Theorem bj-dvelimdv 36034

Description: Deduction form of dvelim 2449 with disjoint variable conditions. Uncurried (imported) form of bj-dvelimdv1 36035. Typically, 𝑧 is a fresh variable used for the implicit substitution hypothesis that results in 𝜒 (namely, 𝜓 can be thought as 𝜓(𝑥, 𝑦) and 𝜒 as 𝜓(𝑥, 𝑧)). So the theorem says that if x is effectively free in 𝜓(𝑥, 𝑧), then if x and y are not the same variable, then 𝑥 is also effectively free in 𝜓(𝑥, 𝑦), in a context 𝜑.

One can weaken the implicit substitution hypothesis by adding the antecedent 𝜑 but this typically does not make the theorem much more useful. Similarly, one could use nonfreeness hypotheses instead of disjoint variable conditions but since this result is typically used when 𝑧 is a dummy variable, this would not be of much benefit. One could also remove DV (𝑥, 𝑧) since in the proof nfv 1916 can be replaced with nfal 2315 followed by nfn 1859.

Remark: nfald 2320 uses ax-11 2153; it might be possible to inline and use ax11w 2125 instead, but there is still a use via 19.12 2319 anyway. (Contributed by BJ, 20-Oct-2021.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
bj-dvelimdv.nf	⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜒)
bj-dvelimdv.is	⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑦 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜓))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bj-dvelimdv	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦) → Ⅎ𝑥𝜓)

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑧   𝑦,𝑧   𝜑,𝑧   𝜓,𝑧

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑦)   𝜓(𝑥,𝑦)   𝜒(𝑥,𝑦,𝑧)

Proof of Theorem bj-dvelimdv

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		bj-dvelimdv.is	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑦 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜓))
2	1	equsalvw 2006	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑧(𝑧 = 𝑦 → 𝜒) ↔ 𝜓)
3	2	bicomi 223	. 2 ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑧(𝑧 = 𝑦 → 𝜒))
4		nfv 1916	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧𝜑
5		nfv 1916	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧 ¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦
6	4, 5	nfan 1901	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧(𝜑 ∧ ¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦)
7		nfeqf2 2375	. . . . 5 ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → Ⅎ𝑥 𝑧 = 𝑦)
8	7	adantl 481	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦) → Ⅎ𝑥 𝑧 = 𝑦)
9		bj-dvelimdv.nf	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜒)
10	9	adantr 480	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦) → Ⅎ𝑥𝜒)
11	8, 10	nfimd 1896	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦) → Ⅎ𝑥(𝑧 = 𝑦 → 𝜒))
12	6, 11	nfald 2320	. 2 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦) → Ⅎ𝑥∀𝑧(𝑧 = 𝑦 → 𝜒))
13	3, 12	nfxfrd 1855	1 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦) → Ⅎ𝑥𝜓)

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ↔ wb 205   ∧ wa 395  ∀wal 1538  Ⅎwnf 1784

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1796  ax-4 1810  ax-5 1912  ax-6 1970  ax-7 2010  ax-10 2136  ax-11 2153  ax-12 2170  ax-13 2370

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 396  df-or 845  df-tru 1543  df-ex 1781  df-nf 1785

This theorem is referenced by: (None)