Theorem animpimp2impd 859

Description: Deduction deriving nested implications from conjunctions. (Contributed by AV, 21-Aug-2022.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
animpimp2impd.1	⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜑) → (𝜒 → (𝜃 → 𝜂)))
animpimp2impd.2	⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜃)) → (𝜂 → 𝜏))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
animpimp2impd	⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜓 → 𝜒) → (𝜓 → (𝜃 → 𝜏))))

Proof of Theorem animpimp2impd

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		animpimp2impd.1	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜑) → (𝜒 → (𝜃 → 𝜂)))
2		animpimp2impd.2	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜃)) → (𝜂 → 𝜏))
3	2	expr 461	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜑) → (𝜃 → (𝜂 → 𝜏)))
4	3	a2d 30	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜑) → ((𝜃 → 𝜂) → (𝜃 → 𝜏)))
5	1, 4	syld 48	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜑) → (𝜒 → (𝜃 → 𝜏)))
6	5	expcom 418	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜃 → 𝜏))))
7	6	a2d 30	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜓 → 𝜒) → (𝜓 → (𝜃 → 𝜏))))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 400

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 401

This theorem is referenced by:  seqcl2  14052  seqfveq2  14056  seqshft2  14060  monoord  14064  seqsplit  14067  seqid2  14080  seqhomo  14081  sylow1lem1  19664  imasdsf1olem  24495  ovolicc2lem3  25643  dvnres  26055  cvmliftlem7  35678  cvmliftlem10  35681  monoordxrv  46080  smonoord  47996