Theorem reseq12d 4828

Description: Equality deduction for restrictions. (Contributed by NM, 21-Oct-2014.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
reseqd.1	|- ( ph -> A = B )
reseqd.2	|- ( ph -> C = D )

Assertion

Ref	Expression
reseq12d	|- ( ph -> ( A |` C ) = ( B |` D ) )

Proof of Theorem reseq12d

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		reseqd.1	. . 3 |- ( ph -> A = B )
2	1	reseq1d 4826	. 2 |- ( ph -> ( A |` C ) = ( B |` C ) )
3		reseqd.2	. . 3 |- ( ph -> C = D )
4	3	reseq2d 4827	. 2 |- ( ph -> ( B |` C ) = ( B |` D ) )
5	2, 4	eqtrd 2173	1 |- ( ph -> ( A |` C ) = ( B |` D ) )

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4   = wceq 1332   |` cres 4549

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107  ax-io 699  ax-5 1424  ax-7 1425  ax-gen 1426  ax-ie1 1470  ax-ie2 1471  ax-8 1483  ax-10 1484  ax-11 1485  ax-i12 1486  ax-bndl 1487  ax-4 1488  ax-17 1507  ax-i9 1511  ax-ial 1515  ax-i5r 1516  ax-ext 2122

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-tru 1335  df-nf 1438  df-sb 1737  df-clab 2127  df-cleq 2133  df-clel 2136  df-nfc 2271  df-v 2691  df-in 3082  df-opab 3998  df-xp 4553  df-res 4559

This theorem is referenced by:  tfrlem3ag  6214  tfrlem3a  6215  tfrlemi1  6237  tfr1onlem3ag  6242  setsvalg  12028  isxms  12659  isms  12661