ILE Home Intuitionistic Logic Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  ILE Home  >  Th. List  >  ceqsrexv GIF version

Theorem ceqsrexv 2745
Description: Elimination of a restricted existential quantifier, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 30-Apr-2004.)
Hypothesis
Ref Expression
ceqsrexv.1 (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑𝜓))
Assertion
Ref Expression
ceqsrexv (𝐴𝐵 → (∃𝑥𝐵 (𝑥 = 𝐴𝜑) ↔ 𝜓))
Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴   𝑥,𝐵   𝜓,𝑥
Allowed substitution hint:   𝜑(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem ceqsrexv
StepHypRef Expression
1 df-rex 2365 . . 3 (∃𝑥𝐵 (𝑥 = 𝐴𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥𝐵 ∧ (𝑥 = 𝐴𝜑)))
2 an12 528 . . . 4 ((𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ (𝑥𝐵𝜑)) ↔ (𝑥𝐵 ∧ (𝑥 = 𝐴𝜑)))
32exbii 1541 . . 3 (∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ (𝑥𝐵𝜑)) ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥𝐵 ∧ (𝑥 = 𝐴𝜑)))
41, 3bitr4i 185 . 2 (∃𝑥𝐵 (𝑥 = 𝐴𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ (𝑥𝐵𝜑)))
5 eleq1 2150 . . . . 5 (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝑥𝐵𝐴𝐵))
6 ceqsrexv.1 . . . . 5 (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑𝜓))
75, 6anbi12d 457 . . . 4 (𝑥 = 𝐴 → ((𝑥𝐵𝜑) ↔ (𝐴𝐵𝜓)))
87ceqsexgv 2744 . . 3 (𝐴𝐵 → (∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ (𝑥𝐵𝜑)) ↔ (𝐴𝐵𝜓)))
98bianabs 578 . 2 (𝐴𝐵 → (∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ (𝑥𝐵𝜑)) ↔ 𝜓))
104, 9syl5bb 190 1 (𝐴𝐵 → (∃𝑥𝐵 (𝑥 = 𝐴𝜑) ↔ 𝜓))
Colors of variables: wff set class
Syntax hints:  wi 4  wa 102  wb 103   = wceq 1289  wex 1426  wcel 1438  wrex 2360
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 104  ax-ia2 105  ax-ia3 106  ax-io 665  ax-5 1381  ax-7 1382  ax-gen 1383  ax-ie1 1427  ax-ie2 1428  ax-8 1440  ax-10 1441  ax-11 1442  ax-i12 1443  ax-bndl 1444  ax-4 1445  ax-17 1464  ax-i9 1468  ax-ial 1472  ax-i5r 1473  ax-ext 2070
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 115  df-tru 1292  df-nf 1395  df-sb 1693  df-clab 2075  df-cleq 2081  df-clel 2084  df-nfc 2217  df-rex 2365  df-v 2621
This theorem is referenced by:  ceqsrexbv  2746  ceqsrex2v  2747  f1oiso  5587  creur  8391  creui  8392
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator