Theorem rabxmdc 3389

Description: Law of excluded middle given decidability, in terms of restricted class abstractions. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 2-Aug-2018.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
rabxmdc	|- ( A. xDECID ph -> A = ( { x e. A | ph } u. { x e. A | -. ph } ) )

Distinct variable group:   x, A

Allowed substitution hint:   ph( x)

Proof of Theorem rabxmdc

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		exmiddc 821	. . . . . 6 |- (DECID ph -> ( ph \/ -. ph ) )
2	1	a1d 22	. . . . 5 |- (DECID ph -> ( x e. A -> ( ph \/ -. ph ) ) )
3	2	alimi 1431	. . . 4 |- ( A. xDECID ph -> A. x ( x e. A -> ( ph \/ -. ph ) ) )
4		df-ral 2419	. . . 4 |- ( A. x e. A ( ph \/ -. ph ) <-> A. x ( x e. A -> ( ph \/ -. ph ) ) )
5	3, 4	sylibr 133	. . 3 |- ( A. xDECID ph -> A. x e. A ( ph \/ -. ph ) )
6		rabid2 2605	. . 3 |- ( A = { x e. A | ( ph \/ -. ph ) } <-> A. x e. A ( ph \/ -. ph ) )
7	5, 6	sylibr 133	. 2 |- ( A. xDECID ph -> A = { x e. A | ( ph \/ -. ph ) } )
8		unrab 3342	. 2 |- ( { x e. A | ph } u. { x e. A | -. ph } ) = { x e. A | ( ph \/ -. ph ) }
9	7, 8	syl6eqr 2188	1 |- ( A. xDECID ph -> A = ( { x e. A | ph } u. { x e. A | -. ph } ) )

Syntax hints:   -. wn 3   -> wi 4   \/ wo 697  DECID wdc 819   A.wal 1329   = wceq 1331   e. wcel 1480   A.wral 2414   {crab 2418   u. cun 3064

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107  ax-io 698  ax-5 1423  ax-7 1424  ax-gen 1425  ax-ie1 1469  ax-ie2 1470  ax-8 1482  ax-10 1483  ax-11 1484  ax-i12 1485  ax-bndl 1486  ax-4 1487  ax-17 1506  ax-i9 1510  ax-ial 1514  ax-i5r 1515  ax-ext 2119

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-dc 820  df-tru 1334  df-nf 1437  df-sb 1736  df-clab 2124  df-cleq 2130  df-clel 2133  df-nfc 2268  df-ral 2419  df-rab 2423  df-v 2683  df-un 3070

This theorem is referenced by: (None)