Theorem fvelrnbf 45449

Description: A version of fvelrnb 6900 using bound-variable hypotheses instead of distinct variable conditions. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 20-Apr-2017.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
fvelrnbf.1	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
fvelrnbf.2	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵
fvelrnbf.3	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐹

Assertion

Ref	Expression
fvelrnbf	⊢ (𝐹 Fn 𝐴 → (𝐵 ∈ ran 𝐹 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐹‘𝑥) = 𝐵))

Proof of Theorem fvelrnbf

Dummy variable 𝑦 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		fvelrnb 6900	. 2 ⊢ (𝐹 Fn 𝐴 → (𝐵 ∈ ran 𝐹 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐹‘𝑦) = 𝐵))
2		nfcv 2898	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴
3		fvelrnbf.1	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
4		fvelrnbf.3	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐹
5		nfcv 2898	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝑦
6	4, 5	nffv 6850	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(𝐹‘𝑦)
7		fvelrnbf.2	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵
8	6, 7	nfeq 2912	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(𝐹‘𝑦) = 𝐵
9		nfv 1916	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦(𝐹‘𝑥) = 𝐵
10		fveqeq2 6849	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑥 → ((𝐹‘𝑦) = 𝐵 ↔ (𝐹‘𝑥) = 𝐵))
11	2, 3, 8, 9, 10	cbvrexfw 3278	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐹‘𝑦) = 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐹‘𝑥) = 𝐵)
12	1, 11	bitrdi 287	1 ⊢ (𝐹 Fn 𝐴 → (𝐵 ∈ ran 𝐹 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐹‘𝑥) = 𝐵))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 206   = wceq 1542   ∈ wcel 2114  Ⅎwnfc 2883  ∃wrex 3061  ran crn 5632   Fn wfn 6493  ‘cfv 6498

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1797  ax-4 1811  ax-5 1912  ax-6 1969  ax-7 2010  ax-8 2116  ax-9 2124  ax-10 2147  ax-11 2163  ax-12 2185  ax-ext 2708  ax-sep 5231  ax-nul 5241  ax-pr 5375

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 849  df-3an 1089  df-tru 1545  df-fal 1555  df-ex 1782  df-nf 1786  df-sb 2069  df-mo 2539  df-eu 2569  df-clab 2715  df-cleq 2728  df-clel 2811  df-nfc 2885  df-ne 2933  df-ral 3052  df-rex 3062  df-rab 3390  df-v 3431  df-dif 3892  df-un 3894  df-in 3896  df-ss 3906  df-nul 4274  df-if 4467  df-sn 4568  df-pr 4570  df-op 4574  df-uni 4851  df-br 5086  df-opab 5148  df-mpt 5167  df-id 5526  df-xp 5637  df-rel 5638  df-cnv 5639  df-co 5640  df-dm 5641  df-rn 5642  df-iota 6454  df-fun 6500  df-fn 6501  df-fv 6506

This theorem is referenced by:  refsumcn  45461  stoweidlem29  46457