Theorem fvelrnbf 45559

Description: A version of fvelrnb 6922 using bound-variable hypotheses instead of distinct variable conditions. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 20-Apr-2017.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
fvelrnbf.1	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
fvelrnbf.2	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵
fvelrnbf.3	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐹

Assertion

Ref	Expression
fvelrnbf	⊢ (𝐹 Fn 𝐴 → (𝐵 ∈ ran 𝐹 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐹‘𝑥) = 𝐵))

Proof of Theorem fvelrnbf

Dummy variable 𝑦 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		fvelrnb 6922	. 2 ⊢ (𝐹 Fn 𝐴 → (𝐵 ∈ ran 𝐹 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐹‘𝑦) = 𝐵))
2		nfcv 2923	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴
3		fvelrnbf.1	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
4		fvelrnbf.3	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐹
5		nfcv 2923	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝑦
6	4, 5	nffv 6872	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(𝐹‘𝑦)
7		fvelrnbf.2	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵
8	6, 7	nfeq 2936	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(𝐹‘𝑦) = 𝐵
9		nfv 1933	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦(𝐹‘𝑥) = 𝐵
10		fveqeq2 6871	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑥 → ((𝐹‘𝑦) = 𝐵 ↔ (𝐹‘𝑥) = 𝐵))
11	2, 3, 8, 9, 10	cbvrexfw 3302	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐹‘𝑦) = 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐹‘𝑥) = 𝐵)
12	1, 11	bitrdi 289	1 ⊢ (𝐹 Fn 𝐴 → (𝐵 ∈ ran 𝐹 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐹‘𝑥) = 𝐵))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 208   = wceq 1559   ∈ wcel 2141  Ⅎwnfc 2908  ∃wrex 3085  ran crn 5644   Fn wfn 6511  ‘cfv 6516

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1814  ax-4 1828  ax-5 1929  ax-6 1986  ax-7 2027  ax-8 2143  ax-9 2151  ax-10 2174  ax-11 2190  ax-12 2211  ax-ext 2733  ax-sep 5243  ax-nul 5253  ax-pr 5387

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 400  df-or 859  df-3an 1099  df-tru 1562  df-fal 1572  df-ex 1799  df-nf 1803  df-sb 2090  df-mo 2565  df-eu 2595  df-clab 2740  df-cleq 2753  df-clel 2836  df-nfc 2910  df-ne 2957  df-ral 3076  df-rex 3086  df-rab 3414  df-v 3455  df-dif 3905  df-un 3907  df-in 3909  df-ss 3919  df-nul 4284  df-if 4478  df-sn 4580  df-pr 4582  df-op 4586  df-uni 4863  df-br 5098  df-opab 5160  df-mpt 5179  df-id 5538  df-xp 5649  df-rel 5650  df-cnv 5651  df-co 5652  df-dm 5653  df-rn 5654  df-iota 6472  df-fun 6518  df-fn 6519  df-fv 6524

This theorem is referenced by:  refsumcn  45571  stoweidlem29  46564