| Intuitionistic Logic Explorer Theorem List (p. 60 of 165) | < Previous Next > | |
| Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
|
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > ILE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
||
| Type | Label | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Statement | ||
| Theorem | f1mpt 5901* | Express injection for a mapping operation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Jan-2017.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐶) & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝐶 = 𝐷) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵 ↔ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐶 = 𝐷 → 𝑥 = 𝑦))) | ||
| Theorem | f1fveq 5902 | Equality of function values for a one-to-one function. (Contributed by NM, 11-Feb-1997.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵 ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝐴)) → ((𝐹‘𝐶) = (𝐹‘𝐷) ↔ 𝐶 = 𝐷)) | ||
| Theorem | f1elima 5903 | Membership in the image of a 1-1 map. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝐴) → ((𝐹‘𝑋) ∈ (𝐹 “ 𝑌) ↔ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑌)) | ||
| Theorem | f1imass 5904 | Taking images under a one-to-one function preserves subsets. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 30-Oct-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵 ∧ (𝐶 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ⊆ 𝐴)) → ((𝐹 “ 𝐶) ⊆ (𝐹 “ 𝐷) ↔ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷)) | ||
| Theorem | f1imaeq 5905 | Taking images under a one-to-one function preserves equality. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 30-Oct-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵 ∧ (𝐶 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ⊆ 𝐴)) → ((𝐹 “ 𝐶) = (𝐹 “ 𝐷) ↔ 𝐶 = 𝐷)) | ||
| Theorem | dff1o6 5906* | A one-to-one onto function in terms of function values. (Contributed by NM, 29-Mar-2008.) |
| ⊢ (𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵 ↔ (𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ ran 𝐹 = 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝐹‘𝑥) = (𝐹‘𝑦) → 𝑥 = 𝑦))) | ||
| Theorem | f1ocnvfv1 5907 | The converse value of the value of a one-to-one onto function. (Contributed by NM, 20-May-2004.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴) → (◡𝐹‘(𝐹‘𝐶)) = 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | f1ocnvfv2 5908 | The value of the converse value of a one-to-one onto function. (Contributed by NM, 20-May-2004.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝐹‘(◡𝐹‘𝐶)) = 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | f1ocnvfv 5909 | Relationship between the value of a one-to-one onto function and the value of its converse. (Contributed by Raph Levien, 10-Apr-2004.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴) → ((𝐹‘𝐶) = 𝐷 → (◡𝐹‘𝐷) = 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | f1ocnvfvb 5910 | Relationship between the value of a one-to-one onto function and the value of its converse. (Contributed by NM, 20-May-2004.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝐵) → ((𝐹‘𝐶) = 𝐷 ↔ (◡𝐹‘𝐷) = 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | f1ocnvdm 5911 | The value of the converse of a one-to-one onto function belongs to its domain. (Contributed by NM, 26-May-2006.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐵) → (◡𝐹‘𝐶) ∈ 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | f1ocnvfvrneq 5912 | If the values of a one-to-one function for two arguments from the range of the function are equal, the arguments themselves must be equal. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 12-Nov-2017.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵 ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ran 𝐹 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐹)) → ((◡𝐹‘𝐶) = (◡𝐹‘𝐷) → 𝐶 = 𝐷)) | ||
| Theorem | fcof1 5913 | An application is injective if a retraction exists. Proposition 8 of [BourbakiEns] p. E.II.18. (Contributed by FL, 11-Nov-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 27-Dec-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ (𝑅 ∘ 𝐹) = ( I ↾ 𝐴)) → 𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | fcofo 5914 | An application is surjective if a section exists. Proposition 8 of [BourbakiEns] p. E.II.18. (Contributed by FL, 17-Nov-2011.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 27-Dec-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ 𝑆:𝐵⟶𝐴 ∧ (𝐹 ∘ 𝑆) = ( I ↾ 𝐵)) → 𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | cbvfo 5915* | Change bound variable between domain and range of function. (Contributed by NM, 23-Feb-1997.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 21-Mar-2015.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐹‘𝑥) = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝐵 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓)) | ||
| Theorem | cbvexfo 5916* | Change bound variable between domain and range of function. (Contributed by NM, 23-Feb-1997.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐹‘𝑥) = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝐵 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓)) | ||
| Theorem | cocan1 5917 | An injection is left-cancelable. (Contributed by FL, 2-Aug-2009.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 21-Mar-2015.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐵–1-1→𝐶 ∧ 𝐻:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ 𝐾:𝐴⟶𝐵) → ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐻) = (𝐹 ∘ 𝐾) ↔ 𝐻 = 𝐾)) | ||
| Theorem | cocan2 5918 | A surjection is right-cancelable. (Contributed by FL, 21-Nov-2011.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 21-Mar-2015.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝐵 ∧ 𝐻 Fn 𝐵 ∧ 𝐾 Fn 𝐵) → ((𝐻 ∘ 𝐹) = (𝐾 ∘ 𝐹) ↔ 𝐻 = 𝐾)) | ||
| Theorem | fcof1o 5919 | Show that two functions are inverse to each other by computing their compositions. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 21-Mar-2015.) |
| ⊢ (((𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ 𝐺:𝐵⟶𝐴) ∧ ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺) = ( I ↾ 𝐵) ∧ (𝐺 ∘ 𝐹) = ( I ↾ 𝐴))) → (𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵 ∧ ◡𝐹 = 𝐺)) | ||
| Theorem | foeqcnvco 5920 | Condition for function equality in terms of vanishing of the composition with the converse. EDITORIAL: Is there a relation-algebraic proof of this? (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 12-Feb-2015.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝐵 ∧ 𝐺:𝐴–onto→𝐵) → (𝐹 = 𝐺 ↔ (𝐹 ∘ ◡𝐺) = ( I ↾ 𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | f1eqcocnv 5921 | Condition for function equality in terms of vanishing of the composition with the inverse. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 12-Feb-2015.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵 ∧ 𝐺:𝐴–1-1→𝐵) → (𝐹 = 𝐺 ↔ (◡𝐹 ∘ 𝐺) = ( I ↾ 𝐴))) | ||
| Theorem | fliftrel 5922* | 𝐹, a function lift, is a subset of 𝑅 × 𝑆. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Dec-2016.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = ran (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑋) → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑅) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑋) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ⊆ (𝑅 × 𝑆)) | ||
| Theorem | fliftel 5923* | Elementhood in the relation 𝐹. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Dec-2016.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = ran (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑋) → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑅) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑋) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶𝐹𝐷 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 (𝐶 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 = 𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | fliftel1 5924* | Elementhood in the relation 𝐹. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Dec-2016.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = ran (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑋) → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑅) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑋) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑋) → 𝐴𝐹𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | fliftcnv 5925* | Converse of the relation 𝐹. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Dec-2016.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = ran (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑋) → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑅) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑋) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ◡𝐹 = ran (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ 〈𝐵, 𝐴〉)) | ||
| Theorem | fliftfun 5926* | The function 𝐹 is the unique function defined by 𝐹‘𝐴 = 𝐵, provided that the well-definedness condition holds. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Dec-2016.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = ran (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑋) → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑅) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑋) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝐴 = 𝐶) & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝐵 = 𝐷) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (Fun 𝐹 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 (𝐴 = 𝐶 → 𝐵 = 𝐷))) | ||
| Theorem | fliftfund 5927* | The function 𝐹 is the unique function defined by 𝐹‘𝐴 = 𝐵, provided that the well-definedness condition holds. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Dec-2016.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = ran (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑋) → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑅) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑋) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝐴 = 𝐶) & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝐵 = 𝐷) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐴 = 𝐶)) → 𝐵 = 𝐷) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun 𝐹) | ||
| Theorem | fliftfuns 5928* | The function 𝐹 is the unique function defined by 𝐹‘𝐴 = 𝐵, provided that the well-definedness condition holds. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Dec-2016.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = ran (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑋) → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑅) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑋) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (Fun 𝐹 ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑋 (⦋𝑦 / 𝑥⦌𝐴 = ⦋𝑧 / 𝑥⦌𝐴 → ⦋𝑦 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 = ⦋𝑧 / 𝑥⦌𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | fliftf 5929* | The domain and range of the function 𝐹. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Dec-2016.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = ran (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑋) → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑅) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑋) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (Fun 𝐹 ↔ 𝐹:ran (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ 𝐴)⟶𝑆)) | ||
| Theorem | fliftval 5930* | The value of the function 𝐹. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Dec-2016.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = ran (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑋) → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑅) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑋) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑌 → 𝐴 = 𝐶) & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑌 → 𝐵 = 𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun 𝐹) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑋) → (𝐹‘𝐶) = 𝐷) | ||
| Theorem | isoeq1 5931 | Equality theorem for isomorphisms. (Contributed by NM, 17-May-2004.) |
| ⊢ (𝐻 = 𝐺 → (𝐻 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) ↔ 𝐺 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | isoeq2 5932 | Equality theorem for isomorphisms. (Contributed by NM, 17-May-2004.) |
| ⊢ (𝑅 = 𝑇 → (𝐻 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) ↔ 𝐻 Isom 𝑇, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | isoeq3 5933 | Equality theorem for isomorphisms. (Contributed by NM, 17-May-2004.) |
| ⊢ (𝑆 = 𝑇 → (𝐻 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) ↔ 𝐻 Isom 𝑅, 𝑇 (𝐴, 𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | isoeq4 5934 | Equality theorem for isomorphisms. (Contributed by NM, 17-May-2004.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐶 → (𝐻 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) ↔ 𝐻 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐶, 𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | isoeq5 5935 | Equality theorem for isomorphisms. (Contributed by NM, 17-May-2004.) |
| ⊢ (𝐵 = 𝐶 → (𝐻 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) ↔ 𝐻 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐶))) | ||
| Theorem | nfiso 5936 | Bound-variable hypothesis builder for an isomorphism. (Contributed by NM, 17-May-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 22-Oct-2011.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐻 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝑅 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝑆 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝐻 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | isof1o 5937 | An isomorphism is a one-to-one onto function. (Contributed by NM, 27-Apr-2004.) |
| ⊢ (𝐻 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) → 𝐻:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | isorel 5938 | An isomorphism connects binary relations via its function values. (Contributed by NM, 27-Apr-2004.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐻 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝐴)) → (𝐶𝑅𝐷 ↔ (𝐻‘𝐶)𝑆(𝐻‘𝐷))) | ||
| Theorem | isoresbr 5939* | A consequence of isomorphism on two relations for a function's restriction. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 11-Jan-2019.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐹 ↾ 𝐴) Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, (𝐹 “ 𝐴)) → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥𝑅𝑦 → (𝐹‘𝑥)𝑆(𝐹‘𝑦))) | ||
| Theorem | isoid 5940 | Identity law for isomorphism. Proposition 6.30(1) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 33. (Contributed by NM, 27-Apr-2004.) |
| ⊢ ( I ↾ 𝐴) Isom 𝑅, 𝑅 (𝐴, 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | isocnv 5941 | Converse law for isomorphism. Proposition 6.30(2) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 33. (Contributed by NM, 27-Apr-2004.) |
| ⊢ (𝐻 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) → ◡𝐻 Isom 𝑆, 𝑅 (𝐵, 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | isocnv2 5942 | Converse law for isomorphism. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-Jan-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝐻 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) ↔ 𝐻 Isom ◡𝑅, ◡𝑆(𝐴, 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | isores2 5943 | An isomorphism from one well-order to another can be restricted on either well-order. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Jan-2013.) |
| ⊢ (𝐻 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) ↔ 𝐻 Isom 𝑅, (𝑆 ∩ (𝐵 × 𝐵))(𝐴, 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | isores1 5944 | An isomorphism from one well-order to another can be restricted on either well-order. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Jan-2013.) |
| ⊢ (𝐻 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) ↔ 𝐻 Isom (𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐴)), 𝑆(𝐴, 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | isores3 5945 | Induced isomorphism on a subset. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 5-Nov-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐻 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) ∧ 𝐾 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 = (𝐻 “ 𝐾)) → (𝐻 ↾ 𝐾) Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐾, 𝑋)) | ||
| Theorem | isotr 5946 | Composition (transitive) law for isomorphism. Proposition 6.30(3) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 33. (Contributed by NM, 27-Apr-2004.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 5-Dec-2016.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐻 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) ∧ 𝐺 Isom 𝑆, 𝑇 (𝐵, 𝐶)) → (𝐺 ∘ 𝐻) Isom 𝑅, 𝑇 (𝐴, 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | iso0 5947 | The empty set is an 𝑅, 𝑆 isomorphism from the empty set to the empty set. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 24-Oct-2015.) |
| ⊢ ∅ Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (∅, ∅) | ||
| Theorem | isoini 5948 | Isomorphisms preserve initial segments. Proposition 6.31(2) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 33. (Contributed by NM, 20-Apr-2004.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐻 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐻 “ (𝐴 ∩ (◡𝑅 “ {𝐷}))) = (𝐵 ∩ (◡𝑆 “ {(𝐻‘𝐷)}))) | ||
| Theorem | isoini2 5949 | Isomorphisms are isomorphisms on their initial segments. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-Mar-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝐶 = (𝐴 ∩ (◡𝑅 “ {𝑋})) & ⊢ 𝐷 = (𝐵 ∩ (◡𝑆 “ {(𝐻‘𝑋)})) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐻 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐻 ↾ 𝐶) Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐶, 𝐷)) | ||
| Theorem | isoselem 5950* | Lemma for isose 5951. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Jun-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐻 “ 𝑥) ∈ V) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑅 Se 𝐴 → 𝑆 Se 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | isose 5951 | An isomorphism preserves set-like relations. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Jun-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝐻 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) → (𝑅 Se 𝐴 ↔ 𝑆 Se 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | isopolem 5952 | Lemma for isopo 5953. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 16-Nov-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝐻 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) → (𝑆 Po 𝐵 → 𝑅 Po 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | isopo 5953 | An isomorphism preserves partial ordering. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 16-Nov-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝐻 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) → (𝑅 Po 𝐴 ↔ 𝑆 Po 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | isosolem 5954 | Lemma for isoso 5955. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 16-Nov-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝐻 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) → (𝑆 Or 𝐵 → 𝑅 Or 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | isoso 5955 | An isomorphism preserves strict ordering. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 16-Nov-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝐻 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) → (𝑅 Or 𝐴 ↔ 𝑆 Or 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | f1oiso 5956* | Any one-to-one onto function determines an isomorphism with an induced relation 𝑆. Proposition 6.33 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 34. (Contributed by NM, 30-Apr-2004.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐻:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵 ∧ 𝑆 = {〈𝑧, 𝑤〉 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝑧 = (𝐻‘𝑥) ∧ 𝑤 = (𝐻‘𝑦)) ∧ 𝑥𝑅𝑦)}) → 𝐻 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | f1oiso2 5957* | Any one-to-one onto function determines an isomorphism with an induced relation 𝑆. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Mar-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝑆 = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (◡𝐻‘𝑥)𝑅(◡𝐻‘𝑦))} ⇒ ⊢ (𝐻:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵 → 𝐻 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | canth 5958 | No set 𝐴 is equinumerous to its power set (Cantor's theorem), i.e., no function can map 𝐴 onto its power set. Compare Theorem 6B(b) of [Enderton] p. 132. (Use nex 1546 if you want the form ¬ ∃𝑓𝑓:𝐴–onto→𝒫 𝐴.) (Contributed by NM, 7-Aug-1994.) (Revised by Noah R Kingdon, 23-Jul-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ ¬ 𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝒫 𝐴 | ||
| Syntax | crio 5959 | Extend class notation with restricted description binder. |
| class (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑) | ||
| Definition | df-riota 5960 | Define restricted description binder. In case there is no unique 𝑥 such that (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) holds, it evaluates to the empty set. See also comments for df-iota 5278. (Contributed by NM, 15-Sep-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Oct-2016.) (Revised by NM, 2-Sep-2018.) |
| ⊢ (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑) = (℩𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)) | ||
| Theorem | riotaeqdv 5961* | Formula-building deduction for iota. (Contributed by NM, 15-Sep-2011.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓) = (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓)) | ||
| Theorem | riotabidv 5962* | Formula-building deduction for restricted iota. (Contributed by NM, 15-Sep-2011.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓) = (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒)) | ||
| Theorem | riotaeqbidv 5963* | Equality deduction for restricted universal quantifier. (Contributed by NM, 15-Sep-2011.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓) = (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒)) | ||
| Theorem | riotaexg 5964* | Restricted iota is a set. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 15-Jun-2020.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓) ∈ V) | ||
| Theorem | iotaexel 5965* | Set existence of an iota expression in which all values are contained within a set. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 28-Jun-2025.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ ∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)) → (℩𝑥𝜑) ∈ V) | ||
| Theorem | riotav 5966 | An iota restricted to the universe is unrestricted. (Contributed by NM, 18-Sep-2011.) |
| ⊢ (℩𝑥 ∈ V 𝜑) = (℩𝑥𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | riotauni 5967 | Restricted iota in terms of class union. (Contributed by NM, 11-Oct-2011.) |
| ⊢ (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 → (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑) = ∪ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑}) | ||
| Theorem | nfriota1 5968* | The abstraction variable in a restricted iota descriptor isn't free. (Contributed by NM, 12-Oct-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Oct-2016.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | nfriotadxy 5969* | Deduction version of nfriota 5970. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 12-Jan-2019.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑 & ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜓) & ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥(℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)) | ||
| Theorem | nfriota 5970* | A variable not free in a wff remains so in a restricted iota descriptor. (Contributed by NM, 12-Oct-2011.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 ⇒ ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | cbvriotavw 5971* | Change bound variable in a restricted description binder. Version of cbvriotav 5973 with a disjoint variable condition. (Contributed by NM, 18-Mar-2013.) (Revised by GG, 30-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ⇒ ⊢ (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑) = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓) | ||
| Theorem | cbvriota 5972* | Change bound variable in a restricted description binder. (Contributed by NM, 18-Mar-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Oct-2016.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓 & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ⇒ ⊢ (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑) = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓) | ||
| Theorem | cbvriotav 5973* | Change bound variable in a restricted description binder. (Contributed by NM, 18-Mar-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Oct-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ⇒ ⊢ (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑) = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓) | ||
| Theorem | csbriotag 5974* | Interchange class substitution and restricted description binder. (Contributed by NM, 24-Feb-2013.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑) = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑)) | ||
| Theorem | riotacl2 5975 |
Membership law for "the unique element in 𝐴 such that 𝜑."
(Contributed by NM, 21-Aug-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Dec-2016.) |
| ⊢ (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 → (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑) ∈ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑}) | ||
| Theorem | riotacl 5976* | Closure of restricted iota. (Contributed by NM, 21-Aug-2011.) |
| ⊢ (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 → (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑) ∈ 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | riotasbc 5977 | Substitution law for descriptions. (Contributed by NM, 23-Aug-2011.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 24-Dec-2016.) |
| ⊢ (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 → [(℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑) / 𝑥]𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | riotabidva 5978* | Equivalent wff's yield equal restricted class abstractions (deduction form). (rabbidva 2787 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 17-Jan-2012.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓) = (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒)) | ||
| Theorem | riotabiia 5979 | Equivalent wff's yield equal restricted iotas (inference form). (rabbiia 2784 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 16-Jan-2012.) |
| ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ⇒ ⊢ (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑) = (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓) | ||
| Theorem | riota1 5980* | Property of restricted iota. Compare iota1 5293. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Oct-2016.) |
| ⊢ (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑) = 𝑥)) | ||
| Theorem | riota1a 5981 | Property of iota. (Contributed by NM, 23-Aug-2011.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑) → (𝜑 ↔ (℩𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)) = 𝑥)) | ||
| Theorem | riota2df 5982* | A deduction version of riota2f 5983. (Contributed by NM, 17-Feb-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Oct-2016.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑 & ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜒) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐵) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓) → (𝜒 ↔ (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓) = 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | riota2f 5983* | This theorem shows a condition that allows us to represent a descriptor with a class expression 𝐵. (Contributed by NM, 23-Aug-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Oct-2016.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓 & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐵 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑) → (𝜓 ↔ (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑) = 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | riota2 5984* | This theorem shows a condition that allows us to represent a descriptor with a class expression 𝐵. (Contributed by NM, 23-Aug-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 10-Dec-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐵 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑) → (𝜓 ↔ (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑) = 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | riotaeqimp 5985* | If two restricted iota descriptors for an equality are equal, then the terms of the equality are equal. (Contributed by AV, 6-Dec-2020.) |
| ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑎 ∈ 𝑉 𝑋 = 𝐴) & ⊢ 𝐽 = (℩𝑎 ∈ 𝑉 𝑌 = 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃!𝑎 ∈ 𝑉 𝑋 = 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃!𝑎 ∈ 𝑉 𝑌 = 𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐼 = 𝐽) → 𝑋 = 𝑌) | ||
| Theorem | riotaprop 5986* | Properties of a restricted definite description operator. Todo (df-riota 5960 update): can some uses of riota2f 5983 be shortened with this? (Contributed by NM, 23-Nov-2013.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓 & ⊢ 𝐵 = (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑) & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐵 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ⇒ ⊢ (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 → (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓)) | ||
| Theorem | riota5f 5987* | A method for computing restricted iota. (Contributed by NM, 16-Apr-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Oct-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝐵)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓) = 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | riota5 5988* | A method for computing restricted iota. (Contributed by NM, 20-Oct-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 6-Dec-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝐵)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓) = 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | riotass2 5989* | Restriction of a unique element to a smaller class. (Contributed by NM, 21-Aug-2011.) (Revised by NM, 22-Mar-2013.) |
| ⊢ (((𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 → 𝜓)) ∧ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ∧ ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓)) → (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑) = (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓)) | ||
| Theorem | riotass 5990* | Restriction of a unique element to a smaller class. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Dec-2016.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ∧ ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑) → (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑) = (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑)) | ||
| Theorem | moriotass 5991* | Restriction of a unique element to a smaller class. (Contributed by NM, 19-Feb-2006.) (Revised by NM, 16-Jun-2017.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ∧ ∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑) → (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑) = (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑)) | ||
| Theorem | snriota 5992 | A restricted class abstraction with a unique member can be expressed as a singleton. (Contributed by NM, 30-May-2006.) |
| ⊢ (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = {(℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)}) | ||
| Theorem | eusvobj2 5993* | Specify the same property in two ways when class 𝐵(𝑦) is single-valued. (Contributed by NM, 1-Nov-2010.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 24-Dec-2016.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (∃!𝑥∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 = 𝐵 → (∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 = 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 = 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | eusvobj1 5994* | Specify the same object in two ways when class 𝐵(𝑦) is single-valued. (Contributed by NM, 1-Nov-2010.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 19-Nov-2016.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (∃!𝑥∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 = 𝐵 → (℩𝑥∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 = 𝐵) = (℩𝑥∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 = 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | f1ofveu 5995* | There is one domain element for each value of a one-to-one onto function. (Contributed by NM, 26-May-2006.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐵) → ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐹‘𝑥) = 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | f1ocnvfv3 5996* | Value of the converse of a one-to-one onto function. (Contributed by NM, 26-May-2006.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 24-Dec-2016.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐵) → (◡𝐹‘𝐶) = (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐹‘𝑥) = 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | riotaund 5997* | Restricted iota equals the empty set when not meaningful. (Contributed by NM, 16-Jan-2012.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Oct-2016.) (Revised by NM, 13-Sep-2018.) |
| ⊢ (¬ ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 → (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑) = ∅) | ||
| Theorem | acexmidlema 5998* | Lemma for acexmid 6006. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 6-Aug-2019.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑥 ∈ {∅, {∅}} ∣ (𝑥 = ∅ ∨ 𝜑)} & ⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑥 ∈ {∅, {∅}} ∣ (𝑥 = {∅} ∨ 𝜑)} & ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝐴, 𝐵} ⇒ ⊢ ({∅} ∈ 𝐴 → 𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | acexmidlemb 5999* | Lemma for acexmid 6006. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 6-Aug-2019.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑥 ∈ {∅, {∅}} ∣ (𝑥 = ∅ ∨ 𝜑)} & ⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑥 ∈ {∅, {∅}} ∣ (𝑥 = {∅} ∨ 𝜑)} & ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝐴, 𝐵} ⇒ ⊢ (∅ ∈ 𝐵 → 𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | acexmidlemph 6000* | Lemma for acexmid 6006. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 6-Aug-2019.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑥 ∈ {∅, {∅}} ∣ (𝑥 = ∅ ∨ 𝜑)} & ⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑥 ∈ {∅, {∅}} ∣ (𝑥 = {∅} ∨ 𝜑)} & ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝐴, 𝐵} ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) | ||
| < Previous Next > |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |