| Intuitionistic Logic Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
| Mirrors > Home > ILE Home > Th. List > rabid2 | GIF version | ||
| Description: An "identity" law for restricted class abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 9-Oct-2003.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 30-May-2011.) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| rabid2 | ⊢ (𝐴 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | abeq2 2316 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑))) | |
| 2 | pm4.71 389 | . . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝜑) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑))) | |
| 3 | 2 | albii 1494 | . . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝜑) ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑))) |
| 4 | 1, 3 | bitr4i 187 | . 2 ⊢ (𝐴 = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝜑)) |
| 5 | df-rab 2495 | . . 3 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} | |
| 6 | 5 | eqeq2i 2218 | . 2 ⊢ (𝐴 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝐴 = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)}) |
| 7 | df-ral 2491 | . 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝜑)) | |
| 8 | 4, 6, 7 | 3bitr4i 212 | 1 ⊢ (𝐴 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑) |
| Colors of variables: wff set class |
| Syntax hints: → wi 4 ∧ wa 104 ↔ wb 105 ∀wal 1371 = wceq 1373 ∈ wcel 2178 {cab 2193 ∀wral 2486 {crab 2490 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-ia1 106 ax-ia2 107 ax-ia3 108 ax-5 1471 ax-7 1472 ax-gen 1473 ax-ie1 1517 ax-ie2 1518 ax-8 1528 ax-11 1530 ax-4 1534 ax-17 1550 ax-i9 1554 ax-ial 1558 ax-i5r 1559 ax-ext 2189 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 117 df-nf 1485 df-sb 1787 df-clab 2194 df-cleq 2200 df-clel 2203 df-ral 2491 df-rab 2495 |
| This theorem is referenced by: rabxmdc 3500 rabrsndc 3711 class2seteq 4223 dmmptg 5199 dmmptd 5426 fneqeql 5711 fmpt 5753 acexmidlemph 5960 inffiexmid 7029 ssfirab 7059 exmidaclem 7351 ioomax 10105 iccmax 10106 dfphi2 12657 phiprmpw 12659 phisum 12678 unennn 12883 znnen 12884 isnsg4 13663 lssuni 14240 psrbagfi 14550 lgsquadlem2 15670 |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |