Theorem bj-equsalhv 36192

Description: Version of equsalh 2413 with a disjoint variable condition, which does not require ax-13 2365. Remark: this is the same as equsalhw 2279. TODO: delete after moving the following paragraph somewhere.

Remarks: equsexvw 2000 has been moved to Main; Theorem ax13lem2 2369 has a DV version which is a simple consequence of ax5e 1907; Theorems nfeqf2 2370, dveeq2 2371, nfeqf1 2372, dveeq1 2373, nfeqf 2374, axc9 2375, ax13 2368, have dv versions which are simple consequences of ax-5 1905. (Contributed by BJ, 14-Jun-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
bj-equsalhv.nf	⊢ (𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓)
bj-equsalhv.1	⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bj-equsalhv	⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑) ↔ 𝜓)

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝑦

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑦)   𝜓(𝑥,𝑦)

Proof of Theorem bj-equsalhv

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		bj-equsalhv.nf	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓)
2	1	nf5i 2134	. 2 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓
3		bj-equsalhv.1	. 2 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
4	2, 3	equsalv 2250	1 ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑) ↔ 𝜓)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 205  ∀wal 1531

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1789  ax-4 1803  ax-5 1905  ax-6 1963  ax-7 2003  ax-10 2129  ax-12 2163

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-ex 1774  df-nf 1778

This theorem is referenced by: (None)