| Metamath
Proof Explorer Theorem List (p. 361 of 500) | < Previous Next > | |
| Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
|
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > MPE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
||
| Color key: | (1-30900) |
(30901-32423) |
(32424-49930) |
| Type | Label | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Statement | ||
| Theorem | brapply 36001 | Binary relation form of the Apply function. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 12-Apr-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.) (Proof shortened by Peter Mazsa, 2-Oct-2022.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (〈𝐴, 𝐵〉Apply𝐶 ↔ 𝐶 = (𝐴‘𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | brcup 36002 | Binary relation form of the Cup function. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 14-Apr-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (〈𝐴, 𝐵〉Cup𝐶 ↔ 𝐶 = (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | brcap 36003 | Binary relation form of the Cap function. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 17-Apr-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (〈𝐴, 𝐵〉Cap𝐶 ↔ 𝐶 = (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | lemsuccf 36004* | Lemma for unfolding different forms of the Succ function. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 14-Apr-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (∃𝑥(𝐴( I ⊗ Singleton)𝑥 ∧ 𝑥Cup𝐵) ↔ 𝐵 = suc 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | brsuccf 36005 | Binary relation form of the Succ function. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 14-Apr-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴Succ𝐵 ↔ 𝐵 = suc 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | dfsuccf2 36006* | Alternate definition of Scott Fenton's version of Succ, cf. df-sucmap 38495. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 6-Jan-2026.) |
| ⊢ Succ = {〈𝑚, 𝑛〉 ∣ suc 𝑚 = 𝑛} | ||
| Theorem | funpartlem 36007* | Lemma for funpartfun 36008. Show membership in the restriction. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Dec-2017.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ dom ((Image𝐹 ∘ Singleton) ∩ (V × Singletons )) ↔ ∃𝑥(𝐹 “ {𝐴}) = {𝑥}) | ||
| Theorem | funpartfun 36008 | The functional part of 𝐹 is a function. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 16-Apr-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.) (Proof shortened by Peter Mazsa, 2-Oct-2022.) |
| ⊢ Fun Funpart𝐹 | ||
| Theorem | funpartss 36009 | The functional part of 𝐹 is a subset of 𝐹. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 17-Apr-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.) |
| ⊢ Funpart𝐹 ⊆ 𝐹 | ||
| Theorem | funpartfv 36010 | The function value of the functional part is identical to the original functional value. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 17-Apr-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.) |
| ⊢ (Funpart𝐹‘𝐴) = (𝐹‘𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | fullfunfnv 36011 | The full functional part of 𝐹 is a function over V. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 17-Apr-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.) |
| ⊢ FullFun𝐹 Fn V | ||
| Theorem | fullfunfv 36012 | The function value of the full function of 𝐹 agrees with 𝐹. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 17-Apr-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.) |
| ⊢ (FullFun𝐹‘𝐴) = (𝐹‘𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | brfullfun 36013 | A binary relation form condition for the full function. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 17-Apr-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴FullFun𝐹𝐵 ↔ 𝐵 = (𝐹‘𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | brrestrict 36014 | Binary relation form of the Restrict function. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 17-Apr-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (〈𝐴, 𝐵〉Restrict𝐶 ↔ 𝐶 = (𝐴 ↾ 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | dfrecs2 36015 | A quantifier-free definition of recs. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 17-Jul-2020.) |
