Theorem reseq12d 4714

Description: Equality deduction for restrictions. (Contributed by NM, 21-Oct-2014.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
reseqd.1	|- ( ph -> A = B )
reseqd.2	|- ( ph -> C = D )

Assertion

Ref	Expression
reseq12d	|- ( ph -> ( A |` C ) = ( B |` D ) )

Proof of Theorem reseq12d

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		reseqd.1	. . 3 |- ( ph -> A = B )
2	1	reseq1d 4712	. 2 |- ( ph -> ( A |` C ) = ( B |` C ) )
3		reseqd.2	. . 3 |- ( ph -> C = D )
4	3	reseq2d 4713	. 2 |- ( ph -> ( B |` C ) = ( B |` D ) )
5	2, 4	eqtrd 2120	1 |- ( ph -> ( A |` C ) = ( B |` D ) )

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4   = wceq 1289   |` cres 4440

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 104  ax-ia2 105  ax-ia3 106  ax-io 665  ax-5 1381  ax-7 1382  ax-gen 1383  ax-ie1 1427  ax-ie2 1428  ax-8 1440  ax-10 1441  ax-11 1442  ax-i12 1443  ax-bndl 1444  ax-4 1445  ax-17 1464  ax-i9 1468  ax-ial 1472  ax-i5r 1473  ax-ext 2070

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 115  df-tru 1292  df-nf 1395  df-sb 1693  df-clab 2075  df-cleq 2081  df-clel 2084  df-nfc 2217  df-v 2621  df-in 3005  df-opab 3900  df-xp 4444  df-res 4450

This theorem is referenced by:  tfrlem3ag  6074  tfrlem3a  6075  tfrlemi1  6097  tfr1onlem3ag  6102  setsvalg  11519