Theorem ssundifim 3498

Description: A consequence of inclusion in the union of two classes. In classical logic this would be a biconditional. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 4-Aug-2018.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ssundifim	|- ( A C_ ( B u. C ) -> ( A \ B ) C_ C )

Proof of Theorem ssundifim

Dummy variable x is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		pm5.6r 922	. . . 4 |- ( ( x e. A -> ( x e. B \/ x e. C ) ) -> ( ( x e. A /\ -. x e. B ) -> x e. C ) )
2		elun 3268	. . . . 5 |- ( x e. ( B u. C ) <-> ( x e. B \/ x e. C ) )
3	2	imbi2i 225	. . . 4 |- ( ( x e. A -> x e. ( B u. C ) ) <-> ( x e. A -> ( x e. B \/ x e. C ) ) )
4		eldif 3130	. . . . 5 |- ( x e. ( A \ B ) <-> ( x e. A /\ -. x e. B ) )
5	4	imbi1i 237	. . . 4 |- ( ( x e. ( A \ B ) -> x e. C ) <-> ( ( x e. A /\ -. x e. B ) -> x e. C ) )
6	1, 3, 5	3imtr4i 200	. . 3 |- ( ( x e. A -> x e. ( B u. C ) ) -> ( x e. ( A \ B ) -> x e. C ) )
7	6	alimi 1448	. 2 |- ( A. x ( x e. A -> x e. ( B u. C ) ) -> A. x ( x e. ( A \ B ) -> x e. C ) )
8		dfss2 3136	. 2 |- ( A C_ ( B u. C ) <-> A. x ( x e. A -> x e. ( B u. C ) ) )
9		dfss2 3136	. 2 |- ( ( A \ B ) C_ C <-> A. x ( x e. ( A \ B ) -> x e. C ) )
10	7, 8, 9	3imtr4i 200	1 |- ( A C_ ( B u. C ) -> ( A \ B ) C_ C )

Syntax hints:   -. wn 3   -> wi 4   /\ wa 103   \/ wo 703   A.wal 1346   e. wcel 2141   \ cdif 3118   u. cun 3119   C_ wss 3121

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107  ax-in1 609  ax-in2 610  ax-io 704  ax-5 1440  ax-7 1441  ax-gen 1442  ax-ie1 1486  ax-ie2 1487  ax-8 1497  ax-10 1498  ax-11 1499  ax-i12 1500  ax-bndl 1502  ax-4 1503  ax-17 1519  ax-i9 1523  ax-ial 1527  ax-i5r 1528  ax-ext 2152

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-tru 1351  df-nf 1454  df-sb 1756  df-clab 2157  df-cleq 2163  df-clel 2166  df-nfc 2301  df-v 2732  df-dif 3123  df-un 3125  df-in 3127  df-ss 3134

This theorem is referenced by: (None)