Theorem fvelrnbf 45625

Description: A version of fvelrnb 6939 using bound-variable hypotheses instead of distinct variable conditions. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 20-Apr-2017.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
fvelrnbf.1	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
fvelrnbf.2	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵
fvelrnbf.3	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐹

Assertion

Ref	Expression
fvelrnbf	⊢ (𝐹 Fn 𝐴 → (𝐵 ∈ ran 𝐹 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐹‘𝑥) = 𝐵))

Proof of Theorem fvelrnbf

Dummy variable 𝑦 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		fvelrnb 6939	. 2 ⊢ (𝐹 Fn 𝐴 → (𝐵 ∈ ran 𝐹 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐹‘𝑦) = 𝐵))
2		nfcv 2931	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴
3		fvelrnbf.1	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
4		fvelrnbf.3	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐹
5		nfcv 2931	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝑦
6	4, 5	nffv 6889	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(𝐹‘𝑦)
7		fvelrnbf.2	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵
8	6, 7	nfeq 2944	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(𝐹‘𝑦) = 𝐵
9		nfv 1941	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦(𝐹‘𝑥) = 𝐵
10		fveqeq2 6888	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑥 → ((𝐹‘𝑦) = 𝐵 ↔ (𝐹‘𝑥) = 𝐵))
11	2, 3, 8, 9, 10	cbvrexfw 3312	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐹‘𝑦) = 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐹‘𝑥) = 𝐵)
12	1, 11	bitrdi 290	1 ⊢ (𝐹 Fn 𝐴 → (𝐵 ∈ ran 𝐹 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐹‘𝑥) = 𝐵))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   = wceq 1567   ∈ wcel 2149  Ⅎwnfc 2916  ∃wrex 3095  ran crn 5660   Fn wfn 6529  ‘cfv 6534

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1822  ax-4 1836  ax-5 1937  ax-6 1994  ax-7 2035  ax-8 2151  ax-9 2159  ax-10 2182  ax-11 2198  ax-12 2219  ax-ext 2741  ax-sep 5258  ax-nul 5268  ax-pr 5402

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 401  df-or 861  df-3an 1103  df-tru 1570  df-fal 1580  df-ex 1807  df-nf 1811  df-sb 2098  df-mo 2573  df-eu 2603  df-clab 2748  df-cleq 2761  df-clel 2844  df-nfc 2918  df-ne 2965  df-ral 3086  df-rex 3096  df-rab 3424  df-v 3465  df-dif 3916  df-un 3918  df-in 3920  df-ss 3930  df-nul 4295  df-if 4490  df-sn 4592  df-pr 4594  df-op 4598  df-uni 4874  df-br 5111  df-opab 5175  df-mpt 5194  df-id 5554  df-xp 5665  df-rel 5666  df-cnv 5667  df-co 5668  df-dm 5669  df-rn 5670  df-iota 6490  df-fun 6536  df-fn 6537  df-fv 6542

This theorem is referenced by:  refsumcn  45637  stoweidlem29  46630