Theorem ceqsrexv 2869

Description: Elimination of a restricted existential quantifier, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 30-Apr-2004.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
ceqsrexv.1	⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ceqsrexv	⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ 𝜓))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴   𝑥,𝐵   𝜓,𝑥

Allowed substitution hint:   𝜑(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem ceqsrexv

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-rex 2461	. . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)))
2		an12 561	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)))
3	2	exbii 1605	. . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)) ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)))
4	1, 3	bitr4i 187	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)))
5		eleq1 2240	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵))
6		ceqsrexv.1	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
7	5, 6	anbi12d 473	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜓)))
8	7	ceqsexgv 2868	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → (∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)) ↔ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜓)))
9	8	bianabs 611	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → (∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)) ↔ 𝜓))
10	4, 9	bitrid 192	1 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ 𝜓))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 104   ↔ wb 105   = wceq 1353  ∃wex 1492   ∈ wcel 2148  ∃wrex 2456

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-io 709  ax-5 1447  ax-7 1448  ax-gen 1449  ax-ie1 1493  ax-ie2 1494  ax-8 1504  ax-10 1505  ax-11 1506  ax-i12 1507  ax-bndl 1509  ax-4 1510  ax-17 1526  ax-i9 1530  ax-ial 1534  ax-i5r 1535  ax-ext 2159

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-tru 1356  df-nf 1461  df-sb 1763  df-clab 2164  df-cleq 2170  df-clel 2173  df-nfc 2308  df-rex 2461  df-v 2741

This theorem is referenced by:  ceqsrexbv  2870  ceqsrex2v  2871  f1oiso  5830  creur  8919  creui  8920