P. 438 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 43701-43800   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	mhphf 43701	A homogeneous polynomial defines a homogeneous function. Equivalently, an algebraic form is a homogeneous function. (An algebraic form is the function corresponding to a homogeneous polynomial, which in this case is the (𝑄‘𝑋) which corresponds to 𝑋). (Contributed by SN, 28-Jul-2024.) (Proof shortened by SN, 8-Mar-2025.)
⊢ 𝑄 = ((𝐼 evalSub 𝑆)‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝐼 mHomP 𝑈)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = (𝑆 ↾s 𝑅)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝑆)    &   ⊢ · = (.r‘𝑆)    &   ⊢ ↑ = (.g‘(mulGrp‘𝑆))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ CRing)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ (SubRing‘𝑆))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ∈ 𝑅)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (𝐻‘𝑁))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝐾 ↑m 𝐼))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑄‘𝑋)‘((𝐼 × {𝐿}) ∘f · 𝐴)) = ((𝑁 ↑ 𝐿) · ((𝑄‘𝑋)‘𝐴)))
Theorem	mhphf2 43702	A homogeneous polynomial defines a homogeneous function; this is mhphf 43701 with simpler notation in the conclusion in exchange for a complex definition of ∙, which is based on frlmvscafval 22073 but without the finite support restriction (frlmpws 22057, frlmbas 22062) on the assignments 𝐴 from variables to values. TODO?: Polynomials (df-mpl 22220) are defined to have a finite amount of terms (of finite degree). As such, any assignment may be replaced by an assignment with finite support (as only a finite amount of variables matter in a given polynomial, even if the set of variables is infinite). So the finite support restriction can be assumed without loss of generality. (Contributed by SN, 11-Nov-2024.)
⊢ 𝑄 = ((𝐼 evalSub 𝑆)‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝐼 mHomP 𝑈)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = (𝑆 ↾s 𝑅)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝑆)    &   ⊢ ∙ = ( ·𝑠 ‘((ringLMod‘𝑆) ↑s 𝐼))    &   ⊢ · = (.r‘𝑆)    &   ⊢ ↑ = (.g‘(mulGrp‘𝑆))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ CRing)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ (SubRing‘𝑆))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ∈ 𝑅)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (𝐻‘𝑁))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝐾 ↑m 𝐼))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑄‘𝑋)‘(𝐿 ∙ 𝐴)) = ((𝑁 ↑ 𝐿) · ((𝑄‘𝑋)‘𝐴)))
Theorem	mhphf3 43703	A homogeneous polynomial defines a homogeneous function; this is mhphf2 43702 with the finite support restriction (frlmpws 22057, frlmbas 22062) on the assignments 𝐴 from variables to values. See comment of mhphf2 43702. (Contributed by SN, 23-Nov-2024.)
⊢ 𝑄 = ((𝐼 evalSub 𝑆)‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝐼 mHomP 𝑈)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = (𝑆 ↾s 𝑅)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝑆)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑆 freeLMod 𝐼)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = (Base‘𝐹)    &   ⊢ ∙ = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝐹)    &   ⊢ · = (.r‘𝑆)    &   ⊢ ↑ = (.g‘(mulGrp‘𝑆))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ CRing)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ (SubRing‘𝑆))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ∈ 𝑅)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (𝐻‘𝑁))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑀)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑄‘𝑋)‘(𝐿 ∙ 𝐴)) = ((𝑁 ↑ 𝐿) · ((𝑄‘𝑋)‘𝐴)))
Theorem	mhphf4 43704	A homogeneous polynomial defines a homogeneous function; this is mhphf3 43703 with evalSub collapsed to eval. (Contributed by SN, 23-Nov-2024.)
⊢ 𝑄 = (𝐼 eval 𝑆)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝐼 mHomP 𝑆)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝑆)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑆 freeLMod 𝐼)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = (Base‘𝐹)    &   ⊢ ∙ = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝐹)    &   ⊢ · = (.r‘𝑆)    &   ⊢ ↑ = (.g‘(mulGrp‘𝑆))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ CRing)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ∈ 𝐾)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (𝐻‘𝑁))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑀)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑄‘𝑋)‘(𝐿 ∙ 𝐴)) = ((𝑁 ↑ 𝐿) · ((𝑄‘𝑋)‘𝐴)))
21.33.7  Projective spaces Looking at a corner in 3D space, one can see three right angles. It is impossible to draw three lines in 2D space such that any two of these lines are perpendicular, but a good enough representation is made by casting lines from the 2D surface. Points along the same cast line are collapsed into one point on the 2D surface. In many cases, the 2D surface is smaller than whatever needs to be represented. If the lines cast were perpendicular to the 2D surface, then only areas as small as the 2D surface could be represented. To fix this, the lines need to get further apart as they go farther from the 2D surface. On the other side of the 2D surface the lines will get closer together and intersect at a point (because it's defined that way). From this perspective, two parallel lines in 3D space will be represented by two lines that seem to intersect at a point "at infinity". Considering all maximal classes of parallel lines on a 2D plane in 3D space, these classes will all appear to intersect at different points at infinity, forming a line at infinity. Therefore the real projective plane can be thought of as the real affine plane together with the line at infinity. The projective plane takes care of some exceptions that may be found in the affine plane. For example, consider the curve that is the zeroes of 𝑦 = 𝑥↑2. Any line connecting the point (0, 1) to the x-axis intersects with the curve twice, except for the vertical line between (0, 1) and (0, 0). In the projective plane, the curve becomes an ellipse and there is no exception. While it may not seem like it, points at infinity and points corresponding to the affine plane are the same type of point. Consider a line going through the origin in 3D (affine) space. Either it intersects the plane 𝑧 = 1 once, or it is entirely within the plane 𝑧 = 0. If it is entirely within the plane 𝑧 = 0, then it corresponds to the point at infinity intersecting all lines on the plane 𝑧 = 1 with the same slope. Else it corresponds to the point in the 2D plane 𝑧 = 1 that it intersects. So there is a bijection between 3D lines through the origin and points on the real projective plane. The concept of a projective space generalizes the projective plane to any dimension (df-prjspn 43719).
Syntax	cprjsp 43705	Extend class notation with the projective space function.
class ℙroj
Definition	df-prjsp 43706*	Define the projective space function. In the bijection between 3D lines through the origin and points in the projective plane (see section comment), this is equivalent to making any two 3D points (excluding the origin) equivalent iff one is a multiple of another. Note that the meaning of "projective space" is more general than the section comment might suggest. In particular, the projective space obtained from ℝ as a ℚ-vector space is infinite-dimensional and is not of the form covered by df-prjspn 43719. Compare df-lsatoms 40109. (Contributed by BJ and SN, 29-Apr-2023.)
⊢ ℙroj = (𝑣 ∈ LVec ↦ ⦋((Base‘𝑣) ∖ {(0g‘𝑣)}) / 𝑏⦌(𝑏 / {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑏 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑏) ∧ ∃𝑙 ∈ (Base‘(Scalar‘𝑣))𝑥 = (𝑙( ·𝑠 ‘𝑣)𝑦))}))
Theorem	prjspval 43707*	Value of the projective space function, which is also known as the projectivization of 𝑉. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 29-Apr-2023.)
⊢ 𝐵 = ((Base‘𝑉) ∖ {(0g‘𝑉)})    &   ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑉)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (Scalar‘𝑉)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑉 ∈ LVec → (ℙroj‘𝑉) = (𝐵 / {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ ∃𝑙 ∈ 𝐾 𝑥 = (𝑙 · 𝑦))}))
Theorem	prjsprel 43708*	Utility theorem regarding the relation used in ℙroj. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 29-Apr-2023.)
⊢ ∼ = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ ∃𝑙 ∈ 𝐾 𝑥 = (𝑙 · 𝑦))}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑋 ∼ 𝑌 ↔ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ ∃𝑚 ∈ 𝐾 𝑋 = (𝑚 · 𝑌)))
Theorem	prjspertr 43709*	The relation in ℙroj is transitive. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 1-May-2023.)
⊢ ∼ = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ ∃𝑙 ∈ 𝐾 𝑥 = (𝑙 · 𝑦))}    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = ((Base‘𝑉) ∖ {(0g‘𝑉)})    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (Scalar‘𝑉)    &   ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑉)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑉 ∈ LMod ∧ (𝑋 ∼ 𝑌 ∧ 𝑌 ∼ 𝑍)) → 𝑋 ∼ 𝑍)
Theorem	prjsperref 43710*	The relation in ℙroj is reflexive. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 30-Apr-2023.)
⊢ ∼ = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ ∃𝑙 ∈ 𝐾 𝑥 = (𝑙 · 𝑦))}    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = ((Base‘𝑉) ∖ {(0g‘𝑉)})    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (Scalar‘𝑉)    &   ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑉)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑉 ∈ LMod → (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ↔ 𝑋 ∼ 𝑋))
Theorem	prjspersym 43711*	The relation in ℙroj is symmetric. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 1-May-2023.)
⊢ ∼ = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ ∃𝑙 ∈ 𝐾 𝑥 = (𝑙 · 𝑦))}    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = ((Base‘𝑉) ∖ {(0g‘𝑉)})    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (Scalar‘𝑉)    &   ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑉)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑉 ∈ LVec ∧ 𝑋 ∼ 𝑌) → 𝑌 ∼ 𝑋)
Theorem	prjsper 43712*	The relation used to define ℙroj is an equivalence relation. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 1-May-2023.)
⊢ ∼ = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ ∃𝑙 ∈ 𝐾 𝑥 = (𝑙 · 𝑦))}    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = ((Base‘𝑉) ∖ {(0g‘𝑉)})    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (Scalar‘𝑉)    &   ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑉)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑉 ∈ LVec → ∼ Er 𝐵)
Theorem	prjspreln0 43713*	Two nonzero vectors are equivalent by a nonzero scalar. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 31-May-2023.)
⊢ ∼ = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ ∃𝑙 ∈ 𝐾 𝑥 = (𝑙 · 𝑦))}    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = ((Base‘𝑉) ∖ {(0g‘𝑉)})    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (Scalar‘𝑉)    &   ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑉)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝑆)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑉 ∈ LVec → (𝑋 ∼ 𝑌 ↔ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ ∃𝑚 ∈ (𝐾 ∖ { 0 })𝑋 = (𝑚 · 𝑌))))
Theorem	prjspvs 43714*	A nonzero multiple of a vector is equivalent to the vector. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 6-Jun-2023.)
⊢ ∼ = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ ∃𝑙 ∈ 𝐾 𝑥 = (𝑙 · 𝑦))}    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = ((Base‘𝑉) ∖ {(0g‘𝑉)})    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (Scalar‘𝑉)    &   ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑉)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝑆)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑉 ∈ LVec ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ (𝐾 ∖ { 0 })) → (𝑁 · 𝑋) ∼ 𝑋)
Theorem	prjsprellsp 43715*	Two vectors are equivalent iff their spans are equal. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 31-May-2023.)
⊢ ∼ = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ ∃𝑙 ∈ 𝐾 𝑥 = (𝑙 · 𝑦))}    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = ((Base‘𝑉) ∖ {(0g‘𝑉)})    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (Scalar‘𝑉)    &   ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑉)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝑆)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (LSpan‘𝑉)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑉 ∈ LVec ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝑋 ∼ 𝑌 ↔ (𝑁‘{𝑋}) = (𝑁‘{𝑌})))
Theorem	prjspeclsp 43716*	The vectors equivalent to a vector 𝑋 are the nonzero vectors in the span of 𝑋. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 6-Jun-2023.)
⊢ ∼ = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ ∃𝑙 ∈ 𝐾 𝑥 = (𝑙 · 𝑦))}    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = ((Base‘𝑉) ∖ {(0g‘𝑉)})    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (Scalar‘𝑉)    &   ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑉)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝑆)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (LSpan‘𝑉)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑉 ∈ LVec ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) → [𝑋] ∼ = ((𝑁‘{𝑋}) ∖ {(0g‘𝑉)}))
Theorem	prjspval2 43717*	Alternate definition of projective space. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 7-Jun-2023.)
⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑉)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = ((Base‘𝑉) ∖ { 0 })    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (LSpan‘𝑉)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑉 ∈ LVec → (ℙroj‘𝑉) = ∪ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 {((𝑁‘{𝑧}) ∖ { 0 })})
Syntax	cprjspn 43718	Extend class notation with the n-dimensional projective space function.
class ℙrojn
Definition	df-prjspn 43719*	Define the n-dimensional projective space function. A projective space of dimension 1 is a projective line, and a projective space of dimension 2 is a projective plane. Compare df-ehl 25708. This space is considered n-dimensional because the vector space (𝑘 freeLMod (0...𝑛)) is (n+1)-dimensional and the ℙroj function returns equivalence classes with respect to a linear (1-dimensional) relation. (Contributed by BJ and Steven Nguyen, 29-Apr-2023.)
⊢ ℙrojn = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0, 𝑘 ∈ DivRing ↦ (ℙroj‘(𝑘 freeLMod (0...𝑛))))
Theorem	prjspnval 43720	Value of the n-dimensional projective space function. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 1-May-2023.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐾 ∈ DivRing) → (𝑁 ℙrojn 𝐾) = (ℙroj‘(𝐾 freeLMod (0...𝑁))))
Theorem	prjspnerlem 43721*	A lemma showing that the equivalence relation used in prjspnval2 43722 and the equivalence relation used in prjspval 43707 are equal, but only with the antecedent 𝐾 ∈ DivRing. (Contributed by SN, 15-Jul-2023.)
⊢ ∼ = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ ∃𝑙 ∈ 𝑆 𝑥 = (𝑙 · 𝑦))}    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = (𝐾 freeLMod (0...𝑁))    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = ((Base‘𝑊) ∖ {(0g‘𝑊)})    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ DivRing → ∼ = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ ∃𝑙 ∈ (Base‘(Scalar‘𝑊))𝑥 = (𝑙 · 𝑦))})
Theorem	prjspnval2 43722*	Value of the n-dimensional projective space function, expanded. (Contributed by SN, 15-Jul-2023.)
⊢ ∼ = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ ∃𝑙 ∈ 𝑆 𝑥 = (𝑙 · 𝑦))}    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = (𝐾 freeLMod (0...𝑁))    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = ((Base‘𝑊) ∖ {(0g‘𝑊)})    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ DivRing)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑁 ℙrojn 𝐾) = (𝐵 / ∼ ))
Theorem	prjspner 43723*	The relation used to define ℙroj (and indirectly ℙrojn through df-prjspn 43719) is an equivalence relation. This is a lemma that converts the equivalence relation used in results like prjspertr 43709 and prjspersym 43711 (see prjspnerlem 43721). Several theorems are covered in one thanks to the theorems around df-er 8718. (Contributed by SN, 14-Aug-2023.)
⊢ ∼ = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ ∃𝑙 ∈ 𝑆 𝑥 = (𝑙 · 𝑦))}    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = (𝐾 freeLMod (0...𝑁))    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = ((Base‘𝑊) ∖ {(0g‘𝑊)})    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ DivRing)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∼ Er 𝐵)
Theorem	prjspnvs 43724*	A nonzero multiple of a vector is equivalent to the vector. This is prjspvs 43714 with the equivalence relation converted by prjspnerlem 43721. (Contributed by SN, 8-Aug-2024.)
⊢ ∼ = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ ∃𝑙 ∈ 𝑆 𝑥 = (𝑙 · 𝑦))}    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = (𝐾 freeLMod (0...𝑁))    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = ((Base‘𝑊) ∖ {(0g‘𝑊)})    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ DivRing)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ≠ 0 )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 · 𝑋) ∼ 𝑋)
Theorem	prjspnssbas 43725	A projective space is a set of subsets of the corresponding free module (a set of equivalence classes of nonzero vectors of that module). (Contributed by SN, 17-Jan-2025.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (𝑁 ℙrojn 𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = (𝐾 freeLMod (0...𝑁))    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = ((Base‘𝑊) ∖ {(0g‘𝑊)})    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ DivRing)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ⊆ 𝒫 𝐵)
Theorem	elprjspnss 43726	A point of a projective space is a subset of the corresponding free module (an equivalence class of nonzero vectors of that module). (Contributed by SN, 23-Sep-2026.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (𝑁 ℙrojn 𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = (𝐾 freeLMod (0...𝑁))    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = ((Base‘𝑊) ∖ {(0g‘𝑊)})    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ DivRing)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵)
Theorem	prjspnn0 43727	A projective point is nonempty. (Contributed by SN, 17-Jan-2025.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (𝑁 ℙrojn 𝐾)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ DivRing)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ ∅)
Theorem	frlmnzcoordex 43728*	Every nonzero vector of a free module has a nonzero coordinate. (Contributed by SN, 23-Sep-2026.)
⊢ 𝑊 = (𝐾 freeLMod (0...𝑁))    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = ((Base‘𝑊) ∖ {(0g‘𝑊)})    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ Ring)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑖 ∈ (0...𝑁) ∣ (𝑉‘𝑖) ≠ (0g‘𝐾)} ≠ ∅)
Theorem	frlmnzcoordval 43729*	Value of 𝐽, a function that returns the index of the first nonzero coordinate of 𝑉. (Contributed by SN, 23-Sep-2026.)
⊢ 𝐽 = (𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ inf({𝑖 ∈ (0...𝑁) ∣ (𝑏‘𝑖) ≠ (0g‘𝐾)}, ℝ, < ))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐽‘𝑉) = inf({𝑖 ∈ (0...𝑁) ∣ (𝑉‘𝑖) ≠ (0g‘𝐾)}, ℝ, < ))
Theorem	frlmnzcoordinf 43730*	The result (𝐽‘𝑉) is the smallest index corresponding to a nonzero coordinate. (Contributed by SN, 23-Sep-2026.)
⊢ 𝐽 = (𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ inf({𝑖 ∈ (0...𝑁) ∣ (𝑏‘𝑖) ≠ (0g‘𝐾)}, ℝ, < ))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐼 ∈ {𝑖 ∈ (0...𝑁) ∣ (𝑉‘𝑖) ≠ (0g‘𝐾)}) → (𝐽‘𝑉) ≤ 𝐼)
Theorem	frlmnzcoordcl 43731*	Closure of the first nonzero coordinate function 𝐽. (Contributed by SN, 23-Sep-2026.)
⊢ 𝐽 = (𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ inf({𝑖 ∈ (0...𝑁) ∣ (𝑏‘𝑖) ≠ (0g‘𝐾)}, ℝ, < ))    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = (𝐾 freeLMod (0...𝑁))    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = ((Base‘𝑊) ∖ {(0g‘𝑊)})    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ Ring)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐽‘𝑉) ∈ (0...𝑁))
Theorem	frlmnzcoordcl2 43732*	The first nonzero coordinate is a scalar. (Contributed by SN, 24-Sep-2026.)
⊢ 𝐽 = (𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ inf({𝑖 ∈ (0...𝑁) ∣ (𝑏‘𝑖) ≠ (0g‘𝐾)}, ℝ, < ))    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = (𝐾 freeLMod (0...𝑁))    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = ((Base‘𝑊) ∖ {(0g‘𝑊)})    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ Ring)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (Base‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑉‘(𝐽‘𝑉)) ∈ 𝑆)
Theorem	frlmnzcoordn0 43733*	The function 𝐽 gives a nonzero coordinate. (Contributed by SN, 23-Sep-2026.)
⊢ 𝐽 = (𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ inf({𝑖 ∈ (0...𝑁) ∣ (𝑏‘𝑖) ≠ (0g‘𝐾)}, ℝ, < ))    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = (𝐾 freeLMod (0...𝑁))    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = ((Base‘𝑊) ∖ {(0g‘𝑊)})    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ Ring)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑉‘(𝐽‘𝑉)) ≠ (0g‘𝐾))
Theorem	frlmnzcoordsca 43734*	In a free module, scaling a vector does not change the index of its first nonzero coordinate. (Contributed by SN, 24-Sep-2026.)
⊢ 𝐽 = (𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ inf({𝑖 ∈ (0...𝑁) ∣ (𝑏‘𝑖) ≠ (0g‘𝐾)}, ℝ, < ))    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = (𝐾 freeLMod (0...𝑁))    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = ((Base‘𝑊) ∖ {(0g‘𝑊)})    &   ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ DivRing)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ≠ 0 )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐽‘(𝐶 · 𝑉)) = (𝐽‘𝑉))
Theorem	prjspnnormval 43735*	Value of 𝐹, a function that 'normalizes' a vector 𝑉 by scaling the first nonzero coordinate to 1. (Contributed by SN, 24-Sep-2026.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ ((𝐼‘(𝑣‘(𝐽‘𝑣))) · 𝑣))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝑉) = ((𝐼‘(𝑉‘(𝐽‘𝑉))) · 𝑉))
Theorem	prjspnequivnorm 43736*	In a free module, a nonzero vector is equivalent to its normalized vector. (Contributed by SN, 24-Sep-2026.)
⊢ ∼ = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ ∃𝑙 ∈ 𝑆 𝑥 = (𝑙 · 𝑦))}    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ inf({𝑖 ∈ (0...𝑁) ∣ (𝑏‘𝑖) ≠ (0g‘𝐾)}, ℝ, < ))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ ((𝐼‘(𝑣‘(𝐽‘𝑣))) · 𝑣))    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = (𝐾 freeLMod (0...𝑁))    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = ((Base‘𝑊) ∖ {(0g‘𝑊)})    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (invr‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ DivRing)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∼ (𝐹‘𝑋))
Theorem	prjspnnorm 43737*	In a free module, two nonzero vectors are equivalent iff they have the same normalized representative. (Contributed by SN, 24-Sep-2026.)
⊢ ∼ = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ ∃𝑙 ∈ 𝑆 𝑥 = (𝑙 · 𝑦))}    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ inf({𝑖 ∈ (0...𝑁) ∣ (𝑏‘𝑖) ≠ (0g‘𝐾)}, ℝ, < ))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ ((𝐼‘(𝑣‘(𝐽‘𝑣))) · 𝑣))    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = (𝐾 freeLMod (0...𝑁))    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = ((Base‘𝑊) ∖ {(0g‘𝑊)})    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (invr‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ DivRing)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 ∼ 𝑌 ↔ (𝐹‘𝑋) = (𝐹‘𝑌)))
Theorem	0prjspnlem 43738	Lemma for 0prjspn 43740. The given unit vector is a nonzero vector. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 16-Jul-2023.)
⊢ 𝐵 = ((Base‘𝑊) ∖ {(0g‘𝑊)})    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = (𝐾 freeLMod (0...0))    &   ⊢ 1 = ((𝐾 unitVec (0...0))‘0)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ DivRing → 1 ∈ 𝐵)
Theorem	0prjspnrel 43739*	In a zero-dimensional projective space, all vectors are equivalent to the unit vector. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 7-Jun-2023.)
⊢ ∼ = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ ∃𝑙 ∈ 𝑆 𝑥 = (𝑙 · 𝑦))}    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = ((Base‘𝑊) ∖ {(0g‘𝑊)})    &   ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = (𝐾 freeLMod (0...0))    &   ⊢ 1 = ((𝐾 unitVec (0...0))‘0)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ DivRing ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝑋 ∼ 1 )
Theorem	0prjspn 43740	A zero-dimensional projective space has only 1 point. (Contributed by SN, 9-Jun-2023.)
⊢ 𝑊 = (𝐾 freeLMod (0...0))    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = ((Base‘𝑊) ∖ {(0g‘𝑊)})    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ DivRing → (0 ℙrojn 𝐾) = {𝐵})
Syntax	cprjcrv 43741	Extend class notation with the projective curve function.
class ℙrojCrv
Definition	df-prjcrv 43742*	Define the projective curve function. This takes a homogeneous polynomial and outputs the homogeneous coordinates where the polynomial evaluates to zero (the "zero set"). (In other words, scalar multiples are collapsed into the same projective point. See mhphf4 43704 and prjspvs 43714). (Contributed by SN, 23-Nov-2024.)
⊢ ℙrojCrv = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0, 𝑘 ∈ Field ↦ (𝑓 ∈ ∪ ran ((0...𝑛) mHomP 𝑘) ↦ {𝑝 ∈ (𝑛 ℙrojn 𝑘) ∣ ((((0...𝑛) eval 𝑘)‘𝑓) “ 𝑝) = {(0g‘𝑘)}}))
Theorem	prjcrvfval 43743*	Value of the projective curve function. (Contributed by SN, 23-Nov-2024.)
⊢ 𝐻 = ((0...𝑁) mHomP 𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((0...𝑁) eval 𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (𝑁 ℙrojn 𝐾)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ Field)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑁 ℙrojCrv 𝐾) = (𝑓 ∈ ∪ ran 𝐻 ↦ {𝑝 ∈ 𝑃 ∣ ((𝐸‘𝑓) “ 𝑝) = { 0 }}))
Theorem	prjcrvval 43744*	Value of the projective curve function. (Contributed by SN, 23-Nov-2024.)
⊢ 𝐻 = ((0...𝑁) mHomP 𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((0...𝑁) eval 𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (𝑁 ℙrojn 𝐾)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ Field)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ ∪ ran 𝐻)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑁 ℙrojCrv 𝐾)‘𝐹) = {𝑝 ∈ 𝑃 ∣ ((𝐸‘𝐹) “ 𝑝) = { 0 }})
Theorem	prjcrv0 43745	The "curve" (zero set) corresponding to the zero polynomial contains all coordinates. (Contributed by SN, 23-Nov-2024.)
⊢ 𝑌 = ((0...𝑁) mPoly 𝐾)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑌)    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (𝑁 ℙrojn 𝐾)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ Field)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑁 ℙrojCrv 𝐾)‘ 0 ) = 𝑃)
21.33.8  Basic reductions for Fermat's Last Theorem
Theorem	dffltz 43746*	Fermat's Last Theorem (FLT) for nonzero integers is equivalent to the original scope of natural numbers. The backwards direction takes (𝑎↑𝑛) + (𝑏↑𝑛) = (𝑐↑𝑛), and adds the negative of any negative term to both sides, thus creating the corresponding equation with only positive integers. There are six combinations of negativity, so the proof is particularly long. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 27-Feb-2023.)
⊢ (∀𝑛 ∈ (ℤ≥‘3)∀𝑥 ∈ ℕ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℕ ∀𝑧 ∈ ℕ ((𝑥↑𝑛) + (𝑦↑𝑛)) ≠ (𝑧↑𝑛) ↔ ∀𝑛 ∈ (ℤ≥‘3)∀𝑎 ∈ (ℤ ∖ {0})∀𝑏 ∈ (ℤ ∖ {0})∀𝑐 ∈ (ℤ ∖ {0})((𝑎↑𝑛) + (𝑏↑𝑛)) ≠ (𝑐↑𝑛))
Theorem	fltmul 43747	A counterexample to FLT stays valid when scaled. The hypotheses are more general than they need to be for convenience. (There does not seem to be a standard term for Fermat or Pythagorean triples extended to any 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0, so the label is more about the context in which this theorem is used). (Contributed by SN, 20-Aug-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴↑𝑁) + (𝐵↑𝑁)) = (𝐶↑𝑁))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (((𝑆 · 𝐴)↑𝑁) + ((𝑆 · 𝐵)↑𝑁)) = ((𝑆 · 𝐶)↑𝑁))
Theorem	fltltc 43748	(𝐶↑𝑁) is the largest term and therefore 𝐵 < 𝐶. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 22-Aug-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘3))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴↑𝑁) + (𝐵↑𝑁)) = (𝐶↑𝑁))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 < 𝐶)
Theorem	fltnltalem 43749	Lemma for fltnlta 43750. A lower bound for 𝐴 based on pwdif 16038. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 22-Aug-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘3))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴↑𝑁) + (𝐵↑𝑁)) = (𝐶↑𝑁))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐶 − 𝐵) · ((𝐶↑(𝑁 − 1)) + ((𝑁 − 1) · (𝐵↑(𝑁 − 1))))) < (𝐴↑𝑁))
Theorem	fltnlta 43750	In a Fermat counterexample, the exponent 𝑁 is less than all three numbers (𝐴, 𝐵, and 𝐶). Note that 𝐴 < 𝐵 (hypothesis) and 𝐵 < 𝐶 (fltltc 43748). See https://youtu.be/EymVXkPWxyc 43748 for an outline. (Contributed by SN, 24-Aug-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘3))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴↑𝑁) + (𝐵↑𝑁)) = (𝐶↑𝑁))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 < 𝐴)
21.33.9  Exemplar theorems These theorems were added for illustration or pedagogical purposes without the intention of being used, but some may still be moved to main and used, of course.
Theorem	iddii 43751	Version of a1ii 2 with the hypotheses switched. The first hypothesis is redundant so this theorem should not normally appear in a proof. Inference associated with idd 25. (Contributed by SN, 1-Apr-2025.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝜑    &   ⊢ 𝜓    ⇒   ⊢ 𝜓
Theorem	bicomdALT 43752	Alternate proof of bicomd 226 which is shorter after expanding all parent theorems (as of 8-Aug-2024, bicom 225 depends on bicom1 224 and sylib 221 depends on syl 18). Additionally, the labels bicom1 224 and syl 18 happen to contain fewer characters than bicom 225 and sylib 221. However, neither of these conditions count as a shortening according to conventions 31002. In the first case, the criteria could easily be broken by upstream changes, and in many cases the upstream dependency tree is nontrivial (see orass 935 and pm2.31 936). For the latter case, theorem labels are up to revision, so they are not counted in the size of a proof. (Contributed by SN, 21-May-2022.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜓))
Theorem	alan 43753	Alias for 19.26 1902 for easier lookup. (Contributed by SN, 12-Aug-2025.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (∀𝑥𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑥𝜓))
Theorem	exor 43754	Alias for 19.43 1914 for easier lookup. (Contributed by SN, 5-Jul-2025.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (∃𝑥(𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ↔ (∃𝑥𝜑 ∨ ∃𝑥𝜓))
Theorem	rexor 43755	Alias for r19.43 3130 for easier lookup. (Contributed by SN, 5-Jul-2025.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ↔ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ∨ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓))
Theorem	ruvALT 43756	Alternate proof of ruv 9603 with one fewer syntax step thanks to using elirrv 9592 instead of elirr 9595. However, it does not change the compressed proof size or the number of symbols in the generated display, so it is not considered a shortening according to conventions 31002. (Contributed by SN, 1-Sep-2024.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ {𝑥 ∣ 𝑥 ∉ 𝑥} = V
Theorem	sn-wcdeq 43757	Alternative to wcdeq 3720 and df-cdeq 3721. This flattens the syntax representation ( wi ( weq vx vy ) wph ) to ( sn-wcdeq vx vy wph ), illustrating the comment of df-cdeq 3721. (Contributed by SN, 26-Sep-2024.) (New usage is discouraged.)
wff (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑)
Theorem	sq45 43758	45 squared is 2025. (Contributed by SN, 30-Mar-2025.)
⊢ (;45↑2) = ;;;2025
Theorem	sum9cubes 43759	The sum of the first nine perfect cubes is 2025. (Contributed by SN, 30-Mar-2025.)
⊢ Σ𝑘 ∈ (1...9)(𝑘↑3) = ;;;2025
Theorem	sn-isghm 43760*	Longer proof of isghm 19431, unsuccessfully attempting to simplify isghm 19431 using elovmpo 7666 according to an editorial note (now removed). (Contributed by SN, 7-Jun-2025.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑋 = (Base‘𝑆)    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = (Base‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ + = (+g‘𝑆)    &   ⊢ ⨣ = (+g‘𝑇)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (𝑆 GrpHom 𝑇) ↔ ((𝑆 ∈ Grp ∧ 𝑇 ∈ Grp) ∧ (𝐹:𝑋⟶𝑌 ∧ ∀𝑢 ∈ 𝑋 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝑋 (𝐹‘(𝑢 + 𝑣)) = ((𝐹‘𝑢) ⨣ (𝐹‘𝑣)))))
Theorem	aprilfools2025 43761	An abuse of notation. (Contributed by Prof. Loof Lirpa, 1-Apr-2025.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ {⟨“𝐴𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑙”⟩, ⟨“𝑓𝑜𝑜𝑙𝑠!”⟩} ∈ V
21.33.9.1  Standard replacements of ax-10 , ax-11 , ax-12 It is known that ax-10 2177, ax-11 2193, and ax-12 2212 are logically redundant in a weak sense. Practically, they can be replaced with hbn1w 2080, alcomimw 2075, and ax12wlem 2168 as long as you can fully substitute 𝑦 for 𝑥 in the relevant wff (that is, 𝑥 cannot appear in the wff after substituting). This strategy (which I will call a "standard replacement" of axioms) has a lot of potential, for example it works with df-fv 6546 and df-mpt 5186, two very common constructions. But doing a standard replacement of ax-10 2177, ax-11 2193, and ax-12 2212 takes unsatisfyingly long. Usually, if another approach is found, that approach is shorter and better.
Theorem	nfa1w 43762*	Replace ax-10 2177 in nfa1 2187 with a substitution hypothesis. (Contributed by SN, 2-Sep-2025.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥∀𝑥𝜑
Theorem	eu6w 43763*	Replace ax-10 2177, ax-12 2212 in eu6 2599 with substitution hypotheses. (Contributed by SN, 27-May-2025.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑧 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃!𝑥𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑦))
Theorem	abbibw 43764*	Replace ax-10 2177, ax-11 2193, ax-12 2212 in abbib 2829 with substitution hypotheses. (Contributed by SN, 27-May-2025.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ ({𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓} ↔ ∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
Theorem	absnw 43765*	Replace ax-10 2177, ax-11 2193, ax-12 2212 in absn 4603 with a substitution hypothesis. (Contributed by SN, 27-May-2025.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ ({𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑌} ↔ ∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑌))
Theorem	euabsn2w 43766*	Replace ax-10 2177, ax-11 2193, ax-12 2212 in euabsn2 4685 with substitution hypotheses. (Contributed by SN, 27-May-2025.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑧 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃!𝑥𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦{𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑦})
21.34  Mathbox for Igor Ieskov
Theorem	cu3addd 43767	Cube of sum of three numbers. (Contributed by Igor Ieskov, 14-Dec-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (((𝐴 + 𝐵) + 𝐶)↑3) = (((((𝐴↑3) + (3 · ((𝐴↑2) · 𝐵))) + ((3 · (𝐴 · (𝐵↑2))) + (𝐵↑3))) + (((3 · ((𝐴↑2) · 𝐶)) + (((3 · 2) · (𝐴 · 𝐵)) · 𝐶)) + (3 · ((𝐵↑2) · 𝐶)))) + (((3 · (𝐴 · (𝐶↑2))) + (3 · (𝐵 · (𝐶↑2)))) + (𝐶↑3))))
Theorem	negexpidd 43768	The sum of a real number to the power of N and the negative of the number to the power of N equals zero if N is a nonnegative odd integer. (Contributed by Igor Ieskov, 21-Jan-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 2 ∥ 𝑁)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴↑𝑁) + ( -𝐴↑𝑁)) = 0)
Theorem	rexlimdv3d 43769*	An extended version of rexlimdvv 3218 to include three set variables. (Contributed by Igor Ieskov, 21-Jan-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐶) → (𝜓 → 𝜒)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 𝜓 → 𝜒))
Theorem	3cubeslem1 43770	Lemma for 3cubes 43776. (Contributed by Igor Ieskov, 22-Jan-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℚ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 < (((𝐴 + 1)↑2) − 𝐴))
Theorem	3cubeslem2 43771	Lemma for 3cubes 43776. Used to show that the denominators in 3cubeslem4 43775 are nonzero. (Contributed by Igor Ieskov, 22-Jan-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℚ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ ((((3↑3) · (𝐴↑2)) + ((3↑2) · 𝐴)) + 3) = 0)
Theorem	3cubeslem3l 43772	Lemma for 3cubes 43776. (Contributed by Igor Ieskov, 22-Jan-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℚ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 · (((((3↑3) · (𝐴↑2)) + ((3↑2) · 𝐴)) + 3)↑3)) = (((𝐴↑7) · (3↑9)) + (((𝐴↑6) · (3↑9)) + (((𝐴↑5) · ((3↑8) + (3↑8))) + (((𝐴↑4) · (((3↑7) · 2) + (3↑6))) + (((𝐴↑3) · ((3↑6) + (3↑6))) + (((𝐴↑2) · (3↑5)) + (𝐴 · (3↑3)))))))))
Theorem	3cubeslem3r 43773	Lemma for 3cubes 43776. (Contributed by Igor Ieskov, 22-Jan-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℚ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((((((3↑3) · (𝐴↑3)) − 1)↑3) + ((( -((3↑3) · (𝐴↑3)) + ((3↑2) · 𝐴)) + 1)↑3)) + ((((3↑3) · (𝐴↑2)) + ((3↑2) · 𝐴))↑3)) = (((𝐴↑7) · (3↑9)) + (((𝐴↑6) · (3↑9)) + (((𝐴↑5) · ((3↑8) + (3↑8))) + (((𝐴↑4) · (((3↑7) · 2) + (3↑6))) + (((𝐴↑3) · ((3↑6) + (3↑6))) + (((𝐴↑2) · (3↑5)) + (𝐴 · (3↑3)))))))))
Theorem	3cubeslem3 43774	Lemma for 3cubes 43776. (Contributed by Igor Ieskov, 22-Jan-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℚ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 · (((((3↑3) · (𝐴↑2)) + ((3↑2) · 𝐴)) + 3)↑3)) = ((((((3↑3) · (𝐴↑3)) − 1)↑3) + ((( -((3↑3) · (𝐴↑3)) + ((3↑2) · 𝐴)) + 1)↑3)) + ((((3↑3) · (𝐴↑2)) + ((3↑2) · 𝐴))↑3)))
Theorem	3cubeslem4 43775	Lemma for 3cubes 43776. This is Ryley's explicit formula for decomposing a rational 𝐴 into a sum of three rational cubes. (Contributed by Igor Ieskov, 22-Jan-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℚ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = (((((((3↑3) · (𝐴↑3)) − 1) / ((((3↑3) · (𝐴↑2)) + ((3↑2) · 𝐴)) + 3))↑3) + (((( -((3↑3) · (𝐴↑3)) + ((3↑2) · 𝐴)) + 1) / ((((3↑3) · (𝐴↑2)) + ((3↑2) · 𝐴)) + 3))↑3)) + (((((3↑3) · (𝐴↑2)) + ((3↑2) · 𝐴)) / ((((3↑3) · (𝐴↑2)) + ((3↑2) · 𝐴)) + 3))↑3)))
Theorem	3cubes 43776*	Every rational number is a sum of three rational cubes. See S. Ryley, The Ladies' Diary 122 (1825), 35. (Contributed by Igor Ieskov, 22-Jan-2024.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℚ ↔ ∃𝑎 ∈ ℚ ∃𝑏 ∈ ℚ ∃𝑐 ∈ ℚ 𝐴 = (((𝑎↑3) + (𝑏↑3)) + (𝑐↑3)))
21.35  Mathbox for Timothy J. O'Malley
Theorem	omexcn 43777	The axioms of the complex numbers imply the Axiom of Infinity (in the form of omex 9645): the map of om2uzf1oi 14097 is a one-to-one onto mapping from ω onto a set of integers, so ω is a set. Compare dcomex 10526 and grothomex 10915. Note that our proof depends on neither ax-inf 9640 nor ax-inf2 9643. (Contributed by Timothy J. O'Malley, 8-Oct-2026.)
⊢ ω ∈ V
21.36  Mathbox for OpenAI
Theorem	rntrclfvOAI 43778	The range of the transitive closure is equal to the range of the relation. (Contributed by OpenAI, 7-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 → ran (t+‘𝑅) = ran 𝑅)
21.37  Mathbox for Stefan O'Rear
21.37.1  Additional elementary logic and set theory
Theorem	moxfr 43779*	Transfer at-most-one between related expressions. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 12-Feb-2015.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ ∃!𝑦 𝑥 = 𝐴    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃*𝑥𝜑 ↔ ∃*𝑦𝜓)
21.37.2  Additional theory of functions
Theorem	imaiinfv 43780*	Indexed intersection of an image. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 22-Feb-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴) → ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝐹‘𝑥) = ∩ (𝐹 “ 𝐵))
21.37.3  Additional topology
Theorem	elrfi 43781*	Elementhood in a set of relative finite intersections. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 22-Feb-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝒫 𝐵) → (𝐴 ∈ (fi‘({𝐵} ∪ 𝐶)) ↔ ∃𝑣 ∈ (𝒫 𝐶 ∩ Fin)𝐴 = (𝐵 ∩ ∩ 𝑣)))
Theorem	elrfirn 43782*	Elementhood in a set of relative finite intersections of an indexed family of sets. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 22-Feb-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐹:𝐼⟶𝒫 𝐵) → (𝐴 ∈ (fi‘({𝐵} ∪ ran 𝐹)) ↔ ∃𝑣 ∈ (𝒫 𝐼 ∩ Fin)𝐴 = (𝐵 ∩ ∩ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑣 (𝐹‘𝑦))))
Theorem	elrfirn2 43783*	Elementhood in a set of relative finite intersections of an indexed family of sets (implicit). (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 22-Feb-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐼 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐵) → (𝐴 ∈ (fi‘({𝐵} ∪ ran (𝑦 ∈ 𝐼 ↦ 𝐶))) ↔ ∃𝑣 ∈ (𝒫 𝐼 ∩ Fin)𝐴 = (𝐵 ∩ ∩ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑣 𝐶)))
Theorem	cmpfiiin 43784*	In a compact topology, a system of closed sets with nonempty finite intersections has a nonempty intersection. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 22-Feb-2015.)
⊢ 𝑋 = ∪ 𝐽    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ Comp)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐼) → 𝑆 ∈ (Clsd‘𝐽))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑙 ⊆ 𝐼 ∧ 𝑙 ∈ Fin)) → (𝑋 ∩ ∩ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑙 𝑆) ≠ ∅)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 ∩ ∩ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐼 𝑆) ≠ ∅)
21.37.4  Characterization of closure operators. Kuratowski closure axioms
Theorem	ismrcd1 43785*	Any function from the subsets of a set to itself, which is extensive (satisfies mrcssid 17792), isotone (satisfies mrcss 17791), and idempotent (satisfies mrcidm 17794) has a collection of fixed points which is a Moore collection, and itself is the closure operator for that collection. This can be taken as an alternate definition for the closure operators. This is the first half, ismrcd2 43786 is the second. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 1-Feb-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝒫 𝐵⟶𝒫 𝐵)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵) → 𝑥 ⊆ (𝐹‘𝑥))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ⊆ 𝑥) → (𝐹‘𝑦) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝑥))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵) → (𝐹‘(𝐹‘𝑥)) = (𝐹‘𝑥))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → dom (𝐹 ∩ I ) ∈ (Moore‘𝐵))
Theorem	ismrcd2 43786*	Second half of ismrcd1 43785. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 1-Feb-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝒫 𝐵⟶𝒫 𝐵)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵) → 𝑥 ⊆ (𝐹‘𝑥))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ⊆ 𝑥) → (𝐹‘𝑦) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝑥))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵) → (𝐹‘(𝐹‘𝑥)) = (𝐹‘𝑥))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = (mrCls‘dom (𝐹 ∩ I )))
Theorem	istopclsd 43787*	A closure function which satisfies sscls 23375, clsidm 23386, cls0 23399, and clsun 37191 defines a (unique) topology which it is the closure function on. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 1-Feb-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝒫 𝐵⟶𝒫 𝐵)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵) → 𝑥 ⊆ (𝐹‘𝑥))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵) → (𝐹‘(𝐹‘𝑥)) = (𝐹‘𝑥))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘∅) = ∅)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ⊆ 𝐵) → (𝐹‘(𝑥 ∪ 𝑦)) = ((𝐹‘𝑥) ∪ (𝐹‘𝑦)))    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = {𝑧 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵 ∣ (𝐹‘(𝐵 ∖ 𝑧)) = (𝐵 ∖ 𝑧)}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐽 ∈ (TopOn‘𝐵) ∧ (cls‘𝐽) = 𝐹))
Theorem	ismrc 43788*	A function is a Moore closure operator iff it satisfies mrcssid 17792, mrcss 17791, and mrcidm 17794. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 1-Feb-2015.)
⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (mrCls “ (Moore‘𝐵)) ↔ (𝐵 ∈ V ∧ 𝐹:𝒫 𝐵⟶𝒫 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑥∀𝑦((𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ⊆ 𝑥) → (𝑥 ⊆ (𝐹‘𝑥) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑦) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝑥) ∧ (𝐹‘(𝐹‘𝑥)) = (𝐹‘𝑥)))))
21.37.5  Algebraic closure systems
Syntax	cnacs 43789	Class of Noetherian closure systems.
class NoeACS
Definition	df-nacs 43790*	Define a closure system of Noetherian type (not standard terminology) as an algebraic system where all closed sets are finitely generated. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Apr-2015.)
⊢ NoeACS = (𝑥 ∈ V ↦ {𝑐 ∈ (ACS‘𝑥) ∣ ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝑐 ∃𝑔 ∈ (𝒫 𝑥 ∩ Fin)𝑠 = ((mrCls‘𝑐)‘𝑔)})
Theorem	isnacs 43791*	Expand definition of Noetherian-type closure system. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Apr-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (mrCls‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (NoeACS‘𝑋) ↔ (𝐶 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋) ∧ ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐶 ∃𝑔 ∈ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin)𝑠 = (𝐹‘𝑔)))
Theorem	nacsfg 43792*	In a Noetherian-type closure system, all closed sets are finitely generated. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Apr-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (mrCls‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ (NoeACS‘𝑋) ∧ 𝑆 ∈ 𝐶) → ∃𝑔 ∈ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin)𝑆 = (𝐹‘𝑔))
Theorem	isnacs2 43793	Express Noetherian-type closure system with fewer quantifiers. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Apr-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (mrCls‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (NoeACS‘𝑋) ↔ (𝐶 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋) ∧ (𝐹 “ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin)) = 𝐶))
Theorem	mrefg2 43794*	Slight variation on finite generation for closure systems. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Apr-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (mrCls‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋) → (∃𝑔 ∈ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin)𝑆 = (𝐹‘𝑔) ↔ ∃𝑔 ∈ (𝒫 𝑆 ∩ Fin)𝑆 = (𝐹‘𝑔)))
Theorem	mrefg3 43795*	Slight variation on finite generation for closure systems. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Apr-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (mrCls‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋) ∧ 𝑆 ∈ 𝐶) → (∃𝑔 ∈ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin)𝑆 = (𝐹‘𝑔) ↔ ∃𝑔 ∈ (𝒫 𝑆 ∩ Fin)𝑆 ⊆ (𝐹‘𝑔)))
Theorem	nacsacs 43796	A closure system of Noetherian type is algebraic. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Apr-2015.)
⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (NoeACS‘𝑋) → 𝐶 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋))
Theorem	isnacs3 43797*	A choice-free order equivalent to the Noetherian condition on a closure system. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Apr-2015.)
⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (NoeACS‘𝑋) ↔ (𝐶 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋) ∧ ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 𝐶((toInc‘𝑠) ∈ Dirset → ∪ 𝑠 ∈ 𝑠)))
Theorem	incssnn0 43798*	Transitivity induction of subsets, lemma for nacsfix 43799. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ((∀𝑥 ∈ ℕ0 (𝐹‘𝑥) ⊆ (𝐹‘(𝑥 + 1)) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝐴)) → (𝐹‘𝐴) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝐵))
Theorem	nacsfix 43799*	An increasing sequence of closed sets in a Noetherian-type closure system eventually fixates. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ (NoeACS‘𝑋) ∧ 𝐹:ℕ0⟶𝐶 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℕ0 (𝐹‘𝑥) ⊆ (𝐹‘(𝑥 + 1))) → ∃𝑦 ∈ ℕ0 ∀𝑧 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑦)(𝐹‘𝑧) = (𝐹‘𝑦))
21.37.6  Miscellanea 1. Map utilities
Theorem	constmap 43800	A constant (represented without dummy variables) is an element of a function set. Note: In the following development, we will be quite often quantifying over functions and points in N-dimensional space (which are equivalent to functions from an "index set"). Many of the following theorems exist to transfer standard facts about functions to elements of function sets. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 30-Aug-2014.) (Revised by Stefan O'Rear, 5-May-2015.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐶 → (𝐴 × {𝐵}) ∈ (𝐶 ↑m 𝐴))