Theorem ceqsrexv 2903

Description: Elimination of a restricted existential quantifier, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 30-Apr-2004.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
ceqsrexv.1	|- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ceqsrexv	|- ( A e. B -> ( E. x e. B ( x = A /\ ph ) <-> ps ) )

Distinct variable groups:   x, A   x, B   ps, x

Allowed substitution hint:   ph( x)

Proof of Theorem ceqsrexv

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-rex 2490	. . 3 |- ( E. x e. B ( x = A /\ ph ) <-> E. x ( x e. B /\ ( x = A /\ ph ) ) )
2		an12 561	. . . 4 |- ( ( x = A /\ ( x e. B /\ ph ) ) <-> ( x e. B /\ ( x = A /\ ph ) ) )
3	2	exbii 1628	. . 3 |- ( E. x ( x = A /\ ( x e. B /\ ph ) ) <-> E. x ( x e. B /\ ( x = A /\ ph ) ) )
4	1, 3	bitr4i 187	. 2 |- ( E. x e. B ( x = A /\ ph ) <-> E. x ( x = A /\ ( x e. B /\ ph ) ) )
5		eleq1 2268	. . . . 5 |- ( x = A -> ( x e. B <-> A e. B ) )
6		ceqsrexv.1	. . . . 5 |- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )
7	5, 6	anbi12d 473	. . . 4 |- ( x = A -> ( ( x e. B /\ ph ) <-> ( A e. B /\ ps ) ) )
8	7	ceqsexgv 2902	. . 3 |- ( A e. B -> ( E. x ( x = A /\ ( x e. B /\ ph ) ) <-> ( A e. B /\ ps ) ) )
9	8	bianabs 611	. 2 |- ( A e. B -> ( E. x ( x = A /\ ( x e. B /\ ph ) ) <-> ps ) )
10	4, 9	bitrid 192	1 |- ( A e. B -> ( E. x e. B ( x = A /\ ph ) <-> ps ) )

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4   /\ wa 104   <-> wb 105   = wceq 1373   E.wex 1515   e. wcel 2176   E.wrex 2485

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-io 711  ax-5 1470  ax-7 1471  ax-gen 1472  ax-ie1 1516  ax-ie2 1517  ax-8 1527  ax-10 1528  ax-11 1529  ax-i12 1530  ax-bndl 1532  ax-4 1533  ax-17 1549  ax-i9 1553  ax-ial 1557  ax-i5r 1558  ax-ext 2187

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-tru 1376  df-nf 1484  df-sb 1786  df-clab 2192  df-cleq 2198  df-clel 2201  df-nfc 2337  df-rex 2490  df-v 2774

This theorem is referenced by:  ceqsrexbv  2904  ceqsrex2v  2905  f1oiso  5895  creur  9032  creui  9033