Theorem mopick2 2163

Description: "At most one" can show the existence of a common value. In this case we can infer existence of conjunction from a conjunction of existence, and it is one way to achieve the converse of 19.40 1679. (Contributed by NM, 5-Apr-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 9-Jul-2011.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
mopick2	⊢ ((∃*𝑥𝜑 ∧ ∃𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ ∃𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜒)) → ∃𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒))

Proof of Theorem mopick2

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		hbmo1 2117	. . . 4 ⊢ (∃*𝑥𝜑 → ∀𝑥∃*𝑥𝜑)
2		hbe1 1543	. . . 4 ⊢ (∃𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → ∀𝑥∃𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))
3	1, 2	hban 1595	. . 3 ⊢ ((∃*𝑥𝜑 ∧ ∃𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)) → ∀𝑥(∃*𝑥𝜑 ∧ ∃𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)))
4		mopick 2158	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((∃*𝑥𝜑 ∧ ∃𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)) → (𝜑 → 𝜓))
5	4	ancld 325	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((∃*𝑥𝜑 ∧ ∃𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)) → (𝜑 → (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)))
6	5	anim1d 336	. . . 4 ⊢ ((∃*𝑥𝜑 ∧ ∃𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)) → ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) → ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜒)))
7		df-3an 1006	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) ↔ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜒))
8	6, 7	imbitrrdi 162	. . 3 ⊢ ((∃*𝑥𝜑 ∧ ∃𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)) → ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) → (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)))
9	3, 8	eximdh 1659	. 2 ⊢ ((∃*𝑥𝜑 ∧ ∃𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)) → (∃𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) → ∃𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)))
10	9	3impia 1226	1 ⊢ ((∃*𝑥𝜑 ∧ ∃𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ ∃𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜒)) → ∃𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 104   ∧ w3a 1004  ∃wex 1540  ∃*wmo 2080

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-io 716  ax-5 1495  ax-7 1496  ax-gen 1497  ax-ie1 1541  ax-ie2 1542  ax-8 1552  ax-10 1553  ax-11 1554  ax-i12 1555  ax-bndl 1557  ax-4 1558  ax-17 1574  ax-i9 1578  ax-ial 1582  ax-i5r 1583

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-3an 1006  df-nf 1509  df-sb 1811  df-eu 2082  df-mo 2083

This theorem is referenced by: (None)