| ⊢ recs(𝐹) = ∪ (( Funs ∩ (◡Domain “ On)) ∖ dom ((◡ E ∘ Domain) ∖ Fix (◡Apply ∘ (FullFun𝐹 ∘ Restrict)))) | ||
| Theorem | dfrdg4 36016 | A quantifier-free definition of the recursive definition generator. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 17-Apr-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.) (Proof shortened by Peter Mazsa, 2-Oct-2022.) |
| ⊢ rec(𝐹, 𝐴) = ∪ (( Funs ∩ (◡Domain “ On)) ∖ dom ((◡ E ∘ Domain) ∖ Fix (◡Apply ∘ (((V × {∅}) × {∪ {𝐴}}) ∪ ((( Bigcup ∘ Img) ↾ (V × Limits )) ∪ ((FullFun𝐹 ∘ (Apply ∘ pprod( I , Bigcup ))) ↾ (V × ran Succ))))))) | ||
| Theorem | dfint3 36017 | Quantifier-free definition of class intersection. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 13-Apr-2018.) |
| ⊢ ∩ 𝐴 = (V ∖ (◡(V ∖ E ) “ 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | imagesset 36018 | The Image functor applied to the converse of the subset relationship yields a subset of the subset relationship. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 14-Apr-2018.) |
| ⊢ Image◡ SSet ⊆ SSet | ||
| Theorem | brub 36019* | Binary relation form of the upper bound functor. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-May-2018.) |
| ⊢ 𝑆 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝑆UB𝑅𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 𝑥𝑅𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | brlb 36020* | Binary relation form of the lower bound functor. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-May-2018.) |
| ⊢ 𝑆 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝑆LB𝑅𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 𝐴𝑅𝑥) | ||
| Syntax | caltop 36021 | Declare the syntax for an alternate ordered pair. |
| class ⟪𝐴, 𝐵⟫ | ||
| Syntax | caltxp 36022 | Declare the syntax for an alternate Cartesian product. |
| class (𝐴 ×× 𝐵) | ||
| Definition | df-altop 36023 | An alternative definition of ordered pairs. This definition removes a hypothesis from its defining theorem (see altopth 36034), making it more convenient in some circumstances. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 22-Mar-2012.) |
| ⊢ ⟪𝐴, 𝐵⟫ = {{𝐴}, {𝐴, {𝐵}}} | ||
| Definition | df-altxp 36024* | Define Cartesian products of alternative ordered pairs. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 23-Mar-2012.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ×× 𝐵) = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝑧 = ⟪𝑥, 𝑦⟫} | ||
| Theorem | altopex 36025 | Alternative ordered pairs always exist. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 22-Mar-2012.) |
| ⊢ ⟪𝐴, 𝐵⟫ ∈ V | ||
| Theorem | altopthsn 36026 | Two alternate ordered pairs are equal iff the singletons of their respective elements are equal. Note that this holds regardless of sethood of any of the elements. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 16-Apr-2012.) |
| ⊢ (⟪𝐴, 𝐵⟫ = ⟪𝐶, 𝐷⟫ ↔ ({𝐴} = {𝐶} ∧ {𝐵} = {𝐷})) | ||
| Theorem | altopeq12 36027 | Equality for alternate ordered pairs. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 22-Mar-2012.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 = 𝐷) → ⟪𝐴, 𝐶⟫ = ⟪𝐵, 𝐷⟫) | ||
| Theorem | altopeq1 36028 | Equality for alternate ordered pairs. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 22-Mar-2012.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → ⟪𝐴, 𝐶⟫ = ⟪𝐵, 𝐶⟫) | ||
| Theorem | altopeq2 36029 | Equality for alternate ordered pairs. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 22-Mar-2012.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → ⟪𝐶, 𝐴⟫ = ⟪𝐶, 𝐵⟫) | ||
| Theorem | altopth1 36030 | Equality of the first members of equal alternate ordered pairs, which holds regardless of the second members' sethood. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 22-Mar-2012.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (⟪𝐴, 𝐵⟫ = ⟪𝐶, 𝐷⟫ → 𝐴 = 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | altopth2 36031 | Equality of the second members of equal alternate ordered pairs, which holds regardless of the first members' sethood. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 22-Mar-2012.) |
| ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → (⟪𝐴, 𝐵⟫ = ⟪𝐶, 𝐷⟫ → 𝐵 = 𝐷)) | ||
| Theorem | altopthg 36032 | Alternate ordered pair theorem. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 22-Mar-2012.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (⟪𝐴, 𝐵⟫ = ⟪𝐶, 𝐷⟫ ↔ (𝐴 = 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 = 𝐷))) | ||
| Theorem | altopthbg 36033 | Alternate ordered pair theorem. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 14-Apr-2012.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝑊) → (⟪𝐴, 𝐵⟫ = ⟪𝐶, 𝐷⟫ ↔ (𝐴 = 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 = 𝐷))) | ||
| Theorem | altopth 36034 | The alternate ordered pair theorem. If two alternate ordered pairs are equal, their first elements are equal and their second elements are equal. Note that 𝐶 and 𝐷 are not required to be a set due to a peculiarity of our specific ordered pair definition, as opposed to the regular ordered pairs used here, which (as in opth 5419), requires 𝐷 to be a set. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 23-Mar-2012.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (⟪𝐴, 𝐵⟫ = ⟪𝐶, 𝐷⟫ ↔ (𝐴 = 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 = 𝐷)) | ||
| Theorem | altopthb 36035 | Alternate ordered pair theorem with different sethood requirements. See altopth 36034 for more comments. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 14-Apr-2012.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (⟪𝐴, 𝐵⟫ = ⟪𝐶, 𝐷⟫ ↔ (𝐴 = 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 = 𝐷)) | ||
| Theorem | altopthc 36036 | Alternate ordered pair theorem with different sethood requirements. See altopth 36034 for more comments. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 14-Apr-2012.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (⟪𝐴, 𝐵⟫ = ⟪𝐶, 𝐷⟫ ↔ (𝐴 = 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 = 𝐷)) | ||
| Theorem | altopthd 36037 | Alternate ordered pair theorem with different sethood requirements. See altopth 36034 for more comments. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 14-Apr-2012.) |
| ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (⟪𝐴, 𝐵⟫ = ⟪𝐶, 𝐷⟫ ↔ (𝐴 = 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 = 𝐷)) | ||
| Theorem | altxpeq1 36038 | Equality for alternate Cartesian products. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 24-Mar-2012.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝐴 ×× 𝐶) = (𝐵 ×× 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | altxpeq2 36039 | Equality for alternate Cartesian products. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 24-Mar-2012.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝐶 ×× 𝐴) = (𝐶 ×× 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | elaltxp 36040* | Membership in alternate Cartesian products. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 23-Mar-2012.) |
| ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ (𝐴 ×× 𝐵) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝑋 = ⟪𝑥, 𝑦⟫) | ||
| Theorem | altopelaltxp 36041 | Alternate ordered pair membership in a Cartesian product. Note that, unlike opelxp 5655, there is no sethood requirement here. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 22-Mar-2012.) |
| ⊢ (⟪𝑋, 𝑌⟫ ∈ (𝐴 ×× 𝐵) ↔ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | altxpsspw 36042 | An inclusion rule for alternate Cartesian products. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 24-Mar-2012.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ×× 𝐵) ⊆ 𝒫 𝒫 (𝐴 ∪ 𝒫 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | altxpexg 36043 | The alternate Cartesian product of two sets is a set. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 24-Mar-2012.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴 ×× 𝐵) ∈ V) | ||
| Theorem | rankaltopb 36044 | Compute the rank of an alternate ordered pair. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 18-Dec-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On)) → (rank‘⟪𝐴, 𝐵⟫) = suc suc ((rank‘𝐴) ∪ suc (rank‘𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | nfaltop 36045 | Bound-variable hypothesis builder for alternate ordered pairs. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 25-Sep-2015.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥⟪𝐴, 𝐵⟫ | ||
| Theorem | sbcaltop 36046* | Distribution of class substitution over alternate ordered pairs. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 25-Sep-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ V → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌⟪𝐶, 𝐷⟫ = ⟪⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶, ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷⟫) | ||
| Syntax | cofs 36047 | Declare the syntax for the outer five segment configuration. |
| class OuterFiveSeg | ||
| Definition | df-ofs 36048* | The outer five segment configuration is an abbreviation for the conditions of the Five Segment Axiom (ax5seg 28918). See brofs 36070 and 5segofs 36071 for how it is used. Definition 2.10 of [Schwabhauser] p. 28. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Sep-2013.) |
| ⊢ OuterFiveSeg = {〈𝑝, 𝑞〉 ∣ ∃𝑛 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑎 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑛)∃𝑏 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑛)∃𝑐 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑛)∃𝑑 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑛)∃𝑥 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑛)∃𝑦 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑛)∃𝑧 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑛)∃𝑤 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑛)(𝑝 = 〈〈𝑎, 𝑏〉, 〈𝑐, 𝑑〉〉 ∧ 𝑞 = 〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 〈𝑧, 𝑤〉〉 ∧ ((𝑏 Btwn 〈𝑎, 𝑐〉 ∧ 𝑦 Btwn 〈𝑥, 𝑧〉) ∧ (〈𝑎, 𝑏〉Cgr〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∧ 〈𝑏, 𝑐〉Cgr〈𝑦, 𝑧〉) ∧ (〈𝑎, 𝑑〉Cgr〈𝑥, 𝑤〉 ∧ 〈𝑏, 𝑑〉Cgr〈𝑦, 𝑤〉)))} | ||
| Theorem | cgrrflx2d 36049 | Deduction form of axcgrrflx 28894. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 13-Oct-2013.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉Cgr〈𝐵, 𝐴〉) | ||
| Theorem | cgrtr4d 36050 | Deduction form of axcgrtr 28895. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 13-Oct-2013.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉Cgr〈𝐶, 𝐷〉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉Cgr〈𝐸, 𝐹〉) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 〈𝐶, 𝐷〉Cgr〈𝐸, 𝐹〉) | ||
| Theorem | cgrtr4and 36051 | Deduction form of axcgrtr 28895. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 13-Oct-2013.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉Cgr〈𝐶, 𝐷〉) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉Cgr〈𝐸, 𝐹〉) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 〈𝐶, 𝐷〉Cgr〈𝐸, 𝐹〉) | ||
| Theorem | cgrrflx 36052 | Reflexivity law for congruence. Theorem 2.1 of [Schwabhauser] p. 27. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 12-Jun-2013.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) → 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉Cgr〈𝐴, 𝐵〉) | ||
| Theorem | cgrrflxd 36053 | Deduction form of cgrrflx 36052. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 13-Oct-2013.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉Cgr〈𝐴, 𝐵〉) | ||
| Theorem | cgrcomim 36054 | Congruence commutes on the two sides. Implication version. Theorem 2.2 of [Schwabhauser] p. 27. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 12-Jun-2013.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → (〈𝐴, 𝐵〉Cgr〈𝐶, 𝐷〉 → 〈𝐶, 𝐷〉Cgr〈𝐴, 𝐵〉)) | ||
| Theorem | cgrcom 36055 | Congruence commutes between the two sides. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 12-Jun-2013.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → (〈𝐴, 𝐵〉Cgr〈𝐶, 𝐷〉 ↔ 〈𝐶, 𝐷〉Cgr〈𝐴, 𝐵〉)) | ||
