Theorem ss2rabdf 42742

Description: Deduction of restricted abstraction subclass from implication. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 21-Dec-2024.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
ss2rabdf.1	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑
ss2rabdf.2	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝜓 → 𝜒))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ss2rabdf	⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓} ⊆ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜒})

Proof of Theorem ss2rabdf

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ss2rabdf.1	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑
2		ss2rabdf.2	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝜓 → 𝜒))
3	2	ex 414	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)))
4	1, 3	ralrimi 3237	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜓 → 𝜒))
5		ss2rab 4010	. 2 ⊢ ({𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓} ⊆ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜒} ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜓 → 𝜒))
6	4, 5	sylibr 233	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓} ⊆ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜒})

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 397  Ⅎwnf 1783   ∈ wcel 2104  ∀wral 3062  {crab 3284   ⊆ wss 3892

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1795  ax-4 1809  ax-5 1911  ax-6 1969  ax-7 2009  ax-8 2106  ax-9 2114  ax-10 2135  ax-11 2152  ax-12 2169  ax-ext 2707

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 398  df-or 846  df-tru 1542  df-ex 1780  df-nf 1784  df-sb 2066  df-clab 2714  df-cleq 2728  df-clel 2814  df-nfc 2887  df-ral 3063  df-rab 3287  df-v 3439  df-in 3899  df-ss 3909

This theorem is referenced by:  pimxrneun  43077