Theorem ssundifim 3393

Description: A consequence of inclusion in the union of two classes. In classical logic this would be a biconditional. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 4-Aug-2018.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ssundifim	⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶) → (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵) ⊆ 𝐶)

Proof of Theorem ssundifim

Dummy variable 𝑥 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		pm5.6r 880	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶)) → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶))
2		elun 3164	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶))
3	2	imbi2i 225	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶)) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶)))
4		eldif 3030	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))
5	4	imbi1i 237	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶) ↔ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶))
6	1, 3, 5	3imtr4i 200	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶)) → (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶))
7	6	alimi 1399	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶)) → ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶))
8		dfss2 3036	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶) ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶)))
9		dfss2 3036	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∖ 𝐵) ⊆ 𝐶 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶))
10	7, 8, 9	3imtr4i 200	1 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶) → (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵) ⊆ 𝐶)

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ∧ wa 103   ∨ wo 670  ∀wal 1297   ∈ wcel 1448   ∖ cdif 3018   ∪ cun 3019   ⊆ wss 3021

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107  ax-in1 584  ax-in2 585  ax-io 671  ax-5 1391  ax-7 1392  ax-gen 1393  ax-ie1 1437  ax-ie2 1438  ax-8 1450  ax-10 1451  ax-11 1452  ax-i12 1453  ax-bndl 1454  ax-4 1455  ax-17 1474  ax-i9 1478  ax-ial 1482  ax-i5r 1483  ax-ext 2082

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-tru 1302  df-nf 1405  df-sb 1704  df-clab 2087  df-cleq 2093  df-clel 2096  df-nfc 2229  df-v 2643  df-dif 3023  df-un 3025  df-in 3027  df-ss 3034

This theorem is referenced by: (None)