P. 361 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 36001-36100   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Syntax	ccolin 36001	Declare the syntax for the colinearity predicate.
class Colinear
Syntax	cfs 36002	Declare the syntax for the five segment predicate.
class FiveSeg
Definition	df-colinear 36003*	The colinearity predicate states that the three points in its arguments sit on one line. Definition 4.10 of [Schwabhauser] p. 36. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 25-Oct-2013.)
⊢ Colinear = ◡{⟨⟨𝑏, 𝑐⟩, 𝑎⟩ ∣ ∃𝑛 ∈ ℕ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑛) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑛) ∧ 𝑐 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑛)) ∧ (𝑎 Btwn ⟨𝑏, 𝑐⟩ ∨ 𝑏 Btwn ⟨𝑐, 𝑎⟩ ∨ 𝑐 Btwn ⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩))}
Definition	df-ifs 36004*	The inner five segment configuration is an abbreviation for another congruence condition. See brifs 36007 and ifscgr 36008 for how it is used. Definition 4.1 of [Schwabhauser] p. 34. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 26-Sep-2013.)
⊢ InnerFiveSeg = {⟨𝑝, 𝑞⟩ ∣ ∃𝑛 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑎 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑛)∃𝑏 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑛)∃𝑐 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑛)∃𝑑 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑛)∃𝑥 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑛)∃𝑦 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑛)∃𝑧 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑛)∃𝑤 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑛)(𝑝 = ⟨⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩, ⟨𝑐, 𝑑⟩⟩ ∧ 𝑞 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, ⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩⟩ ∧ ((𝑏 Btwn ⟨𝑎, 𝑐⟩ ∧ 𝑦 Btwn ⟨𝑥, 𝑧⟩) ∧ (⟨𝑎, 𝑐⟩Cgr⟨𝑥, 𝑧⟩ ∧ ⟨𝑏, 𝑐⟩Cgr⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩) ∧ (⟨𝑎, 𝑑⟩Cgr⟨𝑥, 𝑤⟩ ∧ ⟨𝑐, 𝑑⟩Cgr⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩)))}
Definition	df-cgr3 36005*	The three place congruence predicate. This is an abbreviation for saying that all three pair in a triple are congruent with each other. Three place form of Definition 4.4 of [Schwabhauser] p. 35. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Oct-2013.)
⊢ Cgr3 = {⟨𝑝, 𝑞⟩ ∣ ∃𝑛 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑎 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑛)∃𝑏 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑛)∃𝑐 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑛)∃𝑑 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑛)∃𝑒 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑛)∃𝑓 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑛)(𝑝 = ⟨𝑎, ⟨𝑏, 𝑐⟩⟩ ∧ 𝑞 = ⟨𝑑, ⟨𝑒, 𝑓⟩⟩ ∧ (⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩Cgr⟨𝑑, 𝑒⟩ ∧ ⟨𝑎, 𝑐⟩Cgr⟨𝑑, 𝑓⟩ ∧ ⟨𝑏, 𝑐⟩Cgr⟨𝑒, 𝑓⟩))}
Definition	df-fs 36006*	The general five segment configuration is a generalization of the outer and inner five segment configurations. See brfs 36043 and fscgr 36044 for its use. Definition 4.15 of [Schwabhauser] p. 37. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Oct-2013.)
⊢ FiveSeg = {⟨𝑝, 𝑞⟩ ∣ ∃𝑛 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑎 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑛)∃𝑏 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑛)∃𝑐 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑛)∃𝑑 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑛)∃𝑥 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑛)∃𝑦 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑛)∃𝑧 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑛)∃𝑤 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑛)(𝑝 = ⟨⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩, ⟨𝑐, 𝑑⟩⟩ ∧ 𝑞 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, ⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩⟩ ∧ (𝑎 Colinear ⟨𝑏, 𝑐⟩ ∧ ⟨𝑎, ⟨𝑏, 𝑐⟩⟩Cgr3⟨𝑥, ⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩⟩ ∧ (⟨𝑎, 𝑑⟩Cgr⟨𝑥, 𝑤⟩ ∧ ⟨𝑏, 𝑑⟩Cgr⟨𝑦, 𝑤⟩)))}
Theorem	brifs 36007	Binary relation form of the inner five segment predicate. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 26-Sep-2013.)
⊢ (((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐸 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐺 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐻 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → (⟨⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩, ⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩⟩ InnerFiveSeg ⟨⟨𝐸, 𝐹⟩, ⟨𝐺, 𝐻⟩⟩ ↔ ((𝐵 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝐶⟩ ∧ 𝐹 Btwn ⟨𝐸, 𝐺⟩) ∧ (⟨𝐴, 𝐶⟩Cgr⟨𝐸, 𝐺⟩ ∧ ⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩Cgr⟨𝐹, 𝐺⟩) ∧ (⟨𝐴, 𝐷⟩Cgr⟨𝐸, 𝐻⟩ ∧ ⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩Cgr⟨𝐺, 𝐻⟩))))
Theorem	ifscgr 36008	Inner five segment congruence. Take two triangles, 𝐴𝐷𝐶 and 𝐸𝐻𝐺, with 𝐵 between 𝐴 and 𝐶 and 𝐹 between 𝐸 and 𝐺. If the other components of the triangles are congruent, then so are 𝐵𝐷 and 𝐹𝐻. Theorem 4.2 of [Schwabhauser] p. 34. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 27-Sep-2013.)
⊢ (((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐸 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐺 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐻 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → (⟨⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩, ⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩⟩ InnerFiveSeg ⟨⟨𝐸, 𝐹⟩, ⟨𝐺, 𝐻⟩⟩ → ⟨𝐵, 𝐷⟩Cgr⟨𝐹, 𝐻⟩))
Theorem	cgrsub 36009	Removing identical parts from the end of a line segment preserves congruence. Theorem 4.3 of [Schwabhauser] p. 35. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Oct-2013.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐸 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → (((𝐵 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝐶⟩ ∧ 𝐸 Btwn ⟨𝐷, 𝐹⟩) ∧ (⟨𝐴, 𝐶⟩Cgr⟨𝐷, 𝐹⟩ ∧ ⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩Cgr⟨𝐸, 𝐹⟩)) → ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩Cgr⟨𝐷, 𝐸⟩))
Theorem	brcgr3 36010	Binary relation form of the three-place congruence predicate. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Oct-2013.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐸 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → (⟨𝐴, ⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩⟩Cgr3⟨𝐷, ⟨𝐸, 𝐹⟩⟩ ↔ (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩Cgr⟨𝐷, 𝐸⟩ ∧ ⟨𝐴, 𝐶⟩Cgr⟨𝐷, 𝐹⟩ ∧ ⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩Cgr⟨𝐸, 𝐹⟩)))
Theorem	cgr3permute3 36011	Permutation law for three-place congruence. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Oct-2013.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐸 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → (⟨𝐴, ⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩⟩Cgr3⟨𝐷, ⟨𝐸, 𝐹⟩⟩ ↔ ⟨𝐵, ⟨𝐶, 𝐴⟩⟩Cgr3⟨𝐸, ⟨𝐹, 𝐷⟩⟩))
Theorem	cgr3permute1 36012	Permutation law for three-place congruence. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Oct-2013.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐸 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → (⟨𝐴, ⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩⟩Cgr3⟨𝐷, ⟨𝐸, 𝐹⟩⟩ ↔ ⟨𝐴, ⟨𝐶, 𝐵⟩⟩Cgr3⟨𝐷, ⟨𝐹, 𝐸⟩⟩))
Theorem	cgr3permute2 36013	Permutation law for three-place congruence. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Oct-2013.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐸 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → (⟨𝐴, ⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩⟩Cgr3⟨𝐷, ⟨𝐸, 𝐹⟩⟩ ↔ ⟨𝐵, ⟨𝐴, 𝐶⟩⟩Cgr3⟨𝐸, ⟨𝐷, 𝐹⟩⟩))
Theorem	cgr3permute4 36014	Permutation law for three-place congruence. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Oct-2013.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐸 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → (⟨𝐴, ⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩⟩Cgr3⟨𝐷, ⟨𝐸, 𝐹⟩⟩ ↔ ⟨𝐶, ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩⟩Cgr3⟨𝐹, ⟨𝐷, 𝐸⟩⟩))
Theorem	cgr3permute5 36015	Permutation law for three-place congruence. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Oct-2013.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐸 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → (⟨𝐴, ⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩⟩Cgr3⟨𝐷, ⟨𝐸, 𝐹⟩⟩ ↔ ⟨𝐶, ⟨𝐵, 𝐴⟩⟩Cgr3⟨𝐹, ⟨𝐸, 𝐷⟩⟩))
Theorem	cgr3tr4 36016	Transitivity law for three-place congruence. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Oct-2013.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ ((𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐸 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐺 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐻 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐼 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)))) → ((⟨𝐴, ⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩⟩Cgr3⟨𝐷, ⟨𝐸, 𝐹⟩⟩ ∧ ⟨𝐴, ⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩⟩Cgr3⟨𝐺, ⟨𝐻, 𝐼⟩⟩) → ⟨𝐷, ⟨𝐸, 𝐹⟩⟩Cgr3⟨𝐺, ⟨𝐻, 𝐼⟩⟩))
Theorem	cgr3com 36017	Commutativity law for three-place congruence. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Oct-2013.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐸 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → (⟨𝐴, ⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩⟩Cgr3⟨𝐷, ⟨𝐸, 𝐹⟩⟩ ↔ ⟨𝐷, ⟨𝐸, 𝐹⟩⟩Cgr3⟨𝐴, ⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩⟩))
Theorem	cgr3rflx 36018	Identity law for three-place congruence. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 6-Oct-2013.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → ⟨𝐴, ⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩⟩Cgr3⟨𝐴, ⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩⟩)
Theorem	cgrxfr 36019*	A line segment can be divided at the same place as a congruent line segment is divided. Theorem 4.5 of [Schwabhauser] p. 35. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Oct-2013.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → ((𝐵 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝐶⟩ ∧ ⟨𝐴, 𝐶⟩Cgr⟨𝐷, 𝐹⟩) → ∃𝑒 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)(𝑒 Btwn ⟨𝐷, 𝐹⟩ ∧ ⟨𝐴, ⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩⟩Cgr3⟨𝐷, ⟨𝑒, 𝐹⟩⟩)))
Theorem	btwnxfr 36020	A condition for extending betweenness to a new set of points based on congruence with another set of points. Theorem 4.6 of [Schwabhauser] p. 36. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Oct-2013.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐸 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → ((𝐵 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝐶⟩ ∧ ⟨𝐴, ⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩⟩Cgr3⟨𝐷, ⟨𝐸, 𝐹⟩⟩) → 𝐸 Btwn ⟨𝐷, 𝐹⟩))
Theorem	colinrel 36021	Colinearity is a relationship. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 7-Nov-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.)
⊢ Rel Colinear
Theorem	brcolinear2 36022*	Alternate colinearity binary relation. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 7-Nov-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.)
⊢ ((𝑄 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝑃 Colinear ⟨𝑄, 𝑅⟩ ↔ ∃𝑛 ∈ ℕ ((𝑃 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑛) ∧ 𝑄 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑛) ∧ 𝑅 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑛)) ∧ (𝑃 Btwn ⟨𝑄, 𝑅⟩ ∨ 𝑄 Btwn ⟨𝑅, 𝑃⟩ ∨ 𝑅 Btwn ⟨𝑃, 𝑄⟩))))
Theorem	brcolinear 36023	The binary relation form of the colinearity predicate. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Oct-2013.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → (𝐴 Colinear ⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩ ↔ (𝐴 Btwn ⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩ ∨ 𝐵 Btwn ⟨𝐶, 𝐴⟩ ∨ 𝐶 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩)))
Theorem	colinearex 36024	The colinear predicate exists. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 25-Oct-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.)
⊢ Colinear ∈ V
Theorem	colineardim1 36025	If 𝐴 is colinear with 𝐵 and 𝐶, then 𝐴 is in the same space as 𝐵. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 25-Oct-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑊)) → (𝐴 Colinear ⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩ → 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)))
Theorem	colinearperm1 36026	Permutation law for colinearity. Part of theorem 4.11 of [Schwabhauser] p. 36. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Oct-2013.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → (𝐴 Colinear ⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩ ↔ 𝐴 Colinear ⟨𝐶, 𝐵⟩))
Theorem	colinearperm3 36027	Permutation law for colinearity. Part of theorem 4.11 of [Schwabhauser] p. 36. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Oct-2013.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → (𝐴 Colinear ⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩ ↔ 𝐵 Colinear ⟨𝐶, 𝐴⟩))
Theorem	colinearperm2 36028	Permutation law for colinearity. Part of theorem 4.11 of [Schwabhauser] p. 36. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Oct-2013.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → (𝐴 Colinear ⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩ ↔ 𝐵 Colinear ⟨𝐴, 𝐶⟩))
Theorem	colinearperm4 36029	Permutation law for colinearity. Part of theorem 4.11 of [Schwabhauser] p. 36. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Oct-2013.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → (𝐴 Colinear ⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩ ↔ 𝐶 Colinear ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩))
Theorem	colinearperm5 36030	Permutation law for colinearity. Part of theorem 4.11 of [Schwabhauser] p. 36. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Oct-2013.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → (𝐴 Colinear ⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩ ↔ 𝐶 Colinear ⟨𝐵, 𝐴⟩))
Theorem	colineartriv1 36031	Trivial case of colinearity. Theorem 4.12 of [Schwabhauser] p. 37. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Oct-2013.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) → 𝐴 Colinear ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩)
Theorem	colineartriv2 36032	Trivial case of colinearity. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 18-Oct-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) → 𝐴 Colinear ⟨𝐵, 𝐵⟩)
Theorem	btwncolinear1 36033	Betweenness implies colinearity. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 7-Oct-2013.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → (𝐶 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ → 𝐴 Colinear ⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩))
Theorem	btwncolinear2 36034	Betweenness implies colinearity. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 15-Oct-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → (𝐶 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ → 𝐴 Colinear ⟨𝐶, 𝐵⟩))
Theorem	btwncolinear3 36035	Betweenness implies colinearity. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 15-Oct-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → (𝐶 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ → 𝐵 Colinear ⟨𝐴, 𝐶⟩))
Theorem	btwncolinear4 36036	Betweenness implies colinearity. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 15-Oct-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → (𝐶 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ → 𝐵 Colinear ⟨𝐶, 𝐴⟩))
Theorem	btwncolinear5 36037	Betweenness implies colinearity. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 15-Oct-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → (𝐶 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ → 𝐶 Colinear ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩))
Theorem	btwncolinear6 36038	Betweenness implies colinearity. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 15-Oct-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → (𝐶 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ → 𝐶 Colinear ⟨𝐵, 𝐴⟩))
Theorem	colinearxfr 36039	Transfer law for colinearity. Theorem 4.13 of [Schwabhauser] p. 37. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Oct-2013.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐸 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → ((𝐵 Colinear ⟨𝐴, 𝐶⟩ ∧ ⟨𝐴, ⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩⟩Cgr3⟨𝐷, ⟨𝐸, 𝐹⟩⟩) → 𝐸 Colinear ⟨𝐷, 𝐹⟩))
Theorem	lineext 36040*	Extend a line with a missing point. Theorem 4.14 of [Schwabhauser] p. 37. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 6-Oct-2013.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐸 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → ((𝐴 Colinear ⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩ ∧ ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩Cgr⟨𝐷, 𝐸⟩) → ∃𝑓 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)⟨𝐴, ⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩⟩Cgr3⟨𝐷, ⟨𝐸, 𝑓⟩⟩))
Theorem	brofs2 36041	Change some conditions for outer five segment predicate. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 6-Oct-2013.)
⊢ (((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐸 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐺 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐻 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → (⟨⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩, ⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩⟩ OuterFiveSeg ⟨⟨𝐸, 𝐹⟩, ⟨𝐺, 𝐻⟩⟩ ↔ (𝐵 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝐶⟩ ∧ ⟨𝐴, ⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩⟩Cgr3⟨𝐸, ⟨𝐹, 𝐺⟩⟩ ∧ (⟨𝐴, 𝐷⟩Cgr⟨𝐸, 𝐻⟩ ∧ ⟨𝐵, 𝐷⟩Cgr⟨𝐹, 𝐻⟩))))
Theorem	brifs2 36042	Change some conditions for inner five segment predicate. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 6-Oct-2013.)
⊢ (((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐸 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐺 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐻 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → (⟨⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩, ⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩⟩ InnerFiveSeg ⟨⟨𝐸, 𝐹⟩, ⟨𝐺, 𝐻⟩⟩ ↔ (𝐵 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝐶⟩ ∧ ⟨𝐴, ⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩⟩Cgr3⟨𝐸, ⟨𝐹, 𝐺⟩⟩ ∧ (⟨𝐴, 𝐷⟩Cgr⟨𝐸, 𝐻⟩ ∧ ⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩Cgr⟨𝐺, 𝐻⟩))))
Theorem	brfs 36043	Binary relation form of the general five segment predicate. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Oct-2013.)
⊢ (((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐸 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐺 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐻 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → (⟨⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩, ⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩⟩ FiveSeg ⟨⟨𝐸, 𝐹⟩, ⟨𝐺, 𝐻⟩⟩ ↔ (𝐴 Colinear ⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩ ∧ ⟨𝐴, ⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩⟩Cgr3⟨𝐸, ⟨𝐹, 𝐺⟩⟩ ∧ (⟨𝐴, 𝐷⟩Cgr⟨𝐸, 𝐻⟩ ∧ ⟨𝐵, 𝐷⟩Cgr⟨𝐹, 𝐻⟩))))
Theorem	fscgr 36044	Congruence law for the general five segment configuration. Theorem 4.16 of [Schwabhauser] p. 37. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Oct-2013.)
⊢ (((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐸 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐺 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐻 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → ((⟨⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩, ⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩⟩ FiveSeg ⟨⟨𝐸, 𝐹⟩, ⟨𝐺, 𝐻⟩⟩ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) → ⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩Cgr⟨𝐺, 𝐻⟩))
Theorem	linecgr 36045	Congruence rule for lines. Theorem 4.17 of [Schwabhauser] p. 37. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 6-Oct-2013.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑄 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → (((𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 Colinear ⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩) ∧ (⟨𝐴, 𝑃⟩Cgr⟨𝐴, 𝑄⟩ ∧ ⟨𝐵, 𝑃⟩Cgr⟨𝐵, 𝑄⟩)) → ⟨𝐶, 𝑃⟩Cgr⟨𝐶, 𝑄⟩))
Theorem	linecgrand 36046	Deduction form of linecgr 36045. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 14-Oct-2013.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝐴 Colinear ⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → ⟨𝐴, 𝑃⟩Cgr⟨𝐴, 𝑄⟩)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → ⟨𝐵, 𝑃⟩Cgr⟨𝐵, 𝑄⟩)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → ⟨𝐶, 𝑃⟩Cgr⟨𝐶, 𝑄⟩)
Theorem	lineid 36047	Identity law for points on lines. Theorem 4.18 of [Schwabhauser] p. 38. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 7-Oct-2013.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → (((𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 Colinear ⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩) ∧ (⟨𝐴, 𝐶⟩Cgr⟨𝐴, 𝐷⟩ ∧ ⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩Cgr⟨𝐵, 𝐷⟩)) → 𝐶 = 𝐷))
Theorem	idinside 36048	Law for finding a point inside a segment. Theorem 4.19 of [Schwabhauser] p. 38. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 7-Oct-2013.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → ((𝐶 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∧ ⟨𝐴, 𝐶⟩Cgr⟨𝐴, 𝐷⟩ ∧ ⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩Cgr⟨𝐵, 𝐷⟩) → 𝐶 = 𝐷))
Theorem	endofsegid 36049	If 𝐴, 𝐵, and 𝐶 fall in order on a line, and 𝐴𝐵 and 𝐴𝐶 are congruent, then 𝐶 = 𝐵. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 7-Oct-2013.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → ((𝐵 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝐶⟩ ∧ ⟨𝐴, 𝐶⟩Cgr⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩) → 𝐶 = 𝐵))
Theorem	endofsegidand 36050	Deduction form of endofsegid 36049. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 15-Oct-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝐶 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩Cgr⟨𝐴, 𝐶⟩)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝐵 = 𝐶)
21.11.18.5  Connectivity of betweenness
Theorem	btwnconn1lem1 36051	Lemma for btwnconn1 36065. The next several lemmas introduce various properties of hypothetical points that end up eliminating alternatives to connectivity. We begin by showing a congruence property of those hypothetical points. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 8-Oct-2013.)
⊢ ((((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑐 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝑑 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑋 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) ∧ (((𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶) ∧ (𝐵 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝐶⟩ ∧ 𝐵 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝐷⟩)) ∧ ((𝐷 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝑐⟩ ∧ ⟨𝐷, 𝑐⟩Cgr⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩) ∧ (𝐶 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝑑⟩ ∧ ⟨𝐶, 𝑑⟩Cgr⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩)) ∧ ((𝑐 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝑏⟩ ∧ ⟨𝑐, 𝑏⟩Cgr⟨𝐶, 𝐵⟩) ∧ (𝑑 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝑋⟩ ∧ ⟨𝑑, 𝑋⟩Cgr⟨𝐷, 𝐵⟩)))) → ⟨𝐵, 𝑐⟩Cgr⟨𝑋, 𝐶⟩)
Theorem	btwnconn1lem2 36052	Lemma for btwnconn1 36065. Now, we show that two of the hypotheticals we introduced in the first lemma are identical. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 8-Oct-2013.)
⊢ ((((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑐 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝑑 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑋 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) ∧ (((𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶) ∧ (𝐵 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝐶⟩ ∧ 𝐵 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝐷⟩)) ∧ ((𝐷 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝑐⟩ ∧ ⟨𝐷, 𝑐⟩Cgr⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩) ∧ (𝐶 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝑑⟩ ∧ ⟨𝐶, 𝑑⟩Cgr⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩)) ∧ ((𝑐 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝑏⟩ ∧ ⟨𝑐, 𝑏⟩Cgr⟨𝐶, 𝐵⟩) ∧ (𝑑 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝑋⟩ ∧ ⟨𝑑, 𝑋⟩Cgr⟨𝐷, 𝐵⟩)))) → 𝑋 = 𝑏)
Theorem	btwnconn1lem3 36053	Lemma for btwnconn1 36065. Establish the next congruence in the series. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 8-Oct-2013.)
⊢ ((((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑐 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝑑 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) ∧ (((𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶) ∧ (𝐵 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝐶⟩ ∧ 𝐵 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝐷⟩)) ∧ ((𝐷 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝑐⟩ ∧ ⟨𝐷, 𝑐⟩Cgr⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩) ∧ (𝐶 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝑑⟩ ∧ ⟨𝐶, 𝑑⟩Cgr⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩)) ∧ ((𝑐 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝑏⟩ ∧ ⟨𝑐, 𝑏⟩Cgr⟨𝐶, 𝐵⟩) ∧ (𝑑 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝑏⟩ ∧ ⟨𝑑, 𝑏⟩Cgr⟨𝐷, 𝐵⟩)))) → ⟨𝐵, 𝑑⟩Cgr⟨𝑏, 𝐷⟩)
Theorem	btwnconn1lem4 36054	Lemma for btwnconn1 36065. Assuming 𝐶 ≠ 𝑐, we now attempt to force 𝐷 = 𝑑 from here out via a series of congruences. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 8-Oct-2013.)
⊢ ((((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑐 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝑑 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) ∧ (((𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐶 ≠ 𝑐) ∧ (𝐵 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝐶⟩ ∧ 𝐵 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝐷⟩)) ∧ ((𝐷 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝑐⟩ ∧ ⟨𝐷, 𝑐⟩Cgr⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩) ∧ (𝐶 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝑑⟩ ∧ ⟨𝐶, 𝑑⟩Cgr⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩)) ∧ ((𝑐 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝑏⟩ ∧ ⟨𝑐, 𝑏⟩Cgr⟨𝐶, 𝐵⟩) ∧ (𝑑 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝑏⟩ ∧ ⟨𝑑, 𝑏⟩Cgr⟨𝐷, 𝐵⟩)))) → ⟨𝑑, 𝑐⟩Cgr⟨𝐷, 𝐶⟩)
Theorem	btwnconn1lem5 36055	Lemma for btwnconn1 36065. Now, we introduce 𝐸, the intersection of 𝐶𝑐 and 𝐷𝑑. We begin by showing that it is the midpoint of 𝐶 and 𝑐. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 8-Oct-2013.)
⊢ ((((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑐 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝑑 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐸 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) ∧ ((((𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐶 ≠ 𝑐) ∧ (𝐵 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝐶⟩ ∧ 𝐵 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝐷⟩)) ∧ ((𝐷 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝑐⟩ ∧ ⟨𝐷, 𝑐⟩Cgr⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩) ∧ (𝐶 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝑑⟩ ∧ ⟨𝐶, 𝑑⟩Cgr⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩)) ∧ ((𝑐 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝑏⟩ ∧ ⟨𝑐, 𝑏⟩Cgr⟨𝐶, 𝐵⟩) ∧ (𝑑 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝑏⟩ ∧ ⟨𝑑, 𝑏⟩Cgr⟨𝐷, 𝐵⟩))) ∧ (𝐸 Btwn ⟨𝐶, 𝑐⟩ ∧ 𝐸 Btwn ⟨𝐷, 𝑑⟩))) → ⟨𝐸, 𝐶⟩Cgr⟨𝐸, 𝑐⟩)
Theorem	btwnconn1lem6 36056	Lemma for btwnconn1 36065. Next, we show that 𝐸 is the midpoint of 𝐷 and 𝑑. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 8-Oct-2013.)
⊢ ((((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑐 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝑑 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐸 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) ∧ ((((𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐶 ≠ 𝑐) ∧ (𝐵 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝐶⟩ ∧ 𝐵 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝐷⟩)) ∧ ((𝐷 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝑐⟩ ∧ ⟨𝐷, 𝑐⟩Cgr⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩) ∧ (𝐶 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝑑⟩ ∧ ⟨𝐶, 𝑑⟩Cgr⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩)) ∧ ((𝑐 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝑏⟩ ∧ ⟨𝑐, 𝑏⟩Cgr⟨𝐶, 𝐵⟩) ∧ (𝑑 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝑏⟩ ∧ ⟨𝑑, 𝑏⟩Cgr⟨𝐷, 𝐵⟩))) ∧ (𝐸 Btwn ⟨𝐶, 𝑐⟩ ∧ 𝐸 Btwn ⟨𝐷, 𝑑⟩))) → ⟨𝐸, 𝐷⟩Cgr⟨𝐸, 𝑑⟩)
Theorem	btwnconn1lem7 36057	Lemma for btwnconn1 36065. Under our assumptions, 𝐶 and 𝑑 are distinct. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 8-Oct-2013.)
⊢ ((((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑐 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝑑 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐸 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) ∧ ((((𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐶 ≠ 𝑐) ∧ (𝐵 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝐶⟩ ∧ 𝐵 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝐷⟩)) ∧ ((𝐷 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝑐⟩ ∧ ⟨𝐷, 𝑐⟩Cgr⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩) ∧ (𝐶 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝑑⟩ ∧ ⟨𝐶, 𝑑⟩Cgr⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩)) ∧ ((𝑐 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝑏⟩ ∧ ⟨𝑐, 𝑏⟩Cgr⟨𝐶, 𝐵⟩) ∧ (𝑑 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝑏⟩ ∧ ⟨𝑑, 𝑏⟩Cgr⟨𝐷, 𝐵⟩))) ∧ (𝐸 Btwn ⟨𝐶, 𝑐⟩ ∧ 𝐸 Btwn ⟨𝐷, 𝑑⟩))) → 𝐶 ≠ 𝑑)
Theorem	btwnconn1lem8 36058	Lemma for btwnconn1 36065. Now, we introduce the last three points used in the construction: 𝑃, 𝑄, and 𝑅 will turn out to be equal further down, and will provide us with the key to the final statement. We begin by establishing congruence of 𝑅𝑃 and 𝐸𝑑. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 8-Oct-2013.)
⊢ ((((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ ((𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑐 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝑑 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐸 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑄 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑅 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) ∧ ((((𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐶 ≠ 𝑐) ∧ (𝐵 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝐶⟩ ∧ 𝐵 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝐷⟩)) ∧ ((𝐷 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝑐⟩ ∧ ⟨𝐷, 𝑐⟩Cgr⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩) ∧ (𝐶 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝑑⟩ ∧ ⟨𝐶, 𝑑⟩Cgr⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩)) ∧ ((𝑐 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝑏⟩ ∧ ⟨𝑐, 𝑏⟩Cgr⟨𝐶, 𝐵⟩) ∧ (𝑑 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝑏⟩ ∧ ⟨𝑑, 𝑏⟩Cgr⟨𝐷, 𝐵⟩))) ∧ ((𝐸 Btwn ⟨𝐶, 𝑐⟩ ∧ 𝐸 Btwn ⟨𝐷, 𝑑⟩) ∧ ((𝐶 Btwn ⟨𝑐, 𝑃⟩ ∧ ⟨𝐶, 𝑃⟩Cgr⟨𝐶, 𝑑⟩) ∧ (𝐶 Btwn ⟨𝑑, 𝑅⟩ ∧ ⟨𝐶, 𝑅⟩Cgr⟨𝐶, 𝐸⟩) ∧ (𝑅 Btwn ⟨𝑃, 𝑄⟩ ∧ ⟨𝑅, 𝑄⟩Cgr⟨𝑅, 𝑃⟩))))) → ⟨𝑅, 𝑃⟩Cgr⟨𝐸, 𝑑⟩)
Theorem	btwnconn1lem9 36059	Lemma for btwnconn1 36065. Now, a quick use of transitivity to establish congruence on 𝑅𝑄 and 𝐸𝐷. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 8-Oct-2013.)
⊢ ((((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ ((𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑐 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝑑 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐸 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑄 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑅 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) ∧ ((((𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐶 ≠ 𝑐) ∧ (𝐵 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝐶⟩ ∧ 𝐵 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝐷⟩)) ∧ ((𝐷 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝑐⟩ ∧ ⟨𝐷, 𝑐⟩Cgr⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩) ∧ (𝐶 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝑑⟩ ∧ ⟨𝐶, 𝑑⟩Cgr⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩)) ∧ ((𝑐 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝑏⟩ ∧ ⟨𝑐, 𝑏⟩Cgr⟨𝐶, 𝐵⟩) ∧ (𝑑 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝑏⟩ ∧ ⟨𝑑, 𝑏⟩Cgr⟨𝐷, 𝐵⟩))) ∧ ((𝐸 Btwn ⟨𝐶, 𝑐⟩ ∧ 𝐸 Btwn ⟨𝐷, 𝑑⟩) ∧ ((𝐶 Btwn ⟨𝑐, 𝑃⟩ ∧ ⟨𝐶, 𝑃⟩Cgr⟨𝐶, 𝑑⟩) ∧ (𝐶 Btwn ⟨𝑑, 𝑅⟩ ∧ ⟨𝐶, 𝑅⟩Cgr⟨𝐶, 𝐸⟩) ∧ (𝑅 Btwn ⟨𝑃, 𝑄⟩ ∧ ⟨𝑅, 𝑄⟩Cgr⟨𝑅, 𝑃⟩))))) → ⟨𝑅, 𝑄⟩Cgr⟨𝐸, 𝐷⟩)
Theorem	btwnconn1lem10 36060	Lemma for btwnconn1 36065. Now we establish a congruence that will give us 𝐷 = 𝑑 when we compute 𝑃 = 𝑄 later on. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 8-Oct-2013.)
⊢ ((((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ ((𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑐 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝑑 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐸 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑄 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑅 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) ∧ ((((𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐶 ≠ 𝑐) ∧ (𝐵 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝐶⟩ ∧ 𝐵 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝐷⟩)) ∧ ((𝐷 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝑐⟩ ∧ ⟨𝐷, 𝑐⟩Cgr⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩) ∧ (𝐶 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝑑⟩ ∧ ⟨𝐶, 𝑑⟩Cgr⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩)) ∧ ((𝑐 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝑏⟩ ∧ ⟨𝑐, 𝑏⟩Cgr⟨𝐶, 𝐵⟩) ∧ (𝑑 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝑏⟩ ∧ ⟨𝑑, 𝑏⟩Cgr⟨𝐷, 𝐵⟩))) ∧ ((𝐸 Btwn ⟨𝐶, 𝑐⟩ ∧ 𝐸 Btwn ⟨𝐷, 𝑑⟩) ∧ ((𝐶 Btwn ⟨𝑐, 𝑃⟩ ∧ ⟨𝐶, 𝑃⟩Cgr⟨𝐶, 𝑑⟩) ∧ (𝐶 Btwn ⟨𝑑, 𝑅⟩ ∧ ⟨𝐶, 𝑅⟩Cgr⟨𝐶, 𝐸⟩) ∧ (𝑅 Btwn ⟨𝑃, 𝑄⟩ ∧ ⟨𝑅, 𝑄⟩Cgr⟨𝑅, 𝑃⟩))))) → ⟨𝑑, 𝐷⟩Cgr⟨𝑃, 𝑄⟩)
Theorem	btwnconn1lem11 36061	Lemma for btwnconn1 36065. Now, we establish that 𝐷 and 𝑄 are equidistant from 𝐶. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 8-Oct-2013.)
⊢ ((((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ ((𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑐 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝑑 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐸 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑄 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑅 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) ∧ ((((𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐶 ≠ 𝑐) ∧ (𝐵 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝐶⟩ ∧ 𝐵 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝐷⟩)) ∧ ((𝐷 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝑐⟩ ∧ ⟨𝐷, 𝑐⟩Cgr⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩) ∧ (𝐶 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝑑⟩ ∧ ⟨𝐶, 𝑑⟩Cgr⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩)) ∧ ((𝑐 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝑏⟩ ∧ ⟨𝑐, 𝑏⟩Cgr⟨𝐶, 𝐵⟩) ∧ (𝑑 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝑏⟩ ∧ ⟨𝑑, 𝑏⟩Cgr⟨𝐷, 𝐵⟩))) ∧ ((𝐸 Btwn ⟨𝐶, 𝑐⟩ ∧ 𝐸 Btwn ⟨𝐷, 𝑑⟩) ∧ ((𝐶 Btwn ⟨𝑐, 𝑃⟩ ∧ ⟨𝐶, 𝑃⟩Cgr⟨𝐶, 𝑑⟩) ∧ (𝐶 Btwn ⟨𝑑, 𝑅⟩ ∧ ⟨𝐶, 𝑅⟩Cgr⟨𝐶, 𝐸⟩) ∧ (𝑅 Btwn ⟨𝑃, 𝑄⟩ ∧ ⟨𝑅, 𝑄⟩Cgr⟨𝑅, 𝑃⟩))))) → ⟨𝐷, 𝐶⟩Cgr⟨𝑄, 𝐶⟩)
Theorem	btwnconn1lem12 36062	Lemma for btwnconn1 36065. Using a long string of invocations of linecgr 36045, we show that 𝐷 = 𝑑. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 9-Oct-2013.)
⊢ ((((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ ((𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑐 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝑑 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐸 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑄 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑅 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) ∧ ((((𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐶 ≠ 𝑐) ∧ (𝐵 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝐶⟩ ∧ 𝐵 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝐷⟩)) ∧ ((𝐷 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝑐⟩ ∧ ⟨𝐷, 𝑐⟩Cgr⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩) ∧ (𝐶 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝑑⟩ ∧ ⟨𝐶, 𝑑⟩Cgr⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩)) ∧ ((𝑐 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝑏⟩ ∧ ⟨𝑐, 𝑏⟩Cgr⟨𝐶, 𝐵⟩) ∧ (𝑑 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝑏⟩ ∧ ⟨𝑑, 𝑏⟩Cgr⟨𝐷, 𝐵⟩))) ∧ ((𝐸 Btwn ⟨𝐶, 𝑐⟩ ∧ 𝐸 Btwn ⟨𝐷, 𝑑⟩) ∧ ((𝐶 Btwn ⟨𝑐, 𝑃⟩ ∧ ⟨𝐶, 𝑃⟩Cgr⟨𝐶, 𝑑⟩) ∧ (𝐶 Btwn ⟨𝑑, 𝑅⟩ ∧ ⟨𝐶, 𝑅⟩Cgr⟨𝐶, 𝐸⟩) ∧ (𝑅 Btwn ⟨𝑃, 𝑄⟩ ∧ ⟨𝑅, 𝑄⟩Cgr⟨𝑅, 𝑃⟩))))) → 𝐷 = 𝑑)
Theorem	btwnconn1lem13 36063	Lemma for btwnconn1 36065. Begin back-filling and eliminating hypotheses. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 9-Oct-2013.)
⊢ ((((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ ((𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑐 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝑑 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)))) ∧ (((𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶) ∧ (𝐵 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝐶⟩ ∧ 𝐵 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝐷⟩)) ∧ ((𝐷 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝑐⟩ ∧ ⟨𝐷, 𝑐⟩Cgr⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩) ∧ (𝐶 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝑑⟩ ∧ ⟨𝐶, 𝑑⟩Cgr⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩)) ∧ ((𝑐 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝑏⟩ ∧ ⟨𝑐, 𝑏⟩Cgr⟨𝐶, 𝐵⟩) ∧ (𝑑 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝑏⟩ ∧ ⟨𝑑, 𝑏⟩Cgr⟨𝐷, 𝐵⟩)))) → (𝐶 = 𝑐 ∨ 𝐷 = 𝑑))
Theorem	btwnconn1lem14 36064	Lemma for btwnconn1 36065. Final statement of the theorem when 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 9-Oct-2013.)
⊢ (((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) ∧ ((𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶) ∧ (𝐵 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝐶⟩ ∧ 𝐵 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝐷⟩))) → (𝐶 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝐷⟩ ∨ 𝐷 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝐶⟩))
Theorem	btwnconn1 36065	Connectitivy law for betweenness. Theorem 5.1 of [Schwabhauser] p. 39-41. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 9-Oct-2013.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → ((𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝐶⟩ ∧ 𝐵 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝐷⟩) → (𝐶 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝐷⟩ ∨ 𝐷 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝐶⟩)))
Theorem	btwnconn2 36066	Another connectivity law for betweenness. Theorem 5.2 of [Schwabhauser] p. 41. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 9-Oct-2013.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → ((𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝐶⟩ ∧ 𝐵 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝐷⟩) → (𝐶 Btwn ⟨𝐵, 𝐷⟩ ∨ 𝐷 Btwn ⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩)))
Theorem	btwnconn3 36067	Inner connectivity law for betweenness. Theorem 5.3 of [Schwabhauser] p. 41. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 9-Oct-2013.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → ((𝐵 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝐷⟩ ∧ 𝐶 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝐷⟩) → (𝐵 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝐶⟩ ∨ 𝐶 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩)))
Theorem	midofsegid 36068	If two points fall in the same place in the middle of a segment, then they are identical. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 16-Oct-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐸 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → ((𝐷 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∧ 𝐸 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∧ ⟨𝐴, 𝐷⟩Cgr⟨𝐴, 𝐸⟩) → 𝐷 = 𝐸))
Theorem	segcon2 36069*	Generalization of axsegcon 28960. This time, we generate an endpoint for a segment on the ray 𝑄𝐴 congruent to 𝐵𝐶 and starting at 𝑄, as opposed to axsegcon 28960, where the segment starts at 𝐴 (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 14-Oct-2013.) Remove unneeded inequality. (Revised by Scott Fenton, 15-Oct-2013.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝑄 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → ∃𝑥 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)((𝐴 Btwn ⟨𝑄, 𝑥⟩ ∨ 𝑥 Btwn ⟨𝑄, 𝐴⟩) ∧ ⟨𝑄, 𝑥⟩Cgr⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩))
21.11.18.6  Segment less than or equal to
Syntax	csegle 36070	Declare the constant for the segment less than or equal to relationship.
class Seg≤
Definition	df-segle 36071*	Define the segment length comparison relationship. This relationship expresses that the segment 𝐴𝐵 is no longer than 𝐶𝐷. In this section, we establish various properties of this relationship showing that it is a transitive, reflexive relationship on pairs of points that is substitutive under congruence. Definition 5.4 of [Schwabhauser] p. 41. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 11-Oct-2013.)
⊢ Seg≤ = {⟨𝑝, 𝑞⟩ ∣ ∃𝑛 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑎 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑛)∃𝑏 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑛)∃𝑐 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑛)∃𝑑 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑛)(𝑝 = ⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∧ 𝑞 = ⟨𝑐, 𝑑⟩ ∧ ∃𝑦 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑛)(𝑦 Btwn ⟨𝑐, 𝑑⟩ ∧ ⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩Cgr⟨𝑐, 𝑦⟩))}
Theorem	brsegle 36072*	Binary relation form of the segment comparison relationship. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 11-Oct-2013.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ Seg≤ ⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩ ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)(𝑦 Btwn ⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩ ∧ ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩Cgr⟨𝐶, 𝑦⟩)))
Theorem	brsegle2 36073*	Alternate characterization of segment comparison. Theorem 5.5 of [Schwabhauser] p. 41-42. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 11-Oct-2013.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ Seg≤ ⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩ ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)(𝐵 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝑥⟩ ∧ ⟨𝐴, 𝑥⟩Cgr⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩)))
Theorem	seglecgr12im 36074	Substitution law for segment comparison under congruence. Theorem 5.6 of [Schwabhauser] p. 42. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 11-Oct-2013.)
⊢ (((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐸 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐺 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐻 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → ((⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩Cgr⟨𝐸, 𝐹⟩ ∧ ⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩Cgr⟨𝐺, 𝐻⟩ ∧ ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ Seg≤ ⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩) → ⟨𝐸, 𝐹⟩ Seg≤ ⟨𝐺, 𝐻⟩))
Theorem	seglecgr12 36075	Substitution law for segment comparison under congruence. Biconditional version. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 15-Oct-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.)
⊢ (((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐸 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐺 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐻 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → ((⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩Cgr⟨𝐸, 𝐹⟩ ∧ ⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩Cgr⟨𝐺, 𝐻⟩) → (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ Seg≤ ⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩ ↔ ⟨𝐸, 𝐹⟩ Seg≤ ⟨𝐺, 𝐻⟩)))
Theorem	seglerflx 36076	Segment comparison is reflexive. Theorem 5.7 of [Schwabhauser] p. 42. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 11-Oct-2013.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) → ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ Seg≤ ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩)
Theorem	seglemin 36077	Any segment is at least as long as a degenerate segment. Theorem 5.11 of [Schwabhauser] p. 42. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 11-Oct-2013.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → ⟨𝐴, 𝐴⟩ Seg≤ ⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩)
Theorem	segletr 36078	Segment less than is transitive. Theorem 5.8 of [Schwabhauser] p. 42. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 11-Oct-2013.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐸 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → ((⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ Seg≤ ⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩ ∧ ⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩ Seg≤ ⟨𝐸, 𝐹⟩) → ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ Seg≤ ⟨𝐸, 𝐹⟩))
Theorem	segleantisym 36079	Antisymmetry law for segment comparison. Theorem 5.9 of [Schwabhauser] p. 42. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 14-Oct-2013.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → ((⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ Seg≤ ⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩ ∧ ⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩ Seg≤ ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩) → ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩Cgr⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩))
Theorem	seglelin 36080	Linearity law for segment comparison. Theorem 5.10 of [Schwabhauser] p. 42. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 14-Oct-2013.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ Seg≤ ⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩ ∨ ⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩ Seg≤ ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩))
Theorem	btwnsegle 36081	If 𝐵 falls between 𝐴 and 𝐶, then 𝐴𝐵 is no longer than 𝐴𝐶. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 16-Oct-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → (𝐵 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝐶⟩ → ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ Seg≤ ⟨𝐴, 𝐶⟩))
Theorem	colinbtwnle 36082	Given three colinear points 𝐴, 𝐵, and 𝐶, 𝐵 falls in the middle iff the two segments to 𝐵 are no longer than 𝐴𝐶. Theorem 5.12 of [Schwabhauser] p. 42. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 15-Oct-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → (𝐴 Colinear ⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩ → (𝐵 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝐶⟩ ↔ (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ Seg≤ ⟨𝐴, 𝐶⟩ ∧ ⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩ Seg≤ ⟨𝐴, 𝐶⟩))))
21.11.18.7  Outside-of relationship
Syntax	coutsideof 36083	Declare the syntax for the outside of constant.
class OutsideOf
Definition	df-outsideof 36084	The outside of relationship. This relationship expresses that 𝑃, 𝐴, and 𝐵 fall on a line, but 𝑃 is not on the segment 𝐴𝐵. This definition is taken from theorem 6.4 of [Schwabhauser] p. 43, since it requires no dummy variables. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 17-Oct-2013.)
⊢ OutsideOf = ( Colinear ∖ Btwn )
Theorem	broutsideof 36085	Binary relation form of OutsideOf. Theorem 6.4 of [Schwabhauser] p. 43. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 17-Oct-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.)
⊢ (𝑃OutsideOf⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ↔ (𝑃 Colinear ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∧ ¬ 𝑃 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩))
Theorem	broutsideof2 36086	Alternate form of OutsideOf. Definition 6.1 of [Schwabhauser] p. 43. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 17-Oct-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝑃 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → (𝑃OutsideOf⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ↔ (𝐴 ≠ 𝑃 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝑃 ∧ (𝐴 Btwn ⟨𝑃, 𝐵⟩ ∨ 𝐵 Btwn ⟨𝑃, 𝐴⟩))))
Theorem	outsidene1 36087	Outsideness implies inequality. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 18-Oct-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝑃 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → (𝑃OutsideOf⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ → 𝐴 ≠ 𝑃))
Theorem	outsidene2 36088	Outsideness implies inequality. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 18-Oct-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝑃 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → (𝑃OutsideOf⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ → 𝐵 ≠ 𝑃))
Theorem	btwnoutside 36089	A principle linking outsideness to betweenness. Theorem 6.2 of [Schwabhauser] p. 43. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 18-Oct-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑃 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → (((𝐴 ≠ 𝑃 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝑃 ∧ 𝐶 ≠ 𝑃) ∧ 𝑃 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝐶⟩) → (𝑃 Btwn ⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩ ↔ 𝑃OutsideOf⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩)))
Theorem	broutsideof3 36090*	Characterization of outsideness in terms of relationship to a fourth point. Theorem 6.3 of [Schwabhauser] p. 43. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 18-Oct-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝑃 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → (𝑃OutsideOf⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ↔ (𝐴 ≠ 𝑃 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝑃 ∧ ∃𝑐 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)(𝑐 ≠ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑃 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝑐⟩ ∧ 𝑃 Btwn ⟨𝐵, 𝑐⟩))))
Theorem	outsideofrflx 36091	Reflexivity of outsideness. Theorem 6.5 of [Schwabhauser] p. 44. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 18-Oct-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑃 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) → (𝐴 ≠ 𝑃 → 𝑃OutsideOf⟨𝐴, 𝐴⟩))
Theorem	outsideofcom 36092	Commutativity law for outsideness. Theorem 6.6 of [Schwabhauser] p. 44. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 18-Oct-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝑃 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → (𝑃OutsideOf⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ↔ 𝑃OutsideOf⟨𝐵, 𝐴⟩))
Theorem	outsideoftr 36093	Transitivity law for outsideness. Theorem 6.7 of [Schwabhauser] p. 44. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 18-Oct-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑃 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → ((𝑃OutsideOf⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∧ 𝑃OutsideOf⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩) → 𝑃OutsideOf⟨𝐴, 𝐶⟩))
Theorem	outsideofeq 36094	Uniqueness law for OutsideOf. Analogue of segconeq 35974. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 24-Oct-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑅 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑋 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑌 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → (((𝐴OutsideOf⟨𝑋, 𝑅⟩ ∧ ⟨𝐴, 𝑋⟩Cgr⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩) ∧ (𝐴OutsideOf⟨𝑌, 𝑅⟩ ∧ ⟨𝐴, 𝑌⟩Cgr⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩)) → 𝑋 = 𝑌))
Theorem	outsideofeu 36095*	Given a nondegenerate ray, there is a unique point congruent to the segment 𝐵𝐶 lying on the ray 𝐴𝑅. Theorem 6.11 of [Schwabhauser] p. 44. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 23-Oct-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑅 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → ((𝑅 ≠ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶) → ∃!𝑥 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)(𝐴OutsideOf⟨𝑥, 𝑅⟩ ∧ ⟨𝐴, 𝑥⟩Cgr⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩)))
Theorem	outsidele 36096	Relate OutsideOf to Seg≤. Theorem 6.13 of [Schwabhauser] p. 45. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 24-Oct-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝑃 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → (𝑃OutsideOf⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ → (⟨𝑃, 𝐴⟩ Seg≤ ⟨𝑃, 𝐵⟩ ↔ 𝐴 Btwn ⟨𝑃, 𝐵⟩)))
Theorem	outsideofcol 36097	Outside of implies colinearity. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 26-Oct-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.)
⊢ (𝑃OutsideOf⟨𝑄, 𝑅⟩ → 𝑃 Colinear ⟨𝑄, 𝑅⟩)
21.11.18.8  Lines and Rays
Syntax	cline2 36098	Declare the constant for the line function.
class Line
Syntax	cray 36099	Declare the constant for the ray function.
class Ray
Syntax	clines2 36100	Declare the constant for the set of all lines.
class LinesEE