Theorem ssrd 3175

Description: Deduction based on subclass definition. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 8-Mar-2017.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
ssrd.0	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑
ssrd.1	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
ssrd.2	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵
ssrd.3	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ssrd	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵)

Proof of Theorem ssrd

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ssrd.0	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑
2		ssrd.3	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))
3	1, 2	alrimi 1533	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))
4		ssrd.1	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
5		ssrd.2	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵
6	4, 5	dfss2f 3161	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))
7	3, 6	sylibr 134	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4  ∀wal 1362  Ⅎwnf 1471   ∈ wcel 2160  Ⅎwnfc 2319   ⊆ wss 3144

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-io 710  ax-5 1458  ax-7 1459  ax-gen 1460  ax-ie1 1504  ax-ie2 1505  ax-8 1515  ax-10 1516  ax-11 1517  ax-i12 1518  ax-bndl 1520  ax-4 1521  ax-17 1537  ax-i9 1541  ax-ial 1545  ax-i5r 1546  ax-ext 2171

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-nf 1472  df-sb 1774  df-clab 2176  df-cleq 2182  df-clel 2185  df-nfc 2321  df-in 3150  df-ss 3157

This theorem is referenced by:  eqrd  3188  exmidomni  7171