Theorem rexeqbi1dv 2706

Description: Equality deduction for restricted existential quantifier. (Contributed by NM, 18-Mar-1997.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
raleqd.1	⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
rexeqbi1dv	⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴   𝑥,𝐵

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥)   𝜓(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem rexeqbi1dv

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		rexeq 2694	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑))
2		raleqd.1	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
3	2	rexbidv 2498	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓))
4	1, 3	bitrd 188	1 ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 105   = wceq 1364  ∃wrex 2476

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-io 710  ax-5 1461  ax-7 1462  ax-gen 1463  ax-ie1 1507  ax-ie2 1508  ax-8 1518  ax-10 1519  ax-11 1520  ax-i12 1521  ax-bndl 1523  ax-4 1524  ax-17 1540  ax-i9 1544  ax-ial 1548  ax-i5r 1549  ax-ext 2178

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-tru 1367  df-nf 1475  df-sb 1777  df-cleq 2189  df-clel 2192  df-nfc 2328  df-rex 2481

This theorem is referenced by:  reg2exmid  4572  reg3exmid  4616  exmidomni  7208  bj-nn0suc0  15596