Theorem rabbi 2730

Description: Equivalent wff's correspond to equal restricted class abstractions. Closed theorem form of rabbidva 2809. (Contributed by NM, 25-Nov-2013.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
rabbi	⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒) ↔ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓} = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜒})

Proof of Theorem rabbi

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		abbibcom 2352	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜒)) ↔ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓)} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜒)})
2		df-ral 2533	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒) ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)))
3		pm5.32 457	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) ↔ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜒)))
4	3	albii 1523	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) ↔ ∀𝑥((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜒)))
5	2, 4	bitri 184	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒) ↔ ∀𝑥((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜒)))
6		df-rab 2537	. . 3 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓)}
7		df-rab 2537	. . 3 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜒} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜒)}
8	6, 7	eqeq12i 2252	. 2 ⊢ ({𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓} = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜒} ↔ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓)} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜒)})
9	1, 5, 8	3bitr4i 212	1 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒) ↔ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓} = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜒})

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 104   ↔ wb 105  ∀wal 1400   = wceq 1402   ∈ wcel 2209  {cab 2224  ∀wral 2528  {crab 2532

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-5 1500  ax-7 1501  ax-gen 1502  ax-ie1 1546  ax-ie2 1547  ax-8 1557  ax-11 1559  ax-4 1563  ax-17 1579  ax-i9 1583  ax-ial 1587  ax-i5r 1588  ax-ext 2220

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-tru 1405  df-nf 1514  df-sb 1816  df-clab 2225  df-cleq 2231  df-ral 2533  df-rab 2537

This theorem is used by:  rabbidva  2809  exmidonfinlem  7546