Theorem suppssfv 6046

Description: Formula building theorem for support restriction, on a function which preserves zero. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 9-Mar-2015.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
suppssfv.a	|- ( ph -> ( `' ( x e. D |-> A ) " ( _V \ { Y } ) ) C_ L )
suppssfv.f	|- ( ph -> ( F ` Y ) = Z )
suppssfv.v	|- ( ( ph /\ x e. D ) -> A e. V )

Assertion

Ref	Expression
suppssfv	|- ( ph -> ( `' ( x e. D |-> ( F ` A ) ) " ( _V \ { Z } ) ) C_ L )

Distinct variable groups:   ph, x   x, Y   x, Z

Allowed substitution hints:   A( x)   D( x)   F( x)   L( x)   V( x)

Proof of Theorem suppssfv

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		eldifsni 3705	. . . . 5 |- ( ( F ` A ) e. ( _V \ { Z } ) -> ( F ` A ) =/= Z )
2		suppssfv.v	. . . . . . . . 9 |- ( ( ph /\ x e. D ) -> A e. V )
3		elex 2737	. . . . . . . . 9 |- ( A e. V -> A e. _V )
4	2, 3	syl 14	. . . . . . . 8 |- ( ( ph /\ x e. D ) -> A e. _V )
5	4	adantr 274	. . . . . . 7 |- ( ( ( ph /\ x e. D ) /\ ( F ` A ) =/= Z ) -> A e. _V )
6		suppssfv.f	. . . . . . . . . . 11 |- ( ph -> ( F ` Y ) = Z )
7		fveq2 5486	. . . . . . . . . . . 12 |- ( A = Y -> ( F ` A ) = ( F ` Y ) )
8	7	eqeq1d 2174	. . . . . . . . . . 11 |- ( A = Y -> ( ( F ` A ) = Z <-> ( F ` Y ) = Z ) )
9	6, 8	syl5ibrcom 156	. . . . . . . . . 10 |- ( ph -> ( A = Y -> ( F ` A ) = Z ) )
10	9	necon3d 2380	. . . . . . . . 9 |- ( ph -> ( ( F ` A ) =/= Z -> A =/= Y ) )
11	10	adantr 274	. . . . . . . 8 |- ( ( ph /\ x e. D ) -> ( ( F ` A ) =/= Z -> A =/= Y ) )
12	11	imp 123	. . . . . . 7 |- ( ( ( ph /\ x e. D ) /\ ( F ` A ) =/= Z ) -> A =/= Y )
13		eldifsn 3703	. . . . . . 7 |- ( A e. ( _V \ { Y } ) <-> ( A e. _V /\ A =/= Y ) )
14	5, 12, 13	sylanbrc 414	. . . . . 6 |- ( ( ( ph /\ x e. D ) /\ ( F ` A ) =/= Z ) -> A e. ( _V \ { Y } ) )
15	14	ex 114	. . . . 5 |- ( ( ph /\ x e. D ) -> ( ( F ` A ) =/= Z -> A e. ( _V \ { Y } ) ) )
16	1, 15	syl5 32	. . . 4 |- ( ( ph /\ x e. D ) -> ( ( F ` A ) e. ( _V \ { Z } ) -> A e. ( _V \ { Y } ) ) )
17	16	ss2rabdv 3223	. . 3 |- ( ph -> { x e. D | ( F ` A ) e. ( _V \ { Z } ) } C_ { x e. D | A e. ( _V \ { Y } ) } )
18		eqid 2165	. . . 4 |- ( x e. D |-> ( F ` A ) ) = ( x e. D |-> ( F ` A ) )
19	18	mptpreima 5097	. . 3 |- ( `' ( x e. D |-> ( F ` A ) ) " ( _V \ { Z } ) ) = { x e. D | ( F ` A ) e. ( _V \ { Z } ) }
20		eqid 2165	. . . 4 |- ( x e. D |-> A ) = ( x e. D |-> A )
21	20	mptpreima 5097	. . 3 |- ( `' ( x e. D |-> A ) " ( _V \ { Y } ) ) = { x e. D | A e. ( _V \ { Y } ) }
22	17, 19, 21	3sstr4g 3185	. 2 |- ( ph -> ( `' ( x e. D |-> ( F ` A ) ) " ( _V \ { Z } ) ) C_ ( `' ( x e. D |-> A ) " ( _V \ { Y } ) ) )
23		suppssfv.a	. 2 |- ( ph -> ( `' ( x e. D |-> A ) " ( _V \ { Y } ) ) C_ L )
24	22, 23	sstrd 3152	1 |- ( ph -> ( `' ( x e. D |-> ( F ` A ) ) " ( _V \ { Z } ) ) C_ L )

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4   /\ wa 103   = wceq 1343   e. wcel 2136   =/= wne 2336   {crab 2448   _Vcvv 2726   \ cdif 3113   C_ wss 3116   {csn 3576   |-> cmpt 4043   `'ccnv 4603   "cima 4607   ` cfv 5188

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107  ax-in1 604  ax-in2 605  ax-io 699  ax-5 1435  ax-7 1436  ax-gen 1437  ax-ie1 1481  ax-ie2 1482  ax-8 1492  ax-10 1493  ax-11 1494  ax-i12 1495  ax-bndl 1497  ax-4 1498  ax-17 1514  ax-i9 1518  ax-ial 1522  ax-i5r 1523  ax-14 2139  ax-ext 2147  ax-sep 4100  ax-pow 4153  ax-pr 4187

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-3an 970  df-tru 1346  df-nf 1449  df-sb 1751  df-eu 2017  df-mo 2018  df-clab 2152  df-cleq 2158  df-clel 2161  df-nfc 2297  df-ne 2337  df-ral 2449  df-rex 2450  df-rab 2453  df-v 2728  df-dif 3118  df-un 3120  df-in 3122  df-ss 3129  df-pw 3561  df-sn 3582  df-pr 3583  df-op 3585  df-uni 3790  df-br 3983  df-opab 4044  df-mpt 4045  df-xp 4610  df-rel 4611  df-cnv 4612  df-dm 4614  df-rn 4615  df-res 4616  df-ima 4617  df-iota 5153  df-fv 5196

This theorem is referenced by: (None)