Theorem elabgf2 14468

Description: One implication of elabgf 2879. (Contributed by BJ, 21-Nov-2019.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
elabgf2.nf1	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
elabgf2.nf2	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓
elabgf2.1	⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜓 → 𝜑))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
elabgf2	⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → (𝜓 → 𝐴 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑}))

Proof of Theorem elabgf2

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		elabgf2.nf1	. 2 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
2		elabgf2.nf2	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓
3		nfab1 2321	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥{𝑥 ∣ 𝜑}
4	1, 3	nfel 2328	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝐴 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑}
5	2, 4	nfim 1572	. 2 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(𝜓 → 𝐴 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑})
6		elabgf0 14465	. 2 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝐴 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝜑))
7		bicom1 131	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝜑) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝐴 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑}))
8		elabgf2.1	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜓 → 𝜑))
9		biimp 118	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ 𝐴 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑}) → (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑}))
10	8, 9	syl9 72	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → ((𝜑 ↔ 𝐴 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑}) → (𝜓 → 𝐴 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑})))
11	7, 10	syl5 32	. 2 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → ((𝐴 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝜑) → (𝜓 → 𝐴 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑})))
12	1, 5, 6, 11	bj-vtoclgf 14464	1 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → (𝜓 → 𝐴 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑}))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 105   = wceq 1353  Ⅎwnf 1460   ∈ wcel 2148  {cab 2163  Ⅎwnfc 2306

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-io 709  ax-5 1447  ax-7 1448  ax-gen 1449  ax-ie1 1493  ax-ie2 1494  ax-8 1504  ax-10 1505  ax-11 1506  ax-i12 1507  ax-bndl 1509  ax-4 1510  ax-17 1526  ax-i9 1530  ax-ial 1534  ax-i5r 1535  ax-ext 2159

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-tru 1356  df-nf 1461  df-sb 1763  df-clab 2164  df-cleq 2170  df-clel 2173  df-nfc 2308  df-v 2739

This theorem is referenced by:  elabf2  14470  elabg2  14473  bj-intabssel1  14478