Theorem ss2rabdv 3144

Description: Deduction of restricted abstraction subclass from implication. (Contributed by NM, 30-May-2006.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
ss2rabdv.1	|- ( ( ph /\ x e. A ) -> ( ps -> ch ) )

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ss2rabdv	|- ( ph -> { x e. A | ps } C_ { x e. A | ch } )

Distinct variable group:   ph, x

Allowed substitution hints:   ps( x)   ch( x)   A( x)

Proof of Theorem ss2rabdv

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ss2rabdv.1	. . 3 |- ( ( ph /\ x e. A ) -> ( ps -> ch ) )
2	1	ralrimiva 2479	. 2 |- ( ph -> A. x e. A ( ps -> ch ) )
3		ss2rab 3139	. 2 |- ( { x e. A | ps } C_ { x e. A | ch } <-> A. x e. A ( ps -> ch ) )
4	2, 3	sylibr 133	1 |- ( ph -> { x e. A | ps } C_ { x e. A | ch } )

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4   /\ wa 103   e. wcel 1463   A.wral 2390   {crab 2394   C_ wss 3037

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107  ax-io 681  ax-5 1406  ax-7 1407  ax-gen 1408  ax-ie1 1452  ax-ie2 1453  ax-8 1465  ax-10 1466  ax-11 1467  ax-i12 1468  ax-bndl 1469  ax-4 1470  ax-17 1489  ax-i9 1493  ax-ial 1497  ax-i5r 1498  ax-ext 2097

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-nf 1420  df-sb 1719  df-clab 2102  df-cleq 2108  df-clel 2111  df-nfc 2244  df-ral 2395  df-rab 2399  df-in 3043  df-ss 3050

This theorem is referenced by:  sess1  4219  suppssfv  5932  suppssov1  5933  clsss  12130  metss2lem  12486