Theorem ssundifim 3544

Description: A consequence of inclusion in the union of two classes. In classical logic this would be a biconditional. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 4-Aug-2018.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ssundifim	|- ( A C_ ( B u. C ) -> ( A \ B ) C_ C )

Proof of Theorem ssundifim

Dummy variable x is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		pm5.6r 929	. . . 4 |- ( ( x e. A -> ( x e. B \/ x e. C ) ) -> ( ( x e. A /\ -. x e. B ) -> x e. C ) )
2		elun 3314	. . . . 5 |- ( x e. ( B u. C ) <-> ( x e. B \/ x e. C ) )
3	2	imbi2i 226	. . . 4 |- ( ( x e. A -> x e. ( B u. C ) ) <-> ( x e. A -> ( x e. B \/ x e. C ) ) )
4		eldif 3175	. . . . 5 |- ( x e. ( A \ B ) <-> ( x e. A /\ -. x e. B ) )
5	4	imbi1i 238	. . . 4 |- ( ( x e. ( A \ B ) -> x e. C ) <-> ( ( x e. A /\ -. x e. B ) -> x e. C ) )
6	1, 3, 5	3imtr4i 201	. . 3 |- ( ( x e. A -> x e. ( B u. C ) ) -> ( x e. ( A \ B ) -> x e. C ) )
7	6	alimi 1478	. 2 |- ( A. x ( x e. A -> x e. ( B u. C ) ) -> A. x ( x e. ( A \ B ) -> x e. C ) )
8		ssalel 3181	. 2 |- ( A C_ ( B u. C ) <-> A. x ( x e. A -> x e. ( B u. C ) ) )
9		ssalel 3181	. 2 |- ( ( A \ B ) C_ C <-> A. x ( x e. ( A \ B ) -> x e. C ) )
10	7, 8, 9	3imtr4i 201	1 |- ( A C_ ( B u. C ) -> ( A \ B ) C_ C )

Syntax hints:   -. wn 3   -> wi 4   /\ wa 104   \/ wo 710   A.wal 1371   e. wcel 2176   \ cdif 3163   u. cun 3164   C_ wss 3166

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-in1 615  ax-in2 616  ax-io 711  ax-5 1470  ax-7 1471  ax-gen 1472  ax-ie1 1516  ax-ie2 1517  ax-8 1527  ax-10 1528  ax-11 1529  ax-i12 1530  ax-bndl 1532  ax-4 1533  ax-17 1549  ax-i9 1553  ax-ial 1557  ax-i5r 1558  ax-ext 2187

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-tru 1376  df-nf 1484  df-sb 1786  df-clab 2192  df-cleq 2198  df-clel 2201  df-nfc 2337  df-v 2774  df-dif 3168  df-un 3170  df-in 3172  df-ss 3179

This theorem is referenced by: (None)