P. 361 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 36001-36100   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	satefv 36001	The simplified satisfaction predicate as function over wff codes in the model 𝑀 at the code 𝑈. (Contributed by AV, 30-Oct-2023.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝑀 Sat∈ 𝑈) = (((𝑀 Sat ( E ∩ (𝑀 × 𝑀)))‘ω)‘𝑈))
Theorem	sate0 36002	The simplified satisfaction predicate for any wff code over an empty model. (Contributed by AV, 6-Oct-2023.) (Revised by AV, 5-Nov-2023.)
⊢ (𝑈 ∈ 𝑉 → (∅ Sat∈ 𝑈) = (((∅ Sat ∅)‘ω)‘𝑈))
Theorem	satef 36003	The simplified satisfaction predicate as function over wff codes over an empty model. (Contributed by AV, 30-Oct-2023.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑈 ∈ (Fmla‘ω) ∧ 𝑆 ∈ (𝑀 Sat∈ 𝑈)) → 𝑆:ω⟶𝑀)
Theorem	sate0fv0 36004	A simplified satisfaction predicate as function over wff codes over an empty model is an empty set. (Contributed by AV, 31-Oct-2023.)
⊢ (𝑈 ∈ (Fmla‘ω) → (𝑆 ∈ (∅ Sat∈ 𝑈) → 𝑆 = ∅))
Theorem	satefvfmla0 36005*	The simplified satisfaction predicate for wff codes of height 0. (Contributed by AV, 4-Nov-2023.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ (Fmla‘∅)) → (𝑀 Sat∈ 𝑋) = {𝑎 ∈ (𝑀 ↑m ω) ∣ (𝑎‘(1st ‘(2nd ‘𝑋))) ∈ (𝑎‘(2nd ‘(2nd ‘𝑋)))})
Theorem	sategoelfvb 36006	Characterization of a valuation 𝑆 of a simplified satisfaction predicate for a Godel-set of membership. (Contributed by AV, 5-Nov-2023.)
⊢ 𝐸 = (𝑀 Sat∈ (𝐴∈𝑔𝐵))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ (𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω)) → (𝑆 ∈ 𝐸 ↔ (𝑆 ∈ (𝑀 ↑m ω) ∧ (𝑆‘𝐴) ∈ (𝑆‘𝐵))))
Theorem	sategoelfv 36007	Condition of a valuation 𝑆 of a simplified satisfaction predicate for a Godel-set of membership: The sets in model 𝑀 corresponding to the variables 𝐴 and 𝐵 under the assignment of 𝑆 are in a membership relation in 𝑀. (Contributed by AV, 5-Nov-2023.)
⊢ 𝐸 = (𝑀 Sat∈ (𝐴∈𝑔𝐵))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ (𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) ∧ 𝑆 ∈ 𝐸) → (𝑆‘𝐴) ∈ (𝑆‘𝐵))
Theorem	ex-sategoelel 36008*	Example of a valuation of a simplified satisfaction predicate for a Godel-set of membership. (Contributed by AV, 5-Nov-2023.)
⊢ 𝐸 = (𝑀 Sat∈ (𝐴∈𝑔𝐵))    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑥 ∈ ω ↦ if(𝑥 = 𝐴, 𝑍, if(𝑥 = 𝐵, 𝒫 𝑍, ∅)))    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝑀 ∈ WUni ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑀) ∧ (𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)) → 𝑆 ∈ 𝐸)
Theorem	ex-sategoel 36009*	Instance of sategoelfv 36007 for the example of a valuation of a simplified satisfaction predicate for a Godel-set of membership. (Contributed by AV, 5-Nov-2023.)
⊢ 𝐸 = (𝑀 Sat∈ (𝐴∈𝑔𝐵))    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑥 ∈ ω ↦ if(𝑥 = 𝐴, 𝑍, if(𝑥 = 𝐵, 𝒫 𝑍, ∅)))    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝑀 ∈ WUni ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑀) ∧ (𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)) → (𝑆‘𝐴) ∈ (𝑆‘𝐵))
Theorem	satfv1fvfmla1 36010*	The value of the satisfaction predicate at two Godel-sets of membership combined with a Godel-set for NAND. (Contributed by AV, 17-Nov-2023.)
⊢ 𝑋 = ((𝐼∈𝑔𝐽)⊼𝑔(𝐾∈𝑔𝐿))    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ 𝑊) ∧ (𝐼 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐽 ∈ ω) ∧ (𝐾 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐿 ∈ ω)) → (((𝑀 Sat 𝐸)‘1o)‘𝑋) = {𝑎 ∈ (𝑀 ↑m ω) ∣ (¬ (𝑎‘𝐼)𝐸(𝑎‘𝐽) ∨ ¬ (𝑎‘𝐾)𝐸(𝑎‘𝐿))})
Theorem	2goelgoanfmla1 36011	Two Godel-sets of membership combined with a Godel-set for NAND is a Godel formula of height 1. (Contributed by AV, 17-Nov-2023.)
⊢ 𝑋 = ((𝐼∈𝑔𝐽)⊼𝑔(𝐾∈𝑔𝐿))    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐼 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐽 ∈ ω) ∧ (𝐾 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐿 ∈ ω)) → 𝑋 ∈ (Fmla‘1o))
Theorem	satefvfmla1 36012*	The simplified satisfaction predicate at two Godel-sets of membership combined with a Godel-set for NAND. (Contributed by AV, 17-Nov-2023.)
⊢ 𝑋 = ((𝐼∈𝑔𝐽)⊼𝑔(𝐾∈𝑔𝐿))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ (𝐼 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐽 ∈ ω) ∧ (𝐾 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐿 ∈ ω)) → (𝑀 Sat∈ 𝑋) = {𝑎 ∈ (𝑀 ↑m ω) ∣ (¬ (𝑎‘𝐼) ∈ (𝑎‘𝐽) ∨ ¬ (𝑎‘𝐾) ∈ (𝑎‘𝐿))})
Theorem	ex-sategoelelomsuc 36013*	Example of a valuation of a simplified satisfaction predicate over the ordinal numbers as model for a Godel-set of membership using the properties of a successor: (𝑆‘2o) = 𝑍 ∈ suc 𝑍 = (𝑆‘2o). Remark: the indices 1o and 2o are intentionally reversed to distinguish them from elements of the model: (2o∈𝑔1o) should not be confused with 2o ∈ 1o, which is false. (Contributed by AV, 19-Nov-2023.)
⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑥 ∈ ω ↦ if(𝑥 = 2o, 𝑍, suc 𝑍))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑍 ∈ ω → 𝑆 ∈ (ω Sat∈ (2o∈𝑔1o)))
Theorem	ex-sategoelel12 36014	Example of a valuation of a simplified satisfaction predicate over a proper pair (of ordinal numbers) as model for a Godel-set of membership using the properties of a successor: (𝑆‘2o) = 1o ∈ 2o = (𝑆‘2o). Remark: the indices 1o and 2o are intentionally reversed to distinguish them from elements of the model: (2o∈𝑔1o) should not be confused with 2o ∈ 1o, which is false. (Contributed by AV, 19-Nov-2023.)
⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑥 ∈ ω ↦ if(𝑥 = 2o, 1o, 2o))    ⇒   ⊢ 𝑆 ∈ ({1o, 2o} Sat∈ (2o∈𝑔1o))
Theorem	prv 36015	The "proves" relation on a set. A wff encoded as 𝑈 is true in a model 𝑀 iff for every valuation 𝑠 ∈ (𝑀 ↑m ω), the interpretation of the wff using the membership relation on 𝑀 is true. (Contributed by AV, 5-Nov-2023.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝑀⊧𝑈 ↔ (𝑀 Sat∈ 𝑈) = (𝑀 ↑m ω)))
Theorem	elnanelprv 36016	The wff (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ⊼ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) encoded as ((𝐴∈𝑔𝐵) ⊼𝑔(𝐵∈𝑔𝐴)) is true in any model 𝑀. This is the model theoretic proof of elnanel 9590. (Contributed by AV, 5-Nov-2023.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) → 𝑀⊧((𝐴∈𝑔𝐵)⊼𝑔(𝐵∈𝑔𝐴)))
Theorem	prv0 36017	Every wff encoded as 𝑈 is true in an "empty model" (𝑀 = ∅). Since ⊧ is defined in terms of the interpretations making the given formula true, it is not defined on the "empty model", since there are no interpretations. In particular, the empty set on the LHS of ⊧ should not be interpreted as the empty model, because ∃𝑥𝑥 = 𝑥 is not satisfied on the empty model. (Contributed by AV, 19-Nov-2023.)
⊢ (𝑈 ∈ (Fmla‘ω) → ∅⊧𝑈)
Theorem	prv1n 36018	No wff encoded as a Godel-set of membership is true in a model with only one element. (Contributed by AV, 19-Nov-2023.)
⊢ ((𝐼 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐽 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉) → ¬ {𝑋}⊧(𝐼∈𝑔𝐽))
21.6.11  Godel-sets of formulas - part 2
Syntax	cgon 36019	The Godel-set of negation. (Note that this is not a wff.)
class ¬𝑔𝑈
Syntax	cgoa 36020	The Godel-set of conjunction.
class ∧𝑔
Syntax	cgoi 36021	The Godel-set of implication.
class →𝑔
Syntax	cgoo 36022	The Godel-set of disjunction.
class ∨𝑔
Syntax	cgob 36023	The Godel-set of equivalence.
class ↔𝑔
Syntax	cgoq 36024	The Godel-set of equality.
class =𝑔
Syntax	cgox 36025	The Godel-set of existential quantification. (Note that this is not a wff.)
class ∃𝑔𝑁𝑈
Definition	df-gonot 36026	Define the Godel-set of negation. Here the argument 𝑈 is also a Godel-set corresponding to smaller formulas. Note that this is a class expression, not a wff. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2013.)
⊢ ¬𝑔𝑈 = (𝑈⊼𝑔𝑈)
Definition	df-goan 36027*	Define the Godel-set of conjunction. Here the arguments 𝑈 and 𝑉 are also Godel-sets corresponding to smaller formulas. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2013.)
⊢ ∧𝑔 = (𝑢 ∈ V, 𝑣 ∈ V ↦ ¬𝑔(𝑢⊼𝑔𝑣))
Definition	df-goim 36028*	Define the Godel-set of implication. Here the arguments 𝑈 and 𝑉 are also Godel-sets corresponding to smaller formulas. Note that this is a class expression, not a wff. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2013.)
⊢ →𝑔 = (𝑢 ∈ V, 𝑣 ∈ V ↦ (𝑢⊼𝑔¬𝑔𝑣))
Definition	df-goor 36029*	Define the Godel-set of disjunction. Here the arguments 𝑈 and 𝑉 are also Godel-sets corresponding to smaller formulas. Note that this is a class expression, not a wff. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2013.)
⊢ ∨𝑔 = (𝑢 ∈ V, 𝑣 ∈ V ↦ (¬𝑔𝑢 →𝑔 𝑣))
Definition	df-gobi 36030*	Define the Godel-set of equivalence. Here the arguments 𝑈 and 𝑉 are also Godel-sets corresponding to smaller formulas. Note that this is a class expression, not a wff. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2013.)
⊢ ↔𝑔 = (𝑢 ∈ V, 𝑣 ∈ V ↦ ((𝑢 →𝑔 𝑣)∧𝑔(𝑣 →𝑔 𝑢)))
Definition	df-goeq 36031*	Define the Godel-set of equality. Here the arguments 𝑥 = ⟨𝑁, 𝑃⟩ correspond to vN and vP , so (∅=𝑔1o) actually means v0 = v1 , not 0 = 1. Here we use the trick mentioned in ax-ext 2734 to introduce equality as a defined notion in terms of ∈𝑔. The expression suc (𝑢 ∪ 𝑣) = max (𝑢, 𝑣) + 1 here is a convenient way of getting a dummy variable distinct from 𝑢 and 𝑣. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2013.)
⊢ =𝑔 = (𝑢 ∈ ω, 𝑣 ∈ ω ↦ ⦋suc (𝑢 ∪ 𝑣) / 𝑤⦌∀𝑔𝑤((𝑤∈𝑔𝑢) ↔𝑔 (𝑤∈𝑔𝑣)))
Definition	df-goex 36032	Define the Godel-set of existential quantification. Here 𝑁 ∈ ω corresponds to vN , and 𝑈 represents another formula, and this expression is [∃𝑥𝜑] = ∃𝑔𝑁𝑈 where 𝑥 is the 𝑁-th variable, 𝑈 = [𝜑] is the code for 𝜑. Note that this is a class expression, not a wff. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2013.)
⊢ ∃𝑔𝑁𝑈 = ¬𝑔∀𝑔𝑁¬𝑔𝑈
21.6.12  Models of ZF
Syntax	cgze 36033	The Axiom of Extensionality.
class AxExt
Syntax	cgzr 36034	The Axiom Scheme of Replacement.
class AxRep
Syntax	cgzp 36035	The Axiom of Power Sets.
class AxPow
Syntax	cgzu 36036	The Axiom of Unions.
class AxUn
Syntax	cgzg 36037	The Axiom of Regularity.
class AxReg
Syntax	cgzi 36038	The Axiom of Infinity.
class AxInf
Syntax	cgzf 36039	The set of models of ZF.
class ZF
Definition	df-gzext 36040	The Godel-set version of the Axiom of Extensionality. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2013.)
⊢ AxExt = (∀𝑔2o((2o∈𝑔∅) ↔𝑔 (2o∈𝑔1o)) →𝑔 (∅=𝑔1o))
Definition	df-gzrep 36041	The Godel-set version of the Axiom Scheme of Replacement. Since this is a scheme and not a single axiom, it manifests as a function on wffs, each giving rise to a different axiom. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2013.)
⊢ AxRep = (𝑢 ∈ (Fmla‘ω) ↦ (∀𝑔3o∃𝑔1o∀𝑔2o(∀𝑔1o𝑢 →𝑔 (2o=𝑔1o)) →𝑔 ∀𝑔1o∀𝑔2o((2o∈𝑔1o) ↔𝑔 ∃𝑔3o((3o∈𝑔∅)∧𝑔∀𝑔1o𝑢))))
Definition	df-gzpow 36042	The Godel-set version of the Axiom of Power Sets. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2013.)
⊢ AxPow = ∃𝑔1o∀𝑔2o(∀𝑔1o((1o∈𝑔2o) ↔𝑔 (1o∈𝑔∅)) →𝑔 (2o∈𝑔1o))
Definition	df-gzun 36043	The Godel-set version of the Axiom of Unions. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2013.)
⊢ AxUn = ∃𝑔1o∀𝑔2o(∃𝑔1o((2o∈𝑔1o)∧𝑔(1o∈𝑔∅)) →𝑔 (2o∈𝑔1o))
Definition	df-gzreg 36044	The Godel-set version of the Axiom of Regularity. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2013.)
⊢ AxReg = (∃𝑔1o(1o∈𝑔∅) →𝑔 ∃𝑔1o((1o∈𝑔∅)∧𝑔∀𝑔2o((2o∈𝑔1o) →𝑔 ¬𝑔(2o∈𝑔∅))))
Definition	df-gzinf 36045	The Godel-set version of the Axiom of Infinity. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2013.)
⊢ AxInf = ∃𝑔1o((∅∈𝑔1o)∧𝑔∀𝑔2o((2o∈𝑔1o) →𝑔 ∃𝑔∅((2o∈𝑔∅)∧𝑔(∅∈𝑔1o))))
Definition	df-gzf 36046*	Define the class of all (transitive) models of ZF. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2013.)
⊢ ZF = {𝑚 ∣ ((Tr 𝑚 ∧ 𝑚⊧AxExt ∧ 𝑚⊧AxPow) ∧ (𝑚⊧AxUn ∧ 𝑚⊧AxReg ∧ 𝑚⊧AxInf) ∧ ∀𝑢 ∈ (Fmla‘ω)𝑚⊧(AxRep‘𝑢))}
21.6.13  Metamath formal systems This is a formalization of Appendix C of the Metamath book, which describes the mathematical representation of a formal system, of which set.mm (this file) is one.
Syntax	cmcn 36047	The set of constants.
class mCN
Syntax	cmvar 36048	The set of variables.
class mVR
Syntax	cmty 36049	The type function.
class mType
Syntax	cmvt 36050	The set of variable typecodes.
class mVT
Syntax	cmtc 36051	The set of typecodes.
class mTC
Syntax	cmax 36052	The set of axioms.
class mAx
Syntax	cmrex 36053	The set of raw expressions.
class mREx
Syntax	cmex 36054	The set of expressions.
class mEx
Syntax	cmdv 36055	The set of distinct variables.
class mDV
Syntax	cmvrs 36056	The variables in an expression.
class mVars
Syntax	cmrsub 36057	The set of raw substitutions.
class mRSubst
Syntax	cmsub 36058	The set of substitutions.
class mSubst
Syntax	cmvh 36059	The set of variable hypotheses.
class mVH
Syntax	cmpst 36060	The set of pre-statements.
class mPreSt
Syntax	cmsr 36061	The reduct of a pre-statement.
class mStRed
Syntax	cmsta 36062	The set of statements.
class mStat
Syntax	cmfs 36063	The set of formal systems.
class mFS
Syntax	cmcls 36064	The closure of a set of statements.
class mCls
Syntax	cmpps 36065	The set of provable pre-statements.
class mPPSt
Syntax	cmthm 36066	The set of theorems.
class mThm
Definition	df-mcn 36067	Define the set of constants in a Metamath formal system. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2016.)
⊢ mCN = Slot 1
Definition	df-mvar 36068	Define the set of variables in a Metamath formal system. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2016.)
⊢ mVR = Slot 2
Definition	df-mty 36069	Define the type function in a Metamath formal system. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2016.)
⊢ mType = Slot 3
Definition	df-mtc 36070	Define the set of typecodes in a Metamath formal system. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2016.)
⊢ mTC = Slot 4
Definition	df-mmax 36071	Define the set of axioms in a Metamath formal system. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2016.)
⊢ mAx = Slot 5
Definition	df-mvt 36072	Define the set of variable typecodes in a Metamath formal system. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2016.)
⊢ mVT = (𝑡 ∈ V ↦ ran (mType‘𝑡))
Definition	df-mrex 36073	Define the set of "raw expressions", which are expressions without a typecode attached. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2016.)
⊢ mREx = (𝑡 ∈ V ↦ Word ((mCN‘𝑡) ∪ (mVR‘𝑡)))
Definition	df-mex 36074	Define the set of expressions, which are strings of constants and variables headed by a typecode constant. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2016.)
⊢ mEx = (𝑡 ∈ V ↦ ((mTC‘𝑡) × (mREx‘𝑡)))
Definition	df-mdv 36075	Define the set of distinct variable conditions, which are pairs of distinct variables. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2016.)
⊢ mDV = (𝑡 ∈ V ↦ (((mVR‘𝑡) × (mVR‘𝑡)) ∖ I ))
Definition	df-mvrs 36076*	Define the set of variables in an expression. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2016.)
⊢ mVars = (𝑡 ∈ V ↦ (𝑒 ∈ (mEx‘𝑡) ↦ (ran (2nd ‘𝑒) ∩ (mVR‘𝑡))))
Definition	df-mrsub 36077*	Define a substitution of raw expressions given a mapping from variables to expressions. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2016.)
⊢ mRSubst = (𝑡 ∈ V ↦ (𝑓 ∈ ((mREx‘𝑡) ↑pm (mVR‘𝑡)) ↦ (𝑒 ∈ (mREx‘𝑡) ↦ ((freeMnd‘((mCN‘𝑡) ∪ (mVR‘𝑡))) Σg ((𝑣 ∈ ((mCN‘𝑡) ∪ (mVR‘𝑡)) ↦ if(𝑣 ∈ dom 𝑓, (𝑓‘𝑣), ⟨“𝑣”⟩)) ∘ 𝑒)))))
Definition	df-msub 36078*	Define a substitution of expressions given a mapping from variables to expressions. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2016.)
⊢ mSubst = (𝑡 ∈ V ↦ (𝑓 ∈ ((mREx‘𝑡) ↑pm (mVR‘𝑡)) ↦ (𝑒 ∈ (mEx‘𝑡) ↦ ⟨(1st ‘𝑒), (((mRSubst‘𝑡)‘𝑓)‘(2nd ‘𝑒))⟩)))
Definition	df-mvh 36079*	Define the mapping from variables to their variable hypothesis. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2016.)
⊢ mVH = (𝑡 ∈ V ↦ (𝑣 ∈ (mVR‘𝑡) ↦ ⟨((mType‘𝑡)‘𝑣), ⟨“𝑣”⟩⟩))
Definition	df-mpst 36080*	Define the set of all pre-statements. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2016.)
⊢ mPreSt = (𝑡 ∈ V ↦ (({𝑑 ∈ 𝒫 (mDV‘𝑡) ∣ ◡𝑑 = 𝑑} × (𝒫 (mEx‘𝑡) ∩ Fin)) × (mEx‘𝑡)))
Definition	df-msr 36081*	Define the reduct of a pre-statement. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2016.)
⊢ mStRed = (𝑡 ∈ V ↦ (𝑠 ∈ (mPreSt‘𝑡) ↦ ⦋(2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑠)) / ℎ⦌⦋(2nd ‘𝑠) / 𝑎⦌⟨((1st ‘(1st ‘𝑠)) ∩ ⦋∪ ((mVars‘𝑡) “ (ℎ ∪ {𝑎})) / 𝑧⦌(𝑧 × 𝑧)), ℎ, 𝑎⟩))
Definition	df-msta 36082	Define the set of all statements. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2016.)
⊢ mStat = (𝑡 ∈ V ↦ ran (mStRed‘𝑡))
Definition	df-mfs 36083*	Define the set of all formal systems. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2016.)
⊢ mFS = {𝑡 ∣ ((((mCN‘𝑡) ∩ (mVR‘𝑡)) = ∅ ∧ (mType‘𝑡):(mVR‘𝑡)⟶(mTC‘𝑡)) ∧ ((mAx‘𝑡) ⊆ (mStat‘𝑡) ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ (mVT‘𝑡) ¬ (◡(mType‘𝑡) “ {𝑣}) ∈ Fin))}
Definition	df-mcls 36084*	Define the closure of a set of statements relative to a set of disjointness constraints. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2016.)
⊢ mCls = (𝑡 ∈ V ↦ (𝑑 ∈ 𝒫 (mDV‘𝑡), ℎ ∈ 𝒫 (mEx‘𝑡) ↦ ∩ {𝑐 ∣ ((ℎ ∪ ran (mVH‘𝑡)) ⊆ 𝑐 ∧ ∀𝑚∀𝑜∀𝑝(⟨𝑚, 𝑜, 𝑝⟩ ∈ (mAx‘𝑡) → ∀𝑠 ∈ ran (mSubst‘𝑡)(((𝑠 “ (𝑜 ∪ ran (mVH‘𝑡))) ⊆ 𝑐 ∧ ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝑥𝑚𝑦 → (((mVars‘𝑡)‘(𝑠‘((mVH‘𝑡)‘𝑥))) × ((mVars‘𝑡)‘(𝑠‘((mVH‘𝑡)‘𝑦)))) ⊆ 𝑑)) → (𝑠‘𝑝) ∈ 𝑐)))}))
Definition	df-mpps 36085*	Define the set of provable pre-statements. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2016.)
⊢ mPPSt = (𝑡 ∈ V ↦ {⟨⟨𝑑, ℎ⟩, 𝑎⟩ ∣ (⟨𝑑, ℎ, 𝑎⟩ ∈ (mPreSt‘𝑡) ∧ 𝑎 ∈ (𝑑(mCls‘𝑡)ℎ))})
Definition	df-mthm 36086	Define the set of theorems. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2016.)
⊢ mThm = (𝑡 ∈ V ↦ (◡(mStRed‘𝑡) “ ((mStRed‘𝑡) “ (mPPSt‘𝑡))))
Theorem	mvtval 36087	The set of variable typecodes. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2016.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (mVT‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = (mType‘𝑇)    ⇒   ⊢ 𝑉 = ran 𝑌
Theorem	mrexval 36088	The set of "raw expressions", which are expressions without a typecode, that is, just sequences of constants and variables. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2016.)
⊢ 𝐶 = (mCN‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = (mVR‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = (mREx‘𝑇)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑇 ∈ 𝑊 → 𝑅 = Word (𝐶 ∪ 𝑉))
Theorem	mexval 36089	The set of expressions, which are pairs whose first element is a typecode, and whose second element is a raw expression. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2016.)
⊢ 𝐾 = (mTC‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (mEx‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = (mREx‘𝑇)    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐸 = (𝐾 × 𝑅)
Theorem	mexval2 36090	The set of expressions, which are pairs whose first element is a typecode, and whose second element is a list of constants and variables. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2016.)
⊢ 𝐾 = (mTC‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (mEx‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (mCN‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = (mVR‘𝑇)    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐸 = (𝐾 × Word (𝐶 ∪ 𝑉))
Theorem	mdvval 36091	The set of disjoint variable conditions, which are pairs of distinct variables. (This definition differs from appendix C, which uses unordered pairs instead. We use ordered pairs, but all sets of disjoint variable conditions of interest will be symmetric, so it does not matter.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2016.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (mVR‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (mDV‘𝑇)    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑉 × 𝑉) ∖ I )
Theorem	mvrsval 36092	The set of variables in an expression. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2016.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (mVR‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (mEx‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = (mVars‘𝑇)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐸 → (𝑊‘𝑋) = (ran (2nd ‘𝑋) ∩ 𝑉))
Theorem	mvrsfpw 36093	The set of variables in an expression is a finite subset of 𝑉. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2016.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (mVR‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (mEx‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = (mVars‘𝑇)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐸 → (𝑊‘𝑋) ∈ (𝒫 𝑉 ∩ Fin))
Theorem	mrsubffval 36094*	The substitution of some variables for expressions in a raw expression. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2016.)
⊢ 𝐶 = (mCN‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = (mVR‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = (mREx‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (mRSubst‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (freeMnd‘(𝐶 ∪ 𝑉))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑇 ∈ 𝑊 → 𝑆 = (𝑓 ∈ (𝑅 ↑pm 𝑉) ↦ (𝑒 ∈ 𝑅 ↦ (𝐺 Σg ((𝑣 ∈ (𝐶 ∪ 𝑉) ↦ if(𝑣 ∈ dom 𝑓, (𝑓‘𝑣), ⟨“𝑣”⟩)) ∘ 𝑒)))))
Theorem	mrsubfval 36095*	The substitution of some variables for expressions in a raw expression. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2016.)
⊢ 𝐶 = (mCN‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = (mVR‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = (mREx‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (mRSubst‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (freeMnd‘(𝐶 ∪ 𝑉))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴⟶𝑅 ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑉) → (𝑆‘𝐹) = (𝑒 ∈ 𝑅 ↦ (𝐺 Σg ((𝑣 ∈ (𝐶 ∪ 𝑉) ↦ if(𝑣 ∈ 𝐴, (𝐹‘𝑣), ⟨“𝑣”⟩)) ∘ 𝑒))))
Theorem	mrsubval 36096*	The substitution of some variables for expressions in a raw expression. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2016.)
⊢ 𝐶 = (mCN‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = (mVR‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = (mREx‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (mRSubst‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (freeMnd‘(𝐶 ∪ 𝑉))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴⟶𝑅 ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑅) → ((𝑆‘𝐹)‘𝑋) = (𝐺 Σg ((𝑣 ∈ (𝐶 ∪ 𝑉) ↦ if(𝑣 ∈ 𝐴, (𝐹‘𝑣), ⟨“𝑣”⟩)) ∘ 𝑋)))
Theorem	mrsubcv 36097	The value of a substituted singleton. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2016.)
⊢ 𝐶 = (mCN‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = (mVR‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = (mREx‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (mRSubst‘𝑇)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴⟶𝑅 ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ (𝐶 ∪ 𝑉)) → ((𝑆‘𝐹)‘⟨“𝑋”⟩) = if(𝑋 ∈ 𝐴, (𝐹‘𝑋), ⟨“𝑋”⟩))
Theorem	mrsubvr 36098	The value of a substituted variable. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2016.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (mVR‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = (mREx‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (mRSubst‘𝑇)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴⟶𝑅 ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) → ((𝑆‘𝐹)‘⟨“𝑋”⟩) = (𝐹‘𝑋))
Theorem	mrsubff 36099	A substitution is a function from 𝑅 to 𝑅. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2016.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (mVR‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = (mREx‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (mRSubst‘𝑇)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑇 ∈ 𝑊 → 𝑆:(𝑅 ↑pm 𝑉)⟶(𝑅 ↑m 𝑅))
Theorem	mrsubrn 36100	Although it is defined for partial mappings of variables, every partial substitution is a substitution on some complete mapping of the variables. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2016.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (mVR‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = (mREx‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (mRSubst‘𝑇)    ⇒   ⊢ ran 𝑆 = (𝑆 “ (𝑅 ↑m 𝑉))