Theorem ss2rabdv 3274

Description: Deduction of restricted abstraction subclass from implication. (Contributed by NM, 30-May-2006.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
ss2rabdv.1	|- ( ( ph /\ x e. A ) -> ( ps -> ch ) )

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ss2rabdv	|- ( ph -> { x e. A | ps } C_ { x e. A | ch } )

Distinct variable group:   ph, x

Allowed substitution hints:   ps( x)   ch( x)   A( x)

Proof of Theorem ss2rabdv

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ss2rabdv.1	. . 3 |- ( ( ph /\ x e. A ) -> ( ps -> ch ) )
2	1	ralrimiva 2579	. 2 |- ( ph -> A. x e. A ( ps -> ch ) )
3		ss2rab 3269	. 2 |- ( { x e. A | ps } C_ { x e. A | ch } <-> A. x e. A ( ps -> ch ) )
4	2, 3	sylibr 134	1 |- ( ph -> { x e. A | ps } C_ { x e. A | ch } )

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4   /\ wa 104   e. wcel 2176   A.wral 2484   {crab 2488   C_ wss 3166

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-io 711  ax-5 1470  ax-7 1471  ax-gen 1472  ax-ie1 1516  ax-ie2 1517  ax-8 1527  ax-10 1528  ax-11 1529  ax-i12 1530  ax-bndl 1532  ax-4 1533  ax-17 1549  ax-i9 1553  ax-ial 1557  ax-i5r 1558  ax-ext 2187

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-nf 1484  df-sb 1786  df-clab 2192  df-cleq 2198  df-clel 2201  df-nfc 2337  df-ral 2489  df-rab 2493  df-in 3172  df-ss 3179

This theorem is referenced by:  sess1  4384  suppssfv  6154  suppssov1  6155  lspss  14161  clsss  14590  metss2lem  14969