Theorem ceqsrexv 2933

Description: Elimination of a restricted existential quantifier, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 30-Apr-2004.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
ceqsrexv.1	|- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ceqsrexv	|- ( A e. B -> ( E. x e. B ( x = A /\ ph ) <-> ps ) )

Distinct variable groups:   x, A   x, B   ps, x

Allowed substitution hint:   ph( x)

Proof of Theorem ceqsrexv

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-rex 2514	. . 3 |- ( E. x e. B ( x = A /\ ph ) <-> E. x ( x e. B /\ ( x = A /\ ph ) ) )
2		an12 561	. . . 4 |- ( ( x = A /\ ( x e. B /\ ph ) ) <-> ( x e. B /\ ( x = A /\ ph ) ) )
3	2	exbii 1651	. . 3 |- ( E. x ( x = A /\ ( x e. B /\ ph ) ) <-> E. x ( x e. B /\ ( x = A /\ ph ) ) )
4	1, 3	bitr4i 187	. 2 |- ( E. x e. B ( x = A /\ ph ) <-> E. x ( x = A /\ ( x e. B /\ ph ) ) )
5		eleq1 2292	. . . . 5 |- ( x = A -> ( x e. B <-> A e. B ) )
6		ceqsrexv.1	. . . . 5 |- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )
7	5, 6	anbi12d 473	. . . 4 |- ( x = A -> ( ( x e. B /\ ph ) <-> ( A e. B /\ ps ) ) )
8	7	ceqsexgv 2932	. . 3 |- ( A e. B -> ( E. x ( x = A /\ ( x e. B /\ ph ) ) <-> ( A e. B /\ ps ) ) )
9	8	bianabs 613	. 2 |- ( A e. B -> ( E. x ( x = A /\ ( x e. B /\ ph ) ) <-> ps ) )
10	4, 9	bitrid 192	1 |- ( A e. B -> ( E. x e. B ( x = A /\ ph ) <-> ps ) )

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4   /\ wa 104   <-> wb 105   = wceq 1395   E.wex 1538   e. wcel 2200   E.wrex 2509

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-io 714  ax-5 1493  ax-7 1494  ax-gen 1495  ax-ie1 1539  ax-ie2 1540  ax-8 1550  ax-10 1551  ax-11 1552  ax-i12 1553  ax-bndl 1555  ax-4 1556  ax-17 1572  ax-i9 1576  ax-ial 1580  ax-i5r 1581  ax-ext 2211

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-tru 1398  df-nf 1507  df-sb 1809  df-clab 2216  df-cleq 2222  df-clel 2225  df-nfc 2361  df-rex 2514  df-v 2801

This theorem is referenced by:  ceqsrexbv  2934  ceqsrex2v  2935  f1oiso  5950  creur  9106  creui  9107