Theorem ssoprab2 7501

Description: Equivalence of ordered pair abstraction subclass and implication. Compare ssopab2 5556. (Contributed by FL, 6-Nov-2013.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 11-Dec-2016.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ssoprab2	⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦∀𝑧(𝜑 → 𝜓) → {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜓})

Proof of Theorem ssoprab2

Dummy variable 𝑤 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		id 22	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝜑 → 𝜓) → (𝜑 → 𝜓))
2	1	anim2d 612	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝜑 → 𝜓) → ((𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑) → (𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜓)))
3	2	aleximi 1829	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∀𝑧(𝜑 → 𝜓) → (∃𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑) → ∃𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜓)))
4	3	aleximi 1829	. . . 4 ⊢ (∀𝑦∀𝑧(𝜑 → 𝜓) → (∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑) → ∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜓)))
5	4	aleximi 1829	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦∀𝑧(𝜑 → 𝜓) → (∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑) → ∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜓)))
6	5	ss2abdv 4076	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦∀𝑧(𝜑 → 𝜓) → {𝑤 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑)} ⊆ {𝑤 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜓)})
7		df-oprab 7435	. 2 ⊢ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑤 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑)}
8		df-oprab 7435	. 2 ⊢ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜓} = {𝑤 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜓)}
9	6, 7, 8	3sstr4g 4041	1 ⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦∀𝑧(𝜑 → 𝜓) → {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜓})

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 395  ∀wal 1535   = wceq 1537  ∃wex 1776  {cab 2712   ⊆ wss 3963  ⟨cop 4637  {coprab 7432

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1792  ax-4 1806  ax-5 1908  ax-6 1965  ax-7 2005  ax-9 2116  ax-ext 2706

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-ex 1777  df-sb 2063  df-clab 2713  df-cleq 2727  df-ss 3980  df-oprab 7435

This theorem is referenced by:  ssoprab2b  7502  eqoprab2bw  7503  joinfval  18431  meetfval  18445