Theorem ss2rabdv 3236

Description: Deduction of restricted abstraction subclass from implication. (Contributed by NM, 30-May-2006.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
ss2rabdv.1	|- ( ( ph /\ x e. A ) -> ( ps -> ch ) )

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ss2rabdv	|- ( ph -> { x e. A | ps } C_ { x e. A | ch } )

Distinct variable group:   ph, x

Allowed substitution hints:   ps( x)   ch( x)   A( x)

Proof of Theorem ss2rabdv

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ss2rabdv.1	. . 3 |- ( ( ph /\ x e. A ) -> ( ps -> ch ) )
2	1	ralrimiva 2550	. 2 |- ( ph -> A. x e. A ( ps -> ch ) )
3		ss2rab 3231	. 2 |- ( { x e. A | ps } C_ { x e. A | ch } <-> A. x e. A ( ps -> ch ) )
4	2, 3	sylibr 134	1 |- ( ph -> { x e. A | ps } C_ { x e. A | ch } )

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4   /\ wa 104   e. wcel 2148   A.wral 2455   {crab 2459   C_ wss 3129

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-io 709  ax-5 1447  ax-7 1448  ax-gen 1449  ax-ie1 1493  ax-ie2 1494  ax-8 1504  ax-10 1505  ax-11 1506  ax-i12 1507  ax-bndl 1509  ax-4 1510  ax-17 1526  ax-i9 1530  ax-ial 1534  ax-i5r 1535  ax-ext 2159

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-nf 1461  df-sb 1763  df-clab 2164  df-cleq 2170  df-clel 2173  df-nfc 2308  df-ral 2460  df-rab 2464  df-in 3135  df-ss 3142

This theorem is referenced by:  sess1  4334  suppssfv  6073  suppssov1  6074  clsss  13282  metss2lem  13661