Theorem ssundifim 3611

Description: A consequence of inclusion in the union of two classes. In classical logic this would be a biconditional. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 4-Aug-2018.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ssundifim	⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶) → (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵) ⊆ 𝐶)

Proof of Theorem ssundifim

Dummy variable 𝑥 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		pm5.6r 939	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶)) → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶))
2		elun 3370	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶))
3	2	imbi2i 226	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶)) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶)))
4		eldif 3229	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))
5	4	imbi1i 238	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶) ↔ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶))
6	1, 3, 5	3imtr4i 201	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶)) → (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶))
7	6	alimi 1508	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶)) → ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶))
8		ssalel 3235	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶) ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶)))
9		ssalel 3235	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∖ 𝐵) ⊆ 𝐶 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶))
10	7, 8, 9	3imtr4i 201	1 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶) → (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵) ⊆ 𝐶)

This proof depends on syntax axioms:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ∧ wa 104   ∨ wo 720  ∀wal 1400   ∈ wcel 2209   ∖ cdif 3217   ∪ cun 3218   ⊆ wss 3220

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-in1 623  ax-in2 624  ax-io 721  ax-5 1500  ax-7 1501  ax-gen 1502  ax-ie1 1546  ax-ie2 1547  ax-8 1557  ax-10 1558  ax-11 1559  ax-i12 1560  ax-bndl 1562  ax-4 1563  ax-17 1579  ax-i9 1583  ax-ial 1587  ax-i5r 1588  ax-ext 2220

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-tru 1405  df-nf 1514  df-sb 1816  df-clab 2225  df-cleq 2231  df-clel 2234  df-nfc 2381  df-v 2823  df-dif 3222  df-un 3224  df-in 3226  df-ss 3233

This theorem is used by:  hashfibclem  11298