Theorem fvelrnbf 44157

Description: A version of fvelrnb 6942 using bound-variable hypotheses instead of distinct variable conditions. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 20-Apr-2017.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
fvelrnbf.1	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
fvelrnbf.2	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵
fvelrnbf.3	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐹

Assertion

Ref	Expression
fvelrnbf	⊢ (𝐹 Fn 𝐴 → (𝐵 ∈ ran 𝐹 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐹‘𝑥) = 𝐵))

Proof of Theorem fvelrnbf

Dummy variable 𝑦 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		fvelrnb 6942	. 2 ⊢ (𝐹 Fn 𝐴 → (𝐵 ∈ ran 𝐹 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐹‘𝑦) = 𝐵))
2		nfcv 2895	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴
3		fvelrnbf.1	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
4		fvelrnbf.3	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐹
5		nfcv 2895	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝑦
6	4, 5	nffv 6891	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(𝐹‘𝑦)
7		fvelrnbf.2	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵
8	6, 7	nfeq 2908	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(𝐹‘𝑦) = 𝐵
9		nfv 1909	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦(𝐹‘𝑥) = 𝐵
10		fveqeq2 6890	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑥 → ((𝐹‘𝑦) = 𝐵 ↔ (𝐹‘𝑥) = 𝐵))
11	2, 3, 8, 9, 10	cbvrexfw 3294	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐹‘𝑦) = 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐹‘𝑥) = 𝐵)
12	1, 11	bitrdi 287	1 ⊢ (𝐹 Fn 𝐴 → (𝐵 ∈ ran 𝐹 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐹‘𝑥) = 𝐵))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 205   = wceq 1533   ∈ wcel 2098  Ⅎwnfc 2875  ∃wrex 3062  ran crn 5667   Fn wfn 6528  ‘cfv 6533

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1789  ax-4 1803  ax-5 1905  ax-6 1963  ax-7 2003  ax-8 2100  ax-9 2108  ax-10 2129  ax-11 2146  ax-12 2163  ax-ext 2695  ax-sep 5289  ax-nul 5296  ax-pr 5417

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 396  df-or 845  df-3an 1086  df-tru 1536  df-fal 1546  df-ex 1774  df-nf 1778  df-sb 2060  df-mo 2526  df-eu 2555  df-clab 2702  df-cleq 2716  df-clel 2802  df-nfc 2877  df-ne 2933  df-ral 3054  df-rex 3063  df-rab 3425  df-v 3468  df-dif 3943  df-un 3945  df-in 3947  df-ss 3957  df-nul 4315  df-if 4521  df-sn 4621  df-pr 4623  df-op 4627  df-uni 4900  df-br 5139  df-opab 5201  df-mpt 5222  df-id 5564  df-xp 5672  df-rel 5673  df-cnv 5674  df-co 5675  df-dm 5676  df-rn 5677  df-iota 6485  df-fun 6535  df-fn 6536  df-fv 6541

This theorem is referenced by:  refsumcn  44169  stoweidlem29  45196