| Intuitionistic Logic Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
| Mirrors > Home > ILE Home > Th. List > rabid2 | GIF version | ||
| Description: An "identity" law for restricted class abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 9-Oct-2003.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 30-May-2011.) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| rabid2 | ⊢ (𝐴 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | abeq2 2347 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑))) | |
| 2 | pm4.71 393 | . . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝜑) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑))) | |
| 3 | 2 | albii 1523 | . . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝜑) ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑))) |
| 4 | 1, 3 | bitr4i 187 | . 2 ⊢ (𝐴 = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝜑)) |
| 5 | df-rab 2537 | . . 3 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} | |
| 6 | 5 | eqeq2i 2249 | . 2 ⊢ (𝐴 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝐴 = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)}) |
| 7 | df-ral 2533 | . 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝜑)) | |
| 8 | 4, 6, 7 | 3bitr4i 212 | 1 ⊢ (𝐴 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑) |
| Colors of variables: wff set class |
| This proof depends on syntax axioms: → wi 4 ∧ wa 104 ↔ wb 105 ∀wal 1400 = wceq 1402 ∈ wcel 2209 {cab 2224 ∀wral 2528 {crab 2532 |
| This proof depends on axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-ia1 106 ax-ia2 107 ax-ia3 108 ax-5 1500 ax-7 1501 ax-gen 1502 ax-ie1 1546 ax-ie2 1547 ax-8 1557 ax-11 1559 ax-4 1563 ax-17 1579 ax-i9 1583 ax-ial 1587 ax-i5r 1588 ax-ext 2220 |
| This proof depends on definitions: df-bi 117 df-nf 1514 df-sb 1816 df-clab 2225 df-cleq 2231 df-clel 2234 df-ral 2533 df-rab 2537 |
| This theorem is used by: rabxmdc 3554 rabrsndc 3779 class2seteq 4300 dmmptg 5285 dmmptd 5514 fneqeql 5817 fmpt 5858 acexmidlemph 6078 inffiexmid 7213 ssfirab 7244 exmidaclem 7565 ioomax 10361 iccmax 10362 hashfibc 11299 dfphi2 13021 phiprmpw 13023 phisum 13042 unennn 13340 znnen 13341 isnsg4 14068 lssuni 14784 psrbagfi 15143 lgsquadlem2 16363 rabid1o 17200 stnot 17205 |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |