Theorem tfrlem3a 6519

Description: Lemma for transfinite recursion. Let A be the class of "acceptable" functions. The final thing we're interested in is the union of all these acceptable functions. This lemma just changes some bound variables in A for later use. (Contributed by NM, 9-Apr-1995.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
tfrlem3.1	|- A = { f | E. x e. On ( f Fn x /\ A. y e. x ( f ` y ) = ( F ` ( f |` y ) ) ) }
tfrlem3.2	|- G e. _V

Assertion

Ref	Expression
tfrlem3a	|- ( G e. A <-> E. z e. On ( G Fn z /\ A. w e. z ( G ` w ) = ( F ` ( G |` w ) ) ) )

Distinct variable groups:   w, f, x, y, z, F   f, G, w, x, y, z

Allowed substitution hints:   A( x, y, z, w, f)

Proof of Theorem tfrlem3a

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		tfrlem3.2	. 2 |- G e. _V
2		fneq12 5430	. . . 4 |- ( ( f = G /\ x = z ) -> ( f Fn x <-> G Fn z ) )
3		simpll 527	. . . . . . 7 |- ( ( ( f = G /\ x = z ) /\ y = w ) -> f = G )
4		simpr 110	. . . . . . 7 |- ( ( ( f = G /\ x = z ) /\ y = w ) -> y = w )
5	3, 4	fveq12d 5655	. . . . . 6 |- ( ( ( f = G /\ x = z ) /\ y = w ) -> ( f ` y ) = ( G ` w ) )
6	3, 4	reseq12d 5020	. . . . . . 7 |- ( ( ( f = G /\ x = z ) /\ y = w ) -> ( f |` y ) = ( G |` w ) )
7	6	fveq2d 5652	. . . . . 6 |- ( ( ( f = G /\ x = z ) /\ y = w ) -> ( F ` ( f |` y ) ) = ( F ` ( G |` w ) ) )
8	5, 7	eqeq12d 2246	. . . . 5 |- ( ( ( f = G /\ x = z ) /\ y = w ) -> ( ( f ` y ) = ( F ` ( f |` y ) ) <-> ( G ` w ) = ( F ` ( G |` w ) ) ) )
9		simpr 110	. . . . . 6 |- ( ( f = G /\ x = z ) -> x = z )
10	9	adantr 276	. . . . 5 |- ( ( ( f = G /\ x = z ) /\ y = w ) -> x = z )
11	8, 10	cbvraldva2 2775	. . . 4 |- ( ( f = G /\ x = z ) -> ( A. y e. x ( f ` y ) = ( F ` ( f |` y ) ) <-> A. w e. z ( G ` w ) = ( F ` ( G |` w ) ) ) )
12	2, 11	anbi12d 473	. . 3 |- ( ( f = G /\ x = z ) -> ( ( f Fn x /\ A. y e. x ( f ` y ) = ( F ` ( f |` y ) ) ) <-> ( G Fn z /\ A. w e. z ( G ` w ) = ( F ` ( G |` w ) ) ) ) )
13	12	cbvrexdva 2778	. 2 |- ( f = G -> ( E. x e. On ( f Fn x /\ A. y e. x ( f ` y ) = ( F ` ( f |` y ) ) ) <-> E. z e. On ( G Fn z /\ A. w e. z ( G ` w ) = ( F ` ( G |` w ) ) ) ) )
14		tfrlem3.1	. 2 |- A = { f | E. x e. On ( f Fn x /\ A. y e. x ( f ` y ) = ( F ` ( f |` y ) ) ) }
15	1, 13, 14	elab2 2955	1 |- ( G e. A <-> E. z e. On ( G Fn z /\ A. w e. z ( G ` w ) = ( F ` ( G |` w ) ) ) )

Syntax hints:   /\ wa 104   <-> wb 105   = wceq 1398   e. wcel 2202   {cab 2217   A.wral 2511   E.wrex 2512   _Vcvv 2803   Oncon0 4466   |` cres 4733   Fn wfn 5328   ` cfv 5333

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-io 717  ax-5 1496  ax-7 1497  ax-gen 1498  ax-ie1 1542  ax-ie2 1543  ax-8 1553  ax-10 1554  ax-11 1555  ax-i12 1556  ax-bndl 1558  ax-4 1559  ax-17 1575  ax-i9 1579  ax-ial 1583  ax-i5r 1584  ax-ext 2213

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-3an 1007  df-tru 1401  df-nf 1510  df-sb 1811  df-clab 2218  df-cleq 2224  df-clel 2227  df-nfc 2364  df-ral 2516  df-rex 2517  df-v 2805  df-un 3205  df-in 3207  df-ss 3214  df-sn 3679  df-pr 3680  df-op 3682  df-uni 3899  df-br 4094  df-opab 4156  df-xp 4737  df-rel 4738  df-cnv 4739  df-co 4740  df-dm 4741  df-res 4743  df-iota 5293  df-fun 5335  df-fn 5336  df-fv 5341

This theorem is referenced by:  tfrlem3  6520  tfrlem5  6523  tfrlemisucaccv  6534  tfrlemibxssdm  6536  tfrlemi14d  6542  tfrexlem  6543