Theorem reseq12d 4922

Description: Equality deduction for restrictions. (Contributed by NM, 21-Oct-2014.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
reseqd.1	|- ( ph -> A = B )
reseqd.2	|- ( ph -> C = D )

Assertion

Ref	Expression
reseq12d	|- ( ph -> ( A |` C ) = ( B |` D ) )

Proof of Theorem reseq12d

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		reseqd.1	. . 3 |- ( ph -> A = B )
2	1	reseq1d 4920	. 2 |- ( ph -> ( A |` C ) = ( B |` C ) )
3		reseqd.2	. . 3 |- ( ph -> C = D )
4	3	reseq2d 4921	. 2 |- ( ph -> ( B |` C ) = ( B |` D ) )
5	2, 4	eqtrd 2221	1 |- ( ph -> ( A |` C ) = ( B |` D ) )

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4   = wceq 1363   |` cres 4642

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-io 710  ax-5 1457  ax-7 1458  ax-gen 1459  ax-ie1 1503  ax-ie2 1504  ax-8 1514  ax-10 1515  ax-11 1516  ax-i12 1517  ax-bndl 1519  ax-4 1520  ax-17 1536  ax-i9 1540  ax-ial 1544  ax-i5r 1545  ax-ext 2170

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-tru 1366  df-nf 1471  df-sb 1773  df-clab 2175  df-cleq 2181  df-clel 2184  df-nfc 2320  df-v 2753  df-in 3149  df-opab 4079  df-xp 4646  df-res 4652

This theorem is referenced by:  tfrlem3ag  6327  tfrlem3a  6328  tfrlemi1  6350  tfr1onlem3ag  6355  setsvalg  12509  isxms  14334  isms  14336