| Intuitionistic Logic Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
| Mirrors > Home > ILE Home > Th. List > rabn0m | GIF version | ||
| Description: Inhabited restricted class abstraction. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 18-Sep-2018.) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| rabn0m | ⊢ (∃𝑦 𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | df-rex 2492 | . 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)) | |
| 2 | rabid 2684 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)) | |
| 3 | 2 | exbii 1629 | . 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)) |
| 4 | nfv 1552 | . . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦 𝑥 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} | |
| 5 | df-rab 2495 | . . . . 5 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} | |
| 6 | 5 | eleq2i 2274 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)}) |
| 7 | nfsab1 2197 | . . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} | |
| 8 | 6, 7 | nfxfr 1498 | . . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} |
| 9 | eleq1 2270 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑥 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑})) | |
| 10 | 4, 8, 9 | cbvex 1780 | . 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ ∃𝑦 𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑}) |
| 11 | 1, 3, 10 | 3bitr2ri 209 | 1 ⊢ (∃𝑦 𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑) |
| Colors of variables: wff set class |
| Syntax hints: ∧ wa 104 ↔ wb 105 ∃wex 1516 ∈ wcel 2178 {cab 2193 ∃wrex 2487 {crab 2490 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-ia1 106 ax-ia2 107 ax-ia3 108 ax-5 1471 ax-7 1472 ax-gen 1473 ax-ie1 1517 ax-ie2 1518 ax-8 1528 ax-11 1530 ax-4 1534 ax-17 1550 ax-i9 1554 ax-ial 1558 ax-ext 2189 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 117 df-nf 1485 df-sb 1787 df-clab 2194 df-cleq 2200 df-clel 2203 df-rex 2492 df-rab 2495 |
| This theorem is referenced by: exss 4289 cc4f 7416 cc4n 7418 nnwosdc 12475 lspf 14266 incistruhgr 15801 |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |