![]() |
Intuitionistic Logic Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
|
Mirrors > Home > ILE Home > Th. List > rabid | GIF version |
Description: An "identity" law of concretion for restricted abstraction. Special case of Definition 2.1 of [Quine] p. 16. (Contributed by NM, 9-Oct-2003.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
rabid | ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | df-rab 2464 | . 2 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} | |
2 | 1 | abeq2i 2288 | 1 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)) |
Colors of variables: wff set class |
Syntax hints: ∧ wa 104 ↔ wb 105 ∈ wcel 2148 {crab 2459 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-ia1 106 ax-ia2 107 ax-ia3 108 ax-5 1447 ax-gen 1449 ax-ie1 1493 ax-ie2 1494 ax-8 1504 ax-4 1510 ax-17 1526 ax-i9 1530 ax-ial 1534 ax-ext 2159 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 117 df-sb 1763 df-clab 2164 df-cleq 2170 df-clel 2173 df-rab 2464 |
This theorem is referenced by: rabeq2i 2734 rabn0m 3450 repizf2lem 4160 rabxfrd 4468 onintrab2im 4516 tfis 4581 nnwosdc 12032 imasnopn 13670 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |