Theorem rexeqbi1dv 2681

Description: Equality deduction for restricted existential quantifier. (Contributed by NM, 18-Mar-1997.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
raleqd.1	⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
rexeqbi1dv	⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴   𝑥,𝐵

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥)   𝜓(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem rexeqbi1dv

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		rexeq 2673	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑))
2		raleqd.1	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
3	2	rexbidv 2478	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓))
4	1, 3	bitrd 188	1 ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 105   = wceq 1353  ∃wrex 2456

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-io 709  ax-5 1447  ax-7 1448  ax-gen 1449  ax-ie1 1493  ax-ie2 1494  ax-8 1504  ax-10 1505  ax-11 1506  ax-i12 1507  ax-bndl 1509  ax-4 1510  ax-17 1526  ax-i9 1530  ax-ial 1534  ax-i5r 1535  ax-ext 2159

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-tru 1356  df-nf 1461  df-sb 1763  df-cleq 2170  df-clel 2173  df-nfc 2308  df-rex 2461

This theorem is referenced by:  reg2exmid  4534  reg3exmid  4578  exmidomni  7136  bj-nn0suc0  14553