Users' Mathboxes Mathbox for BJ < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  MPE Home  >  Th. List  >   Mathboxes  >  bj-dvelimdv Structured version   Visualization version   GIF version

Theorem bj-dvelimdv 35822
Description: Deduction form of dvelim 2450 with disjoint variable conditions. Uncurried (imported) form of bj-dvelimdv1 35823. Typically, 𝑧 is a fresh variable used for the implicit substitution hypothesis that results in 𝜒 (namely, 𝜓 can be thought as 𝜓(𝑥, 𝑦) and 𝜒 as 𝜓(𝑥, 𝑧)). So the theorem says that if x is effectively free in 𝜓(𝑥, 𝑧), then if x and y are not the same variable, then 𝑥 is also effectively free in 𝜓(𝑥, 𝑦), in a context 𝜑.

One can weaken the implicit substitution hypothesis by adding the antecedent 𝜑 but this typically does not make the theorem much more useful. Similarly, one could use nonfreeness hypotheses instead of disjoint variable conditions but since this result is typically used when 𝑧 is a dummy variable, this would not be of much benefit. One could also remove DV (𝑥, 𝑧) since in the proof nfv 1917 can be replaced with nfal 2316 followed by nfn 1860.

Remark: nfald 2321 uses ax-11 2154; it might be possible to inline and use ax11w 2126 instead, but there is still a use via 19.12 2320 anyway. (Contributed by BJ, 20-Oct-2021.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)

Hypotheses
Ref Expression
bj-dvelimdv.nf (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜒)
bj-dvelimdv.is (𝑧 = 𝑦 → (𝜒𝜓))
Assertion
Ref Expression
bj-dvelimdv ((𝜑 ∧ ¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦) → Ⅎ𝑥𝜓)
Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑧   𝑦,𝑧   𝜑,𝑧   𝜓,𝑧
Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑦)   𝜓(𝑥,𝑦)   𝜒(𝑥,𝑦,𝑧)

Proof of Theorem bj-dvelimdv
StepHypRef Expression
1 bj-dvelimdv.is . . . 4 (𝑧 = 𝑦 → (𝜒𝜓))
21equsalvw 2007 . . 3 (∀𝑧(𝑧 = 𝑦𝜒) ↔ 𝜓)
32bicomi 223 . 2 (𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑧(𝑧 = 𝑦𝜒))
4 nfv 1917 . . . 4 𝑧𝜑
5 nfv 1917 . . . 4 𝑧 ¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦
64, 5nfan 1902 . . 3 𝑧(𝜑 ∧ ¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦)
7 nfeqf2 2376 . . . . 5 (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → Ⅎ𝑥 𝑧 = 𝑦)
87adantl 482 . . . 4 ((𝜑 ∧ ¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦) → Ⅎ𝑥 𝑧 = 𝑦)
9 bj-dvelimdv.nf . . . . 5 (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜒)
109adantr 481 . . . 4 ((𝜑 ∧ ¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦) → Ⅎ𝑥𝜒)
118, 10nfimd 1897 . . 3 ((𝜑 ∧ ¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦) → Ⅎ𝑥(𝑧 = 𝑦𝜒))
126, 11nfald 2321 . 2 ((𝜑 ∧ ¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦) → Ⅎ𝑥𝑧(𝑧 = 𝑦𝜒))
133, 12nfxfrd 1856 1 ((𝜑 ∧ ¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦) → Ⅎ𝑥𝜓)
Colors of variables: wff setvar class
Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3  wi 4  wb 205  wa 396  wal 1539  wnf 1785
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1797  ax-4 1811  ax-5 1913  ax-6 1971  ax-7 2011  ax-10 2137  ax-11 2154  ax-12 2171  ax-13 2371
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 397  df-or 846  df-tru 1544  df-ex 1782  df-nf 1786
This theorem is referenced by: (None)
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator