| Metamath
Proof Explorer Theorem List (p. 361 of 500) | < Previous Next > | |
| Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
|
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > MPE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
||
| Color key: | (1-30905) |
(30906-32428) |
(32429-49911) |
| Type | Label | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Statement | ||
| Theorem | dfrecs2 36001 | A quantifier-free definition of recs. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 17-Jul-2020.) |
| ⊢ recs(𝐹) = ∪ (( Funs ∩ (◡Domain “ On)) ∖ dom ((◡ E ∘ Domain) ∖ Fix (◡Apply ∘ (FullFun𝐹 ∘ Restrict)))) | ||
| Theorem | dfrdg4 36002 | A quantifier-free definition of the recursive definition generator. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 17-Apr-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.) (Proof shortened by Peter Mazsa, 2-Oct-2022.) |
| ⊢ rec(𝐹, 𝐴) = ∪ (( Funs ∩ (◡Domain “ On)) ∖ dom ((◡ E ∘ Domain) ∖ Fix (◡Apply ∘ (((V × {∅}) × {∪ {𝐴}}) ∪ ((( Bigcup ∘ Img) ↾ (V × Limits )) ∪ ((FullFun𝐹 ∘ (Apply ∘ pprod( I , Bigcup ))) ↾ (V × ran Succ))))))) | ||
| Theorem | dfint3 36003 | Quantifier-free definition of class intersection. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 13-Apr-2018.) |
| ⊢ ∩ 𝐴 = (V ∖ (◡(V ∖ E ) “ 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | imagesset 36004 | The Image functor applied to the converse of the subset relationship yields a subset of the subset relationship. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 14-Apr-2018.) |
| ⊢ Image◡ SSet ⊆ SSet | ||
| Theorem | brub 36005* | Binary relation form of the upper bound functor. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-May-2018.) |
| ⊢ 𝑆 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝑆UB𝑅𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 𝑥𝑅𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | brlb 36006* | Binary relation form of the lower bound functor. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-May-2018.) |
| ⊢ 𝑆 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝑆LB𝑅𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 𝐴𝑅𝑥) | ||
| Syntax | caltop 36007 | Declare the syntax for an alternate ordered pair. |
| class ⟪𝐴, 𝐵⟫ | ||
| Syntax | caltxp 36008 | Declare the syntax for an alternate Cartesian product. |
| class (𝐴 ×× 𝐵) | ||
| Definition | df-altop 36009 | An alternative definition of ordered pairs. This definition removes a hypothesis from its defining theorem (see altopth 36020), making it more convenient in some circumstances. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 22-Mar-2012.) |
| ⊢ ⟪𝐴, 𝐵⟫ = {{𝐴}, {𝐴, {𝐵}}} | ||
| Definition | df-altxp 36010* | Define Cartesian products of alternative ordered pairs. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 23-Mar-2012.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ×× 𝐵) = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝑧 = ⟪𝑥, 𝑦⟫} | ||
| Theorem | altopex 36011 | Alternative ordered pairs always exist. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 22-Mar-2012.) |
| ⊢ ⟪𝐴, 𝐵⟫ ∈ V | ||
| Theorem | altopthsn 36012 | Two alternate ordered pairs are equal iff the singletons of their respective elements are equal. Note that this holds regardless of sethood of any of the elements. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 16-Apr-2012.) |
| ⊢ (⟪𝐴, 𝐵⟫ = ⟪𝐶, 𝐷⟫ ↔ ({𝐴} = {𝐶} ∧ {𝐵} = {𝐷})) | ||
| Theorem | altopeq12 36013 | Equality for alternate ordered pairs. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 22-Mar-2012.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 = 𝐷) → ⟪𝐴, 𝐶⟫ = ⟪𝐵, 𝐷⟫) | ||
| Theorem | altopeq1 36014 | Equality for alternate ordered pairs. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 22-Mar-2012.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → ⟪𝐴, 𝐶⟫ = ⟪𝐵, 𝐶⟫) | ||
| Theorem | altopeq2 36015 | Equality for alternate ordered pairs. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 22-Mar-2012.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → ⟪𝐶, 𝐴⟫ = ⟪𝐶, 𝐵⟫) | ||
| Theorem | altopth1 36016 | Equality of the first members of equal alternate ordered pairs, which holds regardless of the second members' sethood. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 22-Mar-2012.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (⟪𝐴, 𝐵⟫ = ⟪𝐶, 𝐷⟫ → 𝐴 = 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | altopth2 36017 | Equality of the second members of equal alternate ordered pairs, which holds regardless of the first members' sethood. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 22-Mar-2012.) |
| ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → (⟪𝐴, 𝐵⟫ = ⟪𝐶, 𝐷⟫ → 𝐵 = 𝐷)) | ||
| Theorem | altopthg 36018 | Alternate ordered pair theorem. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 22-Mar-2012.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (⟪𝐴, 𝐵⟫ = ⟪𝐶, 𝐷⟫ ↔ (𝐴 = 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 = 𝐷))) | ||
| Theorem | altopthbg 36019 | Alternate ordered pair theorem. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 14-Apr-2012.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝑊) → (⟪𝐴, 𝐵⟫ = ⟪𝐶, 𝐷⟫ ↔ (𝐴 = 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 = 𝐷))) | ||
| Theorem | altopth 36020 | The alternate ordered pair theorem. If two alternate ordered pairs are equal, their first elements are equal and their second elements are equal. Note that 𝐶 and 𝐷 are not required to be a set due to a peculiarity of our specific ordered pair definition, as opposed to the regular ordered pairs used here, which (as in opth 5419), requires 𝐷 to be a set. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 23-Mar-2012.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (⟪𝐴, 𝐵⟫ = ⟪𝐶, 𝐷⟫ ↔ (𝐴 = 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 = 𝐷)) | ||
| Theorem | altopthb 36021 | Alternate ordered pair theorem with different sethood requirements. See altopth 36020 for more comments. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 14-Apr-2012.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (⟪𝐴, 𝐵⟫ = ⟪𝐶, 𝐷⟫ ↔ (𝐴 = 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 = 𝐷)) | ||
| Theorem | altopthc 36022 | Alternate ordered pair theorem with different sethood requirements. See altopth 36020 for more comments. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 14-Apr-2012.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (⟪𝐴, 𝐵⟫ = ⟪𝐶, 𝐷⟫ ↔ (𝐴 = 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 = 𝐷)) | ||
| Theorem | altopthd 36023 | Alternate ordered pair theorem with different sethood requirements. See altopth 36020 for more comments. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 14-Apr-2012.) |
| ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (⟪𝐴, 𝐵⟫ = ⟪𝐶, 𝐷⟫ ↔ (𝐴 = 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 = 𝐷)) | ||
| Theorem | altxpeq1 36024 | Equality for alternate Cartesian products. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 24-Mar-2012.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝐴 ×× 𝐶) = (𝐵 ×× 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | altxpeq2 36025 | Equality for alternate Cartesian products. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 24-Mar-2012.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝐶 ×× 𝐴) = (𝐶 ×× 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | elaltxp 36026* | Membership in alternate Cartesian products. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 23-Mar-2012.) |
| ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ (𝐴 ×× 𝐵) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝑋 = ⟪𝑥, 𝑦⟫) | ||
| Theorem | altopelaltxp 36027 | Alternate ordered pair membership in a Cartesian product. Note that, unlike opelxp 5655, there is no sethood requirement here. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 22-Mar-2012.) |
| ⊢ (⟪𝑋, 𝑌⟫ ∈ (𝐴 ×× 𝐵) ↔ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | altxpsspw 36028 | An inclusion rule for alternate Cartesian products. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 24-Mar-2012.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ×× 𝐵) ⊆ 𝒫 𝒫 (𝐴 ∪ 𝒫 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | altxpexg 36029 | The alternate Cartesian product of two sets is a set. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 24-Mar-2012.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴 ×× 𝐵) ∈ V) | ||
| Theorem | rankaltopb 36030 | Compute the rank of an alternate ordered pair. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 18-Dec-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On)) → (rank‘⟪𝐴, 𝐵⟫) = suc suc ((rank‘𝐴) ∪ suc (rank‘𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | nfaltop 36031 | Bound-variable hypothesis builder for alternate ordered pairs. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 25-Sep-2015.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥⟪𝐴, 𝐵⟫ | ||
| Theorem | sbcaltop 36032* | Distribution of class substitution over alternate ordered pairs. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 25-Sep-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ V → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌⟪𝐶, 𝐷⟫ = ⟪⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶, ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷⟫) | ||
| Syntax | cofs 36033 | Declare the syntax for the outer five segment configuration. |
| class OuterFiveSeg | ||
| Definition | df-ofs 36034* | The outer five segment configuration is an abbreviation for the conditions of the Five Segment Axiom (ax5seg 28923). See brofs 36056 and 5segofs 36057 for how it is used. Definition 2.10 of [Schwabhauser] p. 28. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Sep-2013.) |
| ⊢ OuterFiveSeg = {〈𝑝, 𝑞〉 ∣ ∃𝑛 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑎 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑛)∃𝑏 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑛)∃𝑐 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑛)∃𝑑 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑛)∃𝑥 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑛)∃𝑦 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑛)∃𝑧 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑛)∃𝑤 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑛)(𝑝 = 〈〈𝑎, 𝑏〉, 〈𝑐, 𝑑〉〉 ∧ 𝑞 = 〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 〈𝑧, 𝑤〉〉 ∧ ((𝑏 Btwn 〈𝑎, 𝑐〉 ∧ 𝑦 Btwn 〈𝑥, 𝑧〉) ∧ (〈𝑎, 𝑏〉Cgr〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∧ 〈𝑏, 𝑐〉Cgr〈𝑦, 𝑧〉) ∧ (〈𝑎, 𝑑〉Cgr〈𝑥, 𝑤〉 ∧ 〈𝑏, 𝑑〉Cgr〈𝑦, 𝑤〉)))} | ||
| Theorem | cgrrflx2d 36035 | Deduction form of axcgrrflx 28899. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 13-Oct-2013.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉Cgr〈𝐵, 𝐴〉) | ||
| Theorem | cgrtr4d 36036 | Deduction form of axcgrtr 28900. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 13-Oct-2013.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉Cgr〈𝐶, 𝐷〉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉Cgr〈𝐸, 𝐹〉) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 〈𝐶, 𝐷〉Cgr〈𝐸, 𝐹〉) | ||
| Theorem | cgrtr4and 36037 | Deduction form of axcgrtr 28900. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 13-Oct-2013.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉Cgr〈𝐶, 𝐷〉) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉Cgr〈𝐸, 𝐹〉) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 〈𝐶, 𝐷〉Cgr〈𝐸, 𝐹〉) | ||
| Theorem | cgrrflx 36038 | Reflexivity law for congruence. Theorem 2.1 of [Schwabhauser] p. 27. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 12-Jun-2013.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) → 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉Cgr〈𝐴, 𝐵〉) | ||
| Theorem | cgrrflxd 36039 | Deduction form of cgrrflx 36038. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 13-Oct-2013.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉Cgr〈𝐴, 𝐵〉) | ||
| Theorem | cgrcomim 36040 | Congruence commutes on the two sides. Implication version. Theorem 2.2 of [Schwabhauser] p. 27. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 12-Jun-2013.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → (〈𝐴, 𝐵〉Cgr〈𝐶, 𝐷〉 → 〈𝐶, 𝐷〉Cgr〈𝐴, 𝐵〉)) | ||
| Theorem | cgrcom 36041 | Congruence commutes between the two sides. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 12-Jun-2013.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → (〈𝐴, 𝐵〉Cgr〈𝐶, 𝐷〉 ↔ 〈𝐶, 𝐷〉Cgr〈𝐴, 𝐵〉)) | ||
| Theorem | cgrcomand 36042 | Deduction form of cgrcom 36041. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 13-Oct-2013.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉Cgr〈𝐶, 𝐷〉) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 〈𝐶, 𝐷〉Cgr〈𝐴, 𝐵〉) | ||
| Theorem | cgrtr 36043 | Transitivity law for congruence. Theorem 2.3 of [Schwabhauser] p. 27. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 24-Sep-2013.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐸 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → ((〈𝐴, 𝐵〉Cgr〈𝐶, 𝐷〉 ∧ 〈𝐶, 𝐷〉Cgr〈𝐸, 𝐹〉) → 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉Cgr〈𝐸, 𝐹〉)) | ||
| Theorem | cgrtrand 36044 | Deduction form of cgrtr 36043. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 13-Oct-2013.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉Cgr〈𝐶, 𝐷〉) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 〈𝐶, 𝐷〉Cgr〈𝐸, 𝐹〉) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉Cgr〈𝐸, 𝐹〉) | ||
| Theorem | cgrtr3 36045 | Transitivity law for congruence. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 7-Oct-2013.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐸 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → ((〈𝐴, 𝐵〉Cgr〈𝐸, 𝐹〉 ∧ 〈𝐶, 𝐷〉Cgr〈𝐸, 𝐹〉) → 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉Cgr〈𝐶, 𝐷〉)) | ||
| Theorem | cgrtr3and 36046 | Deduction form of cgrtr3 36045. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 13-Oct-2013.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉Cgr〈𝐸, 𝐹〉) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 〈𝐶, 𝐷〉Cgr〈𝐸, 𝐹〉) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉Cgr〈𝐶, 𝐷〉) | ||
| Theorem | cgrcoml 36047 | Congruence commutes on the left. Biconditional version of Theorem 2.4 of [Schwabhauser] p. 27. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 12-Jun-2013.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → (〈𝐴, 𝐵〉Cgr〈𝐶, 𝐷〉 ↔ 〈𝐵, 𝐴〉Cgr〈𝐶, 𝐷〉)) | ||
| Theorem | cgrcomr 36048 | Congruence commutes on the right. Biconditional version of Theorem 2.5 of [Schwabhauser] p. 27. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 12-Jun-2013.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → (〈𝐴, 𝐵〉Cgr〈𝐶, 𝐷〉 ↔ 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉Cgr〈𝐷, 𝐶〉)) | ||
| Theorem | cgrcomlr 36049 | Congruence commutes on both sides. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 12-Jun-2013.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → (〈𝐴, 𝐵〉Cgr〈𝐶, 𝐷〉 ↔ 〈𝐵, 𝐴〉Cgr〈𝐷, 𝐶〉)) | ||
| Theorem | cgrcomland 36050 | Deduction form of cgrcoml 36047. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 14-Oct-2013.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉Cgr〈𝐶, 𝐷〉) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 〈𝐵, 𝐴〉Cgr〈𝐶, 𝐷〉) | ||
| Theorem | cgrcomrand 36051 | Deduction form of cgrcoml 36047. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 14-Oct-2013.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉Cgr〈𝐶, 𝐷〉) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉Cgr〈𝐷, 𝐶〉) | ||
| Theorem | cgrcomlrand 36052 | Deduction form of cgrcomlr 36049. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 14-Oct-2013.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉Cgr〈𝐶, 𝐷〉) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 〈𝐵, 𝐴〉Cgr〈𝐷, 𝐶〉) | ||
| Theorem | cgrtriv 36053 | Degenerate segments are congruent. Theorem 2.8 of [Schwabhauser] p. 28. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 12-Jun-2013.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) → 〈𝐴, 𝐴〉Cgr〈𝐵, 𝐵〉) | ||
| Theorem | cgrid2 36054 | Identity law for congruence. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 12-Jun-2013.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → (〈𝐴, 𝐴〉Cgr〈𝐵, 𝐶〉 → 𝐵 = 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | cgrdegen 36055 | Two congruent segments are either both degenerate or both nondegenerate. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 12-Jun-2013.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → (〈𝐴, 𝐵〉Cgr〈𝐶, 𝐷〉 → (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ 𝐶 = 𝐷))) | ||
| Theorem | brofs 36056 | Binary relation form of the outer five segment predicate. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Sep-2013.) |
| ⊢ (((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐸 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐺 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐻 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → (〈〈𝐴, 𝐵〉, 〈𝐶, 𝐷〉〉 OuterFiveSeg 〈〈𝐸, 𝐹〉, 〈𝐺, 𝐻〉〉 ↔ ((𝐵 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝐶〉 ∧ 𝐹 Btwn 〈𝐸, 𝐺〉) ∧ (〈𝐴, 𝐵〉Cgr〈𝐸, 𝐹〉 ∧ 〈𝐵, 𝐶〉Cgr〈𝐹, 𝐺〉) ∧ (〈𝐴, 𝐷〉Cgr〈𝐸, 𝐻〉 ∧ 〈𝐵, 𝐷〉Cgr〈𝐹, 𝐻〉)))) | ||
| Theorem | 5segofs 36057 | Rephrase ax5seg 28923 using the outer five segment predicate. Theorem 2.10 of [Schwabhauser] p. 28. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Sep-2013.) |
| ⊢ (((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐸 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐺 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐻 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → ((〈〈𝐴, 𝐵〉, 〈𝐶, 𝐷〉〉 OuterFiveSeg 〈〈𝐸, 𝐹〉, 〈𝐺, 𝐻〉〉 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) → 〈𝐶, 𝐷〉Cgr〈𝐺, 𝐻〉)) | ||
| Theorem | ofscom 36058 | The outer five segment predicate commutes. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 26-Sep-2013.) |
| ⊢ (((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐸 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐺 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐻 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → (〈〈𝐴, 𝐵〉, 〈𝐶, 𝐷〉〉 OuterFiveSeg 〈〈𝐸, 𝐹〉, 〈𝐺, 𝐻〉〉 ↔ 〈〈𝐸, 𝐹〉, 〈𝐺, 𝐻〉〉 OuterFiveSeg 〈〈𝐴, 𝐵〉, 〈𝐶, 𝐷〉〉)) | ||
| Theorem | cgrextend 36059 | Link congruence over a pair of line segments. Theorem 2.11 of [Schwabhauser] p. 29. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 12-Jun-2013.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐸 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → (((𝐵 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝐶〉 ∧ 𝐸 Btwn 〈𝐷, 𝐹〉) ∧ (〈𝐴, 𝐵〉Cgr〈𝐷, 𝐸〉 ∧ 〈𝐵, 𝐶〉Cgr〈𝐸, 𝐹〉)) → 〈𝐴, 𝐶〉Cgr〈𝐷, 𝐹〉)) | ||
| Theorem | cgrextendand 36060 | Deduction form of cgrextend 36059. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 14-Oct-2013.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝐵 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝐶〉) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝐸 Btwn 〈𝐷, 𝐹〉) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉Cgr〈𝐷, 𝐸〉) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 〈𝐵, 𝐶〉Cgr〈𝐸, 𝐹〉) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 〈𝐴, 𝐶〉Cgr〈𝐷, 𝐹〉) | ||
| Theorem | segconeq 36061 | Two points that satisfy the conclusion of axsegcon 28912 are identical. Uniqueness portion of Theorem 2.12 of [Schwabhauser] p. 29. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 12-Jun-2013.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑋 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑌 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → ((𝑄 ≠ 𝐴 ∧ (𝐴 Btwn 〈𝑄, 𝑋〉 ∧ 〈𝐴, 𝑋〉Cgr〈𝐵, 𝐶〉) ∧ (𝐴 Btwn 〈𝑄, 𝑌〉 ∧ 〈𝐴, 𝑌〉Cgr〈𝐵, 𝐶〉)) → 𝑋 = 𝑌)) | ||
| Theorem | segconeu 36062* | Existential uniqueness version of segconeq 36061. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 19-Oct-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ ((𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ 𝐶 ≠ 𝐷)) → ∃!𝑟 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)(𝐷 Btwn 〈𝐶, 𝑟〉 ∧ 〈𝐷, 𝑟〉Cgr〈𝐴, 𝐵〉)) | ||
| Theorem | btwntriv2 36063 | Betweenness always holds for the second endpoint. Theorem 3.1 of [Schwabhauser] p. 30. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 12-Jun-2013.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) → 𝐵 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉) | ||
| Theorem | btwncomim 36064 | Betweenness commutes. Implication version. Theorem 3.2 of [Schwabhauser] p. 30. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 12-Jun-2013.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → (𝐴 Btwn 〈𝐵, 𝐶〉 → 𝐴 Btwn 〈𝐶, 𝐵〉)) | ||
| Theorem | btwncom 36065 | Betweenness commutes. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 12-Jun-2013.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → (𝐴 Btwn 〈𝐵, 𝐶〉 ↔ 𝐴 Btwn 〈𝐶, 𝐵〉)) | ||
| Theorem | btwncomand 36066 | Deduction form of btwncom 36065. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 14-Oct-2013.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝐴 Btwn 〈𝐵, 𝐶〉) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝐴 Btwn 〈𝐶, 𝐵〉) | ||
| Theorem | btwntriv1 36067 | Betweenness always holds for the first endpoint. Theorem 3.3 of [Schwabhauser] p. 30. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 12-Jun-2013.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) → 𝐴 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉) | ||
| Theorem | btwnswapid 36068 | If you can swap the first two arguments of a betweenness statement, then those arguments are identical. Theorem 3.4 of [Schwabhauser] p. 30. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 12-Jun-2013.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → ((𝐴 Btwn 〈𝐵, 𝐶〉 ∧ 𝐵 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝐶〉) → 𝐴 = 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | btwnswapid2 36069 | If you can swap arguments one and three of a betweenness statement, then those arguments are identical. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 7-Oct-2013.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → ((𝐴 Btwn 〈𝐵, 𝐶〉 ∧ 𝐶 Btwn 〈𝐵, 𝐴〉) → 𝐴 = 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | btwnintr 36070 | Inner transitivity law for betweenness. Left-hand side of Theorem 3.5 of [Schwabhauser] p. 30. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 12-Jun-2013.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → ((𝐵 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝐷〉 ∧ 𝐶 Btwn 〈𝐵, 𝐷〉) → 𝐵 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝐶〉)) | ||
| Theorem | btwnexch3 36071 | Exchange the first endpoint in betweenness. Left-hand side of Theorem 3.6 of [Schwabhauser] p. 30. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 12-Jun-2013.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → ((𝐵 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝐶〉 ∧ 𝐶 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝐷〉) → 𝐶 Btwn 〈𝐵, 𝐷〉)) | ||
| Theorem | btwnexch3and 36072 | Deduction form of btwnexch3 36071. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 13-Oct-2013.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝐵 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝐶〉) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝐶 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝐷〉) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝐶 Btwn 〈𝐵, 𝐷〉) | ||
| Theorem | btwnouttr2 36073 | Outer transitivity law for betweenness. Left-hand side of Theorem 3.1 of [Schwabhauser] p. 30. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 12-Jun-2013.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → ((𝐵 ≠ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝐶〉 ∧ 𝐶 Btwn 〈𝐵, 𝐷〉) → 𝐶 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝐷〉)) | ||
| Theorem | btwnexch2 36074 | Exchange the outer point of two betweenness statements. Right-hand side of Theorem 3.5 of [Schwabhauser] p. 30. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 14-Jun-2013.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → ((𝐵 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝐷〉 ∧ 𝐶 Btwn 〈𝐵, 𝐷〉) → 𝐶 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝐷〉)) | ||
| Theorem | btwnouttr 36075 | Outer transitivity law for betweenness. Right-hand side of Theorem 3.7 of [Schwabhauser] p. 30. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 14-Jun-2013.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → ((𝐵 ≠ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝐶〉 ∧ 𝐶 Btwn 〈𝐵, 𝐷〉) → 𝐵 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝐷〉)) | ||
| Theorem | btwnexch 36076 | Outer transitivity law for betweenness. Right-hand side of Theorem 3.6 of [Schwabhauser] p. 30. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 24-Sep-2013.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → ((𝐵 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝐶〉 ∧ 𝐶 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝐷〉) → 𝐵 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝐷〉)) | ||
| Theorem | btwnexchand 36077 | Deduction form of btwnexch 36076. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 13-Oct-2013.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝐵 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝐶〉) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝐶 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝐷〉) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝐵 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝐷〉) | ||
| Theorem | btwndiff 36078* | There is always a 𝑐 distinct from 𝐵 such that 𝐵 lies between 𝐴 and 𝑐. Theorem 3.14 of [Schwabhauser] p. 32. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 24-Sep-2013.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) → ∃𝑐 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)(𝐵 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝑐〉 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝑐)) | ||
| Theorem | trisegint 36079* | A line segment between two sides of a triange intersects a segment crossing from the remaining side to the opposite vertex. Theorem 3.17 of [Schwabhauser] p. 33. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 24-Sep-2013.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐸 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑃 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → ((𝐵 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝐶〉 ∧ 𝐸 Btwn 〈𝐷, 𝐶〉 ∧ 𝑃 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝐷〉) → ∃𝑞 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)(𝑞 Btwn 〈𝑃, 𝐶〉 ∧ 𝑞 Btwn 〈𝐵, 𝐸〉))) | ||
| Syntax | ctransport 36080 | Declare the syntax for the segment transport function. |
| class TransportTo | ||
| Definition | df-transport 36081* | Define the segment transport function. See fvtransport 36083 for an explanation of the function. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 18-Oct-2013.) |
| ⊢ TransportTo = {〈〈𝑝, 𝑞〉, 𝑥〉 ∣ ∃𝑛 ∈ ℕ ((𝑝 ∈ ((𝔼‘𝑛) × (𝔼‘𝑛)) ∧ 𝑞 ∈ ((𝔼‘𝑛) × (𝔼‘𝑛)) ∧ (1st ‘𝑞) ≠ (2nd ‘𝑞)) ∧ 𝑥 = (℩𝑟 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑛)((2nd ‘𝑞) Btwn 〈(1st ‘𝑞), 𝑟〉 ∧ 〈(2nd ‘𝑞), 𝑟〉Cgr𝑝)))} | ||
| Theorem | funtransport 36082 | The TransportTo relationship is a function. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 18-Oct-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.) |
| ⊢ Fun TransportTo | ||
| Theorem | fvtransport 36083* | Calculate the value of the TransportTo function. This function takes four points, 𝐴 through 𝐷, where 𝐶 and 𝐷 are distinct. It then returns the point that extends 𝐶𝐷 by the length of 𝐴𝐵. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 18-Oct-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ ((𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ 𝐶 ≠ 𝐷)) → (〈𝐴, 𝐵〉TransportTo〈𝐶, 𝐷〉) = (℩𝑟 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)(𝐷 Btwn 〈𝐶, 𝑟〉 ∧ 〈𝐷, 𝑟〉Cgr〈𝐴, 𝐵〉))) | ||
| Theorem | transportcl 36084 | Closure law for segment transport. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 19-Oct-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ ((𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ 𝐶 ≠ 𝐷)) → (〈𝐴, 𝐵〉TransportTo〈𝐶, 𝐷〉) ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) | ||
| Theorem | transportprops 36085 | Calculate the defining properties of the transport function. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 19-Oct-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ ((𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ 𝐶 ≠ 𝐷)) → (𝐷 Btwn 〈𝐶, (〈𝐴, 𝐵〉TransportTo〈𝐶, 𝐷〉)〉 ∧ 〈𝐷, (〈𝐴, 𝐵〉TransportTo〈𝐶, 𝐷〉)〉Cgr〈𝐴, 𝐵〉)) | ||
| Syntax | cifs 36086 | Declare the syntax for the inner five segment predicate. |
| class InnerFiveSeg | ||
| Syntax | ccgr3 36087 | Declare the syntax for the three place congruence predicate. |
| class Cgr3 | ||
| Syntax | ccolin 36088 | Declare the syntax for the colinearity predicate. |
| class Colinear | ||
| Syntax | cfs 36089 | Declare the syntax for the five segment predicate. |
| class FiveSeg | ||
| Definition | df-colinear 36090* | The colinearity predicate states that the three points in its arguments sit on one line. Definition 4.10 of [Schwabhauser] p. 36. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 25-Oct-2013.) |
| ⊢ Colinear = ◡{〈〈𝑏, 𝑐〉, 𝑎〉 ∣ ∃𝑛 ∈ ℕ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑛) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑛) ∧ 𝑐 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑛)) ∧ (𝑎 Btwn 〈𝑏, 𝑐〉 ∨ 𝑏 Btwn 〈𝑐, 𝑎〉 ∨ 𝑐 Btwn 〈𝑎, 𝑏〉))} | ||
| Definition | df-ifs 36091* | The inner five segment configuration is an abbreviation for another congruence condition. See brifs 36094 and ifscgr 36095 for how it is used. Definition 4.1 of [Schwabhauser] p. 34. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 26-Sep-2013.) |
| ⊢ InnerFiveSeg = {〈𝑝, 𝑞〉 ∣ ∃𝑛 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑎 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑛)∃𝑏 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑛)∃𝑐 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑛)∃𝑑 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑛)∃𝑥 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑛)∃𝑦 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑛)∃𝑧 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑛)∃𝑤 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑛)(𝑝 = 〈〈𝑎, 𝑏〉, 〈𝑐, 𝑑〉〉 ∧ 𝑞 = 〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 〈𝑧, 𝑤〉〉 ∧ ((𝑏 Btwn 〈𝑎, 𝑐〉 ∧ 𝑦 Btwn 〈𝑥, 𝑧〉) ∧ (〈𝑎, 𝑐〉Cgr〈𝑥, 𝑧〉 ∧ 〈𝑏, 𝑐〉Cgr〈𝑦, 𝑧〉) ∧ (〈𝑎, 𝑑〉Cgr〈𝑥, 𝑤〉 ∧ 〈𝑐, 𝑑〉Cgr〈𝑧, 𝑤〉)))} | ||
| Definition | df-cgr3 36092* | The three place congruence predicate. This is an abbreviation for saying that all three pair in a triple are congruent with each other. Three place form of Definition 4.4 of [Schwabhauser] p. 35. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Oct-2013.) |
| ⊢ Cgr3 = {〈𝑝, 𝑞〉 ∣ ∃𝑛 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑎 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑛)∃𝑏 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑛)∃𝑐 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑛)∃𝑑 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑛)∃𝑒 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑛)∃𝑓 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑛)(𝑝 = 〈𝑎, 〈𝑏, 𝑐〉〉 ∧ 𝑞 = 〈𝑑, 〈𝑒, 𝑓〉〉 ∧ (〈𝑎, 𝑏〉Cgr〈𝑑, 𝑒〉 ∧ 〈𝑎, 𝑐〉Cgr〈𝑑, 𝑓〉 ∧ 〈𝑏, 𝑐〉Cgr〈𝑒, 𝑓〉))} | ||
| Definition | df-fs 36093* | The general five segment configuration is a generalization of the outer and inner five segment configurations. See brfs 36130 and fscgr 36131 for its use. Definition 4.15 of [Schwabhauser] p. 37. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Oct-2013.) |
| ⊢ FiveSeg = {〈𝑝, 𝑞〉 ∣ ∃𝑛 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑎 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑛)∃𝑏 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑛)∃𝑐 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑛)∃𝑑 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑛)∃𝑥 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑛)∃𝑦 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑛)∃𝑧 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑛)∃𝑤 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑛)(𝑝 = 〈〈𝑎, 𝑏〉, 〈𝑐, 𝑑〉〉 ∧ 𝑞 = 〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 〈𝑧, 𝑤〉〉 ∧ (𝑎 Colinear 〈𝑏, 𝑐〉 ∧ 〈𝑎, 〈𝑏, 𝑐〉〉Cgr3〈𝑥, 〈𝑦, 𝑧〉〉 ∧ (〈𝑎, 𝑑〉Cgr〈𝑥, 𝑤〉 ∧ 〈𝑏, 𝑑〉Cgr〈𝑦, 𝑤〉)))} | ||
| Theorem | brifs 36094 | Binary relation form of the inner five segment predicate. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 26-Sep-2013.) |
| ⊢ (((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐸 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐺 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐻 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → (〈〈𝐴, 𝐵〉, 〈𝐶, 𝐷〉〉 InnerFiveSeg 〈〈𝐸, 𝐹〉, 〈𝐺, 𝐻〉〉 ↔ ((𝐵 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝐶〉 ∧ 𝐹 Btwn 〈𝐸, 𝐺〉) ∧ (〈𝐴, 𝐶〉Cgr〈𝐸, 𝐺〉 ∧ 〈𝐵, 𝐶〉Cgr〈𝐹, 𝐺〉) ∧ (〈𝐴, 𝐷〉Cgr〈𝐸, 𝐻〉 ∧ 〈𝐶, 𝐷〉Cgr〈𝐺, 𝐻〉)))) | ||
| Theorem | ifscgr 36095 | Inner five segment congruence. Take two triangles, 𝐴𝐷𝐶 and 𝐸𝐻𝐺, with 𝐵 between 𝐴 and 𝐶 and 𝐹 between 𝐸 and 𝐺. If the other components of the triangles are congruent, then so are 𝐵𝐷 and 𝐹𝐻. Theorem 4.2 of [Schwabhauser] p. 34. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 27-Sep-2013.) |
| ⊢ (((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐸 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐺 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐻 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → (〈〈𝐴, 𝐵〉, 〈𝐶, 𝐷〉〉 InnerFiveSeg 〈〈𝐸, 𝐹〉, 〈𝐺, 𝐻〉〉 → 〈𝐵, 𝐷〉Cgr〈𝐹, 𝐻〉)) | ||
| Theorem | cgrsub 36096 | Removing identical parts from the end of a line segment preserves congruence. Theorem 4.3 of [Schwabhauser] p. 35. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Oct-2013.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐸 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → (((𝐵 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝐶〉 ∧ 𝐸 Btwn 〈𝐷, 𝐹〉) ∧ (〈𝐴, 𝐶〉Cgr〈𝐷, 𝐹〉 ∧ 〈𝐵, 𝐶〉Cgr〈𝐸, 𝐹〉)) → 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉Cgr〈𝐷, 𝐸〉)) | ||
| Theorem | brcgr3 36097 | Binary relation form of the three-place congruence predicate. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Oct-2013.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐸 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → (〈𝐴, 〈𝐵, 𝐶〉〉Cgr3〈𝐷, 〈𝐸, 𝐹〉〉 ↔ (〈𝐴, 𝐵〉Cgr〈𝐷, 𝐸〉 ∧ 〈𝐴, 𝐶〉Cgr〈𝐷, 𝐹〉 ∧ 〈𝐵, 𝐶〉Cgr〈𝐸, 𝐹〉))) | ||
| Theorem | cgr3permute3 36098 | Permutation law for three-place congruence. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Oct-2013.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐸 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → (〈𝐴, 〈𝐵, 𝐶〉〉Cgr3〈𝐷, 〈𝐸, 𝐹〉〉 ↔ 〈𝐵, 〈𝐶, 𝐴〉〉Cgr3〈𝐸, 〈𝐹, 𝐷〉〉)) | ||
| Theorem | cgr3permute1 36099 | Permutation law for three-place congruence. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Oct-2013.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐸 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → (〈𝐴, 〈𝐵, 𝐶〉〉Cgr3〈𝐷, 〈𝐸, 𝐹〉〉 ↔ 〈𝐴, 〈𝐶, 𝐵〉〉Cgr3〈𝐷, 〈𝐹, 𝐸〉〉)) | ||
| Theorem | cgr3permute2 36100 | Permutation law for three-place congruence. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Oct-2013.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐸 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → (〈𝐴, 〈𝐵, 𝐶〉〉Cgr3〈𝐷, 〈𝐸, 𝐹〉〉 ↔ 〈𝐵, 〈𝐴, 𝐶〉〉Cgr3〈𝐸, 〈𝐷, 𝐹〉〉)) | ||
| < Previous Next > |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |