Theorem reseq12d 4969

Description: Equality deduction for restrictions. (Contributed by NM, 21-Oct-2014.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
reseqd.1	|- ( ph -> A = B )
reseqd.2	|- ( ph -> C = D )

Assertion

Ref	Expression
reseq12d	|- ( ph -> ( A |` C ) = ( B |` D ) )

Proof of Theorem reseq12d

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		reseqd.1	. . 3 |- ( ph -> A = B )
2	1	reseq1d 4967	. 2 |- ( ph -> ( A |` C ) = ( B |` C ) )
3		reseqd.2	. . 3 |- ( ph -> C = D )
4	3	reseq2d 4968	. 2 |- ( ph -> ( B |` C ) = ( B |` D ) )
5	2, 4	eqtrd 2239	1 |- ( ph -> ( A |` C ) = ( B |` D ) )

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4   = wceq 1373   |` cres 4685

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-io 711  ax-5 1471  ax-7 1472  ax-gen 1473  ax-ie1 1517  ax-ie2 1518  ax-8 1528  ax-10 1529  ax-11 1530  ax-i12 1531  ax-bndl 1533  ax-4 1534  ax-17 1550  ax-i9 1554  ax-ial 1558  ax-i5r 1559  ax-ext 2188

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-tru 1376  df-nf 1485  df-sb 1787  df-clab 2193  df-cleq 2199  df-clel 2202  df-nfc 2338  df-v 2775  df-in 3176  df-opab 4114  df-xp 4689  df-res 4695

This theorem is referenced by:  tfrlem3ag  6408  tfrlem3a  6409  tfrlemi1  6431  tfr1onlem3ag  6436  setsvalg  12937  znval  14473  psrval  14503  isxms  14998  isms  15000