Theorem mopick2 2170

Description: "At most one" can show the existence of a common value. In this case we can infer existence of conjunction from a conjunction of existence, and it is one way to achieve the converse of 19.40 1684. (Contributed by NM, 5-Apr-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 9-Jul-2011.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
mopick2	⊢ ((∃*𝑥𝜑 ∧ ∃𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ ∃𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜒)) → ∃𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒))

Proof of Theorem mopick2

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		hbmo1 2124	. . . 4 ⊢ (∃*𝑥𝜑 → ∀𝑥∃*𝑥𝜑)
2		hbe1 1548	. . . 4 ⊢ (∃𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → ∀𝑥∃𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))
3	1, 2	hban 1600	. . 3 ⊢ ((∃*𝑥𝜑 ∧ ∃𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)) → ∀𝑥(∃*𝑥𝜑 ∧ ∃𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)))
4		mopick 2165	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((∃*𝑥𝜑 ∧ ∃𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)) → (𝜑 → 𝜓))
5	4	ancld 325	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((∃*𝑥𝜑 ∧ ∃𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)) → (𝜑 → (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)))
6	5	anim1d 336	. . . 4 ⊢ ((∃*𝑥𝜑 ∧ ∃𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)) → ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) → ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜒)))
7		df-3an 1011	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) ↔ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜒))
8	6, 7	imbitrrdi 162	. . 3 ⊢ ((∃*𝑥𝜑 ∧ ∃𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)) → ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) → (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)))
9	3, 8	eximdh 1664	. 2 ⊢ ((∃*𝑥𝜑 ∧ ∃𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)) → (∃𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) → ∃𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)))
10	9	3impia 1231	1 ⊢ ((∃*𝑥𝜑 ∧ ∃𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ ∃𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜒)) → ∃𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 104   ∧ w3a 1009  ∃wex 1545  ∃*wmo 2087

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-io 721  ax-5 1500  ax-7 1501  ax-gen 1502  ax-ie1 1546  ax-ie2 1547  ax-8 1557  ax-10 1558  ax-11 1559  ax-i12 1560  ax-bndl 1562  ax-4 1563  ax-17 1579  ax-i9 1583  ax-ial 1587  ax-i5r 1588

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-3an 1011  df-nf 1514  df-sb 1816  df-eu 2089  df-mo 2090

This theorem is referenced by: (None)