 ∩ 𝑃) ⊊ 𝐺 nssinpss 4233, ¬ 𝐺 ⊆ 𝑃 nss 4014; Some H are P, ¬ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐻 → ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑃), ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐻 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑃) exnalimn 1844, ∅ ⊊ (𝐻 ∩ 𝑃) 0pssin 43767, (𝐻 ∩ 𝑃) ≠ ∅ ndisj 4336.
Theorem	dfxor4 43762	Express exclusive-or in terms of implication and negation. Statement in [Frege1879] p. 12. (Contributed by RP, 14-Apr-2020.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ⊻ 𝜓) ↔ ¬ ((¬ 𝜑 → 𝜓) → ¬ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝜓)))
Theorem	dfxor5 43763	Express exclusive-or in terms of implication and negation. Statement in [Frege1879] p. 12. (Contributed by RP, 14-Apr-2020.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ⊻ 𝜓) ↔ ¬ ((𝜑 → ¬ 𝜓) → ¬ (¬ 𝜑 → 𝜓)))
Theorem	df3or2 43764	Express triple-or in terms of implication and negation. Statement in [Frege1879] p. 11. (Contributed by RP, 25-Jul-2020.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓 ∨ 𝜒) ↔ (¬ 𝜑 → (¬ 𝜓 → 𝜒)))
Theorem	df3an2 43765	Express triple-and in terms of implication and negation. Statement in [Frege1879] p. 12. (Contributed by RP, 25-Jul-2020.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) ↔ ¬ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → ¬ 𝜒)))
Theorem	nev 43766*	Express that not every set is in a class. (Contributed by RP, 16-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≠ V ↔ ¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	0pssin 43767*	Express that an intersection is not empty. (Contributed by RP, 16-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (∅ ⊊ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))
21.36.6.2  _Begriffsschrift_ Notation hints The statement 𝑅 hereditary 𝐴 means relation 𝑅 is hereditary (in the sense of Frege) in the class 𝐴 or (𝑅 “ 𝐴) ⊆ 𝐴. The former is only a slight reduction in the number of symbols, but this reduces the number of floating hypotheses needed to be checked. As Frege was not using the language of classes or sets, this naturally differs from the set-theoretic notion that a set is hereditary in a property: that all of its elements have a property and all of their elements have the property and so-on.
Syntax	whe 43768	The property of relation 𝑅 being hereditary in class 𝐴.
wff 𝑅 hereditary 𝐴
Definition	df-he 43769	The property of relation 𝑅 being hereditary in class 𝐴. (Contributed by RP, 27-Mar-2020.)
⊢ (𝑅 hereditary 𝐴 ↔ (𝑅 “ 𝐴) ⊆ 𝐴)
Theorem	dfhe2 43770	The property of relation 𝑅 being hereditary in class 𝐴. (Contributed by RP, 27-Mar-2020.)
⊢ (𝑅 hereditary 𝐴 ↔ (𝑅 ↾ 𝐴) ⊆ (𝐴 × 𝐴))
Theorem	dfhe3 43771*	The property of relation 𝑅 being hereditary in class 𝐴. (Contributed by RP, 27-Mar-2020.)
⊢ (𝑅 hereditary 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → ∀𝑦(𝑥𝑅𝑦 → 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)))
Theorem	heeq12 43772	Equality law for relations being herditary over a class. (Contributed by RP, 27-Mar-2020.)
⊢ ((𝑅 = 𝑆 ∧ 𝐴 = 𝐵) → (𝑅 hereditary 𝐴 ↔ 𝑆 hereditary 𝐵))
Theorem	heeq1 43773	Equality law for relations being herditary over a class. (Contributed by RP, 27-Mar-2020.)
⊢ (𝑅 = 𝑆 → (𝑅 hereditary 𝐴 ↔ 𝑆 hereditary 𝐴))
Theorem	heeq2 43774	Equality law for relations being herditary over a class. (Contributed by RP, 27-Mar-2020.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝑅 hereditary 𝐴 ↔ 𝑅 hereditary 𝐵))
Theorem	sbcheg 43775	Distribute proper substitution through herditary relation. (Contributed by RP, 29-Jun-2020.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝐵 hereditary 𝐶 ↔ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 hereditary ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶))
Theorem	hess 43776	Subclass law for relations being herditary over a class. (Contributed by RP, 27-Mar-2020.)
⊢ (𝑆 ⊆ 𝑅 → (𝑅 hereditary 𝐴 → 𝑆 hereditary 𝐴))
Theorem	xphe 43777	Any Cartesian product is hereditary in its second class. (Contributed by RP, 27-Mar-2020.) (Proof shortened by OpenAI, 3-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (𝐴 × 𝐵) hereditary 𝐵
Theorem	0he 43778	The empty relation is hereditary in any class. (Contributed by RP, 27-Mar-2020.)
⊢ ∅ hereditary 𝐴
Theorem	0heALT 43779	The empty relation is hereditary in any class. (Contributed by RP, 27-Mar-2020.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ∅ hereditary 𝐴
Theorem	he0 43780	Any relation is hereditary in the empty set. (Contributed by RP, 27-Mar-2020.)
⊢ 𝐴 hereditary ∅
Theorem	unhe1 43781	The union of two relations hereditary in a class is also hereditary in a class. (Contributed by RP, 28-Mar-2020.)
⊢ ((𝑅 hereditary 𝐴 ∧ 𝑆 hereditary 𝐴) → (𝑅 ∪ 𝑆) hereditary 𝐴)
Theorem	snhesn 43782	Any singleton is hereditary in any singleton. (Contributed by RP, 28-Mar-2020.)
⊢ {⟨𝐴, 𝐴⟩} hereditary {𝐵}
Theorem	idhe 43783	The identity relation is hereditary in any class. (Contributed by RP, 28-Mar-2020.)
⊢ I hereditary 𝐴
Theorem	psshepw 43784	The relation between sets and their proper subsets is hereditary in the powerclass of any class. (Contributed by RP, 28-Mar-2020.)
⊢ ◡ [⊊] hereditary 𝒫 𝐴
Theorem	sshepw 43785	The relation between sets and their subsets is hereditary in the powerclass of any class. (Contributed by RP, 28-Mar-2020.)
⊢ (◡ [⊊] ∪ I ) hereditary 𝒫 𝐴
21.36.6.3  _Begriffsschrift_ Chapter II Implication
Axiom	ax-frege1 43786	The case in which 𝜑 is denied, 𝜓 is affirmed, and 𝜑 is affirmed is excluded. This is evident since 𝜑 cannot at the same time be denied and affirmed. Axiom 1 of [Frege1879] p. 26. Identical to ax-1 6. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜑))
Axiom	ax-frege2 43787	If a proposition 𝜒 is a necessary consequence of two propositions 𝜓 and 𝜑 and one of those, 𝜓, is in turn a necessary consequence of the other, 𝜑, then the proposition 𝜒 is a necessary consequence of the latter one, 𝜑, alone. Axiom 2 of [Frege1879] p. 26. Identical to ax-2 7. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) → ((𝜑 → 𝜓) → (𝜑 → 𝜒)))
Theorem	rp-simp2-frege 43788	Simplification of triple conjunction. Compare with simp2 1137. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜓)))
Theorem	rp-simp2 43789	Simplification of triple conjunction. Identical to simp2 1137. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜓)
Theorem	rp-frege3g 43790	Add antecedent to ax-frege2 43787. More general statement than frege3 43791. Like ax-frege2 43787, it is essentially a closed form of mpd 15, however it has an extra antecedent. It would be more natural to prove from a1i 11 and ax-frege2 43787 in Metamath. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃)) → ((𝜓 → 𝜒) → (𝜓 → 𝜃))))
Theorem	frege3 43791	Add antecedent to ax-frege2 43787. Special case of rp-frege3g 43790. Proposition 3 of [Frege1879] p. 29. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → 𝜓) → ((𝜒 → (𝜑 → 𝜓)) → ((𝜒 → 𝜑) → (𝜒 → 𝜓))))
Theorem	rp-misc1-frege 43792	Double-use of ax-frege2 43787. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (((𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) → (𝜑 → 𝜓)) → ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) → (𝜑 → 𝜒)))
Theorem	rp-frege24 43793	Introducing an embedded antecedent. Alternate proof for frege24 43811. Closed form for a1d 25. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → 𝜓) → (𝜑 → (𝜒 → 𝜓)))
Theorem	rp-frege4g 43794	Deduction related to distribution. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃))) → (𝜑 → ((𝜓 → 𝜒) → (𝜓 → 𝜃))))
Theorem	frege4 43795	Special case of closed form of a2d 29. Special case of rp-frege4g 43794. Proposition 4 of [Frege1879] p. 31. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (((𝜑 → 𝜓) → (𝜒 → (𝜑 → 𝜓))) → ((𝜑 → 𝜓) → ((𝜒 → 𝜑) → (𝜒 → 𝜓))))
Theorem	frege5 43796	A closed form of syl 17. Identical to imim2 58. Theorem *2.05 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 100. Proposition 5 of [Frege1879] p. 32. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → 𝜓) → ((𝜒 → 𝜑) → (𝜒 → 𝜓)))
Theorem	rp-7frege 43797	Distribute antecedent and add another. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) → (𝜃 → ((𝜑 → 𝜓) → (𝜑 → 𝜒))))
Theorem	rp-4frege 43798	Elimination of a nested antecedent of special form. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → ((𝜓 → 𝜑) → 𝜒)) → (𝜑 → 𝜒))
Theorem	rp-6frege 43799	Elimination of a nested antecedent of special form. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜓 → ((𝜒 → 𝜓) → 𝜃)) → (𝜓 → 𝜃)))
Theorem	rp-8frege 43800	Eliminate antecedent when it is implied by previous antecedent. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → ((𝜒 → 𝜓) → 𝜃))) → (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜃)))