Theorem ssundifim 3498

Description: A consequence of inclusion in the union of two classes. In classical logic this would be a biconditional. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 4-Aug-2018.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ssundifim	⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶) → (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵) ⊆ 𝐶)

Proof of Theorem ssundifim

Dummy variable 𝑥 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		pm5.6r 922	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶)) → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶))
2		elun 3268	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶))
3	2	imbi2i 225	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶)) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶)))
4		eldif 3130	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))
5	4	imbi1i 237	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶) ↔ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶))
6	1, 3, 5	3imtr4i 200	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶)) → (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶))
7	6	alimi 1448	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶)) → ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶))
8		dfss2 3136	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶) ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶)))
9		dfss2 3136	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∖ 𝐵) ⊆ 𝐶 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶))
10	7, 8, 9	3imtr4i 200	1 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶) → (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵) ⊆ 𝐶)

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ∧ wa 103   ∨ wo 703  ∀wal 1346   ∈ wcel 2141   ∖ cdif 3118   ∪ cun 3119   ⊆ wss 3121

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107  ax-in1 609  ax-in2 610  ax-io 704  ax-5 1440  ax-7 1441  ax-gen 1442  ax-ie1 1486  ax-ie2 1487  ax-8 1497  ax-10 1498  ax-11 1499  ax-i12 1500  ax-bndl 1502  ax-4 1503  ax-17 1519  ax-i9 1523  ax-ial 1527  ax-i5r 1528  ax-ext 2152

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-tru 1351  df-nf 1454  df-sb 1756  df-clab 2157  df-cleq 2163  df-clel 2166  df-nfc 2301  df-v 2732  df-dif 3123  df-un 3125  df-in 3127  df-ss 3134

This theorem is referenced by: (None)