Theorem sbex 1935

Description: Move existential quantifier in and out of substitution. (Contributed by NM, 27-Sep-2003.) (Proof rewritten by Jim Kingdon, 12-Feb-2018.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
sbex	⊢ ([𝑧 / 𝑦]∃𝑥𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥[𝑧 / 𝑦]𝜑)

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑦   𝑥,𝑧

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑦,𝑧)

Proof of Theorem sbex

Dummy variable 𝑤 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		sbexyz 1934	. . . 4 ⊢ ([𝑤 / 𝑦]∃𝑥𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥[𝑤 / 𝑦]𝜑)
2	1	sbbii 1702	. . 3 ⊢ ([𝑧 / 𝑤][𝑤 / 𝑦]∃𝑥𝜑 ↔ [𝑧 / 𝑤]∃𝑥[𝑤 / 𝑦]𝜑)
3		sbexyz 1934	. . 3 ⊢ ([𝑧 / 𝑤]∃𝑥[𝑤 / 𝑦]𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥[𝑧 / 𝑤][𝑤 / 𝑦]𝜑)
4	2, 3	bitri 183	. 2 ⊢ ([𝑧 / 𝑤][𝑤 / 𝑦]∃𝑥𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥[𝑧 / 𝑤][𝑤 / 𝑦]𝜑)
5		ax-17 1471	. . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑥𝜑 → ∀𝑤∃𝑥𝜑)
6	5	sbco2v 1876	. 2 ⊢ ([𝑧 / 𝑤][𝑤 / 𝑦]∃𝑥𝜑 ↔ [𝑧 / 𝑦]∃𝑥𝜑)
7		ax-17 1471	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑤𝜑)
8	7	sbco2v 1876	. . 3 ⊢ ([𝑧 / 𝑤][𝑤 / 𝑦]𝜑 ↔ [𝑧 / 𝑦]𝜑)
9	8	exbii 1548	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥[𝑧 / 𝑤][𝑤 / 𝑦]𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥[𝑧 / 𝑦]𝜑)
10	4, 6, 9	3bitr3i 209	1 ⊢ ([𝑧 / 𝑦]∃𝑥𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥[𝑧 / 𝑦]𝜑)

Syntax hints:   ↔ wb 104  ∃wex 1433  [wsb 1699

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107  ax-io 668  ax-5 1388  ax-7 1389  ax-gen 1390  ax-ie1 1434  ax-ie2 1435  ax-8 1447  ax-10 1448  ax-11 1449  ax-i12 1450  ax-4 1452  ax-17 1471  ax-i9 1475  ax-ial 1479  ax-i5r 1480

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-nf 1402  df-sb 1700

This theorem is referenced by:  sbabel  2261  sbcex2  2906  sbcexg  2907