Theorem rexeqbi1dv 2670

Description: Equality deduction for restricted existential quantifier. (Contributed by NM, 18-Mar-1997.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
raleqd.1	⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
rexeqbi1dv	⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴   𝑥,𝐵

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥)   𝜓(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem rexeqbi1dv

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		rexeq 2662	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑))
2		raleqd.1	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
3	2	rexbidv 2467	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓))
4	1, 3	bitrd 187	1 ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 104   = wceq 1343  ∃wrex 2445

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107  ax-io 699  ax-5 1435  ax-7 1436  ax-gen 1437  ax-ie1 1481  ax-ie2 1482  ax-8 1492  ax-10 1493  ax-11 1494  ax-i12 1495  ax-bndl 1497  ax-4 1498  ax-17 1514  ax-i9 1518  ax-ial 1522  ax-i5r 1523  ax-ext 2147

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-tru 1346  df-nf 1449  df-sb 1751  df-cleq 2158  df-clel 2161  df-nfc 2297  df-rex 2450

This theorem is referenced by:  reg2exmid  4513  reg3exmid  4557  exmidomni  7106  bj-nn0suc0  13832