Theorem nfoprab 5929

Description: Bound-variable hypothesis builder for an operation class abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 22-Aug-2013.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
nfoprab.1	⊢ Ⅎ𝑤𝜑

Assertion

Ref	Expression
nfoprab	⊢ Ⅎ𝑤{⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑}

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑤   𝑦,𝑤   𝑧,𝑤

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑦,𝑧,𝑤)

Proof of Theorem nfoprab

Dummy variable 𝑣 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-oprab 5881	. 2 ⊢ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑣 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑)}
2		nfv 1528	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑤 𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩
3		nfoprab.1	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑤𝜑
4	2, 3	nfan 1565	. . . . . 6 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑤(𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑)
5	4	nfex 1637	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑤∃𝑧(𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑)
6	5	nfex 1637	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑤∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑)
7	6	nfex 1637	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑤∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑)
8	7	nfab 2324	. 2 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑤{𝑣 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑)}
9	1, 8	nfcxfr 2316	1 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑤{⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑}

Syntax hints:   ∧ wa 104   = wceq 1353  Ⅎwnf 1460  ∃wex 1492  {cab 2163  Ⅎwnfc 2306  ⟨cop 3597  {coprab 5878

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-io 709  ax-5 1447  ax-7 1448  ax-gen 1449  ax-ie1 1493  ax-ie2 1494  ax-8 1504  ax-10 1505  ax-11 1506  ax-i12 1507  ax-bndl 1509  ax-4 1510  ax-17 1526  ax-i9 1530  ax-ial 1534  ax-i5r 1535  ax-ext 2159

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-nf 1461  df-sb 1763  df-clab 2164  df-cleq 2170  df-clel 2173  df-nfc 2308  df-oprab 5881

This theorem is referenced by:  nfmpo  5946