Intuitionistic Logic Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
Mirrors > Home > ILE Home > Th. List > rabid | GIF version |
Description: An "identity" law of concretion for restricted abstraction. Special case of Definition 2.1 of [Quine] p. 16. (Contributed by NM, 9-Oct-2003.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
rabid | ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | df-rab 2441 | . 2 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} | |
2 | 1 | abeq2i 2265 | 1 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)) |
Colors of variables: wff set class |
Syntax hints: ∧ wa 103 ↔ wb 104 ∈ wcel 2125 {crab 2436 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-ia1 105 ax-ia2 106 ax-ia3 107 ax-5 1424 ax-gen 1426 ax-ie1 1470 ax-ie2 1471 ax-8 1481 ax-4 1487 ax-17 1503 ax-i9 1507 ax-ial 1511 ax-ext 2136 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 116 df-sb 1740 df-clab 2141 df-cleq 2147 df-clel 2150 df-rab 2441 |
This theorem is referenced by: rabeq2i 2706 rabn0m 3417 repizf2lem 4117 rabxfrd 4423 onintrab2im 4471 tfis 4536 imasnopn 12646 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |