Theorem ss2rabdf 44416

Description: Deduction of restricted abstraction subclass from implication. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 21-Dec-2024.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
ss2rabdf.1	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑
ss2rabdf.2	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝜓 → 𝜒))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ss2rabdf	⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓} ⊆ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜒})

Proof of Theorem ss2rabdf

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ss2rabdf.1	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑
2		ss2rabdf.2	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝜓 → 𝜒))
3	2	ex 412	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)))
4	1, 3	ralrimi 3248	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜓 → 𝜒))
5		ss2rab 4063	. 2 ⊢ ({𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓} ⊆ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜒} ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜓 → 𝜒))
6	4, 5	sylibr 233	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓} ⊆ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜒})

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 395  Ⅎwnf 1777   ∈ wcel 2098  ∀wral 3055  {crab 3426   ⊆ wss 3943

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1789  ax-4 1803  ax-5 1905  ax-6 1963  ax-7 2003  ax-8 2100  ax-9 2108  ax-10 2129  ax-11 2146  ax-12 2163  ax-ext 2697

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 396  df-or 845  df-tru 1536  df-ex 1774  df-nf 1778  df-sb 2060  df-clab 2704  df-cleq 2718  df-clel 2804  df-nfc 2879  df-ral 3056  df-rab 3427  df-v 3470  df-in 3950  df-ss 3960

This theorem is referenced by:  pimxrneun  44768