Theorem suppssfv 6154

Description: Formula building theorem for support restriction, on a function which preserves zero. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 9-Mar-2015.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
suppssfv.a	|- ( ph -> ( `' ( x e. D |-> A ) " ( _V \ { Y } ) ) C_ L )
suppssfv.f	|- ( ph -> ( F ` Y ) = Z )
suppssfv.v	|- ( ( ph /\ x e. D ) -> A e. V )

Assertion

Ref	Expression
suppssfv	|- ( ph -> ( `' ( x e. D |-> ( F ` A ) ) " ( _V \ { Z } ) ) C_ L )

Distinct variable groups:   ph, x   x, Y   x, Z

Allowed substitution hints:   A( x)   D( x)   F( x)   L( x)   V( x)

Proof of Theorem suppssfv

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		eldifsni 3762	. . . . 5 |- ( ( F ` A ) e. ( _V \ { Z } ) -> ( F ` A ) =/= Z )
2		suppssfv.v	. . . . . . . . 9 |- ( ( ph /\ x e. D ) -> A e. V )
3		elex 2783	. . . . . . . . 9 |- ( A e. V -> A e. _V )
4	2, 3	syl 14	. . . . . . . 8 |- ( ( ph /\ x e. D ) -> A e. _V )
5	4	adantr 276	. . . . . . 7 |- ( ( ( ph /\ x e. D ) /\ ( F ` A ) =/= Z ) -> A e. _V )
6		suppssfv.f	. . . . . . . . . . 11 |- ( ph -> ( F ` Y ) = Z )
7		fveq2 5576	. . . . . . . . . . . 12 |- ( A = Y -> ( F ` A ) = ( F ` Y ) )
8	7	eqeq1d 2214	. . . . . . . . . . 11 |- ( A = Y -> ( ( F ` A ) = Z <-> ( F ` Y ) = Z ) )
9	6, 8	syl5ibrcom 157	. . . . . . . . . 10 |- ( ph -> ( A = Y -> ( F ` A ) = Z ) )
10	9	necon3d 2420	. . . . . . . . 9 |- ( ph -> ( ( F ` A ) =/= Z -> A =/= Y ) )
11	10	adantr 276	. . . . . . . 8 |- ( ( ph /\ x e. D ) -> ( ( F ` A ) =/= Z -> A =/= Y ) )
12	11	imp 124	. . . . . . 7 |- ( ( ( ph /\ x e. D ) /\ ( F ` A ) =/= Z ) -> A =/= Y )
13		eldifsn 3760	. . . . . . 7 |- ( A e. ( _V \ { Y } ) <-> ( A e. _V /\ A =/= Y ) )
14	5, 12, 13	sylanbrc 417	. . . . . 6 |- ( ( ( ph /\ x e. D ) /\ ( F ` A ) =/= Z ) -> A e. ( _V \ { Y } ) )
15	14	ex 115	. . . . 5 |- ( ( ph /\ x e. D ) -> ( ( F ` A ) =/= Z -> A e. ( _V \ { Y } ) ) )
16	1, 15	syl5 32	. . . 4 |- ( ( ph /\ x e. D ) -> ( ( F ` A ) e. ( _V \ { Z } ) -> A e. ( _V \ { Y } ) ) )
17	16	ss2rabdv 3274	. . 3 |- ( ph -> { x e. D | ( F ` A ) e. ( _V \ { Z } ) } C_ { x e. D | A e. ( _V \ { Y } ) } )
18		eqid 2205	. . . 4 |- ( x e. D |-> ( F ` A ) ) = ( x e. D |-> ( F ` A ) )
19	18	mptpreima 5176	. . 3 |- ( `' ( x e. D |-> ( F ` A ) ) " ( _V \ { Z } ) ) = { x e. D | ( F ` A ) e. ( _V \ { Z } ) }
20		eqid 2205	. . . 4 |- ( x e. D |-> A ) = ( x e. D |-> A )
21	20	mptpreima 5176	. . 3 |- ( `' ( x e. D |-> A ) " ( _V \ { Y } ) ) = { x e. D | A e. ( _V \ { Y } ) }
22	17, 19, 21	3sstr4g 3236	. 2 |- ( ph -> ( `' ( x e. D |-> ( F ` A ) ) " ( _V \ { Z } ) ) C_ ( `' ( x e. D |-> A ) " ( _V \ { Y } ) ) )
23		suppssfv.a	. 2 |- ( ph -> ( `' ( x e. D |-> A ) " ( _V \ { Y } ) ) C_ L )
24	22, 23	sstrd 3203	1 |- ( ph -> ( `' ( x e. D |-> ( F ` A ) ) " ( _V \ { Z } ) ) C_ L )

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4   /\ wa 104   = wceq 1373   e. wcel 2176   =/= wne 2376   {crab 2488   _Vcvv 2772   \ cdif 3163   C_ wss 3166   {csn 3633   |-> cmpt 4105   `'ccnv 4674   "cima 4678   ` cfv 5271

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-in1 615  ax-in2 616  ax-io 711  ax-5 1470  ax-7 1471  ax-gen 1472  ax-ie1 1516  ax-ie2 1517  ax-8 1527  ax-10 1528  ax-11 1529  ax-i12 1530  ax-bndl 1532  ax-4 1533  ax-17 1549  ax-i9 1553  ax-ial 1557  ax-i5r 1558  ax-14 2179  ax-ext 2187  ax-sep 4162  ax-pow 4218  ax-pr 4253

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-3an 983  df-tru 1376  df-nf 1484  df-sb 1786  df-eu 2057  df-mo 2058  df-clab 2192  df-cleq 2198  df-clel 2201  df-nfc 2337  df-ne 2377  df-ral 2489  df-rex 2490  df-rab 2493  df-v 2774  df-dif 3168  df-un 3170  df-in 3172  df-ss 3179  df-pw 3618  df-sn 3639  df-pr 3640  df-op 3642  df-uni 3851  df-br 4045  df-opab 4106  df-mpt 4107  df-xp 4681  df-rel 4682  df-cnv 4683  df-dm 4685  df-rn 4686  df-res 4687  df-ima 4688  df-iota 5232  df-fv 5279

This theorem is referenced by: (None)