Theorem unrab 3406

Description: Union of two restricted class abstractions. (Contributed by NM, 25-Mar-2004.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
unrab	|- ( { x e. A | ph } u. { x e. A | ps } ) = { x e. A | ( ph \/ ps ) }

Proof of Theorem unrab

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-rab 2464	. . 3 |- { x e. A | ph } = { x | ( x e. A /\ ph ) }
2		df-rab 2464	. . 3 |- { x e. A | ps } = { x | ( x e. A /\ ps ) }
3	1, 2	uneq12i 3287	. 2 |- ( { x e. A | ph } u. { x e. A | ps } ) = ( { x | ( x e. A /\ ph ) } u. { x | ( x e. A /\ ps ) } )
4		df-rab 2464	. . 3 |- { x e. A | ( ph \/ ps ) } = { x | ( x e. A /\ ( ph \/ ps ) ) }
5		unab 3402	. . . 4 |- ( { x | ( x e. A /\ ph ) } u. { x | ( x e. A /\ ps ) } ) = { x | ( ( x e. A /\ ph ) \/ ( x e. A /\ ps ) ) }
6		andi 818	. . . . 5 |- ( ( x e. A /\ ( ph \/ ps ) ) <-> ( ( x e. A /\ ph ) \/ ( x e. A /\ ps ) ) )
7	6	abbii 2293	. . . 4 |- { x | ( x e. A /\ ( ph \/ ps ) ) } = { x | ( ( x e. A /\ ph ) \/ ( x e. A /\ ps ) ) }
8	5, 7	eqtr4i 2201	. . 3 |- ( { x | ( x e. A /\ ph ) } u. { x | ( x e. A /\ ps ) } ) = { x | ( x e. A /\ ( ph \/ ps ) ) }
9	4, 8	eqtr4i 2201	. 2 |- { x e. A | ( ph \/ ps ) } = ( { x | ( x e. A /\ ph ) } u. { x | ( x e. A /\ ps ) } )
10	3, 9	eqtr4i 2201	1 |- ( { x e. A | ph } u. { x e. A | ps } ) = { x e. A | ( ph \/ ps ) }

Syntax hints:   /\ wa 104   \/ wo 708   = wceq 1353   e. wcel 2148   {cab 2163   {crab 2459   u. cun 3127

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-io 709  ax-5 1447  ax-7 1448  ax-gen 1449  ax-ie1 1493  ax-ie2 1494  ax-8 1504  ax-10 1505  ax-11 1506  ax-i12 1507  ax-bndl 1509  ax-4 1510  ax-17 1526  ax-i9 1530  ax-ial 1534  ax-i5r 1535  ax-ext 2159

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-tru 1356  df-nf 1461  df-sb 1763  df-clab 2164  df-cleq 2170  df-clel 2173  df-nfc 2308  df-rab 2464  df-v 2739  df-un 3133

This theorem is referenced by:  rabxmdc  3454  phiprmpw  12213  unennn  12389  znnen  12390