| Intuitionistic Logic Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
| Mirrors > Home > ILE Home > Th. List > sbal1 | GIF version | ||
| Description: A theorem used in elimination of disjoint variable conditions on 𝑥, 𝑦 by replacing it with a distinctor ¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑧. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Proof rewitten by Jim Kingdon, 24-Feb-2018.) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| sbal1 | ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑧 → ([𝑧 / 𝑦]∀𝑥𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥[𝑧 / 𝑦]𝜑)) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | sbal 2019 | . . . 4 ⊢ ([𝑤 / 𝑦]∀𝑥𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥[𝑤 / 𝑦]𝜑) | |
| 2 | 1 | sbbii 1779 | . . 3 ⊢ ([𝑧 / 𝑤][𝑤 / 𝑦]∀𝑥𝜑 ↔ [𝑧 / 𝑤]∀𝑥[𝑤 / 𝑦]𝜑) |
| 3 | sbal1yz 2020 | . . 3 ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑧 → ([𝑧 / 𝑤]∀𝑥[𝑤 / 𝑦]𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥[𝑧 / 𝑤][𝑤 / 𝑦]𝜑)) | |
| 4 | 2, 3 | bitrid 192 | . 2 ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑧 → ([𝑧 / 𝑤][𝑤 / 𝑦]∀𝑥𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥[𝑧 / 𝑤][𝑤 / 𝑦]𝜑)) |
| 5 | ax-17 1540 | . . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥𝜑 → ∀𝑤∀𝑥𝜑) | |
| 6 | 5 | sbco2vh 1964 | . 2 ⊢ ([𝑧 / 𝑤][𝑤 / 𝑦]∀𝑥𝜑 ↔ [𝑧 / 𝑦]∀𝑥𝜑) |
| 7 | ax-17 1540 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑤𝜑) | |
| 8 | 7 | sbco2vh 1964 | . . 3 ⊢ ([𝑧 / 𝑤][𝑤 / 𝑦]𝜑 ↔ [𝑧 / 𝑦]𝜑) |
| 9 | 8 | albii 1484 | . 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥[𝑧 / 𝑤][𝑤 / 𝑦]𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥[𝑧 / 𝑦]𝜑) |
| 10 | 4, 6, 9 | 3bitr3g 222 | 1 ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑧 → ([𝑧 / 𝑦]∀𝑥𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥[𝑧 / 𝑦]𝜑)) |
| Colors of variables: wff set class |
| Syntax hints: ¬ wn 3 → wi 4 ↔ wb 105 ∀wal 1362 [wsb 1776 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-ia1 106 ax-ia2 107 ax-ia3 108 ax-in2 616 ax-io 710 ax-5 1461 ax-7 1462 ax-gen 1463 ax-ie1 1507 ax-ie2 1508 ax-8 1518 ax-10 1519 ax-11 1520 ax-i12 1521 ax-bndl 1523 ax-4 1524 ax-17 1540 ax-i9 1544 ax-ial 1548 ax-i5r 1549 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 117 df-nf 1475 df-sb 1777 |
| This theorem is referenced by: (None) |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |