| Intuitionistic Logic Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
| Mirrors > Home > ILE Home > Th. List > rabid2 | GIF version | ||
| Description: An "identity" law for restricted class abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 9-Oct-2003.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 30-May-2011.) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| rabid2 | ⊢ (𝐴 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | abeq2 2347 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑))) | |
| 2 | pm4.71 393 | . . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝜑) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑))) | |
| 3 | 2 | albii 1523 | . . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝜑) ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑))) |
| 4 | 1, 3 | bitr4i 187 | . 2 ⊢ (𝐴 = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝜑)) |
| 5 | df-rab 2537 | . . 3 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} | |
| 6 | 5 | eqeq2i 2249 | . 2 ⊢ (𝐴 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝐴 = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)}) |
| 7 | df-ral 2533 | . 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝜑)) | |
| 8 | 4, 6, 7 | 3bitr4i 212 | 1 ⊢ (𝐴 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑) |
| Colors of variables: wff set class |
| This proof depends on syntax axioms: → wi 4 ∧ wa 104 ↔ wb 105 ∀wal 1400 = wceq 1402 ∈ wcel 2209 {cab 2224 ∀wral 2528 {crab 2532 |
| This proof depends on axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-ia1 106 ax-ia2 107 ax-ia3 108 ax-5 1500 ax-7 1501 ax-gen 1502 ax-ie1 1546 ax-ie2 1547 ax-8 1557 ax-11 1559 ax-4 1563 ax-17 1579 ax-i9 1583 ax-ial 1587 ax-i5r 1588 ax-ext 2220 |
| This proof depends on definitions: df-bi 117 df-nf 1514 df-sb 1816 df-clab 2225 df-cleq 2231 df-clel 2234 df-ral 2533 df-rab 2537 |
| This theorem is used by: rabxmdc 3554 rabrsndc 3779 class2seteq 4302 dmmptg 5288 dmmptd 5517 fneqeql 5820 fmpt 5861 acexmidlemph 6081 inffiexmid 7217 ssfirab 7248 exmidaclem 7570 ioomax 10367 iccmax 10368 hashfibc 11305 dfphi2 13027 phiprmpw 13029 phisum 13048 unennn 13346 znnen 13347 isnsg4 14074 lssuni 14809 psrbagfi 15168 lgsquadlem2 16402 rabid1o 17239 stnot 17244 |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |