Theorem bj-dvelimdv 34177

Description: Deduction form of dvelim 2473 with disjoint variable conditions. Uncurried (imported) form of bj-dvelimdv1 34178. Typically, 𝑧 is a fresh variable used for the implicit substitution hypothesis that results in 𝜒 (namely, 𝜓 can be thought as 𝜓(𝑥, 𝑦) and 𝜒 as 𝜓(𝑥, 𝑧)). So the theorem says that if x is effectively free in 𝜓(𝑥, 𝑧), then if x and y are not the same variable, then 𝑥 is also effectively free in 𝜓(𝑥, 𝑦), in a context 𝜑.

One can weaken the implicit substitution hypothesis by adding the antecedent 𝜑 but this typically does not make the theorem much more useful. Similarly, one could use nonfreeness hypotheses instead of disjoint variable conditions but since this result is typically used when 𝑧 is a dummy variable, this would not be of much benefit. One could also remove DV (𝑥, 𝑧) since in the proof nfv 1915 can be replaced with nfal 2342 followed by nfn 1857.

Remark: nfald 2347 uses ax-11 2161; it might be possible to inline and use ax11w 2134 instead, but there is still a use via 19.12 2346 anyway. (Contributed by BJ, 20-Oct-2021.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
bj-dvelimdv.nf	⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜒)
bj-dvelimdv.is	⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑦 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜓))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bj-dvelimdv	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦) → Ⅎ𝑥𝜓)

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑧   𝑦,𝑧   𝜑,𝑧   𝜓,𝑧

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑦)   𝜓(𝑥,𝑦)   𝜒(𝑥,𝑦,𝑧)

Proof of Theorem bj-dvelimdv

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		bj-dvelimdv.is	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑦 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜓))
2	1	equsalvw 2010	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑧(𝑧 = 𝑦 → 𝜒) ↔ 𝜓)
3	2	bicomi 226	. 2 ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑧(𝑧 = 𝑦 → 𝜒))
4		nfv 1915	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧𝜑
5		nfv 1915	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧 ¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦
6	4, 5	nfan 1900	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧(𝜑 ∧ ¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦)
7		nfeqf2 2395	. . . . 5 ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → Ⅎ𝑥 𝑧 = 𝑦)
8	7	adantl 484	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦) → Ⅎ𝑥 𝑧 = 𝑦)
9		bj-dvelimdv.nf	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜒)
10	9	adantr 483	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦) → Ⅎ𝑥𝜒)
11	8, 10	nfimd 1895	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦) → Ⅎ𝑥(𝑧 = 𝑦 → 𝜒))
12	6, 11	nfald 2347	. 2 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦) → Ⅎ𝑥∀𝑧(𝑧 = 𝑦 → 𝜒))
13	3, 12	nfxfrd 1854	1 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦) → Ⅎ𝑥𝜓)

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ↔ wb 208   ∧ wa 398  ∀wal 1535  Ⅎwnf 1784

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1796  ax-4 1810  ax-5 1911  ax-6 1970  ax-7 2015  ax-10 2145  ax-11 2161  ax-12 2177  ax-13 2390

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 399  df-or 844  df-tru 1540  df-ex 1781  df-nf 1785

This theorem is referenced by: (None)