| Theorem | cgrcomand 36056 | Deduction form of cgrcom 36055. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 13-Oct-2013.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉Cgr〈𝐶, 𝐷〉) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 〈𝐶, 𝐷〉Cgr〈𝐴, 𝐵〉) | ||
| Theorem | cgrtr 36057 | Transitivity law for congruence. Theorem 2.3 of [Schwabhauser] p. 27. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 24-Sep-2013.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐸 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → ((〈𝐴, 𝐵〉Cgr〈𝐶, 𝐷〉 ∧ 〈𝐶, 𝐷〉Cgr〈𝐸, 𝐹〉) → 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉Cgr〈𝐸, 𝐹〉)) | ||
| Theorem | cgrtrand 36058 | Deduction form of cgrtr 36057. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 13-Oct-2013.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉Cgr〈𝐶, 𝐷〉) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 〈𝐶, 𝐷〉Cgr〈𝐸, 𝐹〉) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉Cgr〈𝐸, 𝐹〉) | ||
| Theorem | cgrtr3 36059 | Transitivity law for congruence. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 7-Oct-2013.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐸 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → ((〈𝐴, 𝐵〉Cgr〈𝐸, 𝐹〉 ∧ 〈𝐶, 𝐷〉Cgr〈𝐸, 𝐹〉) → 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉Cgr〈𝐶, 𝐷〉)) | ||
| Theorem | cgrtr3and 36060 | Deduction form of cgrtr3 36059. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 13-Oct-2013.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉Cgr〈𝐸, 𝐹〉) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 〈𝐶, 𝐷〉Cgr〈𝐸, 𝐹〉) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉Cgr〈𝐶, 𝐷〉) | ||
| Theorem | cgrcoml 36061 | Congruence commutes on the left. Biconditional version of Theorem 2.4 of [Schwabhauser] p. 27. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 12-Jun-2013.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → (〈𝐴, 𝐵〉Cgr〈𝐶, 𝐷〉 ↔ 〈𝐵, 𝐴〉Cgr〈𝐶, 𝐷〉)) | ||
| Theorem | cgrcomr 36062 | Congruence commutes on the right. Biconditional version of Theorem 2.5 of [Schwabhauser] p. 27. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 12-Jun-2013.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → (〈𝐴, 𝐵〉Cgr〈𝐶, 𝐷〉 ↔ 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉Cgr〈𝐷, 𝐶〉)) | ||
| Theorem | cgrcomlr 36063 | Congruence commutes on both sides. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 12-Jun-2013.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → (〈𝐴, 𝐵〉Cgr〈𝐶, 𝐷〉 ↔ 〈𝐵, 𝐴〉Cgr〈𝐷, 𝐶〉)) | ||
| Theorem | cgrcomland 36064 | Deduction form of cgrcoml 36061. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 14-Oct-2013.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉Cgr〈𝐶, 𝐷〉) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 〈𝐵, 𝐴〉Cgr〈𝐶, 𝐷〉) | ||
| Theorem | cgrcomrand 36065 | Deduction form of cgrcoml 36061. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 14-Oct-2013.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉Cgr〈𝐶, 𝐷〉) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉Cgr〈𝐷, 𝐶〉) | ||
| Theorem | cgrcomlrand 36066 | Deduction form of cgrcomlr 36063. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 14-Oct-2013.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉Cgr〈𝐶, 𝐷〉) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 〈𝐵, 𝐴〉Cgr〈𝐷, 𝐶〉) | ||
| Theorem | cgrtriv 36067 | Degenerate segments are congruent. Theorem 2.8 of [Schwabhauser] p. 28. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 12-Jun-2013.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) → 〈𝐴, 𝐴〉Cgr〈𝐵, 𝐵〉) | ||
| Theorem | cgrid2 36068 | Identity law for congruence. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 12-Jun-2013.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → (〈𝐴, 𝐴〉Cgr〈𝐵, 𝐶〉 → 𝐵 = 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | cgrdegen 36069 | Two congruent segments are either both degenerate or both nondegenerate. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 12-Jun-2013.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → (〈𝐴, 𝐵〉Cgr〈𝐶, 𝐷〉 → (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ 𝐶 = 𝐷))) | ||
| Theorem | brofs 36070 | Binary relation form of the outer five segment predicate. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Sep-2013.) |
| ⊢ (((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐸 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐺 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐻 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → (〈〈𝐴, 𝐵〉, 〈𝐶, 𝐷〉〉 OuterFiveSeg 〈〈𝐸, 𝐹〉, 〈𝐺, 𝐻〉〉 ↔ ((𝐵 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝐶〉 ∧ 𝐹 Btwn 〈𝐸, 𝐺〉) ∧ (〈𝐴, 𝐵〉Cgr〈𝐸, 𝐹〉 ∧ 〈𝐵, 𝐶〉Cgr〈𝐹, 𝐺〉) ∧ (〈𝐴, 𝐷〉Cgr〈𝐸, 𝐻〉 ∧ 〈𝐵, 𝐷〉Cgr〈𝐹, 𝐻〉)))) | ||
| Theorem | 5segofs 36071 | Rephrase ax5seg 28918 using the outer five segment predicate. Theorem 2.10 of [Schwabhauser] p. 28. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Sep-2013.) |
| ⊢ (((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐸 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐺 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐻 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → ((〈〈𝐴, 𝐵〉, 〈𝐶, 𝐷〉〉 OuterFiveSeg 〈〈𝐸, 𝐹〉, 〈𝐺, 𝐻〉〉 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) → 〈𝐶, 𝐷〉Cgr〈𝐺, 𝐻〉)) | ||
| Theorem | ofscom 36072 | The outer five segment predicate commutes. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 26-Sep-2013.) |
| ⊢ (((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐸 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐺 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐻 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → (〈〈𝐴, 𝐵〉, 〈𝐶, 𝐷〉〉 OuterFiveSeg 〈〈𝐸, 𝐹〉, 〈𝐺, 𝐻〉〉 ↔ 〈〈𝐸, 𝐹〉, 〈𝐺, 𝐻〉〉 OuterFiveSeg 〈〈𝐴, 𝐵〉, 〈𝐶, 𝐷〉〉)) | ||
| Theorem | cgrextend 36073 | Link congruence over a pair of line segments. Theorem 2.11 of [Schwabhauser] p. 29. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 12-Jun-2013.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐸 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → (((𝐵 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝐶〉 ∧ 𝐸 Btwn 〈𝐷, 𝐹〉) ∧ (〈𝐴, 𝐵〉Cgr〈𝐷, 𝐸〉 ∧ 〈𝐵, 𝐶〉Cgr〈𝐸, 𝐹〉)) → 〈𝐴, 𝐶〉Cgr〈𝐷, 𝐹〉)) | ||
| Theorem | cgrextendand 36074 | Deduction form of cgrextend 36073. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 14-Oct-2013.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝐵 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝐶〉) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝐸 Btwn 〈𝐷, 𝐹〉) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉Cgr〈𝐷, 𝐸〉) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 〈𝐵, 𝐶〉Cgr〈𝐸, 𝐹〉) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 〈𝐴, 𝐶〉Cgr〈𝐷, 𝐹〉) | ||
| Theorem | segconeq 36075 | Two points that satisfy the conclusion of axsegcon 28907 are identical. Uniqueness portion of Theorem 2.12 of [Schwabhauser] p. 29. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 12-Jun-2013.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑋 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑌 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → ((𝑄 ≠ 𝐴 ∧ (𝐴 Btwn 〈𝑄, 𝑋〉 ∧ 〈𝐴, 𝑋〉Cgr〈𝐵, 𝐶〉) ∧ (𝐴 Btwn 〈𝑄, 𝑌〉 ∧ 〈𝐴, 𝑌〉Cgr〈𝐵, 𝐶〉)) → 𝑋 = 𝑌)) | ||
| Theorem | segconeu 36076* | Existential uniqueness version of segconeq 36075. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 19-Oct-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ ((𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ 𝐶 ≠ 𝐷)) → ∃!𝑟 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)(𝐷 Btwn 〈𝐶, 𝑟〉 ∧ 〈𝐷, 𝑟〉Cgr〈𝐴, 𝐵〉)) | ||
| Theorem | btwntriv2 36077 | Betweenness always holds for the second endpoint. Theorem 3.1 of [Schwabhauser] p. 30. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 12-Jun-2013.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) → 𝐵 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉) | ||
| Theorem | btwncomim 36078 | Betweenness commutes. Implication version. Theorem 3.2 of [Schwabhauser] p. 30. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 12-Jun-2013.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → (𝐴 Btwn 〈𝐵, 𝐶〉 → 𝐴 Btwn 〈𝐶, 𝐵〉)) | ||
| Theorem | btwncom 36079 | Betweenness commutes. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 12-Jun-2013.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → (𝐴 Btwn 〈𝐵, 𝐶〉 ↔ 𝐴 Btwn 〈𝐶, 𝐵〉)) | ||
| Theorem | btwncomand 36080 | Deduction form of btwncom 36079. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 14-Oct-2013.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝐴 Btwn 〈𝐵, 𝐶〉) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝐴 Btwn 〈𝐶, 𝐵〉) | ||
| Theorem | btwntriv1 36081 | Betweenness always holds for the first endpoint. Theorem 3.3 of [Schwabhauser] p. 30. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 12-Jun-2013.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) → 𝐴 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉) | ||
| Theorem | btwnswapid 36082 | If you can swap the first two arguments of a betweenness statement, then those arguments are identical. Theorem 3.4 of [Schwabhauser] p. 30. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 12-Jun-2013.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → ((𝐴 Btwn 〈𝐵, 𝐶〉 ∧ 𝐵 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝐶〉) → 𝐴 = 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | btwnswapid2 36083 | If you can swap arguments one and three of a betweenness statement, then those arguments are identical. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 7-Oct-2013.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → ((𝐴 Btwn 〈𝐵, 𝐶〉 ∧ 𝐶 Btwn 〈𝐵, 𝐴〉) → 𝐴 = 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | btwnintr 36084 | Inner transitivity law for betweenness. Left-hand side of Theorem 3.5 of [Schwabhauser] p. 30. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 12-Jun-2013.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → ((𝐵 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝐷〉 ∧ 𝐶 Btwn 〈𝐵, 𝐷〉) → 𝐵 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝐶〉)) | ||
| Theorem | btwnexch3 36085 | Exchange the first endpoint in betweenness. Left-hand side of Theorem 3.6 of [Schwabhauser] p. 30. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 12-Jun-2013.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → ((𝐵 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝐶〉 ∧ 𝐶 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝐷〉) → 𝐶 Btwn 〈𝐵, 𝐷〉)) | ||
| Theorem | btwnexch3and 36086 | Deduction form of btwnexch3 36085. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 13-Oct-2013.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝐵 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝐶〉) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝐶 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝐷〉) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝐶 Btwn 〈𝐵, 𝐷〉) | ||
| Theorem | btwnouttr2 36087 | Outer transitivity law for betweenness. Left-hand side of Theorem 3.1 of [Schwabhauser] p. 30. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 12-Jun-2013.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → ((𝐵 ≠ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝐶〉 ∧ 𝐶 Btwn 〈𝐵, 𝐷〉) → 𝐶 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝐷〉)) | ||
| Theorem | btwnexch2 36088 | Exchange the outer point of two betweenness statements. Right-hand side of Theorem 3.5 of [Schwabhauser] p. 30. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 14-Jun-2013.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → ((𝐵 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝐷〉 ∧ 𝐶 Btwn 〈𝐵, 𝐷〉) → 𝐶 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝐷〉)) | ||
| Theorem | btwnouttr 36089 | Outer transitivity law for betweenness. Right-hand side of Theorem 3.7 of [Schwabhauser] p. 30. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 14-Jun-2013.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → ((𝐵 ≠ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝐶〉 ∧ 𝐶 Btwn 〈𝐵, 𝐷〉) → 𝐵 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝐷〉)) | ||
| Theorem | btwnexch 36090 | Outer transitivity law for betweenness. Right-hand side of Theorem 3.6 of [Schwabhauser] p. 30. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 24-Sep-2013.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → ((𝐵 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝐶〉 ∧ 𝐶 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝐷〉) → 𝐵 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝐷〉)) | ||
| Theorem | btwnexchand 36091 | Deduction form of btwnexch 36090. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 13-Oct-2013.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝐵 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝐶〉) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝐶 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝐷〉) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝐵 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝐷〉) | ||
| Theorem | btwndiff 36092* | There is always a 𝑐 distinct from 𝐵 such that 𝐵 lies between 𝐴 and 𝑐. Theorem 3.14 of [Schwabhauser] p. 32. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 24-Sep-2013.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) → ∃𝑐 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)(𝐵 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝑐〉 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝑐)) | ||
| Theorem | trisegint 36093* | A line segment between two sides of a triange intersects a segment crossing from the remaining side to the opposite vertex. Theorem 3.17 of [Schwabhauser] p. 33. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 24-Sep-2013.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐸 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑃 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → ((𝐵 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝐶〉 ∧ 𝐸 Btwn 〈𝐷, 𝐶〉 ∧ 𝑃 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝐷〉) → ∃𝑞 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)(𝑞 Btwn 〈𝑃, 𝐶〉 ∧ 𝑞 Btwn 〈𝐵, 𝐸〉))) | ||
| Syntax | ctransport 36094 | Declare the syntax for the segment transport function. |
| class TransportTo | ||
| Definition | df-transport 36095* | Define the segment transport function. See fvtransport 36097 for an explanation of the function. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 18-Oct-2013.) |
| ⊢ TransportTo = {〈〈𝑝, 𝑞〉, 𝑥〉 ∣ ∃𝑛 ∈ ℕ ((𝑝 ∈ ((𝔼‘𝑛) × (𝔼‘𝑛)) ∧ 𝑞 ∈ ((𝔼‘𝑛) × (𝔼‘𝑛)) ∧ (1st ‘𝑞) ≠ (2nd ‘𝑞)) ∧ 𝑥 = (℩𝑟 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑛)((2nd ‘𝑞) Btwn 〈(1st ‘𝑞), 𝑟〉 ∧ 〈(2nd ‘𝑞), 𝑟〉Cgr𝑝)))} | ||
| Theorem | funtransport 36096 | The TransportTo relationship is a function. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 18-Oct-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.) |
| ⊢ Fun TransportTo | ||
| Theorem | fvtransport 36097* | Calculate the value of the TransportTo function. This function takes four points, 𝐴 through 𝐷, where 𝐶 and 𝐷 are distinct. It then returns the point that extends 𝐶𝐷 by the length of 𝐴𝐵. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 18-Oct-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ ((𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ 𝐶 ≠ 𝐷)) → (〈𝐴, 𝐵〉TransportTo〈𝐶, 𝐷〉) = (℩𝑟 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)(𝐷 Btwn 〈𝐶, 𝑟〉 ∧ 〈𝐷, 𝑟〉Cgr〈𝐴, 𝐵〉))) | ||
| Theorem | transportcl 36098 | Closure law for segment transport. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 19-Oct-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ ((𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ 𝐶 ≠ 𝐷)) → (〈𝐴, 𝐵〉TransportTo〈𝐶, 𝐷〉) ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) | ||
| Theorem | transportprops 36099 | Calculate the defining properties of the transport function. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 19-Oct-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ ((𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ 𝐶 ≠ 𝐷)) → (𝐷 Btwn 〈𝐶, (〈𝐴, 𝐵〉TransportTo〈𝐶, 𝐷〉)〉 ∧ 〈𝐷, (〈𝐴, 𝐵〉TransportTo〈𝐶, 𝐷〉)〉Cgr〈𝐴, 𝐵〉)) | ||
| Syntax | cifs 36100 | Declare the syntax for the inner five segment predicate. |
| class InnerFiveSeg | ||
| < Previous Next > |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |