Theorem spc3egv 2818

Description: Existential specialization with 3 quantifiers, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 12-May-2008.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
spc3egv.1	⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝑧 = 𝐶) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
spc3egv	⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋) → (𝜓 → ∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧𝜑))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑦,𝑧,𝐴   𝑥,𝐵,𝑦,𝑧   𝑥,𝐶,𝑦,𝑧   𝜓,𝑥,𝑦,𝑧

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑦,𝑧)   𝑉(𝑥,𝑦,𝑧)   𝑊(𝑥,𝑦,𝑧)   𝑋(𝑥,𝑦,𝑧)

Proof of Theorem spc3egv

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		elisset 2740	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ∃𝑥 𝑥 = 𝐴)
2		elisset 2740	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 → ∃𝑦 𝑦 = 𝐵)
3		elisset 2740	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑋 → ∃𝑧 𝑧 = 𝐶)
4	1, 2, 3	3anim123i 1174	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋) → (∃𝑥 𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ ∃𝑦 𝑦 = 𝐵 ∧ ∃𝑧 𝑧 = 𝐶))
5		eeeanv 1921	. . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝑧 = 𝐶) ↔ (∃𝑥 𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ ∃𝑦 𝑦 = 𝐵 ∧ ∃𝑧 𝑧 = 𝐶))
6	4, 5	sylibr 133	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋) → ∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝑧 = 𝐶))
7		spc3egv.1	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝑧 = 𝐶) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
8	7	biimprcd 159	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜓 → ((𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝑧 = 𝐶) → 𝜑))
9	8	eximdv 1868	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜓 → (∃𝑧(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝑧 = 𝐶) → ∃𝑧𝜑))
10	9	2eximdv 1870	. 2 ⊢ (𝜓 → (∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝑧 = 𝐶) → ∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧𝜑))
11	6, 10	syl5com 29	1 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋) → (𝜓 → ∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧𝜑))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 104   ∧ w3a 968   = wceq 1343  ∃wex 1480   ∈ wcel 2136

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107  ax-5 1435  ax-7 1436  ax-gen 1437  ax-ie1 1481  ax-ie2 1482  ax-8 1492  ax-4 1498  ax-17 1514  ax-i9 1518  ax-ial 1522  ax-ext 2147

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-3an 970  df-nf 1449  df-sb 1751  df-clab 2152  df-cleq 2158  df-clel 2161  df-v 2728

This theorem is referenced by: (None)