Intuitionistic Logic Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
Mirrors > Home > ILE Home > Th. List > rabeqf | GIF version |
Description: Equality theorem for restricted class abstractions, with bound-variable hypotheses instead of distinct variable restrictions. (Contributed by NM, 7-Mar-2004.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
rabeqf.1 | ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 |
rabeqf.2 | ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵 |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
rabeqf | ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑}) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | rabeqf.1 | . . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 | |
2 | rabeqf.2 | . . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵 | |
3 | 1, 2 | nfeq 2314 | . . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝐴 = 𝐵 |
4 | eleq2 2228 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)) | |
5 | 4 | anbi1d 461 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑))) |
6 | 3, 5 | abbid 2281 | . 2 ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)}) |
7 | df-rab 2451 | . 2 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} | |
8 | df-rab 2451 | . 2 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)} | |
9 | 6, 7, 8 | 3eqtr4g 2222 | 1 ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑}) |
Colors of variables: wff set class |
Syntax hints: → wi 4 ∧ wa 103 = wceq 1342 ∈ wcel 2135 {cab 2150 Ⅎwnfc 2293 {crab 2446 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-ia1 105 ax-ia2 106 ax-ia3 107 ax-io 699 ax-5 1434 ax-7 1435 ax-gen 1436 ax-ie1 1480 ax-ie2 1481 ax-8 1491 ax-10 1492 ax-11 1493 ax-i12 1494 ax-bndl 1496 ax-4 1497 ax-17 1513 ax-i9 1517 ax-ial 1521 ax-i5r 1522 ax-ext 2146 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 116 df-tru 1345 df-nf 1448 df-sb 1750 df-clab 2151 df-cleq 2157 df-clel 2160 df-nfc 2295 df-rab 2451 |
This theorem is referenced by: rabeqif 2712 rabeq 2713 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |