Theorem suppssfv 5971

Description: Formula building theorem for support restriction, on a function which preserves zero. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 9-Mar-2015.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
suppssfv.a	|- ( ph -> ( `' ( x e. D |-> A ) " ( _V \ { Y } ) ) C_ L )
suppssfv.f	|- ( ph -> ( F ` Y ) = Z )
suppssfv.v	|- ( ( ph /\ x e. D ) -> A e. V )

Assertion

Ref	Expression
suppssfv	|- ( ph -> ( `' ( x e. D |-> ( F ` A ) ) " ( _V \ { Z } ) ) C_ L )

Distinct variable groups:   ph, x   x, Y   x, Z

Allowed substitution hints:   A( x)   D( x)   F( x)   L( x)   V( x)

Proof of Theorem suppssfv

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		eldifsni 3647	. . . . 5 |- ( ( F ` A ) e. ( _V \ { Z } ) -> ( F ` A ) =/= Z )
2		suppssfv.v	. . . . . . . . 9 |- ( ( ph /\ x e. D ) -> A e. V )
3		elex 2692	. . . . . . . . 9 |- ( A e. V -> A e. _V )
4	2, 3	syl 14	. . . . . . . 8 |- ( ( ph /\ x e. D ) -> A e. _V )
5	4	adantr 274	. . . . . . 7 |- ( ( ( ph /\ x e. D ) /\ ( F ` A ) =/= Z ) -> A e. _V )
6		suppssfv.f	. . . . . . . . . . 11 |- ( ph -> ( F ` Y ) = Z )
7		fveq2 5414	. . . . . . . . . . . 12 |- ( A = Y -> ( F ` A ) = ( F ` Y ) )
8	7	eqeq1d 2146	. . . . . . . . . . 11 |- ( A = Y -> ( ( F ` A ) = Z <-> ( F ` Y ) = Z ) )
9	6, 8	syl5ibrcom 156	. . . . . . . . . 10 |- ( ph -> ( A = Y -> ( F ` A ) = Z ) )
10	9	necon3d 2350	. . . . . . . . 9 |- ( ph -> ( ( F ` A ) =/= Z -> A =/= Y ) )
11	10	adantr 274	. . . . . . . 8 |- ( ( ph /\ x e. D ) -> ( ( F ` A ) =/= Z -> A =/= Y ) )
12	11	imp 123	. . . . . . 7 |- ( ( ( ph /\ x e. D ) /\ ( F ` A ) =/= Z ) -> A =/= Y )
13		eldifsn 3645	. . . . . . 7 |- ( A e. ( _V \ { Y } ) <-> ( A e. _V /\ A =/= Y ) )
14	5, 12, 13	sylanbrc 413	. . . . . 6 |- ( ( ( ph /\ x e. D ) /\ ( F ` A ) =/= Z ) -> A e. ( _V \ { Y } ) )
15	14	ex 114	. . . . 5 |- ( ( ph /\ x e. D ) -> ( ( F ` A ) =/= Z -> A e. ( _V \ { Y } ) ) )
16	1, 15	syl5 32	. . . 4 |- ( ( ph /\ x e. D ) -> ( ( F ` A ) e. ( _V \ { Z } ) -> A e. ( _V \ { Y } ) ) )
17	16	ss2rabdv 3173	. . 3 |- ( ph -> { x e. D | ( F ` A ) e. ( _V \ { Z } ) } C_ { x e. D | A e. ( _V \ { Y } ) } )
18		eqid 2137	. . . 4 |- ( x e. D |-> ( F ` A ) ) = ( x e. D |-> ( F ` A ) )
19	18	mptpreima 5027	. . 3 |- ( `' ( x e. D |-> ( F ` A ) ) " ( _V \ { Z } ) ) = { x e. D | ( F ` A ) e. ( _V \ { Z } ) }
20		eqid 2137	. . . 4 |- ( x e. D |-> A ) = ( x e. D |-> A )
21	20	mptpreima 5027	. . 3 |- ( `' ( x e. D |-> A ) " ( _V \ { Y } ) ) = { x e. D | A e. ( _V \ { Y } ) }
22	17, 19, 21	3sstr4g 3135	. 2 |- ( ph -> ( `' ( x e. D |-> ( F ` A ) ) " ( _V \ { Z } ) ) C_ ( `' ( x e. D |-> A ) " ( _V \ { Y } ) ) )
23		suppssfv.a	. 2 |- ( ph -> ( `' ( x e. D |-> A ) " ( _V \ { Y } ) ) C_ L )
24	22, 23	sstrd 3102	1 |- ( ph -> ( `' ( x e. D |-> ( F ` A ) ) " ( _V \ { Z } ) ) C_ L )

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4   /\ wa 103   = wceq 1331   e. wcel 1480   =/= wne 2306   {crab 2418   _Vcvv 2681   \ cdif 3063   C_ wss 3066   {csn 3522   |-> cmpt 3984   `'ccnv 4533   "cima 4537   ` cfv 5118

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107  ax-in1 603  ax-in2 604  ax-io 698  ax-5 1423  ax-7 1424  ax-gen 1425  ax-ie1 1469  ax-ie2 1470  ax-8 1482  ax-10 1483  ax-11 1484  ax-i12 1485  ax-bndl 1486  ax-4 1487  ax-14 1492  ax-17 1506  ax-i9 1510  ax-ial 1514  ax-i5r 1515  ax-ext 2119  ax-sep 4041  ax-pow 4093  ax-pr 4126

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-3an 964  df-tru 1334  df-nf 1437  df-sb 1736  df-eu 2000  df-mo 2001  df-clab 2124  df-cleq 2130  df-clel 2133  df-nfc 2268  df-ne 2307  df-ral 2419  df-rex 2420  df-rab 2423  df-v 2683  df-dif 3068  df-un 3070  df-in 3072  df-ss 3079  df-pw 3507  df-sn 3528  df-pr 3529  df-op 3531  df-uni 3732  df-br 3925  df-opab 3985  df-mpt 3986  df-xp 4540  df-rel 4541  df-cnv 4542  df-dm 4544  df-rn 4545  df-res 4546  df-ima 4547  df-iota 5083  df-fv 5126

This theorem is referenced by: (None)