Theorem ss2rabdf 44990

Description: Deduction of restricted abstraction subclass from implication. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 21-Dec-2024.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
ss2rabdf.1	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑
ss2rabdf.2	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝜓 → 𝜒))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ss2rabdf	⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓} ⊆ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜒})

Proof of Theorem ss2rabdf

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ss2rabdf.1	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑
2		ss2rabdf.2	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝜓 → 𝜒))
3	2	ex 412	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)))
4	1, 3	ralrimi 3258	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜓 → 𝜒))
5		ss2rab 4088	. 2 ⊢ ({𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓} ⊆ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜒} ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜓 → 𝜒))
6	4, 5	sylibr 234	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓} ⊆ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜒})

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 395  Ⅎwnf 1781   ∈ wcel 2103  ∀wral 3063  {crab 3438   ⊆ wss 3970

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1793  ax-4 1807  ax-5 1909  ax-6 1967  ax-7 2007  ax-8 2105  ax-9 2113  ax-10 2136  ax-11 2153  ax-12 2173  ax-ext 2705

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 847  df-ex 1778  df-nf 1782  df-sb 2065  df-clab 2712  df-cleq 2726  df-clel 2813  df-nfc 2890  df-ral 3064  df-rab 3439  df-ss 3987

This theorem is referenced by:  pimxrneun  45339