Theorem ssundifim 3518

Description: A consequence of inclusion in the union of two classes. In classical logic this would be a biconditional. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 4-Aug-2018.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ssundifim	|- ( A C_ ( B u. C ) -> ( A \ B ) C_ C )

Proof of Theorem ssundifim

Dummy variable x is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		pm5.6r 928	. . . 4 |- ( ( x e. A -> ( x e. B \/ x e. C ) ) -> ( ( x e. A /\ -. x e. B ) -> x e. C ) )
2		elun 3288	. . . . 5 |- ( x e. ( B u. C ) <-> ( x e. B \/ x e. C ) )
3	2	imbi2i 226	. . . 4 |- ( ( x e. A -> x e. ( B u. C ) ) <-> ( x e. A -> ( x e. B \/ x e. C ) ) )
4		eldif 3150	. . . . 5 |- ( x e. ( A \ B ) <-> ( x e. A /\ -. x e. B ) )
5	4	imbi1i 238	. . . 4 |- ( ( x e. ( A \ B ) -> x e. C ) <-> ( ( x e. A /\ -. x e. B ) -> x e. C ) )
6	1, 3, 5	3imtr4i 201	. . 3 |- ( ( x e. A -> x e. ( B u. C ) ) -> ( x e. ( A \ B ) -> x e. C ) )
7	6	alimi 1465	. 2 |- ( A. x ( x e. A -> x e. ( B u. C ) ) -> A. x ( x e. ( A \ B ) -> x e. C ) )
8		dfss2 3156	. 2 |- ( A C_ ( B u. C ) <-> A. x ( x e. A -> x e. ( B u. C ) ) )
9		dfss2 3156	. 2 |- ( ( A \ B ) C_ C <-> A. x ( x e. ( A \ B ) -> x e. C ) )
10	7, 8, 9	3imtr4i 201	1 |- ( A C_ ( B u. C ) -> ( A \ B ) C_ C )

Syntax hints:   -. wn 3   -> wi 4   /\ wa 104   \/ wo 709   A.wal 1361   e. wcel 2158   \ cdif 3138   u. cun 3139   C_ wss 3141

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-in1 615  ax-in2 616  ax-io 710  ax-5 1457  ax-7 1458  ax-gen 1459  ax-ie1 1503  ax-ie2 1504  ax-8 1514  ax-10 1515  ax-11 1516  ax-i12 1517  ax-bndl 1519  ax-4 1520  ax-17 1536  ax-i9 1540  ax-ial 1544  ax-i5r 1545  ax-ext 2169

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-tru 1366  df-nf 1471  df-sb 1773  df-clab 2174  df-cleq 2180  df-clel 2183  df-nfc 2318  df-v 2751  df-dif 3143  df-un 3145  df-in 3147  df-ss 3154

This theorem is referenced by: (None)