Theorem wl-sb8motv 38269

Description: Substitution of variable in universal quantifier. Closed form of sb8mo 2631 without ax-13 2406, but requiring 𝑥 and 𝑦 being disjoint.

This theorem relates to wl-mo3t 38264, since replacing 𝜑 with [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 in the latter yields subexpressions like [𝑥 / 𝑦][𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑, which can be reduced to 𝜑 via sbft 2307 and sbco 2541. So ∃*𝑥𝜑 ↔ ∃*𝑦[𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 is provable from wl-mo3t 38264 in a simple fashion. From an educational standpoint, one would assume wl-mo3t 38264 to be more fundamental, as it hints how the "at most one" objects on both sides of the biconditional correlate (they are the same), if they exist at all, and then prove this theorem from it. (Contributed by Wolf Lammen, 3-May-2025.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
wl-sb8motv	⊢ (∀𝑥Ⅎ𝑦𝜑 → (∃*𝑥𝜑 ↔ ∃*𝑦[𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑))

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝑦

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥, 𝑦)

Proof of Theorem wl-sb8motv

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		wl-sb8eft 38239	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥Ⅎ𝑦𝜑 → (∃𝑥𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦[𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑))
2		wl-sb8eutv 38267	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥Ⅎ𝑦𝜑 → (∃!𝑥𝜑 ↔ ∃!𝑦[𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑))
3	1, 2	imbi12d 347	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥Ⅎ𝑦𝜑 → ((∃𝑥𝜑 → ∃!𝑥𝜑) ↔ (∃𝑦[𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → ∃!𝑦[𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑)))
4		moeu 2613	. 2 ⊢ (∃*𝑥𝜑 ↔ (∃𝑥𝜑 → ∃!𝑥𝜑))
5		moeu 2613	. 2 ⊢ (∃*𝑦[𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ (∃𝑦[𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → ∃!𝑦[𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑))
6	3, 4, 5	3bitr4g 317	1 ⊢ (∀𝑥Ⅎ𝑦𝜑 → (∃*𝑥𝜑 ↔ ∃*𝑦[𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209  ∀wal 1568  ∃wex 1812  Ⅎwnf 1816  [wsb 2099  ∃*wmo 2567  ∃!weu 2598

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-10 2179  ax-11 2195  ax-12 2216

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2100  df-mo 2569  df-eu 2599

This theorem is used by: (